<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Introduction to American Cultural Studies by Danica Božović</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb</link>
      <description>for uni</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-10-24 12:37:48 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-03-23 05:20:05 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401974372</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The <strong>House of Burgesses</strong> /ˈbɜːrdʒəsɪz/ was the elected representative element of the Virginia General Assembly, the legislative body of the Colony of Virginia. With the creation of the <strong>House of Burgesses</strong> in 1642, the General Assembly, which had been established in 1619, became a bicameral institution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-24 12:48:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401974372</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401975135</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>An <strong>indentured servant</strong> or <strong>indentured</strong> laborer is an employee (indenturee) within a system of unfree labor who is bound by a signed or forced contract (<strong>indenture</strong>) to work for a particular employer for a fixed time. On completion of the contract, <strong>indentured servants</strong> were given their freedom, and occasionally plots of land.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-24 12:49:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401975135</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401975611</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Freedom dues</strong> were a form of payment, supposed to enable the ex-servant to reach autonomy. Generally, historians agree on an average period of 4 to 7 years of indenture. This practice gave way to excesses, with indentures being as long as 15 years.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-24 12:50:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401975611</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401976239</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Passage </strong>to America was granted to the indentured servants, including food, clothes and lodging.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-24 12:51:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401976239</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401976612</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The <strong>headright system</strong> referred to a grant of land, usually 50 acres, given to settlers in the 13 colonies. The <strong>system</strong> was used mainly in Virginia, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Maryland. The <strong>headright system</strong> was originally created in 1618 in Jamestown, Virginia.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-24 12:52:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/401976612</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402463394</link>
         <description><![CDATA[https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F0%2F01%2FA_new_map_of_Virginia%252C_Maryland%252C_and_the_improved_parts_of_Pennsylvania_%2526_New_Jersey._LOC_2005630923_%2528cropped%2529.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FChesapeake_Colonies&amp;tbnid=-kUZ35bQZIMQyM&amp;vet=1&amp;docid=ON-lfUsUrI17OM&amp;w=6709&amp;h=5889&amp;q=chesapeake%20bay%20colonies&amp;hl=en-US&amp;source=sh%2Fx%2Fim]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-25 09:42:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402463394</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464229</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>George Percy, governor of the Jamestown Colony during the Starving Time</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/423599273/a97ba7390707b7f0fa48eb5b357d7a7f/George_Percy_Starving_Time_Jamestown_Colony.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-25 09:46:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464229</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cash crop</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464451</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a crop produced for its commercial value rather than for use by the grower.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-25 09:47:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464451</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Virginia Company of London</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464712</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The London Company was an English joint-stock company established in 1606 by royal charter by King James I with the purpose of establishing colonial settlements in North America. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-25 09:48:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464712</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tobacco colonies of the Chesapeake Bay</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464996</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://freedomcenter.org/content/tobacco-chesapeake</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-25 09:50:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402464996</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402465293</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Pocahontas was a Native American woman notable for her association with the colonial settlement at Jamestown, Virginia. She was the daughter of Powhatan, the paramount chief of a network of tributary tribes in the Tsenacommacah, encompassing the Tidewater region of Virginia.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-25 09:51:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402465293</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>diversification</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402468705</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the action of diversifying something or the fact of becoming more diverse.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-25 10:08:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/402468705</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ethnic group</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403928789</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a community or population made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:09:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403928789</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to live in closer proximity</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403930146</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>to live near or close to something else</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:11:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403930146</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>mercantile system</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403930991</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A system of managing the economy of a country through the regulation of its foreign trade. The goal of this system is to establish a permanent positive balance of trade. This goal can be accomplished by implementing the following trade tactics: High tariffs on inbound goods.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:12:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403930991</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Quaker</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403931742</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A member of the Religious Society of Friends, a Christian movement founded by George Fox <em>c.</em> 1650 and devoted to peaceful principles. Central to the Quakers' belief is the doctrine of the ‘Inner Light’, or sense of Christ's direct working in the soul. This has led them to reject both formal ministry and all set forms of worship.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:13:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403931742</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Distribution center</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403933152</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A <strong>distribution center</strong> is a node in a supply network which can be used for: storing goods (short term or longer), processing products, de-aggregating vehicle loads, creating assortments, assembling shipments, among other things. Transhipment is another traditional role of distribution centers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:15:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403933152</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>middle ground</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403933670</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>an intermediate position or area of compromise or possible agreement between two opposing views or groups.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:16:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403933670</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Middle Colonies</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403936526</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>MIDDLE COLONIES</strong>, composed of <strong>Pennsylvania</strong>, <strong>Delaware</strong>, <strong>New York</strong>, and <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>, were a mix of both northern and southern features, creating a unique environment of early settlement by non-English Europeans, mostly Dutch and German, where Englishmen and women composed the smallest minority. A combination of both urban and rural lifestyles made it more cosmopolitan, religiously pluralistic, and socially tolerant with in a commercial atmosphere. They were all at one time proprietary colonies. After 1664, Anglos began to rush into East Jersey, and English Quakers settled Pennsylvania and West Jersey. Philadelphia, the second largest English city by the time of the American Revolution, was the Ellis Island of colonial America, and many indentured servants made their homes in the Middle Colonies. Established commercial networks from Ulster in Northern Ireland brought the Scotch-Irish Pres by terians to Philadelphia and New Castle and Wilmington, Delaware. These immigrants came mostly in family units that preserved a balanced sex ratio. During the eighteenth century the Middle Colonies' population grew at a higher rate than New England or the southern colonies.<br><br>The English established the township, an area twenty-five to thirty miles square, as the basic settlement type. Various rural neighborhoods along creeks and watercourses developed into townships that were spatially dispersed, like the southern colonies, but that pulled together merchandising and distribution recourses for both commercial and staple crops, like the New England colonies. Fords and crossroads connected the hinterland with Philadelphia and New York. The grain trade to Europe fed Philadelphia commerce.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:19:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403936526</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Religion in the Middle Colonies</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403937505</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Middle Colonies had the highest ratio of churches to population of the three sections of colonial America. Settlement from the European states disrupted by the Protestant Reformation transplanted Dutch Mennonites, Dutch Calvinists, French Huguenots, German Baptists, and Portuguese Jews who joined larger established congregations of Dutch Reformed, Lutherans, Quakers, and Anglicans. Education in the Middle Colonies was mostly sectarian, as local churches sponsored schools. Pennsylvania's toleration allowed Anglicans, Moravians, and Quakers to open schools.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:21:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403937505</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>trinket</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403938594</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a small ornament or item of jewellery that is of little value</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:22:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403938594</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pennsylvania</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403946190</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Pennsylvania was founded in 1681 by William Penn. Penn was issued a land grant by King Charles II largely because of a significant debt owed to his father, Admiral Penn. At the time, the grant was one of the largest in terms of area ever known. It was named Pennsylvania, which means Penn’s Woods, after Admiral Penn.<br><br></div><div>Penn quickly established a government based on religious freedom for the Quakers. Quakers did not believe in the strict rules imposed by the Puritan church. They believed that <strong>people could have a direct relation with God, rather than one mediated by a minister. </strong>The colony’s <strong>religious tolerance</strong> soon attracted German and Scottish immigrants, and promoted more peaceful relations with local Indians. Furthermore, it helped <strong>Philadelphia</strong> grow into the most important city in the thirteen colonies, and it helped established Pennsylvania Dutch Country, where German “Deutsh” political and religious refugees formed farming communities.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-29 15:32:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/403946190</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>thoroughfare</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404345308</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a road or path forming a route between two places; the main road in a town</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 10:27:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404345308</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Population density</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404345673</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A measurement of population per unit area, or exceptionally unit volume; it is a quantity of type number density. It is frequently applied to living organisms, and most of the time to humans. It is a key geographical term.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 10:28:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404345673</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>confluence</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404345855</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the junction of two rivers, especially rivers of approximately equal width.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 10:29:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404345855</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Confluence of Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404346275</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/423599273/586cb9a29aaaad10df636b6cec042c71/300px_Schuylkillmap.png" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 10:31:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404346275</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404346756</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>The Mason–Dixon line</strong>, also called the Mason and Dixon line or Mason's and Dixon's line, was surveyed between 1763 and 1767 by Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon in the resolution of a border dispute involving Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Delaware in Colonial America.<br><br><strong>Fun fact: </strong>In 1784, surveyors David Rittenhouse and Andrew Ellicott and their crew completed the survey of the Mason–Dixon line to the southwest corner of Pennsylvania, five degrees from the Delaware River.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 10:33:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404346756</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Digression</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404347198</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The act of departing from the main subject in speech or writing to discuss an apparently unrelated topic.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 10:35:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404347198</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>moral code</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404347364</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A written, formal, and consistent set of rules prescribing righteous behavior, accepted by a person or by a group of people.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 10:36:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404347364</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chattel slavery</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404397239</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A <strong>chattel slave</strong> is an enslaved person who is owned forever and whose children and children's children are automatically enslaved. <strong>Chattel slaves</strong> are individuals treated as complete property, to be bought and sold. <strong>Chattel slavery</strong> was supported and made legal by European governments and monarchs.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 12:50:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404397239</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>human bondage</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404398421</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>slavery; "bondage" is metaphorical: it refers to humans being controlled by their emotions.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 12:52:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404398421</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404400170</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Samuel McPherson Janney</strong> (1801-1880), a member of a prominent local Quaker family, was a businessman, an academic writer, an educator and a strong anti-slavery activist. The effort to end the horror of slavery caught his heart and mind as a young man and then stayed with him, burning as a constant hot flame.