<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>[12Global Forum-Law] Controversies on AI creations; Various interpretations over vague copyrights by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12</link>
      <description>Watch &#39;Controversies on AI creations; Various interpretations over vague copyrights&quot;&#39; and write your comments here. The title should be [your school name] your name</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-10-17 12:50:29 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-12-13 00:47:59 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>How to use</title>
         <author>bihsexchange</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1822053135</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The title should be [your school name] your name, or if your are a BIHS student, [your school name] your student number your name.&nbsp;<br>Please leave the background color as white(default color). Change the background color to 'red(pink)' only if you want to participate in the discussion about this topic on Oct 19th.  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-17 12:50:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1822053135</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ex. [BIHS] 2901 Hong GilDong</title>
         <author>bihsexchange</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1822053136</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Share your thoughts on the presentation. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-17 12:50:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1822053136</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2203 Gabin Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825901747</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I learned that AI creations are controversial. It was beneficial to learn that AI creations are not recognized in Korea, but the UK and the United States recognize them.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:43:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825901747</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2217 Jeong Soomin</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825908755</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I don't think AI's creations should be protected as works. I think the concept of creation itself is a concept that can be applied to humans, not AI, just as some countries legally restricted the scope of works to "created by humans."<br>In addition, even if copyrights are granted to AI's creations, the rights themselves are likely to go to AI's owners, so I don't think they are fair.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:46:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825908755</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2709 Seoyoung Sim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825914185</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As the technology of AI grows, the need for clarifying the range of copyrights of AI creations is getting important. I think this video gives how other countries respond to this issue and the how should we respond to. It was very beneficial for me to learn new controversies about AI creation. I also want to further research about this issue. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:48:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825914185</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2403 Nayoon Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825921438</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>These days, we can easily use A.I services with evolving technologies. A.I technology can be useful , however, it when it is abused, the effect will be serious. . In this presentation, I could think deeply about the issue of A.I's responsibility.&nbsp; I think we need to pay attention to ethical problems like this rather then simply developing technologies only.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:51:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825921438</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2801 Minseo Kwon</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825921822</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was interesting topic because I have never thought about the copyright of AI creations. I could learn each country's copyright law system and the controversies on the literary property of AI. In my opinion, it would not be effective to give the copyright to AI because it is created by humans and consequently, they will possess the rights.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:51:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825921822</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2107 Kyeonghun Ma</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825929344</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Currently, artificial intelligence technology is developing very much. Therefore, during this process, the problems related to copyright seem to be growing very much. Since technology is certain to continue to develop in the future, we need to put a lot of effort into solving the following problems, and I think the legal system must change accordingly. It was a very important video in the present era, and I think it was a very helpful video for me.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:55:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825929344</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2415 Suhyeon Woo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825930595</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I have thought vaguely about AI creations would be supportive however, though this presentation I have learn that the AI creations could be controversial and vague in law. I found out that still there are the beneficial part of using A.I. service with evolving technologies but there are the bad part of it such as copyright problems.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:55:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825930595</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1719 Subhin Choi</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825931161</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Since the beginning of the 4th industrial revolution, the role of AI has grown. However, we only tried to develop AI-related technologies and did not care about problems (such as copyright). However, in this announcement,&nbsp; It was impressive to hear the examples how we use AI technology of several countries.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:56:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825931161</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2420 Youjin Jeong</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825936731</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was pretty shocking to learn that no copyright laws can be applied to AI creations. AI technology is constantly growing and it's seeping into our daily lives. However, its net of the law is still loose. This presentation video showed me how AI laws should be improved, and it led me to a whole new field of society.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:58:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825936731</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS]2301 Suyeon Kang</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825936754</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Through this presentation, I learned about AI and copyright. As technology advances, AI-related laws need to be discussed accurately. This is because AI will have a lot of influence on our lives in the future, and laws must reflect society well.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:58:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825936754</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2411 Halin Park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825938329</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I learned about AI creations, It is important and copyrights. and I learned each country's copyright law, the controversies on the literary property of AI. In my opinion, we have to change copyright legal. It was an opportunity to think about copyright law once again. and It was a video that allowed me to think about sensitive copyright laws and to know them in detail.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 02:59:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825938329</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS]1706 Hyeonseok Nam</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825944229</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>After watching this video, AI technology<br>With the development of AI works as copyright<br>&nbsp; as public property without recognition<br>I thought I should do it. Also, as AI technology develops rapidly, it seems that a quick response is necessary.It was also a good experience for me to develop my legal knowledge and competency by watching these videos.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:02:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825944229</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1114 Jeyun Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825948263</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the past, I saw artificial intelligence doing activities such as painting, but it was just amazing at that time. However, after watching this video today, I felt that I shouldn't just watch it in a fascinating way. At the same time, I learned that paintings created by artificial intelligence can violate copyrights, and that standards should be set for sure. I felt that I wanted to study how far the standards for acknowledging artificial intelligence activities should be set and what problems would occur if it was not set for sure.