<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>4th Amendment by Justin Sandoval</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs</link>
      <description>The right is to grant protection to people and against unreasonable possessions.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-12-20 14:33:02 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-11 22:56:11 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>What happen if this amendment did not exist?</title>
         <author>justinsandoval2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427016823</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This right protects your property.&nbsp;If you are not aware of your rights under the Fourth Amendment, you may be more likely to allow law enforcement to search your person, property, or possessions without a warrant.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/57185e4301dbaecd1d5e85f8/1495917648509-R75Q1PQAKAOGRWQWTX98/image-asset.gif" />
         <pubDate>2022-12-21 22:33:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427016823</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why it is important?</title>
         <author>justinsandoval2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427019851</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em><br>It is known as the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.</em></div><div><br>The Fourth Amendment simply prohibits the government from searching someone's person, home, vehicle, or other property without having a valid legal reason to do so. What the 4th Amendment does not mean, however, is that the government is <em>never</em> allowed to conduct a search of you or your property; it simply means that, in most cases, they must have a warrant.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://baylorlariat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/NSA-spying-cutout.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2022-12-21 22:46:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427019851</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> What makes this Right so critical? </title>
         <author>justinsandoval2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427030457</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Since many people live in the United States, cases of this type can become abundant and even more unfair depending on the case, but due to the court they do not guarantee that everyone will be tried in the same ways as the 4th Amendment of the constitution says.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.democracynow.org/images/story/88/47388/splash/seg3-era-women.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2022-12-21 23:28:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427030457</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What happen if we violated the Amendment</title>
         <author>justinsandoval2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427044718</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Where there was a violation of one's fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens (To file a Bivens lawsuit, your injuries must be the result of a violation of federal law or your constitutional rights)</div><div>can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damage, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure.<br><br><br>But aside from occasional public disapprobation, there is no penalty for violating the Constitution</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://theleventhalfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/fourthamendment.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2022-12-22 00:12:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427044718</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Case about the Amendment:                            Adams v. Williams    </title>
         <author>justinsandoval2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427053074</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;During the early morning hours of October 30, 1966, an individual approached a police officer in a gas station parking lot in Bridgeport, Connecticut, and informed him that another individual in a nearby vehicle was carrying narcotics and had a gun at his waist. The officer approached the vehicle on foot and asked the occupant, Robert Williams, to open the door. When Williams rolled down the window instead, the officer reached into the car and removed a gun from Williams’ waistband, though the gun was not visible from outside the vehicle. The officer then arrested Williams for unlawful possession of a firearm and proceeded to search his vehicle, where he found heroin. Williams was convicted in a Connecticut state court of possession of a handgun and heroin.<br><br></div><div>After the Supreme Court of Connecticut affirmed the conviction, Williams filed a claim against the prison warden, Frederick Adams, in which he alleged that the state of Connecticut continued to detain him unlawfully as a prisoner. Williams argued that the handgun and drugs were discovered through an unlawful search and should not have been admitted into evidence at his trial. The district court denied his petition. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sided with Williams and ordered that his conviction be set aside.<br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.rittgers.com/wp-content/uploads/migrations/2492946/blog/images/Arrest%20-%20Traffic%20Search%20and%20Seizure.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2022-12-22 00:28:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427053074</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reflection</title>
         <author>justinsandoval2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427053619</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As we already know, this constitutional amendment protects people from illegal searches and seizures. This means that the police cannot search you or your home without a warrant or probable cause. This amendment goes primarily to those defendants who are unfairly questioned by officers.&nbsp;<br><br>The Fourth Amendment was part of the Bill of Rights that was added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and they got it right. As for if this will last, yes I think it will be for even longer than 100 years because it is a rule that has been maintained for a long time and I don't see in what priority to remove it</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://guialegal.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/cuarta-enmienda-constitucion-usa-scaled.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2022-12-22 00:29:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/justinsandoval2/zzf5js5tnxh0opbs/wish/2427053619</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