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 12:54:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404400170</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>fertile</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404400702</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(of soil or land) producing or capable of producing abundant vegetation or crops.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 12:55:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404400702</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>missive</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404402521</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a letter, especially a long or official one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 12:58:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404402521</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Quaker &quot;Meetings&quot;</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404405466</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A meeting for worship is a practice of the Religious Society of Friends in many ways comparable to a church service. These services have a wide variety of forms, creating a spectrum from typical Protestant liturgy to silent waiting for the Spirit.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 13:03:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404405466</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gender equity</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404410181</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Also known as sexual equality or equality of the sexes, is the state of equal ease of access to resources and opportunities regardless of gender, including economic participation and decision-making; and the state of valuing different behaviors, aspirations and needs equally, regardless of gender. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 13:09:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404410181</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>abhor</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404411336</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>regard with disgust and hatred.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 13:11:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404411336</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Quaker Abolitionist Project</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404416276</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Around 1727, the Quakers began to express their official disapproval of the trade and promote reforms. From the 1750s, a number of Quakers in the American colonies began to oppose enslavement. They visited the slaveholders and lobbied the English Headquarters for action. By 1761, Quakers had come to view abolition as a Christian duty and all Quakers, on both sides of the Atlantic, were barred from owning slaves. Any members that did not conform were disowned.<br><br></div><div><br>In 1783 the 'London Society of Friends' yearly meeting presented a petition against the slave trade, signed by nearly 300 Quakers, to Parliament. They subsequently decided to set up a formal committee to consider the slave trade as well as an informal group of six Quakers who pioneered the British abolitionist movement. They later decided to form a small group, open to all denominations, to gain wider Anglican and Parliamentary support.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 13:17:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404416276</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>abolition</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404417901</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the action of abolishing a system, practice, or institution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 13:19:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404417901</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404418589</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>The Underground Railroad</strong> was a network of secret routes and safe houses established in the United States during the early to mid-1800s, and used by enslaved African-Americans to escape into free states and Canada. The scheme was assisted by abolitionists and others sympathetic to the cause of the escapees.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 13:20:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404418589</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>welfare</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404419994</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>the health, happiness, and fortunes of a person or group.</li><li>statutory procedure or social effort designed to promote the basic physical and material well-being of people in need.</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 13:22:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404419994</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>diminish</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404492302</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>make or become less; cause to seem less impressive or valuable</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 14:54:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404492302</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to resonate with someone</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404493966</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To evoke a feeling of shared emotion or belief with someone</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 14:56:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404493966</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>pacifism</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404494385</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the belief that war and violence are unjustifiable and that all disputes should be settled by peaceful means.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 14:57:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404494385</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to stray from (something)</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404496438</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To start thinking or talking about a different subject from the one you should be giving attention to.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 14:59:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404496438</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to exile</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404497801</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>expel and bar (someone) from their native country, typically for political or punitive reasons.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 15:01:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404497801</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Betsy Ross flag</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404498558</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Its distinguishing feature is thirteen 5-pointed stars arranged in a circle to represent the unity of the Thirteen Colonies. As a historic U.S. flag, it has long been a popular symbol of American patriotism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/423599273/38bca9d8de354135c0b6f02d44c40887/41SRqMB8kfL.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 15:02:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404498558</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404499610</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Nathanael Greene</strong> <strong>(1742-1786)</strong> was a major general of the Continental Army in the American Revolutionary War. He emerged from the war with a reputation as General George Washington's most gifted and dependable officer, and is known for his successful command in the southern theater of the war. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 15:03:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404499610</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>exodus</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404501248</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a mass departure of people.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 15:05:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404501248</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>unobstrusive</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404501843</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>not conspicuous or attracting attention.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 15:06:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404501843</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Humanitarian service</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404503347</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Material and logistic assistance to people who need help. It is usually short-term help until the long-term help by government and other institutions replaces it. The primary objective of humanitarian service is to save lives, alleviate suffering, and maintain human dignity.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-30 15:08:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/404503347</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>writ of assistance</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/405357248</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a written order (a <strong>writ</strong>) issued by a court instructing a law enforcement official, such as a sheriff or a tax collector, to perform a certain task.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-01 11:10:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/405357248</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>breadbasket</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406739868</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a part of a region that produces cereals for the rest of it.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 09:49:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406739868</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>buffer zone</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406741245</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a neutral area serving to separate hostile forces or nations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 09:53:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406741245</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Southern Colonies</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406741900</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Southern Colonies included <strong>Maryland</strong>, <strong>Virginia</strong>, <strong>North Carolina</strong>, <strong>South Carolina</strong>, and <strong>Georgia</strong>. The Southern Colonies were dominated by a desire to make money in the new American marketplace, which led to the development of large plantations and an agriculturally-focused society. Much of the labor on the farms and plantations was done by slaves brought over from Africa. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 09:55:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406741900</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Southern Colonies - economy &amp; industry (facts)</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406743977</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Major industry in Maryland was manufacturing of iron and shipbuilding, and agriculture.<br>2. Major industry in Virginia was plantation crops including wheat, corn, and tobacco.<br>3. North Carolina's agriculture focused on plantations of tobacco, rice, and indigo (purple dye). Industry in South Carolina focused on plantations of cattle, cotton, tobacco, rice, and indigo.<br>4. Georgia's agriculture included sugar, rice, and indigo.<br>5. Plantations were often so large that families were separated by hundreds of miles, and workers or slaves often lived in housing on the plantations.<br>6. Laborers in the Southern Colonies were often either slaves or indentured servants. Indentured servants were immigrants from England that agreed to work off their debt (cost of moving to America) by working on the plantation for so many years.<br>7. Settlers who could not afford the plantation lifestyle moved inland - which was more dangerous due to wildlife and the Indians whose land was being taken away as settlers took over. They often built forts for protection.<br>8. Plantations were often made up of a home, a dairy, a kitchen, stables, cabins, barns, a smokehouse, carpenter and brick-maker shops, and sometimes schools for the children.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 10:01:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406743977</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>backbone</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406744380</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the chief support of a system or organization.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 10:03:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406744380</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>life expectancy</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406744624</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the average period that a person may expect to live.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 10:03:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406744624</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>yeoman farmer</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406859707</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a farmer who cultivates his own land; historically one of a class of lesser freeholders, below the gentry, who cultivated their own land, early admitted in England to political rights.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 14:29:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406859707</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Southern Slavery</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406864588</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Slaves lived in all the colonies by 1750. Most lived in the Southern Colonies. Enslaved Africans were treated as if they were property, not people. Plantation owners used cruel laws<br>and punishments to make slaves work hard. Some overseers whipped and even killed workers. Many slaves died young because of this bad treatment. Some ran away. Others created a new culture that blended African traditions to help them survive. They formed close communities. Many adopted Christianity. They combined African music with their religious beliefs to make powerful spirituals.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 14:36:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406864588</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>be sought after</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406865648</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>be much in demand; generally desired.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 14:37:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406865648</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Women in Southern Colonies</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406867682</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Plantation women quilted, helped raise their children, and helped their husbands supervise work on the plantation. Women had few legal rights could not vote or preach. The average women had house and outdoor duties.Women respected and bowed down to their husbands regardless of their class.<br><br>Although not much wage work was available to women in the colonies, women contributed to the economic output of their families through their <strong>domestic labor</strong>. Women were often involved with social and economic exchange beyond their own households and farms, taking responsibility for certain tasks and trades.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 14:40:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406867682</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406868759</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>The</strong> <strong>Enlightenment</strong>, sometimes called the 'Age of Enlightenment', was a late 17th- and 18th-century intellectual movement emphasizing reason, individualism, and skepticism. The Enlightenment presented a challenge to traditional religious views.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 14:42:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406868759</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>paternalistic</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406874418</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>relating to or characterized by the restriction of the freedom and responsibilities of subordinates or dependants in their supposed interest.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-05 14:49:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/406874418</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Negro laborers</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407961733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>What is America doing with these black laborers? We may envisage four hosts who must deal with them — the planter, the manufacturer, the union laborer, and the Northern Negro. The planter inherits a tradition from which he seldom escapes. This tradition regards the Negro laborer as a serf, without a vote, with little education, low wages, and medieval conditions of work. The manufacturer, North and South, has as his ideal a surplus of common labor, whether black white, which will geep wages low by severe competition and periodic unemployment. The union laborer proposes so to restrict and monopolize skilled labor as to compel the employer to grant a living wage. