<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment #1 by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26</link>
      <description>By: Melissa Prosser</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-01-25 02:38:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-02-23 06:25:33 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Post #1- Title: Assignment #1</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455592278</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Made by: Melissa Prosser, Working individually.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 02:56:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455592278</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #4- Red Flag: Red Herring (Video)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455593247</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br></strong>The red flag, <em>Red Herring</em> is used to distract from logical information that is presented to an individual. Many people will use this red flag to distract from the real matter, issues, or topic.<br><strong><br>Connection:<br></strong>In the video, ex-president Donald Trump is asked a question in regard to climate change. Instead of answering the question that was addressed, he countered the question by asking the audience who actually believed in climate change. Now this Red Herring technique has shifted the question from the effects of climate change to the actual belief by popular demand as to whether it actually exists or not. <br>At no point does Donald Trump or most members of the audience use any type of <strong>critical thinking skills</strong> to address they issue of climate change, they are now solely focused on whether they believe it to be real. Donald Trump has consistently stated that climate change is a hoax that has been created by China, but with no evidence to back it up. The idea here is to distract the American people (and the world) from the actually problems from Climate Change to focus on the subterfuge of China.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyulquUwi1Q" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 02:57:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455593247</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #3- Red Flag: Ideological Support (Video)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455593903</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition: <br></strong>An <em>ideology</em> is a set of opinions or beliefs of a group or an individual. Very often <em>ideology</em> refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture.<strong><br><br>Connection: <br></strong>In this video above and the link to the article below, describe the beliefs of a group that calls themselves <em>Young Earth</em> Creationists. This group adopted a method of Biblical interpretation which requires that the earth be no more than 10,000 years old and that the six days of creation described in Genesis each lasted for 24 hours. Young Earth Creationists believe that the origin of the earth, the universe, and various forms of life, etc., are all instances of special creation. <br><br>This video demonstrates the red flag known as Ideology. Where the beliefs of a specific group of people does not meet the rigors of science. If we apply the <strong>critical thinking</strong> and <strong>skepticism</strong> process to the question of the "Age of the Earth". The source of this information from the video comes from the ICR (The Institute for Creation Research), and follows the Bible ideology. From the Bible they look at the book of Genesis for the Creation of the Earth and from the other passages state the Earth is only approximately 6000 years old. Their <strong><em>confirmation bias</em></strong> has them only siting interpretations of the passages in the Bible that support their viewpoint for the age of the Earth. However, another interpretation could be take to say that the all powerful being of God would not be bound by the 24 hour time clock that we live with in our lives today. God being an entity of infinite time could create the world in a "day", but a day to God could be on a much larger time scale that a "day" for man. We also have to look at their methods of gaining their information to support their claims and once again we see their <strong><em>confirmation bias</em></strong> ignores scientific studies of fossils, geology, carbon dating, radioactive isotope dating and more. When presented with this type of information we need to apply our critical thinking and skepticism so that we don't just blinded trust material without questioning its validity. <br><br><strong>https://www.icr.org/article/six-biological-evidences-for-a-young-earth/</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://vimeo.com/333206919" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 02:58:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455593903</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #2- Red Flag: Ancient Wisdom (Article)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455594775</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br></strong>The red flag of <em>Ancient Wisdom</em> is the practices and beliefs from centuries ago.&nbsp; They are not backed by science and the process is that ancient civilizations knew more about everything than we as a society do now. <br><strong><br>Connection: <br></strong>In this article, the author talks about rituals that still happen in Britain to this day showing the red flag of <strong><em>Ancient Wisdom</em></strong>. Such as The Festival of the Horse and the Boys' Ploughing Match which takes place in a small town on the island of South Ronaldsay off the north coast of Scotland. The whole community partakes in these festivals which include elaborate costumes that have been passed down from generation to generation.&nbsp; <br><br>The <strong><em>critical thinking</em></strong> and <strong><em>skepticism</em></strong> should address the true value of these rituals. Some have been used to ward off evil spirits or appease deity to promote good harvests. There is no evidence that the success of a growing season is controlled by any type of deity. We can use critical thinking to state that wearing elaborate costumes and celebrating could raise morale in ancient times and our modern times as we know the benefits of social interactions for people. We could also test and show that the competition of young boys learning to plow would benefit their family's farms as the boys would improve on necessary skills.