Miranda vs. Arizona 1966 by https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu Landmark Supreme Court Case Summary en-us 2019-03-06 17:18:29 UTC 2024-10-26 01:36:38 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Balance.png Does the fifth amendment's protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect? 0428465 https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338507043 2019-03-06 17:34:28 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338507043 feolademilio https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338507504 On March 13,1963 Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his house and brought to the police station where he was questioned by police officers in connection with a kidnapping and rape. After 2 hours of interrogation he finally confessed. In court he was found guilty. Miranda appealed to the Supreme Court. He felt his fifth amendment rights were violated because he was pressured by police officers to confess and he was not aware that he could have an attorney present while being interrogated. The Supreme Court agreed and found him not guilty of kidnapping and rape.]]> 2019-03-06 17:35:11 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338507504 feolademilio https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338507796 2019-03-06 17:35:37 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338507796 0428465 https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338510843 2019-03-06 17:40:44 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338510843 Miranda vs. Arizona influenced today's world because today anyone being suspected will be given the same treatment and will be aware of their right to have an attorney present while being interrogated.There will also be no confusion of the fifth amendment. This established Miranda Rights. 0428465 https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338511132  ]]> 2019-03-06 17:41:14 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338511132 feolademilio https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338512812 The court didn't find Miranda guilty of his crimes. According to the court the interrogation did violate his Fifth Amendment Rights. A defendant was required to be warned before questioning that he had the right to remain silent, and that anything he said can be used against him in a court of law. A defendant was also required to be told that he had the right to an attorney, and if he could not afford an attorney, one was to be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he wished.]]> 2019-03-06 17:44:08 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338512812 0428465 https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338514018 2019-03-06 17:46:09 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338514018 feolademilio https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338517312 2019-03-06 17:51:31 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338517312 0428465 https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338626351 Miranda vs. Arizona Summary]]> 2019-03-06 21:25:03 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/338626351 feolademilio https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/339356253 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ7ooBJ_DEU]]> 2019-03-08 15:59:05 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/339356253 Miranda Vs. Arizona feolademilio https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/339363763 Background Summary: Miranda was taken to an interrogation room where his 5th amendment right was violated
Opinion Of The Court: The court first said that Miranda was found guilty but when he later appealed to the supreme court he was found not guilty
Social Changes: This establish Miranda Rights and gives everyone equal opportunity in court]]> 2019-03-08 16:13:57 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/339363763 tmedero https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/339417094 2019-03-08 18:09:54 UTC https://padlet.com/0428465/zdo2xayia9eu/wish/339417094