https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s en-us 2020-11-18 15:14:32 UTC 2024-07-14 17:30:15 UTC hello@padlet.com jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937114933 Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger

Associate Justices:
William O. Douglas  
William J. Brennan Jr. 
Potter Stewart 
Byron White 
Thurgood Marshall ·
Harry Blackmun 
Lewis F. Powell Jr. 
William Rehnquist

]]> 2020-11-18 15:19:27 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937114933 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937244673 In 1965, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law that banned the distribution of birth control to married couples.

In 1970, Hawaii became the first state to legalize abortion, and later that year, New York legalized abortion as well.

In 1969, a Texas woman by the name of Norma McCorvey wanted to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. At the time, abortion was legal in Texas, but only if the purpose was to save a woman's life. After unsuccessfully attempting to get an illegal abortion, McCorvey met with attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington who were interested in challenging anti-abortion laws. In court documents, Norma McCorvey became known as "Jane Roe."

In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed a lawsuit on behalf of McCorvey and all women "who were or might become pregnant and want to consider options," against Henry Wade, the District Attorney of Dallas, Texas.


]]> 2020-11-18 15:41:37 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937244673 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937318877 In 1970, a three-judge panel of Texas judges ruled that the state of Texas' ban was illegal due to the fact that it violated a constitutional right to privacy. Later, Wade announced that he would continue to prosecute doctors who performed abortions. 

]]> 2020-11-18 15:54:45 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937318877 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937340336 Petitioner's Argument
Norma McCorvey argued that:
The Texas law infringes upon a woman's right to privacy recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut.

The right to an abortion should be recognized as a fundamental right.

The Texas Law violates the fundamental right of doctors to give medical care.

Respondent's Counter-Argument
Wade argued that:
There is no right to an abortion stated in the Constitution.

Griswold v. Connecticut protected marital privacy, not the right to choose an abortion.

A fetus is a "person," and by permitting abortions, that would derpive a person of life.]]> 2020-11-18 15:58:33 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937340336 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937355458 Does the Texas law that makes it a crime to perform an abortion unless it is "necessary," to save the life of the mother violate the Constitutional?]]> 2020-11-18 16:01:13 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937355458 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937364050 The Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Constitution protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.]]> 2020-11-18 16:02:43 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937364050 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937444833 aka Jane Roe]]> 2020-11-18 16:16:49 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937444833 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937461952 The Supreme Court ruled in 7-2 decision, striking down the Texas state law banning abortion and effectively legalizing abortion across the United States.

The majority opinion was written by Justice Harry Blackmun and cited that a woman's right to an abortion was an implicit in the right to privacy protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.]]> 2020-11-18 16:19:35 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937461952 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937517436 2020-11-18 16:29:02 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937517436 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937761432
Dissenting opinion authored by Justice Byron White exclaimed that the court's decision was arbitrary at best and was "an exercise of raw judicial power."

Dissenting opinion by Justice William Rehnquist stated that he does not believe the right of privacy is involved and that the Fourteenth Amendment as well as its Due Process Clause is too vague to have influence on the decision.

Concurring opinion authored by Justice William O. Douglas recognized the vagueness and that the Ninth Amendment does not create enforceable laws. 

Concurring opinion from Justice Potter Steward noted decisions from Griswold v. Connecticut and Ferguson v. Skrupa. Stated that the Due Process Clause protects the freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life. ]]> 2020-11-18 17:11:34 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/937761432 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939604454 The ruling of Roe v. Wade was a landmark decision and among the most debated to this day. The court ruled that the Constitution protects a pregnant woman's right to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction, and in many cases, making abortion legal across the United States. This case ruled against the District Attorney of Dallas, Henry Wade and declared that the Texas law that states abortion illegal unless it was necessary to save a woman's life is unconstitutional. This Supreme Court case is arguably the most disputed case today, with Americans split between Pro-Life and Pro-Choice. Roe v. Wade is as prevalent today as it was in 1973.]]> 2020-11-19 02:37:22 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939604454 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939629436 2020-11-19 02:51:38 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939629436 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939634288 This court case is an example of judicial activism because it ruled that the Texas law that made abortion illegal unless absolutely necessary was unconstitutional, and effectively, legalizing it across the United States.

The justices found that the right to privacy stated in the Fourteenth Amendment included a woman's right to an abortion. Although there is nothing in the Constitution about abortions, they were able to interpret in such a way to consider the broader implications that the ruling had.]]> 2020-11-19 02:54:24 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939634288 jpitts6944 https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939647084 2020-11-19 03:01:38 UTC https://padlet.com/jpitts6944/z12ak54yi0osby2s/wish/939647084