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 09:56:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407961733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407963281</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There is still the slave-holding psychology. The Commissioner of Labor in Georgia openly declares that his department is going to stop the “enticing” of Negroes away by arresting “labor agent parasites” and “heavily fining” them; and by other methods of law and force. Can he keep Negroes in the South by,these methods? A colored spokesman for five families talked last December to a reporter of the Memphis “They claimed to have been kept in debt year in and out by landowners. One man, who refused to give his name, said he had worked ten years on one plantation, and this year in settling up he had only $50 coming to him. He claimed this would not pay for clothing for his family, let alone buying provisions. What live stock they had in the year 1921 was sold to help them through the crisis when cotton was, at its lowest price.” This debt-peonage have been added in recent years the ravages of the boll-weevil. The secretary of the American Cotton Association notes the depopulation of cotton plantations by both white and black farmers on his account and notes that no young mules have been shipped to the cotton belt since the spring of 1920.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:01:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407963281</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cheaper labor</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407965770</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Cheap labour is when a person works hard and earns a low wage. They can work in awful conditions.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:08:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407965770</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407967323</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Sometime in 1619,</strong> a Portuguese slave ship, the São João Bautista, traveled across the Atlantic Ocean with a hull filled with human cargo: captive Africans from Angola, in southwestern Africa. The men, women and children, most likely from the kingdoms of Ndongo and Kongo, endured the horrific journey, bound for a life of enslavement in Mexico. Almost half the captives had died by the time the ship was seized by two English pirate ships; the remaining Africans were taken to Point Comfort, a port near Jamestown, the capital of the English colony of Virginia, which the Virginia Company of London had established 12 years earlier. The colonist John Rolfe wrote to Sir Edwin Sandys, of the Virginia Company, that in August 1619, a “Dutch man of war” arrived in the colony and “brought not anything but 20 and odd Negroes, which the governor and cape merchant bought for victuals.” The Africans were most likely put to work in the tobacco fields that had recently been established in the area.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:12:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407967323</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407970099</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Between 1735 and 1750 Georgia was unique among Britain's American colonies, as it was the only one to attempt to prohibit black slavery as a matter of public policy. The decision to ban slavery was made by the founders of Georgia, the Trustees.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:20:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407970099</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407970487</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/421312199/e5e5e1e45229101d06874cbdce3fde75/m_3772.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:21:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407970487</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slavery banned</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407970969</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>General <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3511">James Oglethorpe</a>, the earl of Egmont, and the other Trustees were not opposed to the enslavement of Africans as a matter of principle. They banned slavery in Georgia because it was inconsistent with their social and economic intentions. Given the Spanish presence in Florida, slavery also seemed certain to threaten the <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3040">military</a> security of the colony. Spain offered freedom in exchange for military service, so any slaves brought to Georgia could be expected to help the Spanish in their efforts to destroy the still-fragile English colony.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:23:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407970969</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407971403</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/4330">Trustees</a> wished to guarantee the early settlers a comfortable living rather than the prospect of the enormous personal wealth associated with the plantation economies elsewhere in British America. They would obtain this living by working for themselves rather than being dependent upon the work of others. The Trustees believed that the silk and other Mediterranean-type commodities they envisaged for Georgia did not require the employment of enslaved Africans but could be easily produced by Europeans.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:24:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407971403</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407971701</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Initially the Trustees believed the settlers would follow their wishes and not use enslaved workers. Oglethorpe realized, however, that many settlers were reluctant to work. Some settlers began to grumble that they would never make money unless they were allowed to employ enslaved Africans. Many South Carolinians, who wanted to expand their planting interests into Georgia, encouraged this line of thinking.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:25:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407971701</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407971949</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Oglethorpe soon persuaded the other Trustees that the ban on slavery had to be backed by the authority of the British government. The influential Trustees easily persuaded the House of Commons that their intentions for Georgia, and the colony's very survival in the face of the Spanish threat, depended upon the exclusion of enslaved Africans. In 1735, two years after the first settlers arrived, the House of Commons passed legislation prohibiting slavery in Georgia.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:26:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407971949</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407972366</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Georgians' campaign to overturn the parliamentary ban on slavery was soon under way and grew in intensity during the late 1730s. Its two most important leaders were a Lowland Scot named Patrick Tailfer and Thomas Stephens, the son of <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3050">William Stephens</a>, the Trustees' secretary in Georgia. They and their band of supporters bombarded the Trustees with letters and petitions demanding that slavery be permitted in Georgia. They also wrote pamphlets in which they set out their case in more detail.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:27:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407972366</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407972924</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The crux of their argument was that the Trustees' economic design for Georgia was simply impractical. They insisted that it would be impossible for settlers to prosper without enslaved workers. West Africans, they argued, were far more able than Europeans to cope with the climatic conditions found in the South. As the growing wealth of South Carolina's rice economy demonstrated, slaves were far more profitable than any other form of labor available to the colonists. Tailfer and Thomas Stephens wanted to recreate the slave-based plantation economy of South Carolina in the Georgia Lowcountry.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div>The Trustees replied to those settlers they depicted as ungrateful "</div><div><a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/4325">malcontents</a>" by simply repeating the arguments that had persuaded them to ban slavery in the first place. They also pointed out that not all Georgia colonists were demanding that slavery be permitted in the colony. They received important backing for their policy from two groups of settlers. In a petition sent to the Trustees in 1738, the Highland Scots who had settled in and around <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3329">Darien</a> expressed their unequivocal support for the continuing ban on slavery. Pastor <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3049">Johann Martin Boltzius</a> expressed similar sentiments on behalf of the <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/2119">Salzburger</a> community at <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/2762">Ebenezer</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:29:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407972924</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407973380</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Before the late 1730s, the Trustees were not under any serious pressure to lift the ban. All this began to change when Thomas Stephens realized that financial pressure could be brought to bear on them. Because the Trustees depended upon the British House of Commons to finance the continuing settlement and defense of Georgia, Stephens tried to persuade the House to make its financial support conditional upon the introduction of slavery. He spent time in London lobbying members of Parliament and trying to secure a broad base of public support for his arguments. Thanks to the political influence of the Trustees, his efforts bore little fruit. As long as Spain remained a threat, the British Parliament was willing to invest money into the Georgia project.<br><br></div><div>The situation changed dramatically in 1742 when Oglethorpe defeated the Spanish at the <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3408">Battle of Bloody Marsh</a> and returned to England. The military arguments in favor of prohibiting slavery were no longer tenable. In Oglethorpe's absence a growing number of settlers became more willing to ignore the ban on slavery.<br><br></div><div>By the mid-1740s the Trustees realized that excluding slavery was rapidly becoming a lost cause. Oglethorpe had virtually lost interest in Georgia by this time, and the health of Egmont had begun to deteriorate. In the absence of their strong leadership, there was little to prevent the Georgia settlers, with the connivance of South Carolina sympathizers, from illicitly importing slaves primarily through the <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/4395">Augusta</a> area.<br><br></div><div>The Trustees, bowing to the inevitable, agreed that the ban on slavery be overturned but only after they had consulted their officials in Georgia about the conditions under which slavery would be permitted. In opposition to South Carolina's slave code, the Trustees wished to ensure a smaller ratio of blacks to whites in Georgia. These consultations were completed by 1750. The Trustees asked the House of Commons to replace the Act of 1735 with one that would permit slavery in Georgia as of January 1, 1751. The legislation they recommended was adopted. The Trustees' desire to exert an influence on the pattern of slavery and race relations in Georgia, even after their Royal Charter expired in 1752, proved very short-lived.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:30:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407973380</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407973887</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The lifting of the Trustees' ban opened the way for Carolina planters to fulfill the dream of expanding their slave-based rice economy into the Georgia Lowcountry. The planters and their slaves flooded into Georgia and soon dominated the colony's government. In 1755 they replaced the slave code agreed to by the Trustees with one that was virtually identical to South Carolina's. This code was amended in 1765 and again in 1770.<br><br></div><div>The South Carolinian migrants enjoyed a significant wealth advantage over the original settlers of Georgia. They quickly established socioeconomic structures and relationships that were nearly identical to those they had known in their own colony. Within twenty years some sixty planters who owned roughly half the colony's rapidly increasing slave population dominated the apex of Lowcountry Georgia's <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/4370">rice economy</a>.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:31:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407973887</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407974332</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Between 1750 and 1775 Georgia's enslaved population grew in size from less than 500 to approximately 18,000 people. Beginning in the mid-1760s, Georgia began to import slaves directly from Africa—mainly from Angola, Sierra Leone, and the Gambia. Most were given physically demanding work in the rice fields, although some were forced to labor in <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3509">Savannah</a>'s expanding urban economy.<br><br></div><div>Slaves had no legal right to private lives, and they struggled against daunting odds to establish some degree of autonomy for themselves. With varying degrees of success, they tried to recreate the patterns of family and religious life they had known in Africa. The circumstances of slavery in the Georgia Lowcountry precluded the possibility of organized rebellion. Yet enslaved people resisted their owners and asserted their humanity in ways that included running away as well as acts of verbal and physical violence. The <a href="https://m.georgiaencyclopedia.org/node/3929">American Revolution</a> (1775-83) would offer them the best prospect of freedom.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:33:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407974332</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407974517</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By the mid-1750s the earlier debate on the introduction of slavery to Georgia seemed never to have taken place. Almost every white person in the Georgia Lowcountry at that time believed that the institution of slavery was essential to his or her economic prosperity. During the remainder of the colonial period, no white Georgian voices were raised to challenge that assumption.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:33:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407974517</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407977099</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the 1730s, England founded the last of its colonies in North America. The project was the brain child of James Oglethorpe, a former army officer. After Oglethorpe left the army, he devoted himself to helping the poor and debt-ridden people of London, whom he suggested settling in America. His choice of Georgia, named for the new King, was also motivated by the idea of creating a defensive buffer for South Carolina, an increasingly important colony with many potential enemies close by. These enemies included the Spanish in Florida, the French in Louisiana and along the Mississippi River, and these powers' Indian allies throughout the region.<br><br></div><div>Twenty trustees received funding from Parliament and a charter from the King, issued in June 1732. The charter granted the trustees the powers of a corporation; they could elect their own governing body, make land grants, and enact their own laws and taxes. Since the corporation was a charitable body, none of the trustees could receive any land from, or hold a paid position in, the corporation. Too, since the undertaking was designed to benefit the poor, the trustees placed a 500-acre limit on the size of individual land holdings. People who had received charity and who had not purchased their own land could not sell, or borrow money against, it. The trustees wanted to avoid the situation in South Carolina, which had very large plantations and extreme gaps between the wealthy and the poor.<br><br></div><div>The undertaking was paternalistic through and through. For example, the trustees did not trust the colonists to make their own laws. They therefore did not establish a representative assembly, although every other mainland colony had one. The trustees made all laws for the colony. Second, the settlements were laid out in compact, confined, and concentrated townships. In part, this arrangement was instituted to enhance the colony's defenses, but social control was another consideration. Third, the trustees prohibited the import and manufacture of rum, for rum would lead to idleness. Finally, the trustees prohibited Negro slavery, for they believed that this ban would encourage the settlement of "English and Christian" people.<br><br></div><div>Georgia's first year, 1733, went well enough, as settlers began to clear the land, build houses, and construct fortifications. Those who came in the first wave of settlement realized that after the first year they would be working for themselves. Meanwhile, Oglethorpe, who went to Georgia with the first settlers, began negotiating treaties with local Indian tribes, especially the Upper Creek tribe. Knowing that the Spanish, based in Florida, had great influence with many of the tribes in the region, Oglethorpe thought it necessary to reach an understanding with these native peoples if Georgia was to remain free from attack. In addition, the Indian trade became an important element of Georgia's economy.<br><br></div><div>It didn't take long, however, until the settlers began to grumble about all the restrictions imposed on them by the trustees. In part, this grumbling may have been due to the fact that most of those moving to Georgia after the first several years were from other colonies, especially South Carolina. These settlers viewed restrictions on the size of individual land holdings as a sure pathway to poverty. They also opposed restrictions on land sales and the prohibition against slavery for the same reason. They certainly did not like the fact that they were deprived of any self-government and their rights as Englishmen. By the early 1740s, the trustees slowly gave way on most of the colonists' grievances<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:42:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407977099</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> The negro slavery</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407979810</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The labor problem was the most serious of all problems for the colonial planter. Some form of bondage was necessary to bring workers to the new lands and to keep them working thereafter for their masters. The colonizers grasped at any kind of labor within reach. Negro slavery was neither the first nor the only form of servitude in North America; it was preceded by Indian and white slavery.