https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh en-us 2020-11-02 03:30:41 UTC 2025-11-19 18:20:37 UTC hello@padlet.com stephaniemccue https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965741 2020-11-02 03:30:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965741 stephaniemccue https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965744 2020-11-02 03:30:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965744 stephaniemccue https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965749 2020-11-02 03:30:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965749 stephaniemccue https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965750 2020-11-02 03:30:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965750 stephaniemccue https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965752 2020-11-02 03:30:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/880965752 stephaniemccue https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888776732 2020-11-04 05:53:45 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888776732 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888789675 The grade that I would give Laura is a 5-6. This is because you have managed to correctly use tables in the area that it was required. For instance, Laura had used titles such as "Change in temperature" and "Mass of powder". She had also correctly added titles such as "Mass of powder vs Change in temperature". She could have added certain things to make her work better, adding more details e.t.c. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:00:56 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888789675 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888790548 Aidan 4 because he didn't include labels axis, but he did use the correct graph. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:01:25 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888790548 26seral4 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888791303 Vittoria M deserves a 4-5 because she has the correct graph with x and y axis. 
Vittoria P deserves a 6 because she has correct graphs with all correct labels and title. She also had x and y axis. She has a detailed and clear writing with explanations.
Filippa deserves a 6-7 because she has clear and detailed explanations with units and an accurate graph.


]]> 2020-11-04 06:01:52 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888791303 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888791763 For strand 1 I think Sera should get a 7 because her information is organised correctly and she processed her data in the correct way. She also included titles and axis labels.]]> 2020-11-04 06:02:08 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888791763 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888791803 Vittoria M deserves a 4 or 5 in this first stand, this is because she had the right type of graph with titles and everything, but the information was not too organised and so the line on the graph was everywhere so it didn't really make sense.]]> 2020-11-04 06:02:10 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888791803 26vittoriap2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888792686 karel: 6. added labels and correctly made the map , the map has a title and you can clearly see the data.

]]> 2020-11-04 06:02:37 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888792686 26mayaa3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793097 Isaac: He deserves 6 because he answered his questions correctly, he evaluated his hypothesis, and he described improvements.
Lewis: Lewis deserves a 5 because answered his questions correctly, he didn't write improvements but he evaluated his hypothesis.
Kyle:]]> 2020-11-04 06:02:52 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793097 26makoa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793299 Maya will get 7-8 because she has title, axis labels.]]> 2020-11-04 06:02:59 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793299 26rubyr2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793319 Anna deserves a 4 because she has the right graph and she has her titles, but the graph is hard to read.]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:00 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793319 26lauraa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793320 Ital deserves a 5-6 because he organized the data he recorded in tables, and he had a title and units in the proper place.]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:00 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793320 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793414 Kyle- Has correctly organized his data however his table is incorrect leaving the 7-8 option out of the table. I think he is on the 5-6 level.]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:02 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793414 26vittoriam2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793486 I think Vittoria P deserves a 4 to 5 because she had 2 graphs but they were hard to understand and some of the information (when i finally deciphered) was correct.]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:04 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793486 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793829 Lucas deserve 4 to 5 because his graph was very interesting to look and he organised his paragraph very well.

]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:15 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793829 26lewisc1 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793990 A 5 as his graphs and tables are correct.]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:21 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888793990 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888794173 Marc deserves a 4 for this strand because he doesn't have units but the rest is pretty good.]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:26 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888794173 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888794390 i think Isaac deserves a 4 for strand 1. because he has presented his data he's collected in his experiment, by using the correct graph, including titles, and axis labels. but did not include units in the proper place.]]> 2020-11-04 06:03:35 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888794390 26lewisc1 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888795707 A 4-5 as he explained his data and patterns]]> 2020-11-04 06:04:17 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888795707 26xinyiz2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888795739 I think Laura can get a 3/4, because she did great on organizing her data to tables, but she mix up wrong with the axis labels. Which make her graphs a bit messy. Also, she put her C° in the wrong place of the table it should be next to the title.]]> 2020-11-04 06:04:18 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888795739 26marct3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888796286 Jake  is a 5 -6 because he explained well and all the pictures he put in were correct and clear.]]> 2020-11-04 06:04:34 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888796286 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888796713 I feel he has answered his research question and giving data to explain his reasoning. Thus i think he is on a 4-5]]> 2020-11-04 06:04:49 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888796713 26vittoriap2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888796843  i think Karel deserves a 7 because he gave an example and a lot of reasoning for his claim, even though he was wrong he pointed out what he did wrong and how he was wrong.

