https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo en-us 2021-01-29 16:53:31 UTC 2021-02-10 20:13:35 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f489.png jocelyn_barrera https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1141496377 Reflect on your findings in the SOAPSTone activity.

What major differences did you notice between the articles?
What made you consider that one source might have been more reliable than the other?
What perspectives or biases did you find from each article? How did you determine this?
Why does it matter if fake news stories are shared more than legitimate or reliable ones?
What are the dangers of sharing fake information?

Once you have taken the time to compare and contrast the articles, also take a moment to respond to 2 or more of your peers by commenting on what they had to say. Remember, be respectful and foster conversation! :D]]> 2021-01-29 16:53:31 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1141496377 4400751 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1144024726 After reading both articles, something different I found from Article 1 is that it is listing one person’s success while Article 2 is reassuring people about the COVID-19 vaccine.  Something that made me think one source was more reliable than the other was that Article 1 was only praising Mike Adams’ success and Article 2 was reassuring people about the vaccine with evidence.  If fake news stories are shared more than reliable ones, it would matter because that means people would believe something that is false over something that is true and that could lead to spreading misinformation.  The dangers of sharing false information can cause more social conflict and mistrust. ]]> 2021-01-30 19:12:23 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1144024726 3900689 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1150409388 somethings I have noticed about the articles is that one piece is trying to get people not to get the vaccine and the other one is almost debunking the first one. I feel the second article was more trustworthy because they are doctors and have facts backing them up and in the first article all we have to back up Mike Adams is himself. If fake news starts to get shared more then real news it will be bad because people start to believe it and spread it and the could cause problems with trust.]]> 2021-02-01 18:50:54 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1150409388 31003331 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1150790295 When reading both articles something that I found different was that article 1 explains how damaging the vaccine can be while article 2 gives out facts on myths that have been told. Article 1 was written by Mike Adams and his opinion on the vaccine is very negative so he only gives one side to things. As for article 2, it is more informational and it is just giving information on the vaccine. The way this was determined was by reading on who the authors are and also seeing how they presented the articles. If fake news were to be shared more than real news people would start believing more the fake news than the real news. Some dangers of sharing fake information are that people can start getting scared, worried, sad, or depressed.]]> 2021-02-01 20:10:50 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1150790295 30005501 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1151187285 after reading both articles I noticed that the first article was talking about how people would be forced to take the vaccine even though it isn´t safe. the second article was about things that can potentially happen to you if you take the COVID-19 vaccine. I think the second article was more trustworthy because this information came from doctors, the website seems legit because it is about medicine and it ends with .org. Meanwhile, the first article has tons of ads, it is written and published in May of last year by someone that doesn´t work in the medical field. Spreading misinformation is very bad because it is misleading and can destroy our trust in other information that is real.]]> 2021-02-01 22:19:44 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1151187285 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1157128332 A  major difference between the two articles is that one is reliable well the other is fake news. I believe that the second article is reliable because it was written by 2 doctors. The first article was bias to not getting the vaccine and talking about how the shot will have a tracker. It matters if fake news is shared more then reliable ones because it is spreading false information.  The dangers of sharing fake news is reacting to it in bad way. - Esme M.                ]]> 2021-02-03 06:24:51 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1157128332 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1189535319 2021-02-10 20:10:27 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/yoizisfa7spy49qo/wish/1189535319