<br><br></div><div><br>The sparse native Indian population proved no solution. The English colonists tried to enslave the North American Indians in the same manner as the Spaniards enslaved the natives of West Indies, Mexico, and Peru. When they discovered that the Indians were either not numerous enough or, like certain African tribes, would not submit to slavery but sickened and died in captivity, they had little further use for them. They proceeded either to slaughter them on the spot or to drive them westward.<br><br></div><div><br>At first the landed proprietors relied upon the importation of white bondsmen from the mother country. England and the continent were combed for servants to be sent to America.<br><br></div><div><br>Some of these indentured servants came of their own accord, voluntarily agreeing to serve their masters for a certain term of years, usually four to seven, in return for their passage. Many others, especially German serfs, were sold by their lords to the slave merchants and ship-owners. In addition the overflowing prisons of England were emptied of their inmates and the convicts brought to America to be sold into servitude for terms ranging from four to fourteen years.<br><br></div><div><br>The Cromwellian conquest of Ireland in the middle of the seventeenth century made slaves as well as subjects of the Irish people. Over one hundred thousand men, women, and children were seized by the English troops and shipped over to the West Indies where they were sold into slavery upon the tobacco plantations. In <strong>The Re-Conquest of Ireland</strong> James Connolly quotes the following instance of the methods used.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:50:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407979810</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407980469</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Negro slave trade came to the planter’s rescue. Negroes could be purchased at reasonable prices and brought in unlimited numbers from the African coasts. They were accustomed to tropical climates and could be worked in such miasmic, malaria-breeding swamplands as those of South Carolina. They were gregarious, prolific, and, once domesticated, were willing to breed in captivity. By keeping the Negroes scattered, ignorant, and terrorized, the slave-owners could keep them in perpetual subjection and prevent them from escaping with impunity. The color of the black man’s skin became the sign of servitude, enabling the white man to keep the Slave yoke fixed firmly on his shoulders.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:53:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407980469</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407980788</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The profits of the slave trade were another potent factor in the extension of Negro slavery. The traffic in slaves became too lucrative an enterprise to remain in private hands. The sovereigns of Spain and England contended with each other for the lion’s share of the trade to fill the royal treasuries. The possession of the slave trade was one of the richest prizes at stake in the War of the Spanish Succession. The Treaty of Utrecht which concluded the war in 1713 awarded a monopoly of the slave trade to England. Their majesties organized a company for carrying on the traffic: one quarter of the stock was taken by Philip of Spain; another by Queen Anne of England; and the remaining half was divided amongst her subjects. Thus the sovereigns of Spain and England became the largest slave merchants in the world.<br><br></div><div><br>The slave trade became a cornerstone of Anglo-American commerce. Many fortunes in Old and New England were derived from the traffic. This trade enjoyed the special protection of the Crown whose agents persistently vetoed the efforts of colonial legislatures to abolish or restrict it. It is estimated that from 1713 to 1780 over twenty thousand slaves were carried annually to America by British and American ships. In 1792 there were 132 ships engaged in the slave trade in Liverpool alone.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:54:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407980788</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407981206</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>How economic necessity and political pressure combined to impose slavery upon the colonial upper classes is explained in the following extract from a letter written in 1757 by Peter Fontaine, a Huguenot emigrant to Virginia, to a friend across the Atlantic:<br><br></div><div><br>The Negroes are enslaved by the Negroes themselves before they are purchased by the masters of the ships who bring them here. It is to be sure at our choice whether we buy them or not, so this is our crime, folly, or whatever you please to call it. But our Assembly, foreseeing the ill consequences of importing such numbers amongst us, hath often attempted to lay a duty upon them which would amount to a prohibition, such as ten or twenty pounds a head, but no governor dare pass such a law, having instructions to the contrary from the Board of Trade at home. By this means they are forced upon us, whether we will or not. This plainly shows the African Company hath the advantage of the colonies, and may do as it pleases with the ministry...<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:55:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407981206</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407981597</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>A common laborer, white or black, if you can be so favored as to hire one, is a shilling sterling or fifteen pence currency per day; a bungling carpenter two shillings or two shillings and sixpence per day; besides diet and lodging. That is, for a lazy fellow to get wood and water, $19.16, current per annum; add to this seven or eight pounds more and you have a slave for life.<br><br></div><div><br>“It seems probable,” says Charles Beard in <strong>The Rise of American Civilization</strong>, “that at least half of the immigrants into America before the Revolution, certainly outside New England, were either indentured servants or Negro slaves.”<br><br></div><div><br>The original foundations of American society rested not upon free but upon slave and semi-servile labor, both white and black.<br><br></div><div><br> <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 10:57:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407981597</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407986163</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Land tenure in Trusteeship Georgia</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/421312199/1af14e62cd04d5dc08a163a1d9cae783/20191107_121324.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 11:13:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/407986163</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408304055</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A colony of debtors<br><br></div><div>In the early 18th century, a few thousand people in England were imprisoned for debt. They suffered terrible abuses and harsh treatment. Parliament committee on prison reform, chaired by James Oglethorpe, took actions to release debtors from prisons. However, they had no means of support so they left their homes in the countryside, went to cities and often resorted to criminal activities. <br><br></div><div>Oglethorpe and a group of ex-prisoners arrived in Georgia in 1732. They founded a colony between southern British colonies and Spanish Florida, as a so-called buffer state. It was established on the principles of Enlightenment philosophy, which meant following certain rules and regulations to create a prospering community of hard-working, righteous and virtuous families which worked on government-given farms. The were not allowed to consume alcohol, sell or buy any land. Slavery was banned, too. <br><br></div><div>The Oglethorpe plan ultimately failed, and 20 years later, Georgia became a royal colony.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 19:21:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408304055</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Outbreak</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408310012</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a sudden start of war, disease, violence, etc.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 19:28:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408310012</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Malaria</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408313780</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a mosquito-borne infectious disease  that affects humans and animals.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 19:33:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408313780</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yellow fever</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408315806</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>an acute viral heamorrhagic disease transmitted by infectious mosquitoes. The "yellow" in the name refers to the jaundice that affects some patients. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 19:36:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408315806</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lifestyle</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408318898</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A way of living of individuals, families (households), and societies, which they manifest in coping with their physical, psychological, social, and economic environments on a day-to-day basis.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 19:40:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408318898</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tidewater aristocrats</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408327599</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>refers to very rich people who lived on a region called Tidewater or Coastal Plain. They owned tobacco plantations and become very wealthy by forcing imported slaves to work for them.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 19:53:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408327599</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Beck and call</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408329702</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>to readily obey and execute somebody else's orders, even the slightest requests;  be completely subservient to somebody.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 19:57:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408329702</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Private tutors </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408332461</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>are teachers who provide one-on-one assistance to one or more students on a certain subject areas or skills. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 20:02:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408332461</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Charitable investors</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408335011</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>are people who invest money, otherwise intended to be a donation, in a business that will increase the amount of the sum and improve life in general in a society. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 20:06:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408335011</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Georgia becomes a royal colony </title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408365463</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> The trustees were unable to establish self-government and gave up before the 21 year charter had expired. Freemen were given the right to vote (unless they were Roman Catholics) and the people elected an assembly. The governor was appointed by the king.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 21:02:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408365463</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The mulberry tree plan</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408368524</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Silkworms were transported from Europe with the hope of developing a silk industry in Georgia's mulberry trees.</div><div>Unfortunately, the plan itself was a miserable failure. Georgia residents complained that some citizens received fertile land while others were forced to work uncooperative soil. Since they could not buy or sell their land, they felt trapped. The mulberry tree plan failed, because the trees in Georgia were the wrong type for cultivating silk. Cries to permit slavery followed as the Georgians envied the success of their neighbors. Eventually many simply fled the colony for the Carolinas. King George revoked the charter in 1752 and Georgia became a royal colony. One of the world's best organized utopian experiments came to an abrupt end.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 21:08:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408368524</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bootlegging</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408413753</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Bootlegging, in U.S. history, illegal traffic in liquor in violation of legislative restrictions on its manufacture, sale, or transportation. The word apparently came into general use in the Midwest in the 1880s to denote the practice of concealing flasks of illicit liquor in boot tops when going to trade with Indians. The term became part of the American vocabulary when the Eighteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution effected the national prohibition of alcohol from 1920 until its repeal in 1933.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-07 23:25:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408413753</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>abate</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408577443</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(of something unpleasant or severe) become less intense or widespread.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-08 11:28:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408577443</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>pecuniary </title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408577644</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>relating to or consisting of money.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-08 11:29:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408577644</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Questions</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408995959</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Why were John Locke's thoughts on the human mind and education an important influence on the American Revolution?<br>2. What were the main historical contributing factors that instigated the American Revolution?<br>3. Why were colonial assemblies the most important form of governance in the colonies?<br>4. What led the colonists to claim equal rights as those hailing from the British Empire (i.e. the mother country)? Why did they ultimately disagree?<br>5. What ideological and religious shifts caused the colonists to seek individual liberties and question authority?<br>6. What were the main reasons that ultimately made the American Revolution rise in popularity? What forms of resistance to the British Empire were imperative for carrying out the Revolution?<br>7. Why were the Virginia Resolves composed more freely when distributed to the public as opposed to the original resolutions passed by House of Burgesses?<br>8. Why can the American Revolution said to be nuanced and paradoxical?<br>9. Why was the Tea Act so important?<br>10. What was the purpose of Coarcive acts?<br>11. What was the role of women during Revolution?<br>12. What issues did Continental Congress have to adress?<br>13. How did the Continetal Cingess try to avoid war with Britain?<br>14. Why was the Battle of Bunker Hill considered a patriot victory?<br>15. What did Lord Dumore's proclamation do?<br>16. Even though the Revolution had the rhetoric of equality, were the measures regarding slaves and natives really effective and fair?<br>17. How did the Revolition impact the modern world?</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2019-11-09 12:55:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/408995959</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Understanding nuances in the American Revolution</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409006487</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The undertaking of the American Revolution not only implied that a new "age of revolution" was at hand, but also became the foundation for Americans' own conceptions about life, ideals and governance. Despite the fact that there seemed to be little cause for instigating a revolution at the time, numerous events that shaped and ultimately led to the American Revolution can be identified, many of which are nuanced and, in some cases, politically and morally problematic.<br><br>1. <strong>Slavery</strong> - even though it had been based on liberal and idealistic principles, slavery persisted as a practice for the duration of and for a long while after the Revolution. Widespread talk of liberty gave thousands of slaves high expectations, and many were ready to fight for a democratic revolution that might offer them freedom. To illustrate, in 1775 at least 10 to 15 black soldiers, including some slaves, fought against the British at the battles of Lexington and Bunker Hill. Two of these men, Salem Poor and Peter Salem, earned special distinction for their bravery. By 1776, however, it had become clear that the revolutionary rhetoric of the founding fathers did not include enslaved blacks. The Declaration of Independence promised liberty for all men but failed to put an end to slavery; and although they had proved themselves in battle, the Continental Congress adopted a policy of excluding black soldiers from the army.