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:03:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825948263</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2102 Soljae Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825950693</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think AI's creation of unique creations can collapse the paradigm we had before. Although creation is a unique ability that only humans have, it seems very ambiguous whether AI can give ownership to it if it can create a new thing that has never existed before. But I wonder if AI can really see what it has created in its creations or categories of works. Of course, humans do imitation, but the current category of AI technology is to bring in the existing artist's drawing style and draw pictures with new themes. As soon as it is recognized as a creation, I think it will be an opportunity for humans to collapse the form of copyright. Therefore, I think it is still a difficult concept to copyright AI's creations, and if there is a form of work that is not related to the existing artist in the future, I think we need to reconsider it then.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:05:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825950693</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS]  2115 Deokmin Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825951569</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>These days, there are many controversies about the Artificial Intelligence. I was glad to hear a lot about AI, a topic I was interested in. It was also interesting to deal with the reluctance to develop AI. It was an opportunity to reconsider the advantages and disadvantages of AI development. In addition, I learned about AI's copyright through this opportunity. The current law does not recognize intellectual property rights to artificial intelligence creations by limiting the subject of invention and creation to humans, so in-depth discussions on the rights of creations are needed in terms of industrial, cultural, and art development. In my opinion, I thought that in order to solve these problems, revision and change of AI-related laws were necessary. Also, after watching this video, I could establish my thoughts on AI's intellectual property rights once again. I think AI's intellectual property rights are really necessary. If there is no AI copyright, more problems will be found. For example, we can talk about several abuse cases caused by exposure to AI technology. In addition, as the 4th Industrial Revolution progresses, without such AI copyrights in the information and internationalization society, there will be many divisions claiming ownership of each other. Recently, as people use artificial intelligence to create creations or produce artificial intelligence independently, these copyright law issues are becoming more prominent. In order to solve these problems, I critically believe that AI copyright is finally necessary. That video was really meaningful. Thank you.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:05:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825951569</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS]2402 Gyumin Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825954572</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Controversy&nbsp;over whether AI created content should be protected is perhaps something to be expected, as AI content generally refers to work created by AI that is presumably generated from existing data. Therefore, on one level, we may approach this question with the idea that AI creations themselves are violating copyright in a way by taking original works and ideas to fumble together a new creation. But judging from how in our world today, remade work (song remakes, art remakes, e.t.c.) are appreciated as an individual form of art, it seems sensible to grant AI copyright too. And as discussed in the speech, it is natural that related laws and necessary policies should follow. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:07:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825954572</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2207 Chanhee Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825956813</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Since artificial intelligence technology is becoming a major technology, we need to think of the side effects. I could learn that the content of law about artificial intelligence is vague. It was a good video to think about the rights of artificial intelligence. Especially, I have never thought about AI copy rights before but after watching this video, I became interested about AI copy rights. I hope the laws about AI get improved. AI technology is too useful for humans to just abandon because of side effects. So laws about AI should become specific to prevent side effects especially in copy rights.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:08:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825956813</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2711 Yun Goeun</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825958006</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I didn't know about the AI's copyright, but through this presentation, I could think about it. With the AI technology's development, AI can do the new work without human's help. I think AI should have the copyright about its creation. Copyright is an exclusive legal right that the creator of the creation has to his or her work. Since AI is the creator of the creation, it must of course obtain rights by this definition, and if this is not done, it will be a violation of copyright law. Also, even if a person made AI, AI should have that right because it is AI that eventually created a new work through the information provided by the person.&nbsp;<br>As AI develops and there will be more and more parts where AI rights can be recognized, I think it is necessary to recognize their rights and make AI development, and because Korea does not have any legislation or policies that are clearly organized in these areas.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:08:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825958006</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1422 Hwang Siu</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825961587</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As the technology has well-developed, we can use&nbsp;AI tools very easy. As this situation is normalized, the copyright of creations of AI emerged as a problem. I think AI's creation should have the copyright half by people, half by creators of AI. Because, if copyright is protected by one side, they(it) will have a enormous profit, and it can cause great damage to the art world with huge profits. Also, art industry can be standardized. So, I would like to debate about these problems, and claim about the copyrights about AI's creation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:10:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825961587</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2717 jihun hyun</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825961925</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I was able to know both positive and negative aspects of artificial intelligence, and I thought I should think about how to highlight positive aspects and reduce negative aspects in the future.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:10:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825961925</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2716 Yoobin Cho </title>
         <author>jessica040319</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825962755</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this status quo, there are many ways to acess to AI. Also, the right of individuals are very important problem in the whole society. As the AI develop, I believe the danger of the It is true that with the development of artificial intelligence, the risk of personal information exposure is also increasing. In this situation, it is true that ambiguous intervention in copyright is inevitable. Making intellectual property rights or individuals about creation, which has about rights we are alert, and to act. However, if there is no further development in ambiguous copyright, copyright will only lag further behind the developing society. In addition, misuse and abuse of artificial intelligence are bound to have a negative impact on people. It can be said that intervention is necessary to solve this situation and go further and to be only affected by artificial intelligence.<br>n addition, I think the law is inseparable from life because the element of law is closely related to daily life. In this respect, it is necessary to stipulate the law on copyright issues. Therefore, I agree with the above subject. In addition, I think the law should be able to have a beneficial effect on people's lives. If a law is enacted, it will be necessary to create an efficient law by receiving all people's opinions.<br>For example, if a copyright-related law is enacted in the COVID-19 situation, I think it will produce good results in that situation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:10:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825962755</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1821 LI ZHENYAN</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825964612</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When you draw a picture, it was refreshing to see and introduce the technology that AI makes like a photograph for the first time. You can feel that the copy ability technology is improving<br>The problem here is copyright. If AI technology is recognized as a copyright, countless pictures can be produced, so it will cause great damage to painters or people who draw pictures. If it is not recognized as copyright, investors will not invest in the technology. Problems arise. I think this issue needs to be coordinated at the national level.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:11:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825964612</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1515 Juhyeon Lee</title>
