Winners and Losers of Imperialism by Johnathan White

Taylor (Factories)

2018-02-07 12:55:37 UTC

Factories would be considered winners because they got natural resources.Even tho I almost got closed down my people still got me to stay up and running. They also made money from textiles.

Trent and Alexis and Europeans(British

2018-02-07 12:55:46 UTC

Europeans(British) are wieners because ever war that the British fought they won because their technology was more advance . The British had guns and the groups used hands or swords

Andy's a factory

2018-02-07 12:55:55 UTC

i say that the factories are a winner, because i made a lot of textiles during the day. yea i know i had a lot of bruised children working to make sure i am working correctly, but i'm a factory what can i do. also i don't mean to hurt the kids, but if i stoop i can't make the product i was made to make. anyway i am a winner. i can make a but-lode of clothes and mass production. and i helped a lot of people with my produced i produce

Bryan R : Zulus (Africans)

2018-02-07 12:56:02 UTC

Our group would be considered losers because British won. They took all our land that had gold and diamonds.

Shyri: Meiji and Japanese

2018-02-07 12:56:51 UTC

Meiji and japan became winners. Before the Americans started trading with japan they were kind of dumb, but once america came, they turned japan into monsters. Japan began to steal land, and become a bully. At the end of the story, Japan was a winner.

Angelina & Isiah : Sepoy

2018-02-07 12:56:54 UTC

I think Sepoy was a loser because the British took over their land. According to my notes  the British got to Imperialized.

Vivi & Rydell: Sepoys

2018-02-07 12:58:09 UTC

According to the chart, we believe that this war would be considered a failure . We think this because the British won this war, instead of the Sepoy's winning nationalism.

Olivia B Opium and Boxer(Chinese)

2018-02-07 12:58:15 UTC

Our groups would be considered a loser because the Chinese would not be able to win because the British have guns and the Chinese don't.

Shabria: Boxers(Chinese)

2018-02-07 12:58:27 UTC

I think that our group would be considered losers because as a result of the war,their dynasty became weaker. Also, the boxers fought with their fists , while the British had guns. They were known as the Righteous and Harmonious Fist because they thought that they could knock out bullets with their fists.

Heidi : factories

2018-02-07 12:58:43 UTC

Factories were considered winners because they still got natural resources to run and made money from textiles.

Starr: Boxers(Chinese)

2018-02-07 12:58:51 UTC

The boxers lost because they didn't have the guns that the British had, they thought they could win with there fist.

Madison: Boxers (chinese)

2018-02-07 12:59:19 UTC

I think that the boxers lost because they thought that they had super powers from the gods so they decided to fight with their fists instead of some guns so... Also the in the opium war the chinese was winning at first and then lost to the british.

Briasia: Boxer (Chinese)

2018-02-07 12:59:50 UTC

According to the chart, our group would be considered a loser because the Boxers lost the war. They lost the war because they thought they had super powers.

Chantry Europeans\British

2018-02-07 13:02:59 UTC

I think the British are wieners because. In the battles the British fault in they won. Because they had guns and the guns they gave to India was put in animal fat.

Shawn{Europeans}

2018-02-07 13:07:36 UTC

they were winners because never lost a war.

2018-02-07 13:09:25 UTC

2018-02-07 13:13:48 UTC