1. Our LLT is meeting monthly to monitor the progress of our Action Plan and discuss next steps.

2. Each meeting has a targeted agenda to direct our LLT work.

1. We have increased professional development in reading this year.

2. Teachers are digging deeper into data and supporting students based on this targeted information.

3. We are celebrating the growth we are seeing as a result with both students and staff.

We've done collaborative planning where we discussed a standard across grade levels to plan instruction. We then planned a unit and watched the unit taught in different classrooms. Then, we regrouped to discuss improvements and student engagement/learning from instruction. Then had opportunities to reteach for better understanding.

We found a barrier that students did not know how to answer certain test questions, so we started giving students practice questions that closely align to question types they would see on the FAST.

1. We are having meetings to discuss data and how to use the data for instructional implications.

2. We see evidence in 3rd grade planning for small groups, and growth within their data.

   
   

We discussed the school wide focus on Central Idea. We hosted PLC, School-wide Data Chats, and Grade-level chats to strengthen our tier 1 instruction.

1. We are celebrating growth from PM1 to PM2. We have had many students increase scale score from 8-10 points.

2. The LL Team used PM2 data reports to meet with teachers to implement specific targeted tier 2 interventions.

1. Our school has implemented daily intervention groups across all grade levels for targeted instruction.

2. We review data at our monthly grade level data meetings to point instruction to students’ immediate needs.

1. We met with all grade levels to discuss which standard our school needs to address school wide.

2. We discussed the use of graphic organizers in all subject areas and heard ideas on how to address improvement on this standard.

1. We have celebrated staff with the Circle of Excellence Awards based on student proficiency rates

• Additional data celebrations took place rewarding student growth rate

• Increased number of teachers working towards micro- credentials

  
  

  2. Evidence has been seen through classroom visuals from word walls to sound walls to align with the UFLI curriculum

• 
  

1. Our school has planned and implemented Learning Walks across grade levels at our school and with district developers/other schools this year.

2. Our PM2 data indicates a decrease in overall level 1s and an increase in level 2s across most grade levels. (ELA)

1. We used PM2 data to meet with specific grade levels to develop plans for standard-based instruction.

2. Lesson plans; classroom observations.

   
   

We have observed an increase in collaborative teamwork, more benchmark aligned activities and small groups, and celebrations of student success.

1. We have analyzed our PM2 data and made instructional decisions based on what we saw.

2. We have a targeted focus on being more intentional with teaching and using the language of the standards.

3. We have created strategic tutoring groups based on our most recent data.

4. Teacher collaboration has increased.

   
   

1. We were able to incorporate a focus on idioms and figurative language as part of our CLW activities. With literature, songs, and videos students and teachers had resources at their fingertips.

2. Students participating in book tasting events, loving going on a blind date with a book, and begging for more. Every morning students run to the circulation desk to check out books. We have to kick them out to make it to class on time. They ate sharing AR test scores and seeing the connection of all these things.

1. We created a purpose statement for our school's LLT and started the process of evaluating our current practices with our values in mind.

2. In our classrooms, we are seeing implementation of UFLI in all K/1 rooms and growth in T3 decoding.

1. Out LLT meets each week to collaborate and plan. Our student data drives our upcoming instruction.

2. Our meeting focuses on student academic needs to support continued growth. We consult with our media specialist who researchers and provides instructional materials based on classroom literary needs.

1. We have solidified a schedule for data chats and have a plan to meet with each teacher or team to target specific standards to monitor.

2. We have a weekly check in to monitor progress of targeted standards and made a plan to support teachers and their instruction in these areas.

1. Our LLT has offered more specific training based on data and needs of our teachers. We have increased collaborative discussions between the team, teachers and staff.

2. We've received positive feedback about the trainings. Observed lessons with reading strategies being implemented across grade levels.

3. Students are invested in their data, and excited to see gains.

4. PM2 data is showing positive results.

1. Our LLT has accomplished multiple goals we set in the November meeting. Our focus was on Prose/Poetry Benchmarks. We incorporated Tier 1 instruction support through a schoolwide Spiral Review. We also incorporated support specifically with R.1.4 into our After Owls tutoring sessions.

2. We have seen evidence of growth through formative assessment in the classrooms, pre/post tests in our After Owls program, and through the data in PM2.

1. We meet on a regular basis to discuss data w/the admin team and weekly during collaborative planning to address celebrations, areas of improvement and how to pivot when necessary

2. When we meet we have a targeted discussion related to how and who will close the gaps to yield high student achievement. As a result, there's an increase in proficiency within our intermediate grades.

1. We have implemented more cross curricular collaborative planning. Including special area classes to support classroom instruction and meet special area standards- media, music, art…

2. We are witnessing better student understanding, deeper conversations, student enthusiasm for learning and academic performance has increased.

We able able to discuss standards and strategies to be used schoolwide with the LLT.

By having these collaborative discussions, students are excited about reaching their AR goals and grade level standards.

Students have become more excited about reading.

1. We host weekly collaborative planning meetings with core subject teachers and special area teachers. We have increased data chats amongst administration, teachers, and students (almost daily). We have implemented more interventions after identifying literacy deficits. We have increased reading challenges across campus.

2. Student accountability has increased campus-wide. Students are now more motivated to read. The ELL students are now more engaged in class and school activities because of the intentional focus to teach them the English language.

1. We focused on improving writing in our third grade classrooms. We met with all our teachers, discussed their data (STAR-Standards Mastery Report), provided a collaborative planning opportunity, and useful teaching tools.

2. We have seen an improvement in our third grade student writing samples. Both teachers and students are more excited about the writing process.