Elements of social recognition 
Malala´s post is mainly connected with Chares Taylor and Axel Honneth's social recognition theories. 

Firstly, it associates with the Chares Taylor one, specifically in its “politics of equal recognition or politics of universalism”, which establishes a humanitarian and equal rights perspective. The activist's post demanded that, in the next session regarding the Afghanistan situation, global authorities stepped in to protect women´s rights since they had been violated by the Taliban by not upholding freedom of religion, banning them from two territories, and not giving them education opportunities. Additionally, she recognizes religion as an essential part of Afghanistan women´s identity. 

Addressing Axel Honneth's theory, the post relates to the solidarity and rights spheres of interaction for social recognition he proposes. Malala´s message reflects solidarity since she recognizes the importance of women´s autonomy to defend and exercise their religion and the protection of their rights. She uses her voice to stand for women in Afghanistan and to claim their social and legal inclusion in the territory. 

It also relates to the theory of  Nancy Fraser, for the french add is an amazing example of redistribution, and the belittlement of women in sports is born of the fact that the cultural value of sports was built around and for men.

Rights: Islam was the first religion to give women’s rights to inheritance. Education is a sacred duty for men and women. Women have the right to accept and decline a marriage, it has to be consent by her. They have freedom of expression. They can own money and property. 

Solidarity: Prophet Muhammad ended with infanticide and defended that a girl’s birth was a blessing. Many women feel comfortable with the religion, reason why 75% reverts of Muslim’s reverts are from women.

At the end of the video the girl says that Muslim community is far from perfect, but expresses that this religion has the clue of many women’s issues nowadays. Islam has been criticized and cataloged (mostly in western countries) as a sexiest religion in which women are subjugated and oppressed; but it is important to get to know more about people who practice it to be more empathetic and tolerant.

By this reel in Instagram, a guy shares with other people his own experience of being born in a body he was not comfortable with and how despite all his efforts for making people recognize him as a boy they didn't accept his identity and still see him as a girl (he cut his hair, changed his name, wore a binder, etc).

He makes a call to action asking people to stop calling him by his dead name and using she-her pronouns on him.

This example is directly linked to Taylor's politic of difference, which refers to specific groups that may be seen as inferior and subjugated by dominant groups.  

Throughout history the rights of the LGBTQ+ community have been violated and in fact some of their issues were considered as diseases by the World Health Organization. This reflects the knowledge, empathy and tolerance we had as a society. There’s still a lot of things to do, but with this kind of content people can reflect about otherness and intersectionality.

The social recognition for people that suffer of mentally health diseases needs to go beyond a superficial awareness that can drive to strong stigma and segregation against neurodiverse people. The post can be related to Charles Taylor’s approach, considering that he mentions: “a person’s understanding of who they are, of their fundamental characteristics as a human being” as the politics of recognition, is not seeing a person for their symptoms but understanding and including them as a part of the society that is valuable and capable with the right environment.

Also, according to Nancy Fraser the injustice of misrecognition is related to discrimination; the discrimination in academic, social and working areas for people that suffer of mental health diseases, ends in injustice of misrecognition, is impossible to actively participate and progress inside society if fundamental activities are denied or impetuous by health complications that also are related to a different other kinds of injustices such as racism, homophobia and sexism. In summary, the recognition of the differences should be focused on reducing the stigma and to give adequate opportunities for every individual. 

Elements of social recognition:
The diagnosis of autism can bring not just social stigma but also the misrecognition of their fundamental rights. Also in a intersectional perspective, the diagnosis of autism can directly affect on reproductive health; the points considered on the post are directly related to the understanding of recognition that Nancy Fraser suggests that can be:

By denying reproductive health and rights, also the independency is being denied and strengthening the institutionalized relation of subordination that can be lived through the hands of sexism but also by the stigma around neurodivergence. 

In addition to this, the spheres of interaction that Axel Honneth proposed, are being denied; love as a provider of self confidence is being denied when the right of having a family is also denied, as mentioned in the post not just in the reproductive violence but also in the parenting denial and custody removal; In the rights sphere “Social and legal exclusion can threaten one’s sense of realization and aspiration for equality and respect”, through this case, many rights are denied by the official diagnose of a disease, which is also necessary for the ones suffering autism to the recognition of other rights and to receive adequate treatment and the validation of their emotions and livings, so both the diagnose or the absence of it is an actual predisposition to the denial of fundamental rights; finally, in the solidarity sphere, the appreciation of differences is being denied by the stigma around the diagnosis that brakes people to search and accept the legal and medical intervention. Mental healthcare is evolving and growing inside our society, and, for a right development of a diverse world, it is important to recognize and embrace the differences far from segregation. 

A key point about social recognition is the phrase mentioned  by Honnet, “For it is only due to the cumulative acquisition of basic self-confidence, of self-respect, and of self-esteem… that a person can come to see himself or herself, unconditionally, as both an autonomous and an individuated being and to identify with his or her goals and desires” (1995). It is important to mention that this post, specifically talks about all the goals reached by women in a sport that has been labeled as masculine: football. Is important to recognize all different areas in this sport that women have been successful, such as sold-out for different matches, more sales in jerseys than men’s selection, debut of teenegers with 16 years and also, the use of hijab during participation of women in the game. All of these actions are a plus in the feminist path to recognize intersectionality that affects different layers of characteristics but also, to recognize women as empowering human beings with a lot of opportunities in different disciplines.