         <author>bihs24dlwngus05</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825974528</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was really interesting because it was a video about something I had never thought of. He seemed to have thought a lot about whether to think of it as a picture drawn by AI or a picture drawn by a human. In addition, I made my own conclusions regarding the current law, but I was impressed because I think I worked hard, and the subject was also interesting, so it was very fun.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:16:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825974528</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BIHS 2414 Solji Woo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825977726</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>These days, the proportion of AI in our society is increasing and has a great influence on us. Now that AI has surpassed human abilities, this video seems to pose a good issue for us. In fact, I had never thought deeply about copyrights for AI creations, but through this video, I realized how insufficient our laws were. As technology are developed more and more, I once again felt that it was important for laws to develop according to changes, although slowly. With this video, I was able to reconsider the issues arising from a changing society from a legal point of view. Thank you for the good presentation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:17:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825977726</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1611 Oh Tae Gyu</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825978092</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I felt that we had to solve many of the problems arising from the development of Ai with responsibility. Even if there is a creation created by Ai, I think all copyrights related to Ai should be guaranteed because even Ai was created by humans. I hope that all legislation related to Ai will be revised or developed by actively reflecting the opinions of the members, and that we will have a lot of benefits from using ai.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:17:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825978092</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1718 Jeong AhIn</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825983405</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Intellectual property rights are emerging as an important issue, and they are still not properly guaranteed, making them a big problem. In this situation, I think accepting  copyrights in artificial intelligence creations will cause great damage to human artists. Artificial intelligence works which are carefully designed according to big data can hinder human artists' desire to create. It is also dangerous to recognize copyrights without properly handling the risks to artificial intelligence technology that has been controversial so far.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:20:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825983405</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS]  2714 ChaeYun Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825983550</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Through this video, I could learn that AI creations also have problems as well as positive aspects. With the development of AI technology, I think we should always recognize that there can be problems that could be caused by AI technology and it is important to create a law helpful for solving copyright problems.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:20:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825983550</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1311 Chaewon Seo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825985495</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I used to draw and use AI program to pour the color. Having used the AI program on creation, however, I have never considered about AI creations' copyright.<br>Due to development of AI, each country are repairing their law to protect both the artist and AI's copyright. It was quite surprising that each country has controversy on considering the creation of human and man-made technology. The video let me to think more about considering AI's creation.<br>Yet, I believe AI's creation cannot be protected by law. It is human that inserts data into AI and let them re-organize them. In some point of view, AI creation can be shown as an act of viloating the author's proprerty. Before we consider the technology, which has no more value than a tool, we should protect a man first. I totally agree that the law should be refined. Still, the concept of copyright is too vague to argue with. Therefore, as it is human that provides the source of creation, AI's literary productions should not be recognized as a creation.<br>And, thank you for good presentation.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:21:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825985495</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BIHS 2517 Chaeun Jung</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825988605</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Since the technology is developing, it was good to think about AI. I thought knowing the advantages and disadvantages of AI is necessary in this society which there are many new technology using AI. I think we should use AI with knowing all the problems that may be caused.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:22:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825988605</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1614 Yoon Jun Hyeok</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825993341</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The world has always changed rapidly. And in the midst of that change, there is the birth of something new and the end of what was existing. For example, as the industrial revolution developed, the domestic handicrafts lost its competitiveness. Things that are always competitive survived, and things that are not have disappeared. I think the copyright issue, the theme of this presentation, is in the same context. Competitive AI works and human works will survive. And after competitive things survive, human society will develop further. I don't think this phenomenon should be regulated as an act that does not recognize the copyright of AI.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:25:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1825993341</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2815 Dawon Jung</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826005970</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;As artificial intelligence technology is more common and common, we can easily excess the information about the new services or new artworks, provided by AI. Although the progress, i have never thought the copyright of AI's work. So, the video was really interesting. We should more think and talk about this topic and integrate the ideas to the copyright. Thank you for great presentation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:31:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826005970</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1314 NaYeon Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826015413</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In my usual legal studies, I am mainly interested in criminal law. I am mainly interested in criminal law. Therefore, although I am not very interested in the direct legal civil law, which is closely related to the daily life of society as a whole, after hearing this announcement, I became interested in civil law. The technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, such as artificial intelligence, occupy more of our lives, the more we need to complete technological legislation. It is said that mankind predicted technology, but it may not be as you wish. In order to avoid this uncertainty, Li must prepare the bill in advance. In particular, copyright is an obscure legal field that hides its pros and cons. Therefore, it needs to be further clarified by law. The law lays the foundation for artificial intelligence as an element that enriches our lives.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:35:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826015413</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1212 Seongwon Yoo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826034483</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>First of all, watching this video gave me a chance to think about A.I creations. Before I watched the video, I have never thought about copyrights of A.I creations, however after I watched the video, I started to think about the copyrights and the relationship between human and A.I.