<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>PSS217 Post Seminar 3 Discussion - F1 Grand Prix by ANIL SINGH</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9</link>
      <description>Q1: Which of the jackass management traits (see final seminar 3 slide) are most damaging in the aftermath of the F1 scenario? (select top 2)? *Reference pages 321 – 353 Sennewald &amp; Baillie, 2021

Q2: What are the security-related threats associated with an event like the F1 Grand Prix?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-02-08 03:12:21 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-04-24 09:34:09 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Question 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2476159215</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- Many high profile guests which may be potential targets<br>- A lot of high value equipment like race cars and their components may attract thieves or saboteurs<br>- Large crowds during race days can result in stampedes or crowd crush situation if not managed properly<br>- People trying to bring dangerous items (flares, sticks etc) into the event area which can cause harm to others </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-10 09:09:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2476159215</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Question 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2476168044</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Acts before thinking<br>- The security manager would start to take disciplinary action without having the full facts of the case resulting in unfair punishments being meted out. Reacting irrationally and jumping to conclusions would bring about more mess, resulting in delays to finding out the true cause of the security breach<br><br>Cowardly<br>- The security manager should not disassociate himself from the blame of this security breach/failure and place all the fault on the security officers on the ground. Doing so would cause him to lose all respect among his subordinates and may result in the true cause of the breach to be ignored or overlooked because everyone is trying to avoid responsibility instead of understanding what caused the incident</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-10 09:18:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2476168044</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Q1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2477712696</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Acts Before Thinking and Punishes<br>- Disciplinary actions against the security personnel and not focusing on the root cause of the incident<br>- For any incident, the management of the service provider is very quick to give out disciplinary actions to his personnel so as to appease the general public. Such actions shows how the management seem to be knee-jerking, and hoping to address the public's sentiments and to close the incident.&nbsp;<br>- However, to the personnel working under the management, it drives down the message that the personnel are just numbers to the company, and the management is always ready to push the blame to the ground personnel, without conducting an investigation to determine the causal factors that lead to the incident.<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-12 09:17:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2477712696</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Q2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2477716175</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>F1 Grand Prix is an international sporting event that attracts fans across the world with high viewership due to the live-telecast, as well as high-profile guests (both locally as well as overseas) who travelled to Singapore to attend the event.&nbsp;<br><br>1. Terrorism - Ranging from Vehicle Bound IED or Human-IED threats that could cause damages to public and the conduct of the race, to lone wolf conducting active stabbing among the spectators, or hostage crisis where high profile guests or political leaders are held by terrorists.&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-12 09:27:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2477716175</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Q1 / Q2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2477725303</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q1. I would think the 2 more damaging jackass management traits are: "know everything" and "acts before thinking".&nbsp;<br><br>A security manager who has these 2 traits would likely be someone who acts on impulse as they would assume that they know everything and already have all the necessary information that is needed. In the case of the F1 episode, these would translate to immediate disciplinary action for the security personnel where the deemed lapses had occurred. The security personnel would unlikely be given a chance to explain themself and is thus held responsible for the incident. Without finding out the actual facts, the management has acted without doing their due diligence and by extension, has failed to determine the actual cause of the lapses. &nbsp;<br><br>Q2. Given that F1 is an international event, there would be an influx of tourists coming for the event. These could include high-profile personnel, international artists, and even VIPs from specific industries.&nbsp;<br><br>Their presence and attendance at the said event increase the risk of security threats. The most prominent threat would be terrorism as the influx of tourists would be a major attraction for a terrorist attack. Other possible threats would be bringing harmful items, possibly to be used to harm others, pickpocketing, or even instigating or starting public chaos. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-12 09:54:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2477725303</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Q1 / Q2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2478273532</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A#1: <br>1) <strong>32- 12 COWARDLY<br></strong>A manager must be responsible to accept the blame and failure of his organisation. Providing guidance, support, fair and appropriate follow-up actions will assure the employees that they will be protected when something goes wrong. This will instill discipline, commitment and boost morale and motivation. <br><br>2) <strong>32-16 BEHIND THE TIMES<br></strong>Failure to keep abreast changing security landscape, threats trends, Modi operandi, and new technologies is dangerous to the organisation. In this context, manager may not what to anticipate, expect and do forward planning to avoid emergence of new disasters or reoccurrences of past events. It may lead to a poor handling and post-disaster recovery actions.<br><br>A#2 <br>1) Act of terrorism (Explosive/Bomb threat)<br>2) Misappropriation of assets (organisers/public)<br>3) Cyber attacks (Ransomware, MITM)<br>4) Bio-hazard threats (Toxin &amp; pathogens)<br><strong><br><br></strong><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-13 02:37:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/anilsinghsona/y5wyr8of1l83l5l9/wish/2478273532</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