<br><br>2. <strong>Common resistance to authority</strong> - Many of the colonists, despite hailing from different colonies, opposed the raising of taxes and colonial laws passed by the British Parliament in unison, especially when these acts began to negatively affect the intricate transatlantic trade and economies that had been established and flourishing in the colonies. Due to the state of constant war that the British Empire had found itself in at the time as well as all the expences it had thus required, the representatives of the Parliament (Whigs and Tories) sought to eliminate the debts caused by war by means of higher taxation and cutting spending on the colonies. This thoroughly imperialistic attitude served to only further provoke the colonists into an eventual uprising. Many colonists felt that they should not pay these taxes, because they were passed in England by Parliament, not by their own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens. It was the phrase '<em>taxation without representation</em>' that was to draw many to the cause of the American patriots against the mother country.<br><br>3. <strong>Democracy</strong> - Limited forms of self-governing were being practiced in the colonies for over 150 years before the Revolution, usually following British models and customs. Thus the "democratic experiment" of Colonial America wasn't new, but even so, neither could the American Revolution be said to have been purely democratic (in spite of the proclamations of universal liberties in the Declaration of Independence). The "founding fathers" may have provided the theoretical and ideological foundation for the Revolution, but this served primarily for the acquisition of independence from the British Empire, not for the purpose of establishing a democratic governance. Furthermore, the common call for Revolution and the conjoined forces of colonists standing up to the mistreatment and injustices of the British Empire did not always appeal to elite leaders, yet this did not manage to diminish the rise of popular forces unified by a common cause - carrying out the Revolution itself. It ultimately proved to be the most important initiator for the shaping of a radically new nation, and its significance continues to be observed throughout American history onwards.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-09 14:33:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409006487</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Stamp Act</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409010268</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.history.com/.amp/this-day-in-history/stamp-act-imposed-on-american-colonies" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-09 15:00:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409010268</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The origins of the American Revolution</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409139766</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. <strong>Wars and economy </strong>- After the Glorious Revolution through the eighteenth century, the British Empire found itself in a state of constant war, which was costly and inhibited the proclamation of any definitive policies in regards to the relationship between the Empire and its American colonies. The War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714) and the Seven Years War (1756-1763) were both politically and economically challenging for the Empire and this led to further misunderstanding and dismissal of the colonists' demands of liberty and independence. On the other hand, the competing, divisive political visions within the Empire itself were another issue that contributed to such a state of affairs. Many British politicians at the time envisioned what could be described as an authoritarian empire that thrives through colonisation and the extraction of resources, and wanting through so doing to diminish the national debt by raising taxes and cutting spending, which was a fairly damaging and exploitative assault on the colonists' lifestyles and all the aspects that they entail. However, some of the more liberal politicians, such as the "patriot Whigs", sought to resolve the issue of taxation and spending via means of economic growth rather than the imperialistic exploitation proposed by their more conservative peers. According to them, the colonists of America should be able to claim equal status as those subjects living in the mother country. Coherent reform, in light of problems such as these, remained unresolved.<br><br>2. <strong>Claims to independence</strong> - As observed in the previous paragraph, the colonists saw themselves as equal in rights as those hailing from the mother country, and owing to this thought that the claims for liberty and independence should be furnished to them, as opposed to the situation that they found themselves in prior to the Revolution, which was a state of exploitative taxation and legal mistreatment on the part of the Empire. Ample economic and democratic growth also took place in the colonies during the eighteenth century, which were observed as successes exactly due to the loosely-defined, "hands-off" approach with which the Empire handled the colonies with the policies passed by Parliament (accorsing to James Otis Jr. the colonists even thought they earned themselves even more rights than the subjects in the mother country due to the Empire's treatment of the American colonies). Colonial assemblies, the self-governing bodies established in each separate colonies, also served to develop this view. In many ways these assemblies resembled the structure and legislative power as that held by the House of Commons in the mother country (managing taxation, the colonies' revenue, granting salaries to royal officials), but due to Britain being preoccupied with its wars in Europe, it failed to provide definitive prerogatives of the assemblies. Through so doing it wasn't able to prevent the further empowerment that the assemblies enjoyed in the colonies, i.e. this inaction on the part of the British served as justification of the colonies' local governance.<br><br>3. <strong>Republicanism</strong> - In both the colonies and the Empire, land posed the prerequisite for political participation. Thus land being more easily obtainable in the colonies brought about more male political participants, drawing inspiration from their counterparts in the mother country - the "Country" party. Their ideological values were called republicanism, which most significantly stressed the corrupting nature of power and required virtuousness on behalf of the citizens participating in self-governance. This also implied constant vigilance on the part of the Patriots due to the potential threats such as weaving of conspiracies, the rise of centralized authority and tyranny within Colonial America. These ideas became widespread and accepted among the colonists, but still failed to resonate with many within the Empire itself.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-10 11:31:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409139766</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ideological shifts preceding the American Revolution</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409539774</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Two seemingly disparate ideologies - that of the <strong>Enlightenment</strong> and the <strong>Great Awakening</strong> - greatly influenced the changing attitudes towards challenging older and more traditional ideas about authority. The most influential ideas proposed by the Enlightenment thinkers of Europe that have significantly impacted colonists' opinions are those attributed to <strong>John Locke</strong>, the 18th century British philosopher, who claimed that the mind is originally a blank slate (<em>tabula rasa</em>) and that the environment is the primary source for formative experiences in human lives in his <em>Essay Concerning Human Understanding</em>, all of which implies that those living more affluent lifestyles are not innately superior to those less well off in regards to their access to education, resources and patronage. On top of this, his ideas in <em>Some Thoughts Concerning Education</em> follow in the same spirit, proposing the notion that better educational availability should produce rational human beings capable of critical thinking and not readily accepting tradition and authority without viable evidence. All this had widespread effects on the colonies, and later the new American nation.<br>The Great Awakening refers to the simultaneous unprecedent wave of evangelical <strong>Protestant revivalism</strong>. The <strong>Rev. George Whitefield</strong>, in the period from 1739 to 1740, travelled throughout Colonial America and held Calvinistic sermons to huge crowds that were designed to appeal to the listeners' emotions. He spoke of the <em>"conversion" experience</em> by which Whitefield advocated taking personal responisbility for one's salvation and unmediated relationship with God, and that "unconverted" ministers only furthered the issue of there being a barrier between God and the faithful.<br>Consequently, these two differing but intertwining ideologies successfully managed to encourage the colonists' attitudes to shift toward ideals of personal liberties, questioning authority as well as to promote an individualistic approach to one's own life.<br><br>Furthermore, the colonists were experiencing a cultural shift within this same time frame: they were becoming more culturally similar to the Britons living in the motherland, striving to attain British standards of living through being able to afford various British goods, such as wares and fashion, and through so doing binding the economy of the colonies with the Empire's own by establishing strong economic interdependence. Naturally, this desire for the British goods became heavily associated with the lifestyles and liberties that the British were enjoying at the time, and thus brought about an attitude that would advocate challenging the Empire's authority, eventually being one of the causes for the Revolution itself.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-11 16:21:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409539774</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Legislative reform prior to the American Revolution</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409707715</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>After the end of the Seven Years' War, the British Empire sought to reform and repair the now costly expansion it had manage to acquire during half a century of almost constant conflict with other countries. These "victories" led the Empire to double the national debt to 13.5 times its annual revenue. In order to firmly establish the means by which the Empire could secure its authority in the colonies it has achieved in the past and as a consequence of this war, in the 1760s the Empire attempted to consolidate its control in the colonies via legislative means, which, in turn inspired resistance.<br><br>1. <strong>The Royal Proclamation of 1763</strong> - In 1760 when King George III took the Crown, he established Tory rule after thirty year of Whig rule. The Tories supported an authoritarian vision of the Empire, which implied a subordinate position for the colonies. This act was the first major postwar imperial action in North America, by which the king forbade settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains in order to limit costly warfare with the Native Americans residing therein. The colonists responded with indignation and demanded access to the territory for which they had fought together with the British.<br><br>2. <strong>The Sugar Act and the Currency Act </strong>- Parliament passed these two reforms in 1764. The purpose of the Sugar Act was to prevent the smuggling of molasses (=thick, dark brown juice obtained from raw sugar during the refining process; in North America: syrup used in baking and to pour over food) in New England, and this would be done by cutting the duty in half and increasing enforcement, whilst also proclaiming that smugglers will be tried by vice admiralty courts and not juries - a direct legislative assault on the colonists' liberties. It was an attempt to make the merchants pay an already existing duty. The Currency Act restricted the production of paper money, whereas coins, both silver and gold, were scarce in the colonies, which also directly impeded the colonies' transatlantic economies, especially damaging due to the fact that a postwar recession had already been set in motion. In all three of the Acts brought up thus far, the colonists observed a pattern of restricted liberties and increasingly exploitative taxation.<br><br>3. <strong>The Stamp Act</strong> - In 1765 Parliament passed this act, which demanded that many documents be printed on paper that had been stamped to show that the duty had been paid, including various printed mediums, such as newspapers, pamphlets, diplomas, legal documents, even playing cards. This was the first "internal" tax that the Empire had established in the colonies, unlike all the other modes of taxation thus far, as the colonies gave their contribution to the Empire via payment of indirect, "external" taxes such as customs and duties. Daniel Dulany wrote in 1765: "<em>A right to impose an internal tax on the colonies, without their consent for the single purpose of revenue, is denied, a right to regulate their trade without their consent is, admitted</em>." Numerous groups were affected by the Stamp Act across the colonies, including individuals with occupations such as lawyers, printers, college graduates, sailors (who played cards) - all leading to a broader and more popular resistance to the Empire's imperialism than there had ever been before.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-11 22:17:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/409707715</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Ta Act</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411077307</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it. Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard. Parliament responded with a series of harsh measures intended to stifle colonial resistance to British rule; two years later the war began.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:34:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411077307</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Crisis in Britain</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411078029</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In 1763, the British Empire emerged as the victor of the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/france/seven-years-war">Seven Years’ War</a> (1756-63). Although the victory greatly expanded the empire’s imperial holdings, it also left it with a massive national debt, and the British government looked to its North American colonies as an untapped source of revenue. In 1765, the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/british-parliament">British Parliament</a> passed the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/stamp-act">Stamp Act</a>, the first direct, internal tax that it had ever levied on the colonists. The colonists resisted the new tax, arguing that only their own elective colonial assemblies could tax them, and that “taxation without representation” was unjust and unconstitutional. After the British government rejected their arguments, the colonists resorted to physical intimidation and mob violence to prevent the collection of the stamp tax. Recognizing that the Stamp Act was a lost cause, Parliament repealed it in 1766.</div><div><br></div><div>Did you know? Each year around the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, a re-enactment party is thrown in Boston and visitors can tour replicas of the Dartmouth, the Beaver and the Eleanor, the three ships that were docked in the Boston Harbor and loaded with the East India Company's tea.</div><div>Parliament did not, however, renounce its right to tax the colonies or otherwise enact legislation over them. In 1767, Charles Townshend (1725-67), Britain’s new chancellor of the Exchequer (an office that placed him in charge of collecting the government’s revenue), proposed a law known as the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/townshend-acts">Townshend Revenue Act</a>. This act placed duties on a number of goods imported into the colonies, including tea, glass, paper and paint. The revenue raised by these duties would be used to pay the salaries of royal colonial governors. Since Parliament had a long history of using duties to regulate imperial trade, Townshend expected that the colonists would acquiesce to the imposition of the new taxes.</div><div>Unfortunately for Townshend, the Stamp Act had aroused colonial resentment to all new taxes, whether levied on imports or on the colonists directly. Moreover, Townshend’s proposal to use the revenue to pay the salaries of colonial governors aroused great suspicion among the colonists. In most colonies, the elective assemblies paid the governors’ salaries, and losing that power of the purse would greatly enhance the power of the royally appointed governors at the expense of representative government. To express their displeasure, the colonists organized popular and effective boycotts of the taxed goods. Once again, colonial resistance had undermined the new system of taxation, and once again, the British government bowed to reality without abandoning the principle that it had rightful authority to tax the colonies. In 1770, Parliament repealed all of the Townshend Act duties except for the one on tea, which was retained as a symbol of Parliament’s power over the colonies.