https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo en-us 2019-01-10 20:00:38 UTC 2019-01-11 14:06:49 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319659949 1. I don't think the British had the right to ban sati because it is the hindu's belief and it is not their place to enforce the British ideas. I agree it was not morally right, but they could make it the wife choice or they could have a vote.
2. I dont think you have to respect other peoples rituals or beliefs but you should not limit their ability to act on the beliefs. 
3. I think that many things societies may disagree in because of their history or religion. but i think that most people think the murder (not in self defense) of another human is morally wrong.most people also agree that bribery or corruption in the government or legal system is also bad. i also think everyone can agree that volentering and helping with the sick, poor or homless is a good thing and should be encuraged. There are probably more things we can agree are good, than things we can agree are bad.]]> 2019-01-11 13:56:50 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319659949 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660007 1. I think that the British had the right idea to ban Sati because it promoted women to kill themselves after their husbands had died, and the British did not want this mistreatment to continue. On the other hand, I do not think that the British had the right to ban Sati because it was a religious ritual that that the Indians followed, and the British cannot take that away from them.
2. I think that it is important that we respect others cultural and religious beliefs. If you believed it something, you would not want a foreign person (to your religion) come and ban it. Although I believe this, I also believe that if the ritual is something very violent that can affect many people in a terrible way, I think that at that time it is okay to do something to fix the issue at hand.
3. I think that most societies believe in the idea of nonviolence]]> 2019-01-11 13:56:57 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660007 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660032 1. I think the British had no right to ban Sati because it was a religious  belief they had. I understand that Santi is killing people, but that is known in their religion and that is something that they believe in. 
2.I believe we do have to respect other peoples religion and practices. I may not like the religion or practices but I can respect it.
3. I think respect is a moral belief that everyone wants to follow but they don't always.]]> 2019-01-11 13:56:59 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660032 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660171 I don't think British had the right to ban Sati because it was part of the Hindu's lives and the way they view that their lives should be. Banning this would hurt the Hindus because it was a ritual in their religion. 
2.I think that it is always right to respects others peoples way of life and religious believes. Since everyone is their own different person, we should accept what they believe even if we disagree. I think there is no reason to judge or hurt someone if they have different opinions than you. 
3. I think society agrees and disagrees on many concepts in life. It is hard to all come together and agree when each person is their own individual and is different from each and every person. Depending on circumstances, I think sometimes people come together and agree on an act or some type of movement, but in the end everyone has different mind sets on life.]]> 2019-01-11 13:57:18 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660171 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660197 1. I think that the British had the right to ban Sati because it was killing people. Although it was a part of a religious ritual, it still saved people from dying.
2. I think we do have to respect other people's beliefs because it is typically something they strongly believe in and live their lives based around those beliefs.
3. I think that society disagrees on many themes and ideas, however it also agrees on some things as well. For example, the majority of society believes in freedom of religion as long as it doesn't impact other peoples beliefs. Religion is important in many families so people believe they should have the right to practice their beliefs. ]]> 2019-01-11 13:57:23 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660197 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660376 1. I believe the British was allowed to say it should be banned, because it was a mistreatment of women and should not have been issued initially. However,  I don't know how much debate occurred regarding this law, but the Indians should have been allowed to state their case. The law was an awful action upon women and should not been let to continue. 
2. I believe we have should respect other people’s views and cultural/religious beliefs, but when an action is put in place where women are constantly at risk, their lives are above an awful happening. With that being said, I also believe that one can discern their own choices and come to their own conclusions regarding whether they would take their life for their religious beliefs. 
3. I believe that the societies were constantly arguing, but they both believed in their own natural state of wellness to a point. They both believed in education, because it evidently proved important. ]]> 2019-01-11 13:57:44 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660376 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660485 1. I do not think the British had the right to ban the sati, IF the women wanted to do it. It should have remained as a choice for the women to make if they wanted to do so. But i do not believe the British have the right to take away a group of people's religion. 
2.  Yes, everyone should always respect other people's views and beliefs. They our not ours to judge wether they are wrong or immoral. It is disgusting to judge a group of people off of their beliefs and cultural views. It does not matter if we do not believe in their views it is not something one takes upon themselves to intervene in.
3. Most everyone in society has ]]> 2019-01-11 13:57:58 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660485 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660986 1. I do believe that the British had a right to make Sati illegal because in the end you are taking someones life a way and the government should have a say on that.
2. I think you do need to respect others cultural and religious practices, but sometimes it is too far. Just because you ban something does not mean you are disrespecting the culture. 
