<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Group 7 by Jar&#39;Queisha Thomas</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s</link>
      <description>Muckrakers: Ida Tarbell and Jacob Riis
Progressive President: Woodrow Wilson
Progressive Topic: PLessy V Ferguson </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-01-29 16:22:54 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-07-25 00:02:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ida Tarbell- History of the Standard Oil Company (Jar&#39;Queisha)</title>
         <author>jthom98481</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325503338</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Tarbell’s devastating work provides a vivid account of the rough-and-tumble nature of<br>business around the turn of the century. This excerpt highlights struggles involving John<br>D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, independent oil men, and railroads. Note in<br>particular that during the late 19th century, government at all levels, rather than being<br>an instrument to control big business, was instead used by big businesses as a tool with<br>which to bludgeon their opponents. It is worth noting that Standard Oil, not feeling they<br>were doing anything wrong, opened their records to Tarbell's investigation, a decision<br>they no doubt came to regret. The Company was broken up in 1911, though its<br>descendants are alive and well today as the Exxon Corporation.<br>With Congress in such a temper the oil men felt that there might be some hope of<br>securing the regulation of interstate commerce they had asked for in 1872. The agitation<br>resulted in the presentation in the House of Representatives of the first Interstate<br>Commerce Bill which promised to be effective. The bill was presented by James H.<br>Hopkins of Pittsburgh. In aid of his bill a House investigation was asked. It was soon<br>evident that the Standard was an enemy of this investigation. Now what Mr. Hopkins<br>wanted was to compel the railroads to present their contracts with the Standard Oil<br>Company. The Committee summoned the proper railroad officers and the treasurer of the<br>Standard Oil Company. Of the railroad men, only one appeared, and he refused to answer<br>the questions asked or to furnish the documents demanded. The Standard treasurer<br>refused also to furnish the committee with information. The two principal witnesses of<br>the oil men were E. G. Patterson of Titusville and Frank Rockefeller of Cleveland, a<br>brother of John D. Rockefeller. Mr. Patterson sketched the history of the oil business<br>since the South Improvement Company identified the Standard Oil Company with that<br>organization, and framed the specific complaint of the oil men, as follows: “The railroad<br>companies have combined with an organization of individuals known as the Standard<br>Ring; they give to that party the sole and entire control of all the petroleum refining<br>interest and petroleum shipping interest in the United States, and consequently place the<br>whole producing interest entirely at their mercy. If they succeed they place the price of<br>refined oil as high as they please. It is simply optional with them how much to give us for<br>what we produce.”<br>Frank Rockefeller gave a pretty complete story of the trials of an independent refiner. He<br>declared that at the moment, his concern, the Pioneer Oil Company, was unable to get the<br>same rates as the Standard; the freight agent frankly told him that unless he could give the<br>road the same amount of oil to transport that the Standard did, he could not give the rate<br>the Standard enjoyed. Mr. Rockefeller said that in his belief there was a pooling<br>arrangement between the railroads and the Standard and that the rebate given was<br>“divided up between the Standard Oil Company and the railroad officials.” He repeatedly<br>declared to the committee that he did not know this to be a positive fact, that he had no <br>proof, but that he believed such was the truth. …<br>Of course after this controversy the railroads were more obdurate than ever. The railroad<br>men were active in securing the suppression of the investigations, and they soon<br>succeeded not only in doing that but in pigeon-holing for the time Mr. Hopkins's<br>Interstate Commerce Bill…<br>…In the meantime the Pennsylvania Transportation Company made the most strenuous<br>efforts to secure the right of way. A large number of men were sent out to talk over the<br>farmers into signing the leases. Hand bills were distributed with an appeal to be generous<br>and to free the oil business from a monopoly that was crushing it. These same circulars<br>told the farmers that a monopoly had hired agents all along the route misrepresenting the<br>facts about their intentions. Mr. Harley, under the excitement of the enterprise and the<br>opposition it aroused, became a public figure, and in October the New York Graphic gave<br>a long interview with him. In this interview Mr. Harley claimed that the pipe-line scheme<br>was gotten up to escape the Standard Oil monopoly. Litigation, he declared, was all his<br>scheme had to fear. “John D. Rockefeller, president of the Standard monopoly,” he said,<br>“is working against us in the country newspapers, prejudicing the farmers and raising<br>issues in the courts, and seeking also to embroil us with other carrying lines.”.<br>-Citation: <a href="http://wwpsd.sharpschool.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10640642/File/bugge/Chapter%2021/Day2ReadingsCombined.pdf">http://wwpsd.sharpschool.