<br><br>I think we should not accept the A.I copyright. In 21st century many artists and campanies are using A.I to create new creations. If we accept A.I copyright, I think it will be harder for humans to make a new creations and I will be hard for humans to acknowledge the copyright.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:44:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826034483</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1618 Jimin Jung</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826038331</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Before I say it, I want to say that the video was very impressive to me. I think AI's creation is not a problem. after watching this video I remembered when I went to Shanghai science hall. in that place there’s Ai that can draw human. l was so surprised and I was worried about that could even paint. However, from a different point of view, Ai can save human’s time. ai can finish an hour's work in 10 minutes. Of course, we should always remember that problems can arise. therefore, we should use AI as a tool. and we have to be alert.</div><div>&nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp; &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:46:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826038331</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1512 Hyojun Park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826049795</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The development of AI technology is now the focus of society, but it is expected that it will have a greater impact on mankind. In addition, discussions on AI's intellectual property rights are also attracting attention. AI's paintings have been commercialized, super-artificial intelligence has human intellectual and cognitive abilities, and even human rational abilities, and AI should have intellectual property rights.<br>If AI is not guaranteed intellectual property rights in modern society, it could hamper scientific development by leaking corporate trade secrets, repeated research and development, and rising human egg social costs. Therefore, AI's intellectual property rights can support and protect AI research processes, and as a result, Korean society can take a leap forward in the fourth industrial revolution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:53:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826049795</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1116 Chae Eun Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826052959</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>AI has developed a lot and is in our daily lives. For example, AI is attracting attention in the field of composition. In 2016, AI composer Emily Howell performed Mozart's songs and battles at the Gyeonggi Cultural Center, and musician Tarin Southern made his debut with an album composed by AI composer Amper. Unlike humans who work hard to compose, AI composers can quickly find mathematical rules in a vast amount of databases through deep neural networks and use this algorithm to mass-produce music in a short period of time. As such, thanks to AI technology, users can use music in a more free way for copyright, and they are doing various activities, such as inspiring human creators or replacing labor to shorten creative time. On the on the hand,when the creation of artworks is not entirely human, the possibility of copyright conflicts between AI creations and human creations is increasing. In Korean copyright law, a work is defined as a 'creative work' that expresses the thoughts or emotions of 'human'. The term "creation" here does not mean high-quality art, but means expressing it independently without copying other existing works. In other words, individuality and uniqueness are key elements, and the law limits the author, who is the subject of this, to humans. This is also used in foreign intellectual property laws, and AI is recognized only as a "tool" in human creation and is difficult to recognize as a subject who has rights or responsibilities. However, I don't think AI is just a creative tool, but I pay attention to the artworks that AI has attempted, just like human works. I think AI's work should also be recognized for its aesthetic value.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 03:55:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826052959</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2309 Yubin Son</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826074730</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think AI's involvement in copyright is a natural phenomenon as technology advances. As AI develops to the level where AI can create something on its own, I think that if AI's creation is a "completely new" or "never seen" creation, the reward for this creation will naturally go to AI, which is in charge of programming. Various people strive to develop innovative AI. I don't think the copyright of AI, the result of such efforts, should be ignored simply because it is "not made by humans" or "taking away human rights."</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:08:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826074730</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2312 Jiwon Yoo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826107181</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The question of whether artificial intelligence is copyrighted corresponds to a case in which the speed of development of non-material culture does not keep up with the speed of development of non-material culture. Artificial intelligence has developed and is now creating what was previously considered a human domain, but related systems are insufficient in various fields, including the legal field. Then, how should we cope with this state of confusion? The copyright of artificial intelligence's creations can and should never be attributed to humans. It is true that artificial intelligence can be used as a tool for creations. Besides, the new media field has recently developed and related creations are emerging. Interactive media has already been accepted as a new form of art. However, if AI's work goes beyond the simple task humans design, it will no longer be able to give credit to humans. We cannot overlook the fact that AI use data of artworks that had been previously created by human artists. Thus, what AI creates is a mere combination of past generation artists. This complicated topic surely has controversies. And it is crucial that we take a step forward to adapt to this changing world.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:28:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826107181</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2619 Joosuwan </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826116048</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Technology advanced greater and many advantages have been made. However, there are significant shortages in nowadays great technological era and one of those technologies which are invented nowadays is AI technology. AI also have many advantages but also many disadvantages. Many controversies have made and I think the most hot issue is about the right of those AI technologies. I think people must be first always. People made AI technology and also it's moral to be our dominant to technology. Therefore, I believe that AI should not have any rights including the vague copyright of some contents.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:34:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826116048</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2406 Yubin Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826124929</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The video was very impressive. By this video, I could know that AI creations are good, but it also has some problems. And intellectual property rights are a big issue, which is one of the problems of AI. I agree about guaranteeing copyrights. Thank you for good presentation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:40:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826124929</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1609 Hye In Song </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826136772</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think AI-made creations can hinder human creators' desire to create creations in a short period of time compared to creations made by human creators after a long time of contemplation and hard work. However, from a different perspective, I think it is okay to compensate for the copyright of artificial intelligence because the new creation created by artificial intelligence is entirely created by artificial intelligence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:46:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826136772</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1506 Taehee Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826141345</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Through the presentation, I noticed that there are websites that use AI for people, such as 'pix2pix'. I thought the law of copyright is for human, not for AI. So, even though AI make drawings humans make into pictures in these websites, humans get the copyright. I also think the laws that exists now are for human. So if AI breaks the rule, we can't punish it because there is no law for AI. We should establish the law applied to AI.