Reflections by Ann

it is good that it starts with definitions and criteria

2021-06-10 09:49:29 UTC

It contains definitions of the learning concepts.

2021-06-10 09:49:38 UTC

criteria to identify LL/GP/PP

2021-06-10 09:49:39 UTC

The best is that it explicitly attempts to capture a learning dimension that before was unadressed

2021-06-10 09:49:44 UTC

criteria that allows a rapid categorisation of learning types for analysis

2021-06-10 09:50:14 UTC

it is good to keep it short

2021-06-10 09:50:57 UTC

2021-06-10 09:51:03 UTC

Make it visually more attractive and uniform/consistent with the ROM deliverables'templates and re-classify sections
(Cover page with general intervention identification data and clear sections 1) for description of GP/LLs; 2) Success factors; 3) Constraints; 4) Consolidation aspects )

the sequence is generally logical

2021-06-10 09:51:29 UTC

Approach visually the other ROM templates.

2021-06-10 09:51:38 UTC

automatically pre-filled template similar to ROM reports

2021-06-10 09:52:19 UTC

Create a cover page with information which should not be filled in by the expert.

2021-06-10 09:52:36 UTC

Add context relevant description elements

2021-06-10 09:52:47 UTC

Proposed revision of the Template

2021-06-10 09:52:52 UTC

2021-06-10 09:52:56 UTC

use the template to identify LL and take burden away from expert on the in depth analysis (due to time and resource constraints of ROM) which can be done at a later stage. Possible in the future a system such as the SDL service can be employed

key words

2021-06-10 09:53:10 UTC

some of the categories we talked about could be added

2021-06-10 09:53:14 UTC

To receive feedback from those who use these fiches

2021-06-10 09:54:14 UTC

talk about the sources of information

2021-06-10 09:54:26 UTC

EU added value could be addressed here too.

2021-06-10 09:56:53 UTC

info15398 — 2024-06-09 11:57:54 UTC

Just testing