&nbsp; &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20230203-the-unruly-ancient-rituals-still-practised-today" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 02:59:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455594775</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #5- Red Flag: Suppression of Authority (Video)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455594894</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br></strong><em>Suppression of Authority</em> is the belief that people who are in positions of power (government, military, monarchy, religion, etc.) are hiding crucial information from society.<br><strong><br>Connection: <br></strong>In this video CNN discusses the debate about Area 51 and whether it does house aliens and UFOs or if it is/was used for the government’s secretive U-2 and OXCART aerial surveillance programs clearly showing the Suppression of Authority red flag.&nbsp;<br><br>UFOs can fall into the category of the Unexplained, but if we have been visited by UFOs and the government is hiding that at the top secret Area 51 base it would be a big suppression of authority. The US government would be hiding information from the public for it's on private agenda. With each new document release from the US government more is learned about Area 51 and it shows that there is still more hidden. This confirms the bias of a conspiracy since national security prevents the complete release of all information about Area 51.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/us/area-51-documents/index.html" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 02:59:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455594894</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #6- Red Flag: Mystical Energy (Video)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595012</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br></strong>The red flag of <strong><em>Mystical Energy</em></strong> can include the use of crystals, lights and energy (positive or negative) to produce emotions and stimulations felt within the body. <br><strong><br>Connection: <br></strong>This video uses the red flag of Mystical Energy to describe the "Top 10 Healing Stones." Healing stones are said to have powerful energetic properties that can harmonize the mind, body, and spirit. While crystals align the seven chakras, which are energy centers in the body that promote the flow of healing life force. <br><br>The <strong><em>watchlist</em></strong> for this is, that there is no scientific proof that this a real and for it to work you need to believe and have faith the stones and crystals. You would also have to avoid the <strong><em>placebo effect</em></strong> that can come from "healing crystals", even during a scientific study. Tests subjects could show healing improvements that are due to the placebo effect rather than the actual crystal. Using <strong>critical thinking</strong> and <strong>skepticism</strong> can help to avoid putting any stock into the placebo effect or even the confirmation bias of mystical healers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC_qoRjzQaA&amp;t=99s" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 02:59:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595012</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #8- Reason for Belief: Emotional Connection (Video)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595611</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br></strong><em>Emotional Connections </em>are what you receive from being attached to people, pets, relationships, places, objects, and even dates because of the bond it provides. These bonds provide: a sense of safety, protection, belonging, comfort, reliability, and positivity. They can also lead people to ignore facts and believe falsehoods because of an emotional connection.<br><br></div><div><strong>Connection:<br></strong>The video shows how an <strong><em>Emotional Connection</em></strong> can make people believe something that goes against science. In the video the medium Teresa Caputo is able to use the Emotional connection of the tv host to state vague statements as a way to prove she is able to communicate with her deceased mother-in-law. At no point does she state any concrete or specific facts about the deceased mother-in-law and she uses the emotional reactions of the host to "solidify" her ability as a medium. Our <strong><em>critical thinking</em></strong> and <strong><em>skepticism</em></strong> would show that any type of scientific testing would show that the "law of averages" is being used by the medium and that the emotional connection of the tv host leads her into a <strong><em>confirmation bias</em></strong> positive feedback loop with the medium.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCqbTeZ38rY" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 03:00:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595611</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #9- Reason for Belief: Patternicity (Article)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br></strong><em>Patternicity</em> is the process of seeing something that isn't actually there such as seeing faces and shapes in clouds or a tree appearing to like another object or having a face. <br><strong><br>Connection: <br></strong>In this article, the author talks about Pareidolia which is the scientific name for when we see patterns in objects or even hear things that aren't there and how it is related to how our brains neural circuitry takes in information about the outside world. Our brains will try very hard to fill in any gaps in the world to make the "world" fit our understanding of it. However, that is a lot of information that needs to be processed and so the brain uses shortcuts and tricks to fill in those gaps quickly and without using up to much processing power. This leads to us "patterning" a lot of what we bring in with our senses. We can clearly see that our brains are easily fooled with almost any optical illusion. We do have to remember that what we see in the world is our brain's interpretation of what we think we see and that true reality is different from our perceptions of it.