Overall, it is quite evident that the percentage of people living in cities increased in all four countries over the given period and is expected to continue rising in the future. Malaysia consistently had the highest proportion throughout the period, while Indonesia started with the lowest figure but is expected to rise sharply and overtake others by 2040.

The diagram reveals that Malaysia maintained the highest proportion of urban residents throughout the period. In 1970, about half of its population lived in cities, and this figure rose steadily to more than 70% by 2020. The trend is expected to continue, though at a slower pace, reaching nearly 80% in 2040. By contrast, Indonesia started with the lowest percentage, at only around 12%. Urbanization there was relatively slow until 2000, after which it accelerated sharply. By 2020, just under half of Indonesians lived in urban areas, and the figure is forecast to climb to 60% by 2040, overtaking Thailand.

As the diagram suggests, Thailand and the Philippines both showed steady but more moderate growth. In 1970, about 30% of Filipinos lived in cities, compared with just 15% in Thailand. By 2020, the figures had risen to around 50% and slightly below that level, respectively. Looking ahead, the Philippines is projected to continue its upward trend, reaching about 60% by 2040. Thailand, on the other hand, is expected to level off after 2020 at just under 50%, remaining the least urbanized country apart from Indonesia in the early years.

ln summary, all four countries are becoming increasingly urbanized. Malaysia will remain the clear leader, while Indonesia, despite starting at the lowest point, is set to rise rapidly. In contrast, the Philippines and Thailand will see steadier growth, with Thailand expected to lag slightly behind the others by 2040.

Overall, it is evident that urban living has witnessed, and will continue to meet a significant upward trend in all nations, with Malaysia and Indonesia holding the highest positions. By the end of 2040, Malaysia is said to have the highest percentage among the countries shown.

In 1970, the percentage of urban residents in the Philippines and Malaysia was nearly identical, standing at 30% each while the figures for Thailand and Indonesia was 19% and 12% respectively. Over the subsequent two decades, Malaysia experienced fluctuations in its urban poplation, surpassing the Philippines around 40%.

The given line chart illustrates the proportion of people living in  urban areas in four  Asian countries (Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia) during the period between 1970 and 2020 with projections for 2030 and 2040.

Overall, it is clear that the urban population increased in all four countries Malaysia  led the way with the highest position in this trend. While Indonesia had the lowest positon in 1970, there was an dramatic rise in the percentage of Indonesian residents in 2040, reaching the second-highest position, when comparing to other countries.

It was evident that Malaysia remained by far the most soaring percentage in Malaysian residents to aprroximately 30 percent in 1970 and reaching a peak to about 86 percent in 2040, according to predictions. There was an overwhelming growth of Indonesia population, while it reached the lowest position to roughly 12 percent in 1970, it then  skyrocketed significantly to approximately 62 percent, reaching the second-highest position after Malaysia.

In addition, besides significant growth in the percentage of Malaysian and Indonesian population, Thailand and Philippines saw a slightly increase from 1970 to 2040. In 1970, Philippines accounted for 31 percent in population and to roughly 52 percent in 2040. Thailand reached the lowest position, comparing to four countries, there was a 19 percentage of Thailand population in 1970 and  it then will account for approximately 41 percent in 2040.

In conclusion, the percentage of all four countries have a considerable intensification in this trend. The percentage of residents in Malaysia and Indonesia grew remarkably. Philippines and Thailand also increased in population, but it was in more stable level.

Firstly, scientific advancements have consistently led to significant improvements in healthcare. Medical research and breakthroughs have resulted in the discovery of life-saving treatments, vaccines, and diagnostic tools. These advancements have prolonged lives and enhanced the overall well-being of individuals by mitigating suffering and improving quality of life. By prioritizing the betterment of people's health, science plays a crucial role in reducing mortality rates, preventing diseases, and alleviating human suffering.

Secondly, scientific progress has led to advancements in technology and innovation, which have transformed various aspects of daily life. From the invention of electricity and the Internet to the development of efficient transportation systems, science has revolutionized the way people communicate, work, and navigate the world. These advancements have enhanced convenience, efficiency, and productivity, ultimately making people's lives more comfortable and enjoyable.

In conclusion, the central aim of science should unquestionably be to improve people's lives. By prioritizing advancements in healthcare, technology, and solutions to global

challenges, science has the potential to enhance the overall well-being of individuals and create a more prosperous and sustainable world.

Overall, the graph shows a clear upward trend in urbanisation for all four countries over the entire period. Furthermore, Malaysia consistently maintained the highest percentage of its population in cities, while Thailand was the least urbanised.

In 1970, the Philippines led the group, with 32% of its people living in urban centres, followed closely by Malaysia at 20%. In contrast, Thailand and Indonesia both started the period with only ar Walesound 15% and 17%, respectively. By 2000, the difference had become more pronounced: the percentage in Malaysia soared to 60%, while the Philippines rose to 50% in 1990 then dropped to 45% after 10 years. Thailand and Indonesia also saw growth but remained below the 40% mark. During the period from 2000 to 2020, most countries had an increase except for the Philippines which had a slight change in 2010 with about 40%.

Looking ahead to the projections for 2040, all four countries are expected to see significant further growth. Malaysia is forecast to reach approximately 88% urbanisation, maintaining its leading position. Indonesia is projected to reach 65%. The country with the most tortuous changes over the decades is the Philippines, with the figure is predicted to reach 55%, while Thailand is expected to be the least urbanised nation at 50%.

On the one hand, there are variety reasons to justify the argument that science should be used to improve human life. One major reason why science should focus on improving people’s lives is that it directly contributes to better health and longer life expectancy. Health is always the area that people pay the most attention and care about, so developing and perfecting science is especially necessary for each of us. For example, genetic engineering is a practical example of today's scientific advancement. Thanks to genetic engineering, doctors can transplant lactic acid cells to treat diabetes and many other diseases. In addition, scientific innovations make daily life more comfortable and efficient. Technology products have gradually become a common tool and are gradually becoming indispensable to human life. The proof is that advanced achievements such as smartphones, laptops, tablets, TVs, etc. are constantly improving and making people rush to purchase them every time a new product is launched.

On the other hand, science is not limited to serving immediate human needs. One of its other valuable purposes is playing a crucial role in protecting the environment. Nowadays, many hydrometeorological experts have applied scientific achievements to predict the weather and storms in our country. This contributes to preventing sudden obstacles from nature and the risk of human damage, especially at a time when many storms are increasingly landing in the East Sea like now.

In conclusion, I believe that improving people’s lives should indeed be the central mission of science. At the same time, the impact of science on other aspects such as the environment is equally important.

Nhóm Nhật Thanh,Nhật Nguyên,Đăng Khôi