https://padlet.com/qmul_cs/zt648r2cezjvfyy3 QMUL management states that 'all teaching has been made up' and blankly promises graduation and progression will go ahead as planned. But how much of that tallies with the reality of students' experiences at QMUL? Are students happy with their assignments being marked by people with no knowledge of the course content and agreed Learning Outcomes? Are they happy that the feedback they get from hired hands is vacuous and useless, because those strike-breakers do not have the time to devote attention to the assignment? How do they feel about all quality control being stripped away, jeopardising the integrity of the QMUL degree? Are these costs they are willing to pay? Read their own words. [students: use this canvas to record your experiences, and please do so anonymously] en-us 2022-06-13 20:43:30 UTC 2025-11-14 18:44:01 UTC hello@padlet.com qmul_cs https://padlet.com/qmul_cs/zt648r2cezjvfyy3/wish/2221092299 QMUL students have been making their voice heard in an open letter, asking management to stop wasting time looking for ways to undermine the boycott and instead choose the much swifter option of coming to an agreement. You can read (and co-sign!) here: ]]> 2022-06-14 18:28:44 UTC https://padlet.com/qmul_cs/zt648r2cezjvfyy3/wish/2221092299 qmul_cs https://padlet.com/qmul_cs/zt648r2cezjvfyy3/wish/2231233320 QMUL students were interviewed for an article in The Tab about the outsourced marking: https://thetab.com/uk/london/2022/06/24/queen-mary-students-appalled-by-incompetent-outsourced-marking-46446]]> 2022-06-27 07:41:53 UTC https://padlet.com/qmul_cs/zt648r2cezjvfyy3/wish/2231233320 qmul_cs https://padlet.com/qmul_cs/zt648r2cezjvfyy3/wish/2231270732 Times Higher Education reported on the outsourced marking, including student testimonials about the 'feedback' provided to their cohort: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/boycott-busting-queen-mary-markers-blasted-basic-feedback]]> 2022-06-27 08:34:58 UTC https://padlet.com/qmul_cs/zt648r2cezjvfyy3/wish/2231270732