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10640642/File/bugge/Chapter%2021/Day2ReadingsCombined.pdf</a><br><br><br><br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Summary</strong><br>Ida Tarbell had a passion for writing. Later Tarbell became a journalists for The&nbsp; McClure's Magazines. Doing business with McClure's Magazine led to the exposing of the Standard Oil Company. Tarbell exposed unfair practices of the company. The reason she exposed the company practices was because most of all the events and practices&nbsp; greatly impacted her and her family.&nbsp; </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-01-29 17:20:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325503338</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jacob Riis- How the Other Half Lives  (Daniel)</title>
         <author>dande0553</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325947855</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The first tenement New York knew bore the mark of Cain from its birth, though a generation passed before the writing was deciphered. It was the “rear house,” infamous ever after in our city’s history. There had been tenant-houses before, but they were not built for the purpose. Nothing would probably have shocked their original owners more than the idea of their harboring a promiscuous crowd; for they were the decorous homes of the old Knickerbockers, the proud aristocracy of Manhattan in the early days.<br><br></div><div><br>It was the stir and bustle of trade, together with the tremendous immigration that followed upon the war of 1812 that dislodged them. In thirty-five years the city of less than a hundred thousand came to harbor half a million souls, for whom homes had to be found. Within the memory of men not yet in their prime, Washington had moved from his house on Cherry Hill as too far out of town to be easily reached. Now the old residents followed his example; but they moved in a different direction and for a different reason. Their comfortable dwellings in the once fashionable streets along the East River front fell into the hands of real-estate agents and boarding-house keepers; and here, says the report to the Legislature of 1857, when the evils engendered had excited just alarm, “in its beginning, the tenant-house became a real blessing to that class of industrious poor whose small earnings limited their expenses, and whose employment in workshops, stores, or about the warehouses and thoroughfares, render a near residence of much importance.”<br>-Citation: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45502/45502-h/45502-h.htm">https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45502/45502-h/45502-h.htm</a><br>-Summary:  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-01-30 17:34:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325947855</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Woodrow Wilson (Daniel)</title>
         <author>dande0553</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325953818</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Pump1913.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-01-30 17:45:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325953818</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Woodrow Wilson (Daniel)</title>
         <author>dande0553</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325959196</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Citation: <a href="http://www.politicsarchive.com/election-of-1912-wilson.html">http://www.politicsarchive.com/election-of-1912-wilson.html</a><br>-Summary: He is priming the pump of Business Prosperity. This picture shows that President Wilson developed policies concerning the Tariff, Anti-Trust, and Currency Legislation. Which all that caused the economy to grow.  Shows him putting his progressive side of him to work, and willing to regulate trusts.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-01-30 17:56:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/325959196</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Plessy V. Ferguson (Jar&#39;Queisha) </title>
         <author>jthom98481</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/326498582</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>During the court case Plessy  V Ferguson the courts decided to make this law that implied citizens were  "Separate but equal". This political cartoon is showing a "car for white folks" and a "Jim Crow car". The political cartoon just shows that in reality the citizens were still not equal. The Car with whites was crushing the blacks (Jim Crow). <br><a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=plessy+v+ferguson+political+cartoon&amp;rlz=1CAXGER_enUS784US784&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=isch&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjP85qXgZngAhULDq0KHdRjBn8Q_AUIDigB&amp;biw=1366&amp;bih=697#imgrc=7zLreSEQubCd6M:">https://www.google.com/search?q=plessy+v+ferguson+political+cartoon&amp;rlz=1CAXGER_enUS784US784&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=isch&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjP85qXgZngAhULDq0KHdRjBn8Q_AUIDigB&amp;biw=1366&amp;bih=697#imgrc=7zLreSEQubCd6M:</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.awesomestories.com/images/user/fedc23c91c0a691f5116ff60e4f9e029.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-01-31 21:48:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jthom98481/z0r0n0dqz58s/wish/326498582</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