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:49:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826141345</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2801 Minseo Kwon </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826154036</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>With the development of artificial intelligence, interest in 'work' created by computers is growing. Artificial intelligence is considered to be capable of even activities called "creation," and we are already seeing artificial intelligence's work activities that can be called artists and musicians. Therefore, the controversy on whether the work created by artificial intelligence is legally protected is expanding. In my opinion, it would not be effective to give the copyright to AI because AI is created by humans's effort and consequently, the right for the invention would be given to the intelligence workers who develop AI. Since the revision in 2006, Korea's Copyright Act has defined a work as a "creative work" that expresses the thoughts or feelings of "human." However, it is not sure that AI invented something after completely understanding the humans' idea or emotions. Under the current law, paintings painted by non-human animals are not recognized as works subject to legal protection because they do not express human thoughts and emotions, even if the creativity of their expressions is recognized. In the same context, academia's view was that weather charts and sheet music automatically output by software, not animals, are not protected as works. Therefore, the possibility of conceding the copyright for AI creations is low. In conclusion, I am arguing that t the results created by artificial intelligence eventually have copyrights to those who provide data and give algorithms to enable artificial intelligence learning, that is, those who create works using artificial intelligence.&nbsp;<br>With the development of technology, it is necessary to discuss on who is the subject of copyrights. It is clear that the subject of creation will expand to subjects other than humans, and this is in line with discussions on whether the copyrights should be granted to AI, and there needs to improve the legal system with respect to the technological development.</div><div><br><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:57:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826154036</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2206 Jungmin Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826155856</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>With the development of AI, discussions have been raised on who has copyrights for creations that have occurred in the process. I think the copyright of AI's creations belongs to the creator of AI. Even if AI did not create a creation with its own thoughts, but by analyzing other people's works, it is also an original work, so copyright arises and the right to exercise that copyright can be exercised by the creator of AI.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 04:59:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826155856</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1818 Lee Hyunji</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826157543</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was very impressive and amazing that the work made by ai was Ai's copyright or our copyright. Also, when I realized that the current laws were not for ai, but for us, I thought that laws for ai should be made.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:00:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826157543</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BIHS 2807 Chanik Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826170679</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think it is necessary to first talk about how AI basically acquires knowledge at first. AI learns to act based on deep learning methods with the goal of how to produce optimal results when in a situation. It is difficult to see AI's artwork or other invention as a result of these efforts as intact AI. The reason is as follows . 1)AI cannot claim its rights. AI just reconstructed its results by learning people's works, or copied their style of painting, but it seemed difficult to see them as AI's works. 2) AI does not have the right to defend itself, and all authority as its own work rests with humans. If this happens, will it be the work of the person who created AI, or is AI copyrighted? The moment you entrust the copyright to AI, something complicated happens. Therefore, the ownership of copyrights for works of art or other inventions for AI should not be recognized, and cannot be recognized. Also, there are several ways to look at art. There is a view of how art is recognized as an homage to what was created the other day, a view that art is a completely new transformation of ideas, and there is also a view that art is the respect of people recognized in a specific organization. Artistic permission of AI should be recognized from the first point of view, but art of AI is not allowed from the second and third points of view. If AI is recognized as an artist, it will only become a new "vocal mimicry master" who mimics other people's works, but it is impossible to create new works of art on its own. Also, AI cannot be recognized as an artist within the human community.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:09:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826170679</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2210 Jeongmin Park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826172604</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Fourth Industrial Revolution made it easier for many people to access the Internet. As anyone freely uses the Internet, access to a lot of information has also become possible for everyone. While sharing a lot of information, it has the effect of sharing knowledge and common sense with people and developing global common sense, but individual copyrights are often violated by indiscriminately using other people's intellectual property rights. The problem of copyright infringement is becoming an increasingly serious legal problem, and the presenters seem to have pointed this out well. In the future, our humanity will make a lot of progress through the Internet, so it would be nice to think of ways to protect human rights.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:11:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826172604</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS]2703 Hyunseung Noh</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826185224</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was very fresh to deal with laws related to AI's production rights. It was an opportunity to think about the debate over whether or not to give AI copyright. Now that AI is increasing and their products are increasing, I think a different law is needed. In the process of enacting and revising the law, I came to think that new law is necessary to consider digital transformation such as AI.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:19:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826185224</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1110 Ye-Eun Seo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826189242</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the case of artificial intelligence judges, there is still a lot of controversy. From whether artificial intelligence can make a proper judgment to whether people can trust artificial intelligence and entrust the judgment. In such a situation, it was a presentation that made me wonder if I could trust an artificial intelligence judge. In this way, the introduction of artificial intelligence can also be found in education. I thought about the case where artificial intelligence became a teacher and taught students. However, I don't think artificial intelligence can completely replace people in the field of education. Because education requires the interaction between students and teachers, and artificial intelligence may help the direction of education, but it cannot give emotional support. Therefore, I don't think artificial intelligence should be introduced in the field of education.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:22:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826189242</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1117 Hyoseon Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826190102</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I was surprised that ai's work was the copyright of ai. I thought it was copyrighted only to people, and I thought it was worth the product, but when I watched this video, I learned that ai can create a single creation, and that the creation is the copyright of ai like people. However, since ai is our human property and human creation, it seems that ai's creations are also human copyright. I hope the government will amend the law and let the people know about it.