<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>CSM #2 by UAL Creative Mindsets</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2</link>
      <description>Which bias have you identified? Record your groups discussion here...</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-01-09 21:34:13 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-01-10 15:25:23 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Case Study 1</title>
         <author>v_hill3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220113901</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>(…) Tina was disappointed to find that there was not a single black tutor on her course and very few black students. Even though the university was situated in an area which is heavily populated by people of colour (POC). In addition, Tina was put in the position of having to represent people of colour and as a result suffered a series of microaggressions. For example, her tutor asked her “why it was that black artists solely made work about being black?” Tina found that she would be forced into a situation where she had to explain protests like ‘Black Lives Matter’ or why it was not appropriate for her peers to refer to her hair as ‘bushy’. Tina also found that the university offered no intersectional approach within the curriculum thus marginalising people of colour further. Tina says that she felt alienated and othered by the institution. <br> <br>(From Shades of Noir: <em>The Little Book of Big Case Studies</em>, <br><a href="https://issuu.com/teachingwithinson/docs/shades_of_noir_case_study_-_people_">https://issuu.com/teachingwithinson/docs/shades_of_noir_case_study_-_people_</a>)<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 11:39:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220113901</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Case study 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220190164</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Racial micro- aggressions<br>Eg “why do black artists only make work about being black”<br>Hair being bushy.<br><br>Colour- blind racial attitudes<br>University offered no intersectional approach within the curriculum.<br><br>Competency proving&nbsp;<br>Having to justify and defend other black people’s work.<br><br>Tokenism<br>Summarises the whole case study- having to defend her culture and other black people just because she is off the same race.<br><br><br>Case study 2<br><br>Status leveling - travelling far and having to pay for the journey when he doesn’t have the money.<br><br>Stereotype threat - worried that becuase of his dyslexia and dyspraxia he might be stereotyped or thought of as less able.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 14:56:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220190164</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220190347</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Case study 1<br><br>Tina was aware that she was being tokenised, and therefore had to deal with microagressions because people believed she represented the whole of her minority group. As result she felt pressured to perform well on behalf of her group, worrying about reaffirming the stereotype. There was no help or support offered for minority groups by the university which shows their colour blind approach because they dont see that there is still issues regarding race that need adressing<br>9, 10, 5, 2<br><br>Case study 2<br>Financial problems add another element of stress<br>3,6</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 14:56:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220190347</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220192402</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Case Study 1<br>1,2,5,10<br><br>Surprised by the lack of intersectional approach&nbsp;<br>Why should context always have to be explained.<br>Racial micro-aggression stood out to us. 'why is it that black artists always make work about being black' - Colour blind racial attitudes. People don't realise that there are racial problems. Shocked that the tutor could have said something like that, it doesn't take a conscious effort to act in an appropriate way<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 15:00:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220192402</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>6!!!!!</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220192449</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In case study 1 we found that both the <strong><mark>racial micro aggressions</mark></strong> and <strong><mark>tokenism</mark></strong> apply. Racial micro aggressions in the form of insensitive comments, the ‘bushy’ hair and tokenism is shown by the assumption that one black person should answer the question ‘why was it that black artists solely make work being black?’<br><br>In case study 2 we found that <strong><mark>status levelling</mark></strong><mark> </mark>and <strong><mark>impression management </mark></strong>applies because of him being conscious of standing out and not looking or sounding like anyone else on the course. This could also be a form of <strong><mark>competency proving</mark></strong> as he deals with coming from a family that’s never been in higher education.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 15:00:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220192449</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>GROUP 1 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220192914</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Case Study 1<br>5, 9, 10</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 15:01:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220192914</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220197947</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Racial micro-aggression&nbsp;<br><br>Tokenism&nbsp;<br><br>There are very few people of colour on her course which makes her fee<br><br>Stereotype threat<br><br>Having to justify her position as an artist and her identity because of being a person of colour<br><br><br>Clear example of racial micro-aggression&nbsp;<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 15:09:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220197947</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220198069</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Case study 2<br>3,9,7,6,10<br>Feeling of threat<br>Presumed incompetance from his family initially and then peers at uni. Nathan has to also make a more conscious effort to chance peoples perception of his presumed incompetence. Treated differently due to being the first to go to university in his family ?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 15:10:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/v_hill3/CSMFA2/wish/220198069</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
