Point is, children deserve happy and healthy childhoods and upbringing and if the parent simply cannot give that to them and admits that they would rather not have a child at this time, then that’s the one true right decision, the parents’. No one should force them into a life of parenthood and force a life into this world where the child cannot be given the best possible childhood they could have. This 15 year old is a child themselves. They have dreams, aspirations, goals, and better yet, they have a life that needs to be further developed and evolved before they choose to bring another into this world. 

Birth is a beautiful and sacred thing and I don’t think we should take it for granted and treat it like a minor subject when in reality we should give a right to every parent to choose if they are ready for that duty and responsibility. I understand that life is precious, so in line with that, wouldn’t it be better to give life when It is the right time in the parent’s life? 

Dear God, I hope you can forgive me for taking part in this abortion. I know you have guided me in my decision and discernment and understand that what I have to do is right and just. It is for the betterment of your 15 year old child and her future, not only that but for her health and wellbeing too, Lord. Life is precious, so we must deliver it here on earth only If we are ready to give the child a good and loving life. 

Forcing her to keep it would be putting both her and the hypothetical child at risk. At fifteen years old, she would be too young to take care of it. Aside from that, forcing her to keep it might endanger her, as there have been studies stating that teenage mothers are at a higher risk of contracting certain illnesses. If I were to drive her away, I would possibly have her risk her own life by putting herself in the hands of people who are not professionally trained to handle abortions. As a doctor, I could not live with the fact that I had put a child at risk due to my own personal beliefs.

Lastly, as a person, I am aware of the argument that she could simply give the child up for adoption. However, as a person who was adopted by a family, I can also say that the argument does not take the child into account. Although I was lucky enough to be legally adopted as an infant, there are articles that mention how other children who were given up for adoption end up “aging out” and growing into adulthood without ever actually getting adopted. In an article written by Cody Cepeda in 2019, it was revealed that there are not enough adoptive families in the country, and that the process is too slow. 

Although I was blessed and adopted into a family, my parents had told me how difficult the process was. It took a long time for them to go through the legal process of actually adopting me, and there was even a period of time wherein my caretakers at the time refused to release me to them after they found out that my parents’ biological son, my brother, had special needs. I was made aware of the ableism in the system, and how arduous it is to adopt a child, if there are any families who are willing to adopt at all. Because of this, I cannot agree with people who try to argue that the child should have the baby and give it up for adoption, since I know that they do not care for the young girl or the baby they are forcing her to have.

Helping her would be the best option, and I will do everything in my power to ensure that she goes through this safely.

My initial response would be to ensure that the teenage girl has access to all the information and resources she needs to make an informed decision. I would provide her with counseling and support for parenting, adoption, and abortion, explaining the risks and benefits of each option. It is crucial that she is enlightened to make a decision of such gravity.

As a church leader, I would also provide guidance and counseling on the religious and moral implications of the decision to terminate a pregnancy. I would urge the teenager to consider the value of human life and to explore all options that would preserve the life of the unborn child. As a medical practitioner, I would ensure that she is aware of the medical risks associated with the procedure and that she is making an informed decision, free from coercion or pressure from others.

While I may hold strong religious beliefs that oppose abortion, I would strive to approach this situation with empathy and respect. I would recognize that every situation is unique, and the teenage girl may have a valid reason to seek an abortion. In such cases, it is essential to respect her autonomy and provide non-judgmental/confrontational support.

It is essential to note that the issue of abortion is complex and multifaceted, with differing perspectives and opinions based on personal, religious, ethical, and cultural beliefs. As a medical practitioner, it is my responsibility to provide safe, non-judgmental, and compassionate treatment to my patients. However, as a church leader, I must also provide guidance and counseling on the religious and moral implications of decisions that the church holds for such acts.

In situations where my medical and religious obligations conflict, I would seek guidance from my spiritual advisors and medical advisers. It is crucial to approach this issue with utmost importance. It is only through thoughtful and respectful dialogue that we can create an environment where women are empowered to make informed decisions about their reproductive health while also upholding religious and moral values.