3. one absolute moral value is killing someone. I think that is pretty absolute as most governments have banned it, and most religions promote the importance of your life.]]> 2019-01-11 13:58:50 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319660986 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661086 1.  While I may believe the practice of Sati is bad and degrading to woman, I do not believe that the British have any right to ban it. It is a sacred belief that is a apart of the Hindu faith and the British have no right to ban it. 
2. I think we all have different  cultural/religious beliefs, and even if they violate my own sense of fairness and justice, I hold no place to judge or disregard it. Just as no one had the right to tell my mother not to have me baptized, I have no right no disrespect anyone else's, no matter how much they differ from my own. 
3. I wish I could say that there is at least one thing we all can agree on. I feel as though writing something here would not be true. ]]> 2019-01-11 13:59:02 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661086 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661146 1. Whether they can ban it or not depends on how the women felt about this trait. If women dreaded this and would rather live on without their husband, I definitely think they have a right to ban it. Because this is a religion, I think it would cause a lot of issues if the British banned it but I think that would be the right thing to do.
2. I feel that we should respect others views and their religions until they go this far. Then we should try to talk to the women and convince them out of it because peoples lives are too valuable to just be thrown in a fire and burned alive.
3. I think most societies disagree on most things because it is hard to get so many people what they want and for everyone to be happy with the outcome. I do think that most societies agree with some things such as some laws like how you can't steal or that murdering is bad.]]> 2019-01-11 13:59:06 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661146 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661173 1.  I think that the British should have the right to ban Sati because of the main reason that it is killing other people . Although some people think the English are "disrespecting" the Hindu religion by doing this, and that because it is sacred to their religion it should not be banned, I don't think it is right for women to have to kill themselves only because their husband has died. 
2. ]]> 2019-01-11 13:59:09 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661173 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661214 1. I think the British did have the right to ban the ritual. While it is sacred to the Indian population, it is morally wrong and no woman or man should have to kill themselves as a result of their spouse's death. Not only is it morally wrong, but it can cause many problems down the road. If the couple has children and suddenly both of them die, what happens to the child. The chances that the child is put in a stable living environment are slim. 
2. I think we definitely do need to respect other's views and beliefs because we would want the same in return. Having said that, I think in no way do we need to alter our opinion on certain things just to show that we agree with others. Using Sati as an example, I don't think the British were disrespecting the Indians by banning it, I think they did it because it was morally wrong. I think if it had been a practice that didn't include burning oneself the British most likely wouldn't have had a problem with it. 
3. I think there are many values that are absolute. ]]> 2019-01-11 13:59:14 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661214 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661269 1. I think the British had a right to ban sati because they have control over the country at this time and I think that this ritual is not a good thing to have present in their society. 
2. I think that we always have to respect others views and rituals no matter how different from our religion it. But I do believe that there is a point where is crosses the line when it puts peoples lives at risk or to death.
3.I believe that while we might think the majority of the world agrees on one subject, in reality there will always be a person, or a culture that has opposite views or beliefs than us. The majority of our society, however, I think believes in freedom to express ourself whether that be under the requirements of our religion or under our own self rules, I do believe that people can agree on having the freedom to choose. ]]> 2019-01-11 13:59:21 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661269 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661302 1. I  think that the British had the right to ban this practice, for it encouraged the mistreatment of women. But on the other hand, the Indian's have a right to their own religion and should honor their religion in whatever way they see fit. The British also don't practice Hinduism and therefore they have no insight on the religion and cannot judge it.
2. I feel like you should always respect another's cultural and religious views. If their views seem unjust to you, it isn't ones place to disrespect a viewpoint just because you don't believe in what they believe.
3. I think many people assume that everyone agrees and has the same moral value but there is always somebody that doesn't agree.

]]> 2019-01-11 13:59:24 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661302 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661374 1. I don't think the British had the right to ban Sati because it was a part of the Hindu religion; however, I think that it is a mistreatment of women and that the Hindu's themselves should have realized that and done something about it themselves.
2. I think that it is important to respect people for their religious views until it becomes harmful to those outside of the religion who don't chose that religion. People who worship a certain religion can do anything they want to themselves but when it gets to the point of harming those who don't choose that religion, is when it crosses the line.
3. I think that society does not usually agree on anything. Everyone has different views on everything. It is hard to have everyone agree on the same thing; however, I think the majority of society believes in nonviolence and freedom, but there are definitely places and religions where that is not the case.]]> 2019-01-11 13:59:34 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661374 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661643 1) I believe the British did have the right to band Sati because even though it was a Hindu's belief, it caused people to die and banding Sati saved lives.
2) I think you should always respect other's religious beliefs, but to the point where it is causing not just harm, but death to people, you do have the right  to not to respect the cruel behavior. 
3) I think ]]> 2019-01-11 14:00:05 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/ysce15mbcpbo/wish/319661643