<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Learning and Teaching Reading Group by Patricia Castellano</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/patricia_c/zb8at456j8f146hd</link>
      <description>Session 1: Collaboration and Co-creation in Academia</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-11-07 13:26:25 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-10-14 17:56:54 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>lindsay_coyle</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/patricia_c/zb8at456j8f146hd/wish/921040024</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Perhaps it would help to use the word ‘co-production’ more when working in the social sciences and related areas as I think people are familiar with the concept in a research context i.e. the co-production of knowledge. Though I don’t think people would be resistant to the word co-creation, it is just that I think more people would recognise co-production. Might be a bit confusing to add another word into the mix! LC<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-13 17:28:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/patricia_c/zb8at456j8f146hd/wish/921040024</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>lindsay_coyle</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/patricia_c/zb8at456j8f146hd/wish/921043181</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I like the idea of asking students/ participants starting a module about what their prior knowledge is and what they are seeking to learn (perhaps through a questionnaire before the first session). This could then shape the learning. LC<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-13 17:29:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/patricia_c/zb8at456j8f146hd/wish/921043181</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>UWSLT</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/patricia_c/zb8at456j8f146hd/wish/926368073</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I wonder if it's the recognition of collaboration, rather than collaborative work itself that needs further support? <br><br>I'd argue that if we were to take a fairly broad view of what collaboration means, there would be very little work in academia that is not, to some extent, collaborative. <br><br>For example, certain in arts subjects (e.g. Literature, which I'm most familiar with), researchers do a lot of work on their own and it's not very common to see a co-authored article. But, then, collected editions are very common - isn't this a form of collaboration? What about conferences where people come together to share ideas and discuss their research, is this a form of collaboration? When a researcher reads and responds to the existing literature in their field, could this be understood as a collaborative endeavour? - EK</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-16 09:16:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/patricia_c/zb8at456j8f146hd/wish/926368073</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