<br>This leads to our <strong><em>critical thinking</em></strong> and <strong><em>skepticism</em></strong> that we should question the accuracy of our ability to directly perceive any situation with 100% accuracy.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fgeraldguild.com%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2F26%2Fpareidolia%2F&amp;psig=AOvVaw2o9xPWLwZfMgaQRTJ3KaKq&amp;ust=1675717959424000&amp;source=images&amp;cd=vfe&amp;ved=0CBAQjRxqFwoTCNCwwv-l__wCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAJ" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 03:00:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #7- Reason for Belief: Unexplained (Video)</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595816</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:<br></strong>When certain events occur that cannot be logically explained but are still considered "real" and cannot be fully grasped or expressed, these events are often labelled as <em>Unexplained</em> by people. <br><strong><br>Connection: <br></strong>This is a short clip makes use of the <strong>Unexplained</strong> reason of belief and was taken in 1967 by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin, known as the "Patterson–Gimlin film," or "Patterson film." This video was filmed in Bluff Creek, and shows what appears to be a large and hairy ape, or "Bigfoot", walking through the clearing in the woods. <br><br>A lot of what people believe can fall into the "Seeing is believing" phrase. Most unexplained phenomenon's such as bigfoot gain huge "credibility" if there is any visual evidence. The problem is that most visual evidence can be faked in our modern times. <strong><em>Critical thinking</em></strong> and <strong><em>skepticism</em></strong> must always be applied to all visual evidence so that it can be confirmed or debunked. It is not enough to just have visual evidence anymore, there should be biological, ecological and any other evidence to corroborate the "legend" of bigfoot.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x3__akoM5w&amp;t=90s" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 03:00:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455595816</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #10: Critical Thinking Process Responses</title>
         <author>melissaprosser1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455596467</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I choose to evaluate post #3 - Red Flag: Ideological Support for the Creationist view on the age of the Earth.<br><br><strong>Define Problem: </strong>&nbsp;</div><div>What is the age of the Earth?</div><div><br><strong>Gather Information: </strong>&nbsp;</div><div>This video is made by ICR (The Institute for Creation Research) who states that their research is unique.<br><br>"The Institute for Creation Research is unique among scientific research organizations. Our research is conducted within a biblical worldview, since ICR is committed to the absolute authority of the inerrant Word of God. The real facts of science will always agree with biblical revelation because the God who made the world of God inspired the Word of God." (https://www.icr.org/how-we-do-research)<br><br>They list 6 possible pieces of evidence to support the "young Earth" view:<br><br>1) Soft Tissues and Biomolecules should not be found in Fossils that are millions of years old as they would decay.<br><br>2)Ancient Microbes have been found and "resurrected" even after millions of years without the necessities of life.&nbsp;<br><br>3)Degeneration of the Human Genome that with each successive generation our DNA degrades due to mutation cumulation.<br><br>4) Evidence for Mitochondrial Eve and Recent Origin of Y-Chromosome Adam showing that there was in fact a first "mother" and first "father" for the human race around 10000 years ago.<br><br>5) Unchanged Living Fossils (Stasis) even after millions of years they are essentially the same with no evolution.<br><br>6) Population Growth that we should have way more people on our planet if the human race have been around for a few million years. &nbsp;<br><br></div><div><strong>Evaluate Evidence:</strong> &nbsp;</div><div>ICR is an ideological research group that uses the Bible as literal interpretations of all that we know. They state that other scientific facts can be left open to interpretation, but that all research should be done through the lens of the bible.&nbsp;<br><br>They do no include any research that does not support the bible. Most scientific studies that have used isotopic dating methods, geological evidence or even cosmic evidence that supports the old earth view, the ICR has discounted them based on their lack of Bible view. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Recognize Assumptions, Emotions, Biases:</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div>The assumptions of ICR and its followers is that the Bible is a literal document of the history of the universe. Not accepting the Bible as fact would cause them to be "blasphemous", and that would prevent them from being allowed into God's heaven in the afterlife. In order to achieve this the ICR and its followers have a bias to anything that supports the Bible out of fear.<br><br><strong>Synthesize Evidence, Identify Alternatives:</strong> &nbsp;</div><div>Alternative Solution 1) The Earth is young between 6000-8000 years old, based on the interpretations of the Bible<br><br>Alternative Solution 2) The Earth is old between 4-4.5 billion years old based on isotopic dating, geological evidence and the fossil record. <br><br><strong>Select Best Alternative: </strong>&nbsp;</div><div>Based on all the evidence I conclude that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.icr.org/how-we-do-research" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-25 03:01:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissaprosser1/y622a458h9gkxz26/wish/2455596467</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