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:22:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826190102</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BIHS 2813 Lim Taesung</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826201034</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Artificial Intelligence Law (AI Law) regulates the use and development of artificial intelligence. It is an aspect of and closely related to <a href="https://www.michalsons.com/focus-areas/robot-law">robot law</a> because smart robots have artificial intelligence built into them. People often mistake the use of AI by lawyers and the impact it has on the legal profession as AI law. But AI Law really refers to the application of the law on AI. There are various aspects to artificial intelligence law including data protection, intellectual property, ethics, politics, social and of course technology. Currently, we all use AI in our daily lives with applications like Siri, video games like <a href="https://www.callofduty.com/">Call of Duty</a>, purchase predictors like coupons or advertisements, machine learning, and bots. Many organisations are using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve our lives by developing chatbots to answer people’s questions. AI is making decisions about people, like whether to grant then a loan or finance a vehicle.<br><br></div><div>Like technology, artificial intelligence has changed rapidly over the last few decades. It has made our lives so much easier and saves us valuable time to complete other tasks. Like any new concept, there is the possibility of malfunctions and disadvantages. In 1927, the movie Metropolis introduced AI to the silver screen and movies like <a href="https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=3&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjF1Zjyt7HXAhXCSyYKHWizBtAQtwIIOzAC&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dl6bmTNadhJE&amp;usg=AOvVaw1k6hM5V_IU2zX8z7Et7hP2">Chappie</a> and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCcx85zbxz4">Blade Runner 2049</a> are more recent films.<br><br>However, I believe that there are a lot <strong>concerns related </strong>to AI LAW.  Various thought leaders have raised their concerns regarding the use of AI and the damage it may cause to the human race. The current artificial intelligence laws cannot regulate the use, manufacturing, behaviour, and responsibility of AI. Although there is a need to implement regulations, how and to what extent AI should be regulated is difficult to grasp given its fast-paced development. A balance between protection and innovation will need to be found.<br><br></div><div>This is a global issue and we must address the development of AI law on a global level – we need a new universal law. During its development, it may require amendments to other laws and could result in changes to common law principles. Legal professionals must include the developers of AI in the drafting process to address the technical issues. Based on the warnings from thought leaders like Elon Musk and Bill Gates, we cannot ignore their concerns. Considering the representation of AI in Hollywood movies it’s questionable whether AI will cause the end of the world.<br><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:30:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826201034</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2208 Libeen Park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826207101</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I have heard about the various ethical issues regarding artificial intelligence, but I've never thought seriously about the copyrights of a.i. creations. Therefore, it was really fascinating to learn new concepts and apps such as pix2pix through the video. Also it was easy to understand both sides of this controversy, and both seemed to be very persuasive. If AI creations are not acknowledged, AI productions would have problems. But AI creations could increase the amount of monopolization phenomenon was also a compelling reason to oppose the claim to acknowledge AI creations copyright. The fact that you explained other countries such as China and Japan's policies regarding AI copyright made it easier to understand the situation around the world. Thank you for your great video!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:34:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826207101</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2202 Gong Gyubeom</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826212752</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This video made me think of AI lawyers. In my opinion AI lawyer is a perfect production to supplement human lawyer's flaws. But people tend to reject this newly developed technology just because they are worried that AI would replace human's jobs. But the fact is, unlike people's national belief, AI is not likely to violate humane life. The point is, to accept AI into our daily life, it is necessary to open our minds to AI. We must accommodate this changing world with all our heart.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:38:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826212752</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1615 Lee Seungmin</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826219926</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Controversy about copyright has been complicated as time goes by. Especially in modern society, the boundaries of it between related people are ambiguous. I think AI should be given its own copyright. However, I disagree with the topic. Under the current law, it is illegal to steal other’s creation without any permission. For this reason, the creations made by not only AI but also people should be protected only when they are based on its(his or her) effort or intelligence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:43:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826219926</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1107 Sunyoung Park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826220657</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By watching this video, I was able to think about the copyright of AI. I think AI's creation should have a copyright because AI developers and related employees worked hard to create it. Like this, as artificial intelligence develops in the future, debates related to it will continue. Therefore, a law should be created so that the use of artificial intelligence is recognized but does not infringe on human rights.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:43:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826220657</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1811 Juwon Park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826225617</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As 21st century begins, 4th industrial revolution becomes faster. With IT technologies such as Deep Fake that cheats a person to another person, there has been an increase of importance that relative law should be made. However, current South Korean Law can't follow the flow of 4th Industrial Revolution. It was impressing that the speakers prepared examples of the law about modern technologies like that of Japan and the United States of America. As the speakers said, we and Korean society should think about the future of law about the development of technology.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:46:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826225617</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1418 IM SOHEE</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826228214</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Since the creation of artificial intelligence, there has been a lot of controversy about who should own the copyright created by artificial intelligence. In order for artificial intelligence to learn on its own and generate new ideas, it seems that copyrights of a different concept from the copyrights originally possessed by people are needed. These days, with the advent of artificial intelligence that writes and composes music, a deep question arises as to whether or not we should pay royalties to artificial intelligence. As a new meaning different from the previous feudal copyright concept is given and the necessity is emphasized, people have reached a point where artificial intelligence cannot be ignored.<br>In my personal opinion, copyrights are granted to AI, but the benefit of AI developers or development companies needs to be taken very little. Also, if AI is owned by an individual, it seems likely that the gains should be distributed by applying a high tax rate to that individual.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:48:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826228214</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1308 Park Suhyun</title>
