Case Study 7.2 by Jennifer Barringer https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7 Carly's Leadership en-us 2019-03-04 21:34:52 UTC 2025-12-23 12:10:00 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Manbag.png Carly's leadership ckansaku https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338683966 The teams know the relationships she has between the various teams.]]> 2019-03-07 01:58:22 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338683966 South East Table https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684028 1. Based on the principals of the LMX theory, what observations would you make about Carly’s leadership at Mill’s, Smith, & Peters?

Carly is not recognizing individual abilities and talents to the fullest extent. 

2. Is there an in-group and out-group, and if so, which are they?

Yes, there is an in group, and there is also an out group.

3. In what way is Carly’s relationship with the four groups productive or counterproductive to the overall goals of the agency?

Her relationship is counterproductive because she causes two groups to feel ostracized. She causes one groups to feel validated, but the out group is large and it can hurt the company.

4. Do you think Carly should change her approach toward the associate directors? If so, what should she do differently?

She should try to build a strong relationship with those who are in the out group. This may cause overall productivity to rise.

]]> 2019-03-07 01:58:38 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684028 #2. Jack ckansaku https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684267  He is the "In group". Sarah is the "out group"

]]> 2019-03-07 01:59:48 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684267 Table Three - K & S https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684273 1) She had a few volunteers that are dependable and committed. She relates to some of the followers but not to others.
2)  Jack's Team = In group
Teri & Julie = Out group
Sarah = neutral
3) With the "In group" it is productive because they produce work and go above and beyond for her. 
With the "Out group" is is counterproductive because they do not want to work for her and feel animosity towards her. 
4) Yes, she should change her approach. She shouldn't show favoritism towards anyone. ]]> 2019-03-07 01:59:50 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684273 1. ddennis10 https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684286 Jack's group is definitely the in group, and based on the theory the in group is willing to go above and beyond and that's what they did. 
2. Yes, there is an in group = Jack's; Julie & Terri's team = out
3. Carly's favoring of the in group, it seems to have a positive influence as they tend to be very productive. But it creates a counterproductiveenvironment with the rest of the groups.
4. Yes, she should try to change and show each associate director how they are valued;  and she 
should not be favoring to the point of isolating others.  ]]> 2019-03-07 01:59:52 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684286 Carl https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684608 2019-03-07 02:01:29 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684608 #3 ckansaku https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684704 It is counter productive because it pits people against each other.  It is also creates animosity. 

]]> 2019-03-07 02:01:52 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338684704 #4 ckansaku https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338685164 Yes, she should. She needs to collaborate and connect with all her employees.]]> 2019-03-07 02:04:04 UTC https://padlet.com/jbarringer/ch7/wish/338685164