]]> 2020-11-04 06:04:53 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888796843 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797322 Marc deserves a 5 for this strand because he didn't explain too much but he still had plenty of detail ]]> 2020-11-04 06:05:08 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797322 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797534 I think Sera should get a four or a five for strand two because she used knowledge and understanding to recognize patterns but she did not refer to her data to draw conclusions.

]]> 2020-11-04 06:05:14 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797534 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797696 Vittoria M deserves a 5 in strand 2, this is because she managed to draw conclusion from the data.]]> 2020-11-04 06:05:18 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797696 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797799 I give Aidan a 5 because he had almost everything on the rubric but not showing the patterns but he did use science terms that is why he got a five.]]> 2020-11-04 06:05:22 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797799 26rubyr2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797878 Anna deserves a 4 because she has used what she knows from the data to make a conclusion but she has not given any specific data.]]> 2020-11-04 06:05:24 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888797878 26karelp https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888798545 2020-11-04 06:05:43 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888798545 26lauraa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888799996 2020-11-04 06:06:26 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888799996 26karelp https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888800643 for this strand Anna deserves a 4 for strand 2 due to her graph being off in the sense of its results. but everything else in that strand was okay.

]]> 2020-11-04 06:06:44 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888800643 26annas3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888800940 I give Lucas 5 because the conclusion was very clear and it was very easy to understand and his explanation is very good. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:06:52 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888800940 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888803414 Mark deserves a 2 because he only had 1 sentence that barely explained anything.]]> 2020-11-04 06:08:08 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888803414 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888803968 The grade that I would give Michelle is a 5-6. I would give this grade to her because she had correctly followed the rubric. For instance, she had used the titles and labels correctly such as "Mass of powder" and "Change in temperature". She also used the data that she had collected from the gizo and managed to transfer it into a graph. Everything was easy to recognize and was very straight forward. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:08:25 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888803968 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888804424 Marc deserves a 0 because he had nothing.]]> 2020-11-04 06:08:36 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888804424 26vittoriam2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888804430 I think Vittoria P deserves a 5 because she had most of the stuff from the rubric but was missing a few things.]]> 2020-11-04 06:08:36 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888804430 26marct3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888804799 For this one I think Jake is a 5- 6 because his explanation was clear and he had evidence to back it up.]]> 2020-11-04 06:08:45 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888804799 26makoa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805190 Maya deserve 7-8 because she wrote question clear and easy to understand.]]> 2020-11-04 06:08:57 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805190 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805298 I give Aidan a 5 because he didn't know how to explain it but he did say why he couldn't explain it.]]> 2020-11-04 06:09:00 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805298 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805358 Marc deserves a 0 because he had nothing.]]> 2020-11-04 06:09:02 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805358 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805406 michell- i was able to give michell a 5-6 because she had included her title, axis labels, and used the correct graph]]> 2020-11-04 06:09:04 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805406 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805490 Kyle's prediction was correct and he did go into detail about what he could do to make it better however if he wanted to make it to the 6-7-8 level he would need to write more. I think for this strand he deserves a 4-5]]> 2020-11-04 06:09:07 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805490 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805808 In this strand Vittoria M deserves a 3-4 this is because she got the right answer on whether it increased or decreased but she had no proper reasons on why except the after experiment answer and so she didn't explain it which is why I think she deserves a 3-4 in this criteria.]]> 2020-11-04 06:09:16 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888805808 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888807357 Jake deserves a 6 because he. organised the data very well.]]> 2020-11-04 06:10:01 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888807357 26seral4 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888808220 Vittoria M deserves a 5 because it has accurate explanations, but isn't very detailed. 
Vittoria P deserves a 6 because she has a clear explanation with specific detail. 
