https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg en-us 2020-11-09 21:57:46 UTC 2020-11-12 19:23:40 UTC hello@padlet.com tannercherokee1 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906354300 He gave valid points, communication is how we share important information with each other and arts can help us express it in various other ways. he also was able to quickly put down any of the arguments for math and science and convey it all using charisma.]]> 2020-11-09 22:20:37 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906354300 paylou000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906356986 the biggest problem i had with the language side was that all their arguments were not really strong. it seemed like his only arguments were counter arguments. when math stated why he believed math was better, the counter was just that communication propelled math and science which doesn't actually prove that its more important, its just a stalling tactic]]> 2020-11-09 22:21:41 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906356986 sumdei000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906358190 2020-11-09 22:22:14 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906358190 dakock000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906358978 I think math won because they had a better argument when it came to mentioning math and science being used every day. And English could only connect to Math by saying that English is a way that science and math communicate.]]> 2020-11-09 22:22:30 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906358978 davtha000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906359165 I think that English and Arts won because the arguments that the person gave were more convincing and had some emotion and facts, while on the other hand, the Science and Math guy spoke in more just facts and kept going to the single topic of it saving lives, which I thought was bland. Also it was fun watching the person for English and Arts basically roast the other guy. Overall, they were both evenly convincing, except  the guy from English and Arts was more organized and goofy. ]]> 2020-11-09 22:22:32 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906359165 AleHanDr0 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906360092 Math and science did have more information to back up there counter arguments but in reality communication is key and without it were just like apes without speaking manner

]]> 2020-11-09 22:23:01 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906360092 erihaz0002 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906361081 By cutting to the core of communication he was able to really show how you need English( or a common language) in order to d math and science. This means that You would first have to learn Language before anything else.]]> 2020-11-09 22:23:30 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906361081 benstork100 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906362476 i already agreed with maths point more but arts points just didn't seem as strong]]> 2020-11-09 22:24:10 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906362476 ama_car0001 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906364277 though good, if not better, points were made on the english and arts side, the presentaition of the facts solidified math's win]]> 2020-11-09 22:25:08 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906364277 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906365420 math and science has better themes then art we need math to get through life .- rhann]]> 2020-11-09 22:25:43 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906365420 cadher000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906365694 2020-11-09 22:25:52 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906365694 chl_pan000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906367082 I think that math and science won because the points he gave were much stronger overall. Unlike the english and arts side, the points stood on their own and strongly supported their side. Art and english on the other-hand had points that were more of counterarguments. Most of the points they made were just saying that without art and english math and science wouldn't have progressed as much.]]> 2020-11-09 22:26:33 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906367082 angmac002 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906367768 i agree

]]> 2020-11-09 22:26:55 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906367768 dartan000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906367918 Math had more valid points and had a better argument overall but the other guy was being more funny and was not as good of a debater as the other guy. But the  other guy could have won with better points.]]> 2020-11-09 22:26:59 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906367918 nga_ma000 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906368875 Math&Science made some valid points and English&Art didn't have strong evidence ]]> 2020-11-09 22:27:27 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906368875 garlar001 https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906475134 you must have people seeking knowledge and be able to tell them the facts it would be like knowing the secrets of the universe but only knowing how to speak georgian]]> 2020-11-09 23:24:36 UTC https://padlet.com/claudiachoi/zdphk1hp9abarzdg/wish/906475134