https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek Would you support Bookchin OR Foreman? State the reason for your preference. en-us 2022-11-24 08:30:53 UTC 2022-11-28 07:16:03 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397042559 Yes, I support Bookchin of Foreman. This is because after they have decided to embrace peace and compromises with each other opinions,  Bookchin can acknowledge to recognise the importance of conserving and ensuring the survival of forest and wilderness.
At the same time, Foreman has decided to lessen the ’anti-human’ emphasis and also recognise the need to resolve social inequalities that affects human population as a whole. ]]> 2022-11-24 16:18:01 UTC https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397042559 https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397610498 I support Bookchin . I think the relationship between ecology and society is very important, because human's daily life is closely related to the ecological system of nature. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the reduction of human activities, such as economic activities, has a positive impact on the ecological environment. Some people believe that the outbreak of COVID-19 is a moment to bring freedom and giving a deep breathing to the earth, nature, animals and plants. Also ,the damage caused by urbanization like the destruction of habitat for animals and soil for plants to grow well. But, the nature very much affects to human society so there are a person say that the ecological crisis is also a social crisis.

]]> 2022-11-25 06:39:18 UTC https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397610498 https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397733837 Social ecology is highly critical of the notion of green consumerism or green investment. I would support Bookchin instead of Foreman. Bookchin's theory presents a vision of human evolution that combines the nature of biology and society into a third "thinking nature" beyond biochemistry and physiology, which he says is of a more complete, conscious, ethical, and rational nature. Humanity, according to this line of thought, is the latest development in the long history of organic development on Earth. He believes that no truly 'green' entrepreneur could survive because ecologically sound practices would place them at fatal disadvantage compared with rivals who can produce at lower costs.]]> 2022-11-25 08:57:50 UTC https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397733837 https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397848760 If have to choose between the two, I will support Bookchin. In Bookchin's theory of social ecology, hierarchy is a cultural, traditional, and psychological system of submission and command, not just an economic concept of class and a political concept of a country. Bookchin's explanation of the evolution of hierarchy shows us the development process of hierarchy. Bookchin also believes that freedom is the potential and direction of nature and social evolution. Freedom is not just a strictly human value or concern, it is an embryonic state in the universe. Bookchin thus objected to the arbitrary use of hierarchical terms to describe nature. 

Simply understood, the theoretical system described by Bookchin is called "social ecology" because of its emphasis on social hierarchy and the absorption of ecological viewpoints. It is called "Liberal Ecology" because of its emphasis on the heritage and ideal of freedom and its ecological scientific basis. In Bookchin's view, a society that draws on the teachings of ecology, eliminates hierarchy and domination, and rebuilds the legacy of freedom will be a society in which the idea of dominating nature no longer exists, that is an "ecological society."]]> 2022-11-25 10:55:51 UTC https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2397848760 syahira_syazwani_ba20 https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2398484222 From my point of view, I would pick Bookchin. As far as I can tell, his view of society is based on the idea that environmental problems are always caused by social problems in human society. The idea behind this approach is that ecological problems won't be completely fixed until the underlying social problems are dealt with and fixed. Bookchin thought that too many environmentalists tried to solve environmental problems by focusing on the symptoms instead of the causes. Instead of trying to change society as a whole, environmentalists focused on specific problems, including such overpopulation and deforestation. A social ecologist emphasises the necessity of creating a more better social structure based on equality and collaboration rather than private interests. Despite their intelligence, humans are still part of ecology and should not be regarded as a "special case" among nature living habitants in general.

]]> 2022-11-26 09:34:54 UTC https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2398484222 https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2398493726 Bookchin has my vote of confidence. His historical and anthropological investigations in The Ecology of Freedom affirm the belief that any truly liberatory popular movement must directly challenge hierarchy in general, not just its particular manifestations as oppression by race, gender, or class, and his 'libertarian municipalism' offers both an outline of a political strategy and the structure underlying social ecology's long-range reconstructive vision. His investigations affirm the belief that any truly liberatory popular movement must directly challenge hierarchy in general, not just its particular manifestations as oppression This vision of directly democratic communities, challenging state power while evolving in harmony with all of nature, drew on decades of research into political structures, sustainable technologies, revolutionary popular movements, and the best of the utopian tradition in Western thought. It was a vision of directly democratic communities.
His theory of social ecology was first made public when he released his first book, which was titled Our Synthetic Environment. This book provided a comprehensive and understandable examination of the factors that led to the rise of pollution, urban concentration, and chemical agriculture. As the years went by, his utopian social critique, historical and anthropological study, dialectical philosophy, and political strategy gradually coalesced into what became known as his social ecology, which was an innovative synthesis. To be more specific, social ecology is concerned with addressing the social and political underpinnings of modern environmental issues. By the 1970s, his social ecology was mostly utilised by organisations that were opposed to nuclear power; by the 1980s, it was adopted by West Germany and other European nations; and by the 1990s, it was used by proponents of the green movement.
This shaky but actual unity between Bookchin and Foreman, in addition to their explicitly declared support for variety among those involved in the movement, is a significant success. This kind of fundamental unity is crucial since thousands of individuals are currently getting engaged in the pursuit of an environmentally responsible and sustainable future.]]> 2022-11-26 10:00:04 UTC https://padlet.com/mazlima5/zerzke6gt0rte1ek/wish/2398493726