Filippa deserves a 6-7 because her explanations are correct/accurate and has specific detailed writing. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:10:25 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888808220 26vittoriap2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888808706  i think Karel deserves a 5 because he was about to explain why he got it wrong but then he gave the wrong example which doesn't support his data,]]> 2020-11-04 06:10:38 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888808706 26lewisc1 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888808975 Kyle's hypothesis was clear and well explained. A 5]]> 2020-11-04 06:10:46 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888808975 26andreav https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888809851 Michelle- i was able to give Michell a 4-5 because she had used her understanding and knowledge of science to recognise patters and draw conclusions from the data]]> 2020-11-04 06:11:11 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888809851 26lauraa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888810379 Maya deserves a 5-6 because she organized the data she recorded in tables, she also had units, titles and y and x axis.  ]]> 2020-11-04 06:11:23 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888810379 26mayaa3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888812725 Isaac: He deserves 6 because he answered his questions correctly, he evaluated his hypothesis, and he described improvements.
Lewis: Lewis deserves a 5 because answered his questions correctly, he didn't write improvements but he evaluated his hypothesis.
Kyle:]]> 2020-11-04 06:12:29 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888812725 26lewisc1 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888812780 Kyle knew what he wrote was wrong or right, showing that he is aware of his strengths and weaknesses. A 5-6? ]]> 2020-11-04 06:12:30 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888812780 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888813079 Jake deserves a 7 because he added a lot of detail to his paragraph.]]> 2020-11-04 06:12:39 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888813079 26mayaa3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888813189 Isaac: He deserves 6 because he answered his questions correctly, he evaluated his hypothesis, and he described improvements.
Lewis: Lewis deserves a 5 because answered his questions correctly, he didn't write improvements but he evaluated his hypothesis.
Kyle:]]> 2020-11-04 06:12:42 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888813189 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888813640 I give him a 6 because he knows his weaknesses and he wrote what he need to do clearly  ]]> 2020-11-04 06:12:55 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888813640 26andreav https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814123 Michelle- i was able to give Michelle a 4-5 because she evaluated her hypothesis by stating if it had been supported or not]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:10 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814123 26mayaa3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814428 2020-11-04 06:13:18 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814428 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814442 Vittoria M deserves a 6 in this 4th strand. This is because she considered the limitations of her procedures in the lab.]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:19 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814442 26vittoriam2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814653 Vittoria P deserves a 6 in this strand because she said she was correct and explained very clearly and well written.]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:25 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814653 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814832 for strand 2 i would have to give isaac a 0. because he did not have anything in this area, it was just blank.]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:30 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888814832 26xinyiz2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815000 I think Laura can get a 5-6 for her conclusion, because she had explain her reasoning clearly using scientific language, according to her data and graph.]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:36 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815000 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815279 I think Filippa should get a six or seven for strand one because she correctly organized the data in the tables and she also used the correct type of graph.]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:43 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815279 26lauraa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815520 Ital deserves a 5-6 because he recognized the patterns and he wrote why and how the variables were related.  ]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:50 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815520 26annas3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815523 Lucas deserve 3-4 because his data was all straight line and I couldn't really understand the scientific explanation which he didn't have.]]> 2020-11-04 06:13:50 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888815523 26mayaa3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888816136 Isaac: He deserves 6 because he answered his questions correctly, he evaluated his hypothesis, and he described improvements.
Lewis: Lewis deserves a 5 because answered his questions correctly, he didn't write improvements but he evaluated his hypothesis.
