Gamification by

Is the research justified?

marcozaufl1 — 2024-06-06 09:57:20 UTC

Is the sample group adequate?

marcozaufl1 — 2024-06-06 09:59:57 UTC

Are our methods chosen wisely?

marcozaufl1 — 2024-06-06 10:02:24 UTC

Is the aim of our study fitting?

marcozaufl1 — 2024-06-06 10:03:41 UTC

Is the timeline when we conduct our study appropriate?

marcozaufl1 — 2024-06-06 10:04:46 UTC

2024-06-20 12:39:09 UTC

just a small correction, on your "Who?" slide, it says "NMS" but the term now is just MS, right?

andreaholzer1810_ — 2024-06-20 12:40:38 UTC

We agree that this topic is highly relevant in today’s time. Especially when thinking about that there is not yet really a lot of research on it. So, good choice!

2024-06-20 12:40:48 UTC

inclusion aspect: take different types of disabilities into account (especially at MS) and students with different L1s, and possible differentiation methods - how could they still participate in this activity, or would they be excluded?

Feedback

2024-06-20 12:42:25 UTC

Aim is fitting because it relates to aspects of learning that are very contemporary and presently relevant to the students’ experience.

As gamification is used more and more by teachers, it is important for us to know the impacts of using it in the classroom.

Earlier Start

lauralg — 2024-06-20 12:43:03 UTC

Maybe you want to consider to start even the school year before approaching schools. This means June the year before so schools can already think about which classes they can do this study with and which teacher would be suitable or willing to do this. And then you can ring them end of August to remind schools again. This would be maybe a more relaxed time table for you.

2024-06-20 12:47:00 UTC

comparison between MS and AHS could also be interesting

2024-06-20 12:50:52 UTC

The questionnaire makes a lot of sense when having such a big sample. One problem could be that students my not read the statements carefully. So the statements need to be simple and clearly formulated.