Quay video ngắn khoảng 2 phút đưa ra quan điểm của con về chủ đề: "Should we assign homework in schools?"

2. Quay video ngắn khoảng 2 phút đưa ra quan điểm của con về chủ đề: "Do video games help young students develop useful skills or promote addictive behavior in young players?"

In my opinion, should freedom of speech be limited in certain cases ?.For me, we should limit them in some cases cuz some cases can relate to online violence. For example as “Facebook”. Many people have use bad words while arguing online for something as “taking arts on printerest and tell that i make it:)”. In this case many people may use bad words to scold so the app can limit 😔those bad words for some reason in some cases 🤓☝️. If the app let people have free speech then some cases like i just tell can have offensive speeches 🤓👍. And there are many young people using the entertainment app and they might can see those post and learn bad words 😔😔😔 that could cause to the child being naughty 😈. So that IS THE EVIDENCE for my opinion 🤓☝️. So for summary, we should limit speeches in those cases 😈😈😈. Thanks for listening 🤓☝️.

Con thề vs cô là con tự viết😔.

2. Quay video ngắn khoảng 2 phút đưa ra quan điểm của con về chủ đề: "Animal experimentation: Should it be banned or not?"

- Quay video ngắn khoảng 2 phút đưa ra quan điểm của con về chủ đề: "Advertising: Does it have a positive or negative impact on consumer behavior?"
(Con chú ý những phần cô đã dạy trên lớp nhé!)

- Quay video ngắn khoảng 2 phút đưa ra quan điểm của con về chủ đề: "Does single-sex education really promote gender equality or does it discriminate and hinder students' learning opportunities?"

The debate over single-sex education and its impact on gender equality is complex and multifaceted. Advocates argue that it creates tailored learning environments, allowing students to thrive without the social pressures often present in co-educational settings. They believe it can help address gender-specific learning needs and empower students, particularly in subjects where traditional stereotypes may hinder participation. However, critics contend that single-sex education reinforces gender stereotypes and limits opportunities for students to interact and collaborate with peers of different genders, skills crucial for the modern world. By segregating students, such systems may inadvertently perpetuate inequality by failing to prepare them for diverse, inclusive environments. Ultimately, whether single-sex education promotes equality or fosters discrimination depends on how it is implemented and the cultural contexts in which it exists.

- Quay video ngắn khoảng 2 phút đưa ra quan điểm của con về chủ đề: "Clean water and sanitation: Should we rely on natural water sources or change our behavior to ensure sustainable water resources?"

End

Các bạn chuẩn bị và mang theo tài liệu cho buổi học sau

Các bạn thuyết trình ý tưởng theo nhóm đã chia

- Ủng hộ Prioritize renewable energy: Phương Thảo, Minh Châu, Gia Linh, Gia Khang, Hà Trang

- Ủng hộ Apply strict energy efficiency standards: Khánh Ngọc, Hải Phong, Tuấn Kiệt, Quỳnh Chi, Hà Chi

2. Tìm hiểu thông tin và chuẩn bị cho chủ đề: “Should we focus on sustainable urban development or protecting the rural environment more to achieve comprehensive development?"

• Economic Growth: Urban areas can drive economic growth through innovation and job creation.

• Infrastructure: Better infrastructure and services can lead to improved living standards.

• Sustainability Technologies: Cities can implement green technologies more effectively.

Reducing Economic Disparities – Rural areas often face underdevelopment, poor infrastructure, and fewer job opportunities. Prioritizing rural projects ensures a more balanced economic landscape.

Preventing Overcrowding in Cities – Urban areas suffer from congestion, pollution, and housing crises. Investing in rural areas encourages people to stay instead of migrating to cities.

Boosting Agricultural & Local Industries – Rural development can improve agriculture, fisheries, and cottage industries, strengthening the national economy.

1. Economic Growth: Investing in rural areas can stimulate economic activities by improving infrastructure, supporting local businesses, and creating jobs.

2. Reduction of Urban Migration: By enhancing the living conditions and opportunities in rural areas, fewer individuals may feel compelled to move to urban centers in search of better prospects, which helps alleviate overcrowding in cities.

3. Social Equity: Focusing on rural development can help bridge the gap in access to education, healthcare, and basic services, fostering a more equitable society.

4. Sustainability: Rural initiatives can prioritize sustainable practices in agriculture and resource management, promoting environmental conservation.

Challenges to Consider

1. Resource Allocation: Balancing investment between urban and rural development projects can be challenging. Urban areas often receive more funding due to higher population densities and economic returns.

2. Infrastructure Needs: Rural areas may require significant investment in infrastructure, such as roads, telecommunications, and electricity, to be effective.

3. Cultural Factors: There may be differing views on what constitutes "development" in rural versus urban contexts, reflecting local values and traditions.

4. Political Will: Advocacy for rural projects may lack the political momentum that urban initiatives often receive, necessitating strong leadership and community engagement.

Conclusion

Prioritizing rural development is essential for addressing regional disparities. A strategic approach that considers local needs, incorporates community input, and ensures sustainable practices can lead to a more balanced and equitable development model.

1. Physical Health: Regular physical activity helps combat obesity, diabetes, and other health issues among children and teenagers. It promotes cardiovascular health and strengthens bones and muscles.

2. Mental Health: Physical activity is linked to improved mood and reduced anxiety and stress. It can help students focus better in class and may lower symptoms of depression.

3. Academic Performance: Studies indicate that students who engage in regular physical activity tend to perform better academically. Exercise boosts brain function and concentration.

4. Social Skills: Participating in physical activities often involves teamwork and cooperation, helping students develop social skills and friendships.

Arguments Against Daily Requirements

1. Curriculum Limitations: Some argue that mandating daily physical activity could take time away from core academic subjects, potentially hindering educational outcomes.

2. Resource Constraints: Not all schools have the facilities or qualified personnel to provide daily physical activity, which could lead to disparities between schools.

3. Student Preferences: Some students may not be interested in physical activities offered at school, and mandated participation might lead to negative experiences.

Possible Solutions

• Flexibility in Activities: Schools could offer a range of physical activities to engage different interests, such as dance, yoga, sports, or outdoor activities.

• Integration into the Curriculum: Physical activity could be integrated into other subjects, such as including movement breaks during lessons or using active learning strategies.

• Community Partnerships: Schools could collaborate with local organizations to provide resources and activities that could enhance physical education programs.

Conclusion

Overall, the question of whether schools should be required to provide daily physical activity for students hinges on balancing health benefits with educational priorities and resource availability. Advocating for a structured approach that prioritizes student well-being while addressing academic needs could lead to a more holistic education system.