Furthermore, the teenage girl is not the only person affected by the decision to terminate a pregnancy. The future of the unborn child is also at stake, and it is crucial to approach this situation with care and compassion as a society, we must also address the root causes of unplanned pregnancies, including access to education, contraception, and healthcare.

In conclusion, despite being a firm believer and devout follower of the church, I have to do what is right as a medical practitioner with a heavy heart in case the girl still pushes with her decision to abort her child. I already did my best in educating her to the best of my capabilities and the decision fully lies in her hand. 

Deep inside, I know I tried my best and my conscience is clean...

 This is a question for the ages, a thought worth cogitating on, and a specific phrase commonly used by those who seek to justify their opposition to the practice of Abortion. And this particular phrase is what I have stood for as a Church leader-- a follower of God

But, on the other side of the coin, I am Medical Practitioner-- an individual with whom people go to entrust their safety; even their lives. And, it is part of our oath to value our patient's choices and decisions regarding medical procedures and such.

Consent is a very important part of the medical field. Every medical choice, medicinal prescription, medical equipment, and many more require the patient's consent to be used. If a patient seeks my professional guidance upon aborting their unborn child, then I would agree.

Technicalities aside; from a moral standpoint, I  would still completely stand up for the number of women who seek to choose bodily autonomy and their rights to make a choice for their own well-being and health. As a church leader, this is quite a controversial take. But I personally believe that one must learn to separate their religious beliefs and avoid projecting this unto your decisions and actions in your chosen profession. As a medical practitioner, I have to instill this objective truth in my practices.

However, I would still be brought upon by another moral dilemma. If we dissect the scenario further, we will come to find that the patient is of 15 years of age-- a minor who cannot legally consent to the abortion process.

I fear this would cause them to resort to unsafe abortion clinics and procedures. So, in this situation, I am morally AND ethically obligated to contact this minor's parents and inform them of the situation at hand and ask if they consent to their child's abortion. If they provide me with their consent, then I will comply. If not, then I would take the time and effort to calmly explain their child's situation and how their choice can potentially put their child at a harmful disposition- medically, physically (and if I am a medical practitioner in the field of counseling and therapy: emotionally and mentally.).

If the parents still choose 'no' as their final decision. Then I would respect it. After all, consent is very important in the medical field. However, I would still try, with all of my power, to provide help to the 15-year-old child. If needed and/or asked, I can start by offering centers and programs that could be of help to her if she happens to conceive her baby. I would also offer her my services if she seeks medical care for herself and her child.

Sometimes, life doesn't go the way we want it to. We cannot erase the fact that Abortion is still viewed and considered a taboo topic by the majority of the citizens and generations in this country. There will always be a negative connotation that surrounds it and we cannot avoid the set of people who fail to see the bigger perspective-- often too blinded by their strong faith and religion. With this, I will just accept that there are certain things that I am deprived of doing so; as hindered by my field and the professionalism that comes with being a medical practitioner. However, that does not mean that I would not try my absolute best and exhaust all of my efforts to fight for what I believe is right and extend my help to the women who are in need of it. 

It's worth noting that there is a spectrum of beliefs and opinions on abortion, even within the medical and religious communities. Ultimately, the decision to have an abortion is a deeply personal one that should be made in consultation with a healthcare provider, and based on the individual's own values and beliefs.

As a religious leader who adheres to the concept of morality, I am aware that abortion disputes my perspective and principles. However, as a medical practitioner who acts in accordance with ethical guidelines, it is my obligation to help and access the necessities of patients. I firmly believe that abortion is the best option for her situation, especially that she is living in poverty without proper financial and psychological support from her parents or significant other. We must not shed some bad light on the topic of abortion, as it helped a copious amount of women throughout the centuries with their sudden and unwanted pregnancies from men, and saved them from dying from hypertension or heart-related diseases due to the intense feeling of giving birth. In addition, let us also put into account the situation of the upcoming baby. Personally, it hurts how children are being forsaken by their parents, and how these people neglect to provide the children’s needs and wants, such as healthy sustenance, clean clothing, and proper shelter. 