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:36:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411078029</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Saving the East India company</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411078369</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The repeal of the majority of the Townshend Act took the wind out of the sails of the colonial boycott. Although many colonists continued to refuse to drink tea out of principle, many others resumed partaking of the beverage, though some of them salved their conscience by drinking smuggled Dutch tea, which was generally cheaper than legally imported tea.The American consumption of smuggled tea hurt the finances of the East India Company, which was already struggling through economic hardship. Although it was a private concern, the company played an integral role in Britain’s imperial economy and served as its conduit to the riches of the East Indies. A glut of tea and a diminished American market had left the company with tons of tea leaves rotting in its warehouses. In an effort to save the troubled enterprise, the British Parliament passed the Tea Act in 1773. The act granted the company the right to ship its tea directly to the colonies without first landing it in England, and to commission agents who would have the sole right to sell tea in the colonies. The act retained the duty on imported tea at its existing rate, but, since the company was no longer required to pay an additional tax in England, the Tea Act effectively lowered the price of the East India Company’s tea in the colonies.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:37:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411078369</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Destruction of the Tea</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411078773</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>If Parliament expected that the lowered cost of tea would mollify the colonists into acquiescing to the Tea Act, it was gravely mistaken. By allowing the East India Company to sell tea directly in the American colonies, the Tea Act cut out colonial merchants, and the prominent and influential colonial merchants reacted with anger. Other colonists viewed the act as a Trojan horse designed to seduce them into accepting Parliament’s right to impose taxes on them. The fact that the agents commissioned by the company to sell its tea included a number of pro-Parliament men only added fuel to the fire.The Tea Act revived the boycott on tea and inspired direct resistance not seen since the Stamp Act crisis. The act also made allies of merchants and patriot groups like the Sons of Liberty. Patriot mobs intimidated the company’s agents into resigning their commissions. In several towns, crowds of colonists gathered along the ports and forced company ships to turn away without unloading their cargo. The most spectacular action occurred in Boston, <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/massachusetts">Massachusetts</a>, where on December 16, 1773, a well-organized group of men dressed up as Native Americans and boarded the company ships. The men smashed open the chests of tea and dumped their contents into Boston Harbor in what later came to be known as the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/boston-tea-party">Boston Tea Party</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:38:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411078773</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Coercive Act and American indenpendence</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411079609</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Boston Tea Party caused considerable property damage and infuriated the British government. Parliament responded with the <a href="https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/british-parliament-adopts-the-coercive-acts">Coercive Acts</a> of 1774, which colonists came to call the Intolerable Acts. The series of measures, among other things, repealed the colonial charter of Massachusetts and closed the port of Boston until the colonists reimbursed the cost of the destroyed tea. Parliament also appointed General Thomas Gage (1719-87), the commander in chief of British forces in North America, as the governor of Massachusetts. Since the Stamp Act crisis of 1765, radical colonists had warned that new British taxes heralded an attempt to overthrow representative government in the colonies and to subjugate the colonists to British tyranny. The Coercive Acts convinced more moderate Americans that the radicals’ claims had merit. Colonial resistance intensified until, three years after Parliament passed the Tea Act, the colonies declared their independence as the United States of America. The <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/american-revolution-history">American Revolution</a> had begun.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:41:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411079609</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>More on Tea Act</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411080471</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By 1773, a relative calm existed between the British government and her colonial subjects. While British soldiers remained in America and the Townshend duty on tea remained the law, moderates on both sides appeared to be gaining control. A new act of Parliament, designed to help a struggling trading company, would next fuel the growing conflict between the American colonies and the British government. The East India Company, once one of England’s oldest and most successful trading companies, faced economic collapse in the years following the Seven Years War. The high annual payment the company was required to pay the British government was a factor in the company’s financial problems. The company enjoyed many friends in the government, and responding to pleas for governmental assistance, the British Parliament passed the Tea Act in May 1773 to help the company. This act eliminated the customs duty on the company’s tea and permitted its direct export to America. Though the company’s tea was still subject to the Townshend tax, dropping the customs duty would allow the East India Company to sell its tea for less than smuggled Dutch tea.<br><br></div><div>Though Parliament did not pass the Tea Act as a revenue measure, patriot leaders saw the act as a cunning way to get the Americans to pay the hated Townshend duty on tea by undercutting the price of smuggled Dutch tea. Many colonial leaders feared that the colonists would buy the company’s tea if it made it to shore and submit to the payment of the tea tax. This would undercut their claim that only colonial legislatures could tax the colonies. Angry mobs, like the Sons of Liberty, in Philadelphia and New York forced ships carrying the company’s tea to return to England without unloading. In Massachusetts, however, the Royal Governor refused to allow the ships carrying the company’s tea to leave the harbor without first paying the duty on the tea. On the evening of December 16, 1773, patriots disguised as Indians boarded three ships in Boston Harbor and threw over three hundred crates of tea into the water to make sure the tea did not get unloaded. The British government swiftly reacted to the Boston Tea Party. In the l8th century, the British proudly based their national identity on the twin pillars of international trade and the rule of law. The senseless destruction of private property by a group of hooligans shocked the English merchant class. Moderates within Great Britain who had long supported the colonists turned decisively against them. Instead of placating the colonies by repealing the Tea Act, the British government decided to punish Boston and the people of Massachusetts with a series of acts which became known as the Intolerable Acts or the Coercive Acts.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:44:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411080471</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>To stipulate</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411080854</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>to say </strong><a href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/exactly"><strong>exactly</strong></a><strong> how something must be or must be done</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:45:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411080854</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411082876</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>340 chests of <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/british-east-india-company">British East India Company Tea</a>, weighing over 92,000 pounds (roughly 46 tons), onboard the <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/history-brig-beaver"><em>Beaver</em></a>, <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/dartmouth"><em>Dartmouth</em></a>, and <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/eleanor"><em>Eleanor</em></a> were smashed open by the <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/sons-of-liberty">Sons of Liberty</a> armed with an assortment of axes and dumped into Boston Harbor the night of December 16, 1773. The cargo was worth more than $1,700,000 dollars in today’s money. Merchant John Andrews wrote in his December 18, 1773 letter,<em> “ten thousand pounds sterling of the East India Company’s tea was destroyed the night, or rather the evening before last…” </em>The British East India Company reported £9,659 worth of damage caused by the <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/">Boston Tea Party</a>.<br><br></div><div>The Bostonians throwing the tea into the water. 1773. New York Public Library.</div><div>No Damage and No Theft<br><br></div><div>Besides the destruction of the tea, historical accounts record no damage was done to any of the <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/ships-history">three ships</a>, the crew or any other items onboard the ships except for one broken padlock. The padlock was the personal property of one of the ships’ captains, and was promptly replaced the next day by the Patriots. Great care was taken by the Sons of Liberty to avoid the destruction of personal property – save for the cargo of British East India Company Tea. John Andrews recorded, <em>“…to Griffin’s wharf, where Hall, Bruce, and Coffin lay, each with 114 chest of the ill-fated article on board; the two former with only that article, but the latter, arrived at the wharf only the day before, was freighted with a large quantity of other goods, which they took the greatest care not to injure in the least…”<br></em><br></div><div>Destruction of tea at Boston. Destruction of the tea at Boston. 1773. New York Public Library.</div><div>Nothing was stolen or looted from the ships, not even the tea. One participant tried to steal some tea but was reprimanded and stopped. The Sons of Liberty were very careful about how the action was carried out and made sure nothing besides the tea was damaged. After the destruction of the tea, the participants swept the decks of the ships clean and anything that was moved was put back in its proper place. The crews of the ships attested to the fact there had been no damage to any of the ships except for the destruction of their cargoes of tea. Boston Tea Party participant <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/george-robert-twelves-hewes">George Hewes</a> remembered the following:<br><br></div><div>Hewes, George R. T. (George Robert Twelves), 1742-1840. New York Public Library.</div><div><br><em>“The commander of the division to which I belonged… ordered me to go to the captain and demand of him the keys to the hatches and a dozen candles. I made the demand accordingly, and the captain promptly replied, and delivered the articles; but requested me at the same time to do no damage to the ship or rigging. We then were ordered by our commanders to open the hatches and take out all the chests of tea and throw them overboard, and we immediately proceeded to execute his orders, first cutting and splitting the chests with our tomahawks, so as thoroughly to expose them to the effects of the water. In about three hours from the time we went on board, we had thus broken and thrown overboard every tea chest to be found in the ship, while those in the other ships were disposing of the tea in the same way, at the same time. We were surrounded by British armed ships, but no attempt was made to resist us… During the time we were throwing the tea overboard, there were several attempts made by some of the citizens of Boston and its vicinity to carry off small quantities of it for their family use. To effect that object, they would watch their opportunity to snatch up a handful from the deck, where it became plentifully scattered, and put it into their pockets. One Captain O’Connor, whom I well knew, came on board for that purpose, and when he supposed he was not noticed, filled his pockets, and also the lining of his coat. But I had detected him and gave information to the captain of what he was doing. We were ordered to take him into custody, and just as he was stepping from the vessel, I seized him by the skirt of his coat, and in attempting to pull him back, I tore it off; but, springing forward, by a rapid effort he made his escape. He had, however, to run a gauntlet through the crowd upon the wharf, each one, as he passed, giving him a kick or a stroke. Another attempt was made to save a little tea from the ruins of the cargo by a tall, aged man who wore a large cocked hat and white wig, which was fashionable at that time. He had sleightly slipped a little into his pockets, but being detected, they seized him and, taking his hat and wig from his head, threw them, together with the tea, of which they had emptied his pockets into the water. In consideration of his advanced age, he was permitted to escape, with now and then a slight kick…</em></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:52:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411082876</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The intolerable acts </title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411084761</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The Coercive Acts of 1774, known as the Intolerable Acts in the American colonies, were a series of four laws passed by the British Parliament to punish the colony of Massachusetts Bay for the Boston Tea Party. The four acts were the Boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration of Justice Act, and the Quartering Act. The Quebec Act of 1774 is sometimes included as one of the Coercive Acts, although it was not related to the Boston Tea Party. These oppressive acts sparked strong colonial resistance, including the meeting of the First Continental Congress, which George Washington attended in September and October 1774.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47da-e46f-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99"><em>This 1777 print entitled, "The able doctor, or America swallowing the bitter draught," depicts the British ministry forcing tea and imperial rule down America's throat. The Miriam and Ira D. Wallach Division of Art, Prints and Photographs: Print Collection, The New York Public Library.</em></a>The Boston Port Act was the first of the Coercive Acts. Parliament passed the bill on March 31, 1774, and King George III gave it royal assent on May 20<sup>th</sup>.  The act authorized the Royal Navy to blockade Boston Harbor because “the commerce of his Majesty’s subjects cannot be safely carried on there."<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note1"><sup>1</sup></a> The blockade commenced on June 1, 1774, effectively closing Boston’s port to commercial traffic. Additionally, it forbade any exports to foreign ports or provinces. The only imports allowed were provisions for the British Army and necessary goods, such as fuel and wheat. The Act mandated that the port remain shuttered until Bostonians made restitution to the East India Company (the owners of the destroyed tea), the king had determined that the colony was able to obey British laws, and that British goods once again could be traded in the harbor safely. However, if the Bostonians refused to pay the East India Company or the king remained unsatisfied, the harbor would be blockaded indefinitely.</div><div><br></div><div><br>The Massachusetts Government Act imperiled representative government in the colony. Assuming that Massachusetts was under mob rule, and to "[preserve] . . . the peace and good order of the said province," Parliament passed the act on May 20, 1774. It received royal assent on the same day.<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note2"><sup>2</sup></a><sup> </sup>The Massachusetts Council, previously constituted as an elected body with the governor’s approval, became appointed by the crown. Additionally, the Act gave the new royal governor the ability to choose judges and county sheriffs without the Council’s approval. County sheriffs could now also appoint jurors, harming the impartiality of the colony’s judicial system. The Government Act also restricted town meetings to once a year, with any additional meetings requiring the governor’s approval. <br><br></div><div><br>The Act for the Impartial Administration of Justice gained the king’s approval on the same day as the Massachusetts Government Act. This law sought to further increase the power of the governor by giving him the ability to move a trial to another colony or Great Britain if it was determined “that an indifferent trial cannot be had within the said province."<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note3"><sup>3 </sup></a>The Act eliminated the right to a fair trial by one’s peers, removing an established judicial principle dating to Magna Carta.<br><br></div><div><br>The Quartering Act was the fourth and final of the main Coercive Acts. It was given royal assent on June 2, 1774. The only act of the four to apply to all of the colonies, it allowed high-ranking military officials to demand better accommodations for troops and to refuse inconvenient locations for quarters. The inability to effectively house troops in North America had been a long-standing issue. Troops were often billeted far from the areas in which they operated, making it difficult for the army to exercise effective control over the colonists. However, the Act did not require colonists to house soldiers within their private homes, as is commonly believed. Rather, it specifically indicated that soldiers were to be housed in “uninhabited houses, out-houses, barns, or other buildings,” yet they were to be quartered at the colonists’ expense.