<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Taller Semana 12 by Carlos Cortés</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/carloscortes631/yler8sha9b0w</link>
      <description>Escriban sus párrafos aquí</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-11-01 21:23:57 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-02 01:35:09 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>carloscortes631</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/carloscortes631/yler8sha9b0w/wish/299602520</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The conclusions of the literature on “cold” conflicts, meanwhile, seem to better explain racism dynamics than the studies on “hot” conflicts. One investigation found that when the principles of war journalism are prominent in news content, journalists may create the conditions for hot conflict (Carter, Thomas, &amp; Ross, 2011, p. 467). Another study found that journalists reinforce the status quo in society by neglecting peaceful solutions, failing to identify the roots of conflict, and failing to present polarization as a social problem (Biazoto, 2011). Reporters also contribute to the opposition among races, dichotomizing groups of people along lines of difference (Terzis, 2008). The dynamics of racial constructions and the concept of “cold” conflicts invite the opportunity to explore the idea that well-established news storytelling in racial democracies might contribute to the polarization and conflict creation among races by promoting an understanding of blackness that legitimizes the power status of some groups over others and by ignoring the social problems that such understanding of blackness generates.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-01 21:31:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/carloscortes631/yler8sha9b0w/wish/299602520</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