Kyle:]]> 2020-11-04 06:14:06 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888816136 26marct3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888816683 For this one Jake got a 5 - 6 because the same thing his explanation has clear detail and evidence.]]> 2020-11-04 06:14:21 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888816683 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888817341 I give him a 0 because it doesn't say anything.]]> 2020-11-04 06:14:42 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888817341 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888817989 In Strand 5 I think Vittoria M deserves a 6 because he has suggested improvements in her procedure. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:15:02 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888817989 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888818011 Jake deserves a 6 because he described how his hypothesis was supported well.]]> 2020-11-04 06:15:03 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888818011 26rubyr2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888818447 Anna deserves a 3 because she has evaluated her hypothesis but she does not say if her data supports her hypothesis or not.]]> 2020-11-04 06:15:15 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888818447 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888818461 The grade that I would give Laura is a 4-5. She had managed to make a conclusion with ease, she had followed most of the directions and gave an example. Though she did well in these certain areas, I believe that there was more that she could have done to get a higher grade. 1: She could have given more examples to show more evidence as to why her hypothesis was either what she believed or what she didn't believe. 2: She could have used claim, evidence, response format to organize and make her conclusion more thorough and well thought through. 3: Laura could have addressed the claim/hypothesis that she had made before starting the experiment so that readers understand what she had done or the hypothesis she made. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:15:15 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888818461 26vittoriap2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888819050
  i think karel deserves a 5 because he gave more than one issue, he wrote them as a warning so he could remember what not to do. he didn't write the improvements but he gave many issues and explained the causes of them.

]]> 2020-11-04 06:15:32 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888819050 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888819864 I think Filippa should get a six for strand 2 because she referred to the data on her tables to draw conclusions and used knowledge and understanding to draw conclusions related to her hypothesis.]]> 2020-11-04 06:15:57 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888819864 26seral4 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820061 Vittoria M deserves a 4-5 because is correct, but its lacking detail.
Vittoria P deserves a 5-6 because her writing gave good and clear explanations.
Filippa deserves a 5-6 because she has a correct explanation with clear statements.]]> 2020-11-04 06:16:03 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820061 26karelp https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820116 for strand 3 Anna deserves a 4. i think she deserves a 4 for this strand  because she didn't write if it supported her hypothesis or not and she didn't write how this even supported her hypothesis or not. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:16:05 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820116 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820808 I am giving jet a 6 because he has the correct graph and he labeled his graph ]]> 2020-11-04 06:16:22 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820808 26andreav https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820908 Michelle- i was able to give Michelle a 4-5 because she was able to evaluate her methods by listing errors and how she could improve]]> 2020-11-04 06:16:23 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888820908 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888821284 Kyle deserves a 5-6 because throught out this strand he gave detail and explained his thoughts however he would need to add more about his understanding and Knowledge of the material and the salt to be able to push his grade to a higher level.]]> 2020-11-04 06:16:34 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888821284 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888821950 Vittoria P deserves a 5 in this criteria as she'd added 2 graphs, the only thing is with her line graph I don't think it was that organized causing it to spike backwards in certain areas which didn't really make sense, but she still had titles and those things so I think she deserves a 5]]> 2020-11-04 06:16:52 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888821950 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888823273 I am going to give jett a 5 because he had almost everything but one thing that was he didn't show the patterns.]]> 2020-11-04 06:17:32 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888823273 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888823585 I think Sera should get a 5 for strand 3 because she did not talk about the data to validate her hypothesis, despite this she still gave reasoning that proves the validity of her hypothesis.]]> 2020-11-04 06:17:42 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888823585 26seral4 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888823851 Vittoria M deserves a 4-5 because she gave a few thoughts however she could have added more explanations.
Vittoria P deserves a 5 possibly a 6 because she gave explanations and she talked about variables and gave support to her opinion.
