Student Expression Discussion by John Godfrey https://padlet.com/godfreyjo/legalaspects Respond to all the three questions by commenting your answer. Before writing your response, take a look at what's been written already by our classmates. SIGN YOUR NAME ON YOUR RESPONSE. en-us 2021-06-23 15:37:36 UTC 2021-07-08 19:36:43 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f5e3.png Question #1: In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, we know that the school created a ban specifically for the black armbands — rather than banning all symbols of political expression. Imagine that the school created a ban on ALL political symbols. Would that have changed the outcome or opinion of the Court? godfreyjo https://padlet.com/godfreyjo/legalaspects/wish/1621910407 2021-06-23 15:41:07 UTC https://padlet.com/godfreyjo/legalaspects/wish/1621910407 Question #2: In Bethel v. Fraser, schools were given the right to discipline students for "lewd" speech. How might school abuse or overextend their definition of "lewd"? godfreyjo https://padlet.com/godfreyjo/legalaspects/wish/1621915513 2021-06-23 15:44:05 UTC https://padlet.com/godfreyjo/legalaspects/wish/1621915513 Question #3: Imagine one of your students occasionally shouts an incoherent phrase in your classroom (of course this would *never* happen to any of us). This happens about once a week, and it takes about 30 seconds for you to reset the class. You expect that it's a potentially inappropriate inside joke, since other students typically laugh and repeat the phrase in class. You ask the student about it, but they insist that it means nothing. Do you have a right to discipline the student? Refer back to Bethel v. Fraser in your response. godfreyjo https://padlet.com/godfreyjo/legalaspects/wish/1621930354 2021-06-23 15:53:07 UTC https://padlet.com/godfreyjo/legalaspects/wish/1621930354