<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note4"><sup>4<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>The Quebec Act, sometimes included as one of the four Coercive Acts, was under consideration by Parliament before the Boston Tea Party. It became law soon after the legislation to punish Massachusetts was enacted. Also known as the Canada Act, the law extended the borders of the province of Quebec southward to the Ohio River. The Act also granted “the free Exercise of the Religion of the Church of Rome,” as the territory was home to a large French Catholic majority.<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note5"><sup>5</sup></a><sup> </sup>While also instituting English criminal law, the act allowed French civil law to remain in place, which excluded trial by jury. The governor and legislative body established by the Quebec Act were crown-appointed positions with complete authority over the colony. At a time of widespread religious intolerance, many Protestant colonists shuddered at the prospect of tolerating Catholicism in North America.<br><br></div><div><br>The Coercive Acts were meant to break Massachusetts Bay and to warn the other colonies of the consequences of rebellious behavior. Each act was specifically designed to cause severe damage to a particular aspect of colonial life. The Boston Port Bill’s assault on colonial trade damaged the provincial economy, drove up unemployment, and starved the Boston people. The Government Act abolished representative government by establishing an all-powerful governor, and the Justice Act removed the right to a fair trial. The Quartering Act insured the close proximity of British troops to the colonists. Finally, the Quebec Act challenged some of the major reasons that colonists had fought in the French and Indian War—to defend and expand Protestantism and representative government in North America.<br><br></div><div><br>Understandably, colonists did not approve of the Coercive Acts. Yet, the petitioning of Parliament by individual colonies had already proved futile. On July 4, 1774, George Washington asked his friend Bryan Fairfax, “have we not addressed the Lords, and remonstrated to the Commons?"<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note6"><sup>6</sup></a> Thus, the First Continental Congress met on September 5, 1774, to coordinate a colonial response to Parliament’s actions. While attending the Congress, Washington advocated for what he called “the non-importation scheme,” or the boycott of British imports, which was similar to the Fairfax Resolves that he had earlier co-authored with George Mason.<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note7"><sup>7</sup></a> The Coercive Acts caused a clear shift in American public opinion. Where Washington had once questioned the radical Boston Tea Party, conceding “that we [do not] approve their conduct in destroying the Tea,” he now fully rallied behind the Bostonians, as he understood that the Coercive Acts threatened American liberty.<a href="https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-coercive-intolerable-acts-of-1774/#note8"><sup>8<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>Parliament did not anticipate the colonies coming to Boston’s defense, and with good reason, as this was the first instance of mass colonial unification. Unlike previous controversial legislation, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767, Parliament did not repeal the Coercive Acts. Hence, Parliament’s intolerable policies sowed the seeds of American rebellion and led to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War in April 1775.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 09:57:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411084761</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The role of women during American Revolution</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411088816</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>War has never solely been a male endeavor. Winning requires the help and participation of the entire population. This frequently occurred during Colonial times. Women performed many invaluable roles that helped secure the nation’s freedom. Along with supporting the war effort at home, several women even fought as soldiers, acted as couriers and engaged in espionage. Here are a few of their stories.<br><br></div><div>Sarah Fulton<br><br></div><div>Created in response to unfair British taxes and regulations, the Daughters of Liberty organization was first mentioned in the press in 1766. They would organize boycotts, help manufacture goods that were in short supply and even engage in public protest when necessary. Regarded as the “Mother of the <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/boston-tea-party-facts">Boston Tea Party</a>,” Sarah Fulton is credited with the idea of men disguising themselves as Mohawks. The Daughters of Liberty also encouraged others to support liberty. Famed Sons of Liberty leader <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/samuel-adams">Samuel Adams</a> said, “with ladies on our side, we can make the Tories tremble.”<br><br></div><div>Sybil Ludington<br><br></div><div>Known as the female <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/paul-revere">Paul Revere</a>, then 16-year-old Sybil Ludington rode 40 miles astride her horse Star to warn local militia that British troops were on the move. Redcoats had landed on the coast of Connecticut and were marching inland to destroy rebel supplies. Because Colonel Henry Ludington had to stay near Danbury to brief his soldiers, his eldest daughter volunteered to rouse the local militia. She rode through the night avoiding bandits and British patrols before returning safely in the morning. Although the militia could not save Danbury, they did force the British troops back to Long Island Sound.<br><br></div><div>Frontispiece of The Female Review: Life of Deborah Sampson, the Female Soldier in the War of Revolution. Source: English wikipedia.</div><div>Deborah Samson<br><br></div><div>Recently freed from indentured servitude on a farm, Deborah Samson was a dedicated patriot. Determined to aid the war effort, she enlisted in the Fourth Massachusetts Regiment under the name Robert Shurtleff. Along with binding her chest, she refused medical treatment after several wounds in order to hide her identity. Her ruse was only discovered when she fell ill with a fever in 1783 when the attending doctor placed his hand on her chest to see if she was still breathing. Samson received a veteran’s pension and was recently designated Massachusetts’ state heroine.<br><br></div><div>Prudence Cummings Wright<br><br></div><div>Prudence Cummings Wright earned the moniker of Guardian of the Bridge. When the men of Pepperell, Massachusetts marched off to battle, the local women formed an armed militia to defend the area. Ms. Wright, known as “Prue,” was chosen as the leader. When she discovered that her Tory brother and others were smuggling information from Canada to Boston, the militia took action. The women captured the spies crossing the town’s covered bridge, confiscated their documents and held them prisoner. This prevented the British in Boston from learning about American troop movements.<br><br></div><div>Lydia Darragh<br><br></div><div>The Philadelphia home of Lydia Darragh was often used as a gathering place for British officers. During their meetings, Darragh would hide in a closet adjoining the room where they met. She would then smuggle the information she overheard to her son who was serving in the Continental Army. The intelligence included plans for a surprise attack against American forces led by <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/george-washington-facts">George Washington</a> at White Marsh in November 1777. The warning enabled the Colonial army to prepare and fight off the attack. With the British retreating back to Philadelphia, the Continental Army was able to successfully reach its winter quarters at Valley Forge.<br><br></div><div>Patience Wright<br><br></div><div>Born on Long Island, Patience Wright began sculpting wax figures to earn an income after her husband died. With the help of <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/benjamin-franklin-facts">Benjamin Franklin</a>’s sister <strong>Jane</strong>, Wright moved to London where she became a popular artist. Wright would hide information that she overheard during her sculpting sessions inside wax figures that she then shipped to patriot leaders in America. She even pleaded the case of independence when she had the opportunity to meet King George and Queen Charlotte.<br><br></div><div>Nanye-hi aka Nancy Ward<br><br></div><div>Nancy Ward, cherokee. Drawing of Nancy Ward by George Catlin. Uploaded from http://www.meyna.com/cherokee.html Source: English wikipedia.</div><div>Known as the Beloved Woman of the Cherokee, Nanye-hi aka Nancy Ward became a leader who could sit with the council because of her bravery in battle. She wanted peace between her people and the newly arriving settlers. Despite the Cherokee’s decision to side with the British, Nanye-hi supported the American cause. She would warn settlements of impending attacks and helped liberate captured prisoners. After the Revolutionary War, she helped negotiate the peace treaty between the United States and the Cherokee nation.<br><br></div><div>Esther de Berdt Reed<br><br></div><div>Like the Daughters of Liberty, other women took leadership roles to ensure that soldiers had the supplies that they needed. Esther de Berdt Reed inspired a group of women to go door-to-door in Philadelphia collecting money and other donations. They raised $300,000. On the urging of General Washington, Reed and her associates purchased cloth and set about making shirts. Although she died in 1780, Reed’s legacy lived on in an anonymously published pamphlet entitled “Sentiments of an American Woman” in which she encouraged politically minded women to show their support for soldiers and the American cause.<br><br></div><div>The basis of the television series “Turn: Washington’s Spies,” the Culper Spy Ring was one of the most famous espionage networks during the American Revolution. Operating out of New York City, the network included a woman known only as <strong>Agent 355</strong>. More than two centuries after the war, her identity is still unknown despite her role in uncovering the traitorous actions of Benedict Arnold. Her actions helped save the fortifications at West Point and were instrumental in the capture of British spy Major John Andre.<br><br></div><div>Margaret Corbin<br><br></div><div>Immortalized by the moniker Molly Pitcher, Margaret Corbin followed her husband off to war. Like many other women, she was a camp follower who would help cook, clean and care for wounded soldiers. Corbin would also bring water to the front line for the soldiers to drink and cool the cannons. When her husband was killed during the Battle of Fort Washington in 1776, Corbin took his place operating the artillery piece until she was wounded in the arm and chest. Three years later, she became the first woman to be awarded an army pension.<br><br></div><div>Catherine Barry<br><br></div><div>Known as the Heroine of the Battle of Cowpens, Catherine Barry was an excellent equestrian. She also knew all the trails and shortcuts near her South Carolina plantation. As a result, she served as a scout for the American army. She played a critical role in alerting Colonial forces about British troop movements before the battle that took place on January 17, 1781. Barry rode her horse rounding up local militia to assist General Daniel Morgan. Her actions helped the Continental Army win a decisive victory.<br><br></div><div>Detail of the Painting, Battle of Germantown. Source: English wikipedia.</div><div>Anna Marie Lane<br><br></div><div>A resident of Virginia, Anna Marie Lane was the first documented female to serve as a soldier. She dressed as a man and accompanied her husband when he enlisted in the Continental Army. The two would fight side-by-side through numerous engagements from 1776 until 1781. She was awarded a pension for her heroic actions during the Battle of Germantown.<br><br></div><div>These are just a few of the many women who played important roles in the <a href="https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/american-revolution">American Revolution</a>. Many participated as nurses and domestic servants while others stepped out of traditional societal norms to risk their lives and safety in the cause of freedom. Some received pensions for their stints as soldiers. While the stories of many women are celebrated, others remain untold but are still an essential part of the birth of our nation.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:09:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411088816</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411090210</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A lengthy, illustrated article appeared in the December 1852 edition of<em> Harper’s New Monthly Magazine</em> recalling the events leading up to the 1773 Boston Tea Party and the defiant role New England women played in setting the course for opposing George III’s tax schemes. A portion of the article reads as follows:<br><br></div><div>In America meetings were frequently held and men thus encouraged each other by mutual conference. Nor did men, alone, preach and practice self-denial of the dreaded tea; American women cast their influence into the scale of patriotism as they assembled in Faneuil Hall, there to declare that they would “totally abstain from the use of tea,” and other proscribed articles.<br><br></div><div>FANEUIL HALL</div><div>Early in February, 1773, the mistresses of three hundred families subscribed their names to a league, binding themselves not to use any more tea until the impost clause in the Revenue Act should be repealed. Their daughters speedily followed their patriotic example, and three days afterward, a multitude of young ladies in Boston and vicinity, signed the following pledge:<br><br></div><blockquote><strong>“We, the daughters of those patriots who have, and do now appear for the public interest, and in that principally regard their posterity—as such, do with pleasure engage with them in denying ourselves the drinking of foreign tea, in hopes to frustrate a plan which tends to deprive a whole community of all that is valuable in life.”<br></strong><br></blockquote><div>From that time, tea was a proscribed article in Boston, and opposition to the form of oppression was strongly manifested by the unanimity with which the pleasant beverage was discarded. Nor did the ladies of Boston bear this honor alone, but in Salem, Newport, Norwich, New York, Philadelphia, Annapolis, Williamsburg, Wilmington, Charleston, and Savannah, the women sipped “the balsamic hyperion,” made from the dried leaves of the raspberry plant, and discarded the poisonous bohea.”1<br><br></div><div>The newspapers of the day abound with notices of social gatherings where foreign tea was entirely discarded in favor of herbal and fruit teas that filled the teapots of homes up and down the Atlantic seaboard.<br><br></div><div>These <em>faux</em> teas were referred to as <strong><em>liberty teas,</em></strong> and woe be unto the colonist who was caught drinking Chinese tea that had passed through the warehouses of London’s East India Company!<br><br></div><div> <br><br></div><div>1 Bohea became a common term for tea both in England and the colonies. A poor quality black tea called bohea came from China’s Wuyi Mountains and 240 chests of it were dumped into Boston Harbor three years later.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:13:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411090210</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Women and political awareness </title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411092687</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most readers are familiar with the details of the Boston Tea Party of 1773, and properly identify it as a key event in the radical movement that triggered the American Revolution. Many North Carolinians have also heard of the <a href="https://northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/edenton-tea-party/">Edenton Tea Party</a> of October 1774, when the leading women of that Eastern North Carolina did not actually dump tea in a nearby sound but did stage one of the nation’s earliest acts of political theater by women. But how many are familiar with the far more incendiary <a href="https://northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/wilmington-tea-party/">Wilmington Tea Party</a> of 1775, also led by women?<br><br></div><div>Tea parties offered an effective political arena to protest taxation. After a period of benign neglect by British authorities, American colonists grew increasingly frustrated after the French and Indian War with Britain’s revived interest in regulating American trade, exemplified by the passage of the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Tea Act of 1773. Although the tea tax was minimal, it enraged many because tea was the popular nonalcoholic drink of the era. Aware of a potential backlash, British leaders had limited the tax amount in hopes of assuaging disgruntled colonists.  British enforcement of trade policies, however, had angered Americans for some time.  In short, the timing of the tea tax was foolhardy, and it took on a symbolic value far in excess of its revenue implications.<br><br></div><div>Many colonial North Carolinians approved of the radical Boston Tea Party in 1773.  After that “notable and striking” event, as John Adams called it, revolutionary tea parties occurred across the colonies. Months after the more-famous Edenton event, sometime between March 25 and April 5, 1775, the women of Wilmington actually burned their tea to protest imposing trade legislation and increased taxation. Unfortunately, there are few details known to historians about this event – a major reason for its relative obscurity in the popular understanding of the times.<br><br></div><div>What we do know is that many were stoking the fires of political agitation in the region. After the Edenton protest in late 1774, the <em>South Carolina Gazette</em> – a Charleston paper that covered news across the eastern Carolinas – encouraged such political protests to take place in the Cape Fear region.  Such displays of “public virtue,” the reporter claimed on March 22, 1775, thwarted corrupt officials’ designs to eradicate the indisputable rights of British citizens.  