Filippa deserves a 5 possibly a 6 because she gave a few flaws and added back up reasoning. She also talked about the solute, solvent, and solution. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:17:51 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888823851 26vittoriam2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888824051 Vittoria P deserves a 6 because she explained what she thought and was very descriptive.]]> 2020-11-04 06:17:57 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888824051 26makoa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888824191 2020-11-04 06:18:01 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888824191 26lewisc1 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888824851 Kyle should get a 5 or a 6(probably 6?) Because he answered most of his questions correctly and were detailed.]]> 2020-11-04 06:18:21 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888824851 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888825196 Kyle was again at the 5-6 level because he stated what he could improve on(his strengths and weeknesses) however he only wrote 2-3 sentences. so what he could do is just get that little more detail.]]> 2020-11-04 06:18:32 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888825196 26rubyr2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888825537 Anna deserves a 5 because have evaluated the method and have listed out some of the strength and weaknesses. she has also talked about the reliability of the method.]]> 2020-11-04 06:18:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888825537 26andreav https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888826097 Michelle- i was able to give Michelle a 5-6 because she given suggestions on how she could have improved on limitations in her procedures ]]> 2020-11-04 06:18:55 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888826097 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888826506 in strand 2 I think Vittoria P deserves a 6 because she explained the graphs and why the temperature increased.]]> 2020-11-04 06:19:07 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888826506 26vittoriap2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888826945  i think karel deserves a 5 ]]> 2020-11-04 06:19:19 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888826945 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827144 i think Isaac deserves a 7 for strand 3. because he evaluated his results to his hypothesis to see if it is correct or wrong. and he used scientific reasoning to explain why this happened. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:19:25 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827144 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827345 Jake deserves a 6 for this strand because he explained everything really well.]]> 2020-11-04 06:19:31 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827345 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827392 I give him a 4-5 because he didn't explain deeper so that it would be more clear. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:19:32 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827392 26lauraa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827713 I am unable to grade Mako because she inserted a graph and she didn't explain anything.]]> 2020-11-04 06:19:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888827713 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888828390 Vittoria P deserves a 0 in this strand as there is no work shown.]]> 2020-11-04 06:20:01 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888828390 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888829340 Vittoria P deserves a 5-6 in this strand as she explained what variables she needs to keep the same and what she needs to change.]]> 2020-11-04 06:20:29 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888829340 26vittoriam2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888829635 I think Vittoria P deserves a 4-5 because she added very little and showing her knowledge on her document she could definetly add more.]]> 2020-11-04 06:20:39 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888829635 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888829933 I give him a 4 because he didn't write why he wrote them down.]]> 2020-11-04 06:20:49 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888829933 26xinyiz2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830101 I think Laura can gets 4-5 , because she wrote it clearly and easy to understand. She also explain why her hypothesis is right or wrong, but I think she can write it more detailed. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:20:53 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830101 26lucass5 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830209 Jake deserves a 6 for this stand because he explained how to make the investigation better really well.]]> 2020-11-04 06:20:56 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830209 26karelp https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830225 for strand 4 Anna deserve a 5-6 because she was able to tell me what she could do in a real lab, while also stating the reason why. But for the flaws where it said give 2 flaws in the method she only gave 1.]]> 2020-11-04 06:20:57 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830225 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830438 Lewis I think got a 4-5 for this because he did not go in to futher detail when he was documenting the changes.(Adding the temperature and grams).]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:02 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888830438 26lewisc1 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831443 4-5 as Aiden's graphs and tables were correct but his graph was not labeled]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:32 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831443 26annas3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831470 I give Lucas 3 because he used " I think" a lot and he didn't explain about method or important details.]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:33 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831470 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831596 The grade that I would give Michelle is a 6-7. I would give this grade to her because it was organized and used many examples to prove why she got that grade. For instance, ]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:37 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831596 26seral4 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831673 Vittoria M deserves a 5 because she clearly stated a few improvements she could make to the flaws. 
Vittoria P deserves a 5 because she gave improvements for avoiding flaws with a small procedure how. 