         <author>psh120411</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826228515</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was a good opportunity to think about the question, "Should AI's creations be copyrighted or not?" If copyright exists for AI, it seems necessary to discuss in detail where to designate it as copyright.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:48:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826228515</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1415 Yoon Boryeong</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826231680</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>AI works based on information injected by people. Since the creations created by AI are based on works created by people, there must be plagiarism. Then, how should we solve this copyright problem? I think the plan is to limit it legally and come up with policies. When AI is first produced, some copyright problems can be solved by injecting only information related to colors or art techniques and not injecting information related to a specific person's work. Furthermore, if AI plagiarizes someone's creations, policies and standards related to how far punishment standards are and whether AI creations also have copyrights should be prepared.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:50:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826231680</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1417 Lee Hoseung</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826236760</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Since AlphaGo beat Lee Se-dol, artificial intelligence has developed with great interest from people, applied to various fields, and is currently together throughout our lives. For example, AI reveals excellent work performance not only in repetitive and computational tasks that humans do not perform well, but also in artistic aspects that have been believed to be possible only by humans. The video introduces the activities of artificial intelligence in the fields of art and creation. Artificial intelligence participates in various music contests and wins awards. In addition, AI technology has made it easier for users to reduce copyright concerns and use music. It is also engaged in various activities, such as inspiring creators or shortening creative time. On the other hand, the creation of art is no longer human-only, but also artificial intelligence, and the possibility of conflict is becoming an issue due to the contradiction of copyrights between artificial intelligence creations and human creations. Art works are works that express human thoughts or emotions.It sees its own unique personality at the core and protects copyright by enforcing the law. Therefore, artificial intelligence, which has a strong instrumental tendency and strong intervention by others, is not recognized as the subject of art. Under the Intellectual Property Act, artificial intelligence is recognized only as a tool for human art and copyright is not recognized as a subject to be protected. As for these developing technologies, cases in which modern laws are not fully applied continue to develop. I think laws should also be able to respond quickly to changing society.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:54:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826236760</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2205 Soohyeon Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826238242</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Through this video, I became deeply interested in the relationship between artificial intelligence and law. I think the copyright should be held by the creator of artificial intelligence for the things that artificial intelligence finds. Initially, the concept of copyright is a right created by rational people to specify their ownership and property rights. It was a good opportunity to establish my own thoughts on copyright.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:55:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826238242</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1421 Hwajeong Chu</title>
         <author>chuhwajeong021584</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826242764</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In accordance with the 4th Industrial Revolution, the function of AI is developed and expanded, but problems such as copyright are occurring accordingly. I was possible to reconsider who is responsible for this problem through this video. I realized that humans are not the only ones that generate copyrights, but also AI. Through this activity, it was found that AI could be further developed through development that compensates for shortcomings, not indiscriminate development.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:58:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826242764</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1404 Kim minjoon</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826243805</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>With the development of technology, our transportation and communication are becoming more convenient and convenient. In addition, technological development has had a lot of influence on our daily lives, and unlike in the past, we continue to live conveniently."However, there were many problems in this convenience. First of all, the types of crimes caused by technological development have increased. Online crimes, illegal photography, and illegal copying have become more diverse, but there are no appropriate bills to prevent them. Recently, the need for legislation to resolve various controversies over AI has emerged, and the law is expected to be further developed.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 05:58:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826243805</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BIHS 1416 Lee Sol</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826245512</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I would like to say that the copyright of the results created by AI is granted to us, not AII is quite fresh. Since they are also a creation made us, the copyright of those produced by them belongs to us. However, as the number of AI increases rapidly and the number of creations they have created increases, I think it is necessary to revise related laws. The new laws will have to consider newly created digital media.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:00:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826245512</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1407 Ryu hyewon </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826248978</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was talking about the issue of whether artificial intelligence creations should have copyrights. I am in favor of this. Currently, most of the copyright laws in each country were created before artificial intelligence appeared. As the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution has arrived, a new copyright law must be prepared to suit on today's situation. Even if it is not at the same level as human creations, it is necessary to recognize and protect the value of creations created by artificial intelligence. And as shown in the video, overseas are already actively discussing the revision of artificial intelligence laws. In Japan, we are considering preparing a system to protect the rights of creations created by artificial intelligence.  I hope korea to have specific guidelines such as copyright recognition, copyright ownership issues, and scope of protection for artificial intelligence creations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:02:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826248978</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2306 SERIM PARK</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826252470</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The development of technologies is not always good since it has always the bad side. But if the bad side is so big and noticeable, it became the cause of the fall. I thought that AI is always good but on the copyrights view, it is not good. It made it harder to distinguish the difference of AI and reality.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:04:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826252470</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2805 Sujeong Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826254232</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As technology advances, artificial intelligence, one of the high-tech industries, continues to develop. Artificial intelligence will bring a lot of convenience to our lives, but on the other hand, controversy arises over limiting the scope of artificial intelligence's entry into the field. Alternatively, research on the ethics of artificial intelligence and people's debates continue to arise, and as a way to solve this problem, people propose legislation. In my opinion, the most important thing when enacting laws related to artificial intelligence is that artificial intelligence should not infringe on the inherent nature of humans. In the future, I hope that artificial intelligence and humans can coexist in harmony.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:06:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826254232</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1408 Park Il Do </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826257565</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Thanks to this video, I learned good information.<br>Some of the laws of other countries should be emulated and some interesting laws.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:08:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826257565</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1108 Soojin Park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826272083</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Through the video, I came to think about the correlation between artificial intelligence, law, and social appearance. Various artificial intelligence, including AI judges, replaces human work, causing job loss and ethical problems. However, I think humans and artificial intelligence will be able to be reborn as a mutually beneficial relationship as long as they have a systematic review at the corrective stage before introducing AI technology and a perfect understanding of technology.