Lesson 4: The Performative Turn by Elizabeth Jochum https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt Theory and Philosopy of Experience en-us 2021-03-16 11:02:06 UTC 2025-11-28 18:31:11 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/267e.png HOW IT WORKS. jochum3 https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1314960839 Please post discussion questions for each reading (separate post for each) in the REPLY/COMMENT bar for each reading.  

]]> 2021-03-16 11:04:25 UTC https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1314960839 Art and Objecthood jochum3 https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1314961172

]]> 2021-03-16 11:04:34 UTC https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1314961172 Transformative Power of Performance jochum3 https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1314963690 2021-03-16 11:05:36 UTC https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1314963690 "The object, not the beholder, must remain the center or focus of the situation; but the situation itself belongs to the beholder—it is his situation. " - Fried jochum3 https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1315101309 Do you agree with this statement?  Support with evidence from the other theories we have read in this class so far. ]]> 2021-03-16 11:53:06 UTC https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1315101309 Lips of Saint Thomas jochum3 https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1315105730 What does this art work (by Marina Abramovic) teach us about the limits of classical aesthetic theory and philosophy?  How would you evaluate this art work an academic way, this performance/art work? What theories would be relevant? What about the situation/event makes intervening impossible (or problematic) for the audience? Does it remind you of other arts works or performances that you have seen? ]]> 2021-03-16 11:54:32 UTC https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1315105730 Bojana, Cecilie, Emma & Malou csha18 https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1315936520 Breakout Session #1
Discussion Questions 
 
What is literalist art, and does it make Michael Fried so angry?
 
He thinks that it will ruin fine art
 
''The meaning in this context of “the condition of non-art” is what I have been calling objecthood.
It is as though objecthood alone can, in the present circumstances, secure something's identity, if
not as non-art, at least as neither painting nor sculpture; or as though a work of art—more
accurately, a work of modernist painting or sculpture—were in some essential respect not an
object.'' - Fried, M.
 
Can you give some examples of literalist art?

carl andre
Minimalistic art are like literalistic art
 
 
 
What does anthropomorphism mean in this (sculptural) context? 
When you give an object human traits/characteristics.
Just because some sculpture has human charactiristics it's enough to be present.
 "The object, not the beholder, must remain the center or focus of the situation; but the situation itself belongs to the beholder—it is his situation." Do you agree with this statement? 
 
Object important, viewer is less important.
 
]]> 2021-03-16 14:33:30 UTC https://padlet.com/jochum3/y5j6gdhg6nctgidt/wish/1315936520