2) One source is supportive of ____ vs One source is unsupportive of _____

3a) HLA 1: INTENTION OF AUTHOR, KAMO

3b) HLA 2: OBJECTIVE TREATMENT OF ISSUE (+ and -) vs 1-SIDED TREATMENT

Source A

The cartoonist in Source A would agree with the teacher in Source B in saying that ChatGPT shouldn't be fully relied on by students for their learning. This is evident as Source A shows a cartoon depicting a student believing that 2+2=22 just because ChatGPT says so. This shows that due to ChatGPT, it can alter student's thoughts even though the information ChatGPT gives is false information. This is also evident as Source B states that "With ChatGPT addressing the more straightforward and factual question" This suggests that ChatGPT should only be used in simpler question which can prevent it from generating false information and the complex question should be answered by the teacher as ChatGPT might mistake the question as another question and feed the students false information which the student would believe in. This will hinder the students learning process instead of helping it. The cartoonist in Source A would agree with the teacher in Source B in saying that ChatGPT shouldn't be fully relied on by students for their learning.

The cartoonist disagrees with source A about ChatGPT improving students' thinking process since the ChatGPT gave an inaccurate answer in source A by saying 2+2=22, students did not process the information and just gave the teacher their answer. Hence, this shows that students do not process the information given out by ChatGPT. However, in source B, it states ¨students can clarify their learning against what ChatGPT throws up.¨ Suggest that students can compare their ideas with ChatGPT which can improve their thinking process and deepen their thinking.

The cartoonist would disagree with the teacher in source B on the reliability of AI for learning. Source B states that "With ChatGPT addressing the more straightforward and factual questions, he has more time to delve into the subject matter" showing that ChatGPT can be used to answer simple questions, however source A shows ChatGPT giving a student the wrong answer to a simple question such as 2+2. This shows that AI such as ChatGPT can provide wrong answers to factual answers, thus making it unreliable for learning, directly contradicting the teacher's stance in source B. Hence, the cartoonist would disagree with the teacher in source B.

Overall, the cartoonist would disagree with the teacher in source B on the use of AI for learning due to a difference in agenda. Source A is written by a cartoonist in an online publication, trying to dissuade the use of AI in classrooms due to its unreliability, as shown in the cartoon where AI provides a student with the wrong answer to a simple question. However, source B is written by a teacher from the Ministry of Education, who is promoting the use of AI in classrooms as he recognises the opportunities it presents for learning, allowing students to understand and learn more in a shorter period of time. Hence, due to a difference in viewpoints, the cartoonist in source A would disagree with the teacher in source B.