Is adaptable in various subjects.

It uses balance by widening your technology world, but it does not take away from classroom learning.

Holistic approach: Looking at technology as a whole rather than individual parts.

Complex: Hard to understand because all components need to be balanced.

It needs more practicability for teachers who struggle with technology integration.

Detailed levels of progression (Entry, Adoption, Adaptation, Infusion, transformation).

Student centered learning.

It is just a "guide", so it will not fit into every class subject and will require more research form teachers.

Easy frame work to work off of in the classroom.

Engages a deeper level of thinking.

May prioritize the use of technology rather than actually learning about it.

Lack of depth.

Student-centered learning.

Easy to understand with measurable goals

Incorporated the use of technology with technology learning.

It focuses on the three ideas but misses the mark on other important goals.

There is not one set understanding of the framework; it can be interpreted differently by many educators.