Filippa deserves a 6 because she wrote improvements and how to complete the improvements. ]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:40 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831673 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831736 I am going to give him a 0 because he has nothing written there ]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:41 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831736 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831842 I think Filippa should get a four for strand 3 because she did not refer to her data to prove the validity of her hypothesis and she provided small amounts of reasoning.]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:44 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888831842 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832037 I think Vittoria P deserves a 6 in this strand because she explained the limitations of the experiment and what she could not do]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:50 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832037 26lauraa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832074 Maya deserves a 3-4 because she understood the patterns and she also wrote about the variables.]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:51 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832074 26marct3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832090 Jake gets a 6 because he backed up what he said with some examples.]]> 2020-11-04 06:21:52 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832090 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832663 I think lewis got a 1-2 for this because for in his conclusion he did not right a lot. He would only write one sentence or nothing.]]> 2020-11-04 06:22:09 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832663 26rubyr2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832699 Anna deserves a 5 because she has given suggestions on how to improve the procedures.]]> 2020-11-04 06:22:10 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888832699 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888834722 i think Isaac deserves a 5 for strand 4. because he has evaluated his method, and considered his procedures, and lab work.]]> 2020-11-04 06:23:02 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888834722 26makoa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888834770 Maya will deserve 5-6 because she wrote the two important thing that has to be done in the lab.]]> 2020-11-04 06:23:03 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888834770 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888835523 I am going to give him a 4-5 because he had the wrong graph but he did label and had the rest of the stuff.]]> 2020-11-04 06:23:25 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888835523 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888835792 I think Sera should get a six for strand 4 because she gave lots of examples of different flaws and stated lots of important things.]]> 2020-11-04 06:23:32 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888835792 26annas3 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888836190 Lucas deserve 4 because he didn't type anything for the last box but he did explain the details and results for improvments.]]> 2020-11-04 06:23:44 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888836190 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888836319 I think lewis deserves a 2-3 because he did state his hypothesis was wrong but that was it.]]> 2020-11-04 06:23:48 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888836319 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888837135 I am going to give him a 6 because he had nice science terms and also because I liked how explained it he showed every thing.]]> 2020-11-04 06:24:09 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888837135 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888838556 Could not Grade nothing there.:(]]> 2020-11-04 06:24:46 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888838556 26rubyr2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888838907 2020-11-04 06:24:57 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888838907 26isaacb2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888839511 Could not grade nothing there.:(]]> 2020-11-04 06:25:12 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888839511 26andreav https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888839557 laura- i give ]]> 2020-11-04 06:25:14 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/888839557 26xinyiz2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/889155243 I think Laura can gets a 5, because she did mention what flaws can she have, but it is not specific enough. ]]> 2020-11-04 08:40:24 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/889155243 26xinyiz2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/889165880 I think Layra can get a 5, because she did said what she can improve simply, but I think she can add more, instead of write nothing for the last question. ]]> 2020-11-04 08:44:50 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/889165880 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893306569 Ital had done a decent job in his conclusion and had answered his research question. He had given examples into why his hypothesis was true or correct using the data. I would give him a low 5 because I believe that he could have written more. ]]> 2020-11-05 09:15:19 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893306569 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893313349 Laura's hypothesis was clear and straight to the point. But she had failed to add any details and examples to explain more to her answer. Without this I would give her a low 4. ]]> 2020-11-05 09:18:04 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893313349 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893315623 Ital's hypothesis was quite clear, he stated if his hypothesis was either correct or wrong and gave evidence which was seen in his data. Because of this I would give him a high 5. ]]> 2020-11-05 09:19:08 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893315623 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893324114 I think Laura deserves a 1 because she had not thought outside of the box, she only had used the description for method 9 to actually answer the question. ]]> 2020-11-05 09:23:01 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893324114 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893328700 I believe that Ital deserves a 4-5 this is because he had thought of different things that he would need to keep consistent. They were straight to the point and made sense. He could have thought of other things but overall it was good.]]> 2020-11-05 09:24:55 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893328700 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893336590 I believe that she would get a 2 because she had only given one answer per question, I think that she could have thought of at least more than one thing to write per question. Also at one area she did not write anything. ]]> 2020-11-05 09:28:13 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893336590 26jaket https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893340810 I would give Ital a low 5 because he managed to answer most questions very well and in detail. I do think that he could have thought more about the last two questions and what he could have done.]]> 2020-11-05 09:30:03 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893340810 26karelp https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893387549 for strand 5 i believe Anna deserve 4-5 she did fill out the question but didn't really answer them like in question 11 when she talked about green and purple molecules moving energy and etc which was good but she didn't answer what improvements she could make to the flaws she had listed.]]> 2020-11-05 09:50:27 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893387549 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893466891 i give Isaac a 7 because he has provided details of how he suggests improvements to limitations in his procedures, and those suggestion was realistic and based on scientific reasoning and research.]]> 2020-11-05 10:27:27 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893466891 26makoa2 https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893556223 Maya will deserve 5-6 because the scentence was short but it was easy to understand. And it is based on the experince in the lab.]]> 2020-11-05 11:13:25 UTC https://padlet.com/stephaniemccue/zda0hpqeregv1guh/wish/893556223