I am aware of the fact that abortion is a sin but I will never put my patient in a dire situation where she needs to pick between her life or the baby's life. I know that God would forgive my action of saving a young teenager's life despite conducting an abortion procedure on her baby.

Additionally, with a utilitarian approach, this states that the acceptance of what is morally wrong and what is morally right is based on the outcomes– whether or not these actions would produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Many pro-life arguments regarding abortion are rooted from the significance and respect of any future that living humans, fetus included, can achieve. The argument “the baby could be the next Elon Musk” or “the baby could be the doctor who cures cancer!” has been used time and time again. Consider an example of taking an unborn child to term in this economy as parents underneath the poverty line. Access to abortion would give the couple and their family a chance to be able to experience physical, psychological, and financial ease. Another argument is the concept of opportunity and luck. To be the next Elon Musk, or a doctor, or even an artist, one must consider that opportunities and luck that may have been laid out for others, may not be laid out for the fetus.  Another critical example would stem back to situations where inhumane disregard for a woman’s bodily autonomy is experienced. Carrying a product of such violence is not beneficial for all. This may cause severe psychological trauma for both the mother and the child if carried to term. In that case, both the right to live a safe and healthy life is unachievable. Instances of fetal complications and medical concerns would risk both the child’s future and the mother’s well-being in carrying the fetus to term. This situation then, under a utilitarian perspective, is morally acceptable. 

This Bible verse has been the automatic go-to of diehard, conservative Christians whenever they defend their stance of abortion being equivalent to murder. However, even modern interpretations of this verse all point to miscarriages, not abortions. The phrase "life for life" is also debatable, in terms of its meaning and impact on the decisions being made; not just by doctors, but also by government leaders who don't seem to understand how to draw the line between their own beliefs and scientific facts.

Research shows that a one-month-old embryo is nothing but a heartbeat. Why should we scream 'murder' for the removal of something no bigger than a grain of rice? Why do we consider it alright to "pull the plug" on braindead patients, for the sake of mercy and practicality, but call teenage girls with unplanned pregnancies 'selfish killers'? If life is the point of concern, what about the life of the mother?

The 15-year-old girl who lives under the poverty line will not be able to sustain her child. What about her life? Should we really force our textbook principles onto people who will have to live with the consequences of OUR DECISIONS? As a Church leader, I teach others to "Love thy Neighbor." Love should not be selfish, but denying that girl of having an abortion will be.

Yes, I am a Church Leader, but leading means adapting to your followers. Times are changing, and so should we. I will stand by my decision to support and help that girl with her abortion. 

As a medical practitioner, you must adhere to professional standards and legal requirements. You must evaluate the girl's medical condition and determine whether an abortion is necessary. If the baby in her womb has defects, is unhealthy, and poses a risk to her life, you can proceed with the abortion. You must also consider the girl's mental and emotional well-being and provide her with the necessary support and care.

However, you must also consider the legal implications of performing an abortion on a minor without the consent of her parents or legal guardians. Laws regarding abortion vary from country to country, and you must be familiar with the laws in your jurisdiction. In some cases, a court order may be required to proceed with the abortion, and it is essential to follow the legal procedures to avoid any legal complications.

In conclusion, the case of a 15-year-old girl seeking assistance in aborting her one-month-old embryo is a complex and sensitive issue that requires your attention and expertise. As a church leader and a medical practitioner, you must weigh whatever is good with the baby and the mother before you proceed with your decision.

I believe that we shouldn’t bar access to abortions, as this would only result in women resorting to more unconventional and dangerous methods for abortion. While I agree that bearing a child is a blessing, there are certain circumstances where an abortion may be necessary for the betterment of the mother, their family, and the well-being of the child.

 Raising a child takes time, love, and immense care, and parents should owe it to their kids to provide those needs. Bringing a human into a world with parent/s that aren't ready and can’t handle the immense weight of raising a child does a great disservice to them, so people just like the teenager in the scenario have every right to make the conscious decision for whether or not they should abort the child. 

In conclusion, no religious or political beliefs should determine what a woman does with her body, and the only voice that matters when it comes to the decision of aborting a child or not should be that of the mother’s.