https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq Tire Program en-us 2017-12-15 02:56:09 UTC 2017-12-15 17:49:31 UTC hello@padlet.com bei_brent https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373514 Program should be incentivized to encourage recycling

It is anticipated that NOT ALL materials in ALL programs will be 100% recyclable and this non recyclable factor (perhaps tire fluff, or in paints the “cigarette butt contaminated paint” factor) should be Factored into this “allowable disposal” ...producers should not be penalized for non recycled product in this “factor”


]]> 2017-12-15 02:56:09 UTC https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373514 bei_brent https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373515 It is recommended that the material available for COLLECTION should be the funded amount NOT amount recycled HOWEVER the programs should be incentivized to support recycling. Without this contingency MORE PRODUCT will not be collected than is recyclable ...
All material collected must be funded ]]> 2017-12-15 02:56:09 UTC https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373515 bei_brent https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373516 Although these comments are shown for Tire Program it is anticipated that they should be crafted in anticipation of other stewardship product collection programs]]> 2017-12-15 02:56:09 UTC https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373516 bei_brent https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373517 A transparent mechanism should be in place to address the “shrinkage” factor ie material lost/ used product BUT  the starting number should be 100%

Formula
100% produced -SHRINKAGE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = %TARGET

AN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
...this factor may include such items as expended tire tread, a historical reference of number of tires NOT HISTORICALLY COLLECTED (say used for misc use eg boat bumpers, tie downs for tarps, whatever but there is a historical reference that that sector of producers can say DO NOT come back on an annual basis )

This factor can then, on a percentage basis, be used to reduce the target qty Reqd by producers ON A COLLECTED BASIS (ie not recycled basis) ]]> 2017-12-15 02:56:09 UTC https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373517 bei_brent https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373518 Service providers should NOT. be responsible to collect materials that the producers say they WILL NOT FUND

If the program success results in a higher than target collection is amount has to have a mechanism to be funded 
(NOTE PREMISE ON COLLECTED IS THE REAL NUMBER NOT THE AMOUNT RECYCLED OR TARGETS)
Target collection = 100
Actual collection = 115 
15 units have been collected that the Producers are not required to pay for ... 
ARE THE SERVICE PROVIDERS SUPPOSED TO PAY.  FOR THIS EXPENSE?? 

So overage of 15 units should be paid for either in THIS YEAR “OVERCOLLECTION FACTOR” or “CARRIED FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR FACTOR” 

This tonnage /volume MUST BE FUNDED by a carryover or allowable excess in the year of collection.

So if 15 extra units collected this year then NEXT YEAR = 100 from this year PLUS 15 FROM LAST YEAR .....PLUS ANY. NEXT YEAR VOLUME TARGET ADJUSTMENT

So I would suggest the following 

Year 1.      115 collected but 100 funded 15 unfunded
Year 2.      New target is 115 (based on last year historical this is now doable) BUT  WE STILL HAVE 15 UNITS FROM LAST YEAR THAT MUST BE FUNDED SO THIS IS ADDED TO YEAR 2 WHICH IS NOW = 115 (NEW TARGET) PLUS 15 OVERAGE  = 130 IN YEAR 2 COLLECTABLE 

IF PRODUCERS OVER FUND THEY SHOULD HAVE A CARRYFORWARD MECHANISM FOR THESE CONTINGENCY SITUATIONS

KEY PRINCIPLE
100% COLLECTED= 100% FUNDED ]]> 2017-12-15 02:56:09 UTC https://padlet.com/BrentB/y6wt7ihqr1wq/wish/216373518