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:17:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826272083</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1402 Kang Dongjin</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826275467</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This video presents a story about the law of art and creation. We became very interested in artificial intelligence through Google's unmanned car business and the Go match between AlphaGo and Lee Se-dol, and learned a lot of information about it. Artificial intelligence is currently being used in all areas of our society, and detailed and specific parts are currently being actively studied. Artificial intelligence is especially used in the arts. In the past, everyone thought that art was completed by manually painting or sculpting, but now artificial intelligence can be used to complete art without drawing yourself. Using artificial intelligence in this way can create new creations that we have never thought of, reduce creative time, and expand and use our art in various fields. However, while using artificial intelligence, contradictions in copyright can lead to disputes, and the concept is ambiguous. Copyright is also one of the human rights we must have. Therefore, we think that as artificial intelligence has been actively established in our society, it is necessary to reorganize certain laws related to artificial intelligence. As artificial intelligence is widely used internationally, I think that laws such as the Court of Justice should not only add provisions related to artificial intelligence, but also make certain efforts to expand the law around the world.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:19:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826275467</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1619 Choi Eunsol</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826277756</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>First of all, copyright belongs to humans. This is because copyright belongs to the person who first provided the idea. And in the same situation, even if AI painted before humans, AI cannot have copyright because AI did not create ideas by thinking, but collected original information and painted them.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:20:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826277756</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1420 Minhee Cho</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826290724</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As the fourth industrial revolution came up almost right under our nose, human's attention has been naturally drawn to artificial intelligence. As cars that don't need drivers have been invented the idea of AI has become a more approachable area for people. In this video, they talk about the legal copyrights of artificial intelligence. Some countries say that the previous policies show that AI can not be an author, but on the other hand, some countries have already approved the copyright ability of AI creations. In this term, we must think about how it can affect our lives in the future. As I mentioned before, the diverless cars are becoming more advanced, and many expect it to be popular afterword. However, there is a dilemma in the trials. What about the accidents happening within those cars? Then who is responsible? I think that in the case of the video, the copyright of AI's creations should be admitted, but we need to establish a clear barrier on how to divide whether the creation belongs to human or artificial intelligence. Also, in the case of driverless cars we must establish a standard in law.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:28:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826290724</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 1410 Seo Jae Woong</title>
         <author>bihs24sjw2005125</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826294090</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Watching the video, I realized that artificial intelligence has penetrated our daily lives deeply. Companies such as Google are interested in artificial intelligence through AlphaGo and self-driving cars, and artificial intelligence-based services such as "Luda" also existed in Korea. These artificial intelligence are expanding their position by pioneering the fields of creation and art that machines thought could not work. However, there is also a problem that such artificial intelligence came to our side. These are copyright-like problems, but there are still a number of confusion as laws on artificial intelligence are insufficient. Depending on their perspective, their views on rights differ, so there was a "Luda" situation in Korea. Therefore, clear rights and laws must be established for them, and laws need to be expanded internationally. If laws against them arise, it seems that the time has come to think about their legal rights because development through international cooperation can also be achieved.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:30:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826294090</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2817 Minseo Cho</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826295742</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Considering law and digital transformation, I was only worried about the ethical problems that digital transformation would bring about. However, disputes over whether AI can become a writer due to digital transformation and whether copyrights can be recognized for works made by these AI seem to lead to an attitude toward how our society can accept digital technology. It can be seen that the degree of development of each company's digital industry may differ depending on whether the copyright created by AI is recognized. I think copyrights should be recognized for works made by AI. Of course, it is necessary to discuss a little more about who the owner of the copyright created by AI is, but I thought that the use of negative copyrights such as unauthorized copying could be prevented only when the copyrights created by AI are recognized. It was a presentation where you could feel the need for various systems and laws to anticipate various results in advance and actively respond to the active use of digital transformation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 06:31:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826295742</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2212 Yeojin Seo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826350932</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I could think of copyright with this video. Because of AI's I heard that many laws and regulations were being made, but I could see laws in countries abroad. We should try to involve making regulations and rule some creations which AI made. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 07:03:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826350932</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BIHS]2607 Park Chae won</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826352531</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think copyright should be given to humans. Even if the picture was created by AI, it can be said that humans provided ideas. Since the painting was completed under the premise of human ideas, it can be seen that the copyright of the creation belongs to humans. Also, AI did not make creations only on its own. It moved with a set program and system. In addition, if AI is given copyright, humans will give up creating creations, which can eliminate various creations. In addition, as shown in the data, the AI creation program is also a human creation, so it is against logic that creation created creation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 07:04:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826352531</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2410 Sechan park</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826612070</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>After watching the video, I seriously thought about the laws and regulations related to artificial intelligence. With the advancement of technology, ai technology is gradually developing and is currently being used in many fields. The use of ai is by no means limited, and as it is widely used, I also thought about the need for laws related to the ethical issues of ai.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 09:14:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826612070</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2219 Seoyoung Han </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826884992</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>After watching this video, I could think about&nbsp; the backside of artificial intelligence. As the industry develops, artificial intelligence that gives convenience to humans has developed, but related laws still lacking. The most ordinary problem we can face is 'copyright'. I think copyright should given to human. Because even if AI draws picture, humans programmed to draw the picture. As technology for artificial intelligence develops faster and faster, related laws should also be enacted as soon as possible.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-19 11:57:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1826884992</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[BIHS] 2816 Jeong woo jin</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1829359259</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The advance of technology is not always good because there are many Unexpected behavior such as AI's independent. But if the side effects are so noticeable, it may become collapse. I thought that AI isn't always good for our lie. It made it harder to distinguish the difference of AI and reality.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-20 04:43:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bihsexchange/gf12/wish/1829359259</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