As historian Vernon O. Stumpf points out, this plea must have been written before the Wilmington Tea Party took place and influenced the women’s decision.<br><br></div><div>A well-born Scot, loyal to her country and king, Janet Schaw visited relatives in the Cape Fear region during early 1775.  She arrived in the town of Brunswick on February 14, and subsequent events soon shocked her.  Wilmington was buzzing with political dissent, and Schaw unsurprisingly disapproved.  She contemptuously criticized North Carolinians for closing their port to British shipping, and for doing so, when they had an opportunity to corner the North American tea market.  Apparently, the “rusticks,” as Schaw called Tar Heels, loved liberty more.<br><br></div><div>The activities of Wilmington’s women undoubtedly bothered Schaw.  In <em>Journal of a Lady of Quality</em>, she records the following: “The Ladies have burnt their tea in a solemn procession.”  An appalled Schaw, however, questioned the extent of their patriotism: “They had delayed however till the sacrifice was not very considerable, as I do not think any one offered above a quarter of a pound.”  <br><br></div><div>Schaw, never passing up a chance to criticize what she considered an unsophisticated spirit of liberty, did not realize that an eventful and unprecedented event occurred in Wilmington that day.  Wilmington women had publicly opposed British trade policies and swore to never buy tea again until such policies were remanded.  Their actions showed that, in the spring of 1775, many Wilmington residents, like the counterparts in the other American colonies, opposed increased British taxation and trade restrictions.<br><br></div><div>When we see contemporary examples of North Carolinians, of all sexes and persuasions, demonstrating in favor of their cherished political causes, we can rest assured that, at least in some ways, their behavior is extremely traditional. Protest is in our blood.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:19:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411092687</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Coming to the (someone&#39;s) aid</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411093554</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To provide assistance, support, or rescue to someone</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:22:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411093554</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411094806</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>From 1774 to 1789, the Continental Congress served as the government of the 13 American colonies and later the United States. The First Continental Congress, which was comprised of delegates from the colonies, met in 1774 in reaction to the Coercive Acts, a series of measures imposed by the British government on the colonies in response to their resistance to new taxes. In 1775, the Second Continental Congress convened after the American Revolutionary War (1775-83) had already begun. In 1776, it took the momentous step of declaring America’s independence from Britain. Five years later, the Congress ratified the first national constitution, the Articles of Confederation, under which the country would be governed until 1789, when it was replaced by the current U.S. Constitution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:26:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411094806</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Taxation without representation </title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411095090</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Throughout most of colonial history, the British Crown was the only political institution that united the American colonies. The Imperial Crisis of the 1760s and 1770s, however, drove the colonies toward increasingly greater unity. Americans throughout the 13 colonies united in opposition to the new system of imperial taxation initiated by the British government in 1765. The <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/stamp-act">Stamp Act</a> of that year–the first direct, internal tax imposed on the colonists by the British Parliament–inspired concerted resistance within the colonies. Nine colonial assemblies sent delegates to the Stamp Act Congress, an extralegal convention that met to coordinate the colonies’ response to the new tax. Although the Stamp Act Congress was short-lived, it hinted at the enhanced unity among the colonies that would soon follow</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:26:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411095090</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411095471</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Colonial opposition made a dead letter of the Stamp Act and brought about its repeal in 1766. The British government did not abandon its claim to the authority to pass laws for the colonies, however, and would make repeated attempts to exert its power over the colonies in the years to follow. In response to the violence of the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/boston-massacre">Boston Massacre</a> of 1770 and new taxes like the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/tea-act">Tea Act</a> of 1773, a group of frustrated colonists protested taxation without representation by dumping 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor on the night of December 16, 1773 – an event known to history as <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/boston-tea-party">Boston Tea Party</a>.</div><div>Colonists continued to coordinate their resistance to new imperial measures, but between 1766 until 1774, they did so primarily through committees of correspondence, which exchanged ideas and information, rather than through a united political body</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:28:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411095471</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The First Continental Congress</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411095841</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>On September 5, 1774, delegates from each of the 13 colonies except for <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/georgia">Georgia</a> (which was fighting a Native American uprising and was dependent on the British for military supplies) met in Philadelphia as the <a href="https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/first-continental-congress-convenes">First Continental Congress</a> to organize colonial resistance to Parliament’s Coercive Acts. The delegates included a number of future luminaries, such as future presidents <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/john-adams">John Adams</a> (1735-1826) of <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/massachusetts">Massachusetts</a> and <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/george-washington">George Washington</a> (1732-99) of <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/virginia">Virginia</a>, and future U.S. <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/supreme-court-facts">Supreme Court</a> Chief Justice and diplomat <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/john-jay">John Jay</a> (1745-1829) of <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/new-york">New York</a>. The Congress was structured with emphasis on the equality of participants, and to promote free debate. After much discussion, the Congress issued a Declaration of Rights, affirming its loyalty to the British Crown but disputing the British Parliament’s right to tax it. The Congress also passed the Articles of Association, which called on the colonies to stop importing goods from the British Isles beginning on December 1, 1774, if the Coercive Acts were not repealed. Should Britain fail to redress the colonists’ grievances in a timely manner, the Congress declared, then it would reconvene on May 10, 1775, and the colonies would cease to export goods to Britain on September 10, 1775. After proclaiming these measures, the First Continental Congress disbanded on October 26, 1774.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:29:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411095841</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The revolutionary war</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411096148</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As promised, Congress reconvened in Philadelphia as the Second Continental Congress on May 10, 1775–and by then the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution">American Revolution</a> had already begun. The British army in Boston had met with armed resistance on the morning of April 19, 1775, when it marched out to the towns of <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/battles-of-lexington-and-concord">Lexington and Concord</a> to seize a cache of weapons held by colonial Patriots who had ceased to recognize the authority of the royal government of Massachusetts. The Patriots drove the British expedition back to Boston and laid siege to the town. The <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/american-revolution-history">Revolutionary War</a> had begun.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:30:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411096148</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Fighting for Reconciliation</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411096494</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>Although the Congress professed its abiding loyalty to the British Crown, it also took steps to preserve its rights by dint of arms. On June 14, 1775, a month after it reconvened, it created a united colonial fighting force, the Continental Army. The next day, it named George <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/washington">Washington</a> as the new army’s commander in chief. The following month, it issued its Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms, penned by John Dickinson (1732-1808) of <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/pennsylvania">Pennsylvania</a>, a veteran of the First Congress whose “Letters from a Farmer of Pennsylvania” (1767) had helped arouse opposition to earlier imperial measures, and by a newcomer from Virginia, <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/thomas-jefferson">Thomas Jefferson</a> (1743-1826). In an effort to avoid a full-scale war, Congress coupled this declaration with the Olive Branch Petition, a personal appeal to Britain’s King <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/british-history/george-iii">George III</a> (1738-1820) asking him to help the colonists resolve their differences with Britain. The king dismissed the petition out of hand.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:31:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411096494</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Declaring indenpendence</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411097204</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>For over a year, the Continental Congress supervised a war against a country to which it proclaimed its loyalty. In fact, both the Congress and the people it represented were divided on the question of independence even after a year of open warfare against Great Britain. Early in 1776, a number of factors began to strengthen the call for separation. In his stirring pamphlet “Common Sense,” published in January of that year, the British immigrant <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/thomas-paine">Thomas Paine</a> (1737-1809) laid out a convincing argument in favor of independence. At the same time, many Americans came to realize that their military might not be capable of defeating the British Empire on its own. Independence would allow it to form alliances with Britain’s powerful rivals–France was at the forefront of everyone’s mind. Meanwhile, the war itself evoked hostility toward Britain among the citizenry, paving the way for independence.</div><div>In the spring of 1776, the provisional colonial governments began to send new instructions to their congressional delegates, obliquely or directly allowing them to vote for independence. The provisional government of Virginia went further: It instructed its delegation to submit a proposal for independence before Congress. On June 7, Virginia delegate Richard Henry Lee (1732-94) complied with his instructions. Congress postponed a final vote on the proposal until July 1, but appointed a committee to draft a provisional declaration of independence for use should the proposal pass.<br><br>The committee consisted of five men, including John Adams and <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/benjamin-franklin">Benjamin Franklin</a> (1706-90) of Pennsylvania. But the declaration was primarily the work of one man, Thomas Jefferson, who penned an eloquent defense of the natural rights of all people, of which, he charged, Parliament and the king had tried to deprive the American nation. <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/the-continental-congress">The Continental Congress</a> made several revisions to Jefferson’s draft, removing, among other things, an attack on the institution of slavery; but on <a href="http://www.history.com/topics/holidays/july-4th">July 4</a>, 1776, Congress voted to approve the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/declaration-of-independence">Declaration of Independence</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:34:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411097204</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Articles of Confederation</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411098666</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Congress’s inability to raise revenue would bedevil it for its entire existence, even after it created a constitution–the Articles of Confederation–to define its powers. Drafted and adopted by the Congress in 1777 but not ratified until 1781, it effectively established the U.S. as a collection of 13 sovereign states, each of which had an equal voice in Congress (which became officially known as the Congress of the Confederation) regardless of population. Under the Articles, congressional decisions were made based on a state-by-state vote, and the Congress had little ability to enforce its decisions. The <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/articles-of-confederation">Articles of Confederation</a> would prove incapable of governing the new nation in a time of peace, but they did not seriously undermine the war effort, both because the war was effectively winding down before the Articles took effect, and because Congress ceded many executive war powers to General Washington.</div><div>Congress’s final triumph came in 1783 when it negotiated the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/treaty-of-paris">Treaty of Paris</a>, officially ending the Revolutionary War. The Congressional delegates Franklin, Jay and Adams secured a favorable peace for the U.S. that included not only the recognition of independence but also claim to almost all of the territory south of Canada and east of the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/mississippi">Mississippi</a> River. On November 25, 1783, the last British troops evacuated <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/new-york-city">New York City</a>. The Revolutionary War was over and Congress had helped to see the country through.</div><div>However, the Articles of Confederation proved an imperfect instrument for a nation at peace with the world. The years immediately following the end of the Revolutionary War in 1783 presented the young American nation with a series of difficulties that Congress could not adequately remedy: dire financial straits, interstate rivalries and domestic insurrection. A movement developed for constitutional reform, culminating in the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. The delegates at the convention decided to scrap the Articles of Confederation completely and create a new system of government. In 1789, the new U.S. <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/constitution">Constitution</a> went into effect and the Continental Congress adjourned forever and was replaced by the U.S. Congress. Although the Continental Congress did not function well in a time of peace, it had helped steer the nation through one of its worst crises, declared its independence and helped to win a war to secure that independence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:38:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411098666</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Battle of Bunker Hill</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411100099</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>On June 16, 1775, on the heels of the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/battles-of-lexington-and-concord">Battles of Lexington and Concord </a>that kicked off the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/american-revolution-history">Revolutionary War</a>, American troops learned that the British were planning to send troops from Boston to occupy the hills surrounding the city. Some 1,000 colonial militiamen under Colonel William Prescott (1726-95) built earthen fortifications on top of Breed’s Hill, overlooking Boston and located on the Charlestown Peninsula. (The men originally had been ordered to construct their fortifications atop Bunker Hill but instead chose the smaller Breed’s Hill, closer to Boston.)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:43:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411100099</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411100525</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>On June 17, some 2,200 British forces under the command of <a href="https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/howe-named-commander-in-chief-of-british-army">Major General William Howe</a> (1729-1814) and Brigadier General Robert Pigot (1720-96) landed on the Charlestown Peninsula then marched to Breed’s Hill. As the British Army advanced in columns against the Americans, Prescott, in an effort to conserve the Americans’ limited supply of ammunition, reportedly told his men, “Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes!” When the Redcoats were within several dozen yards, the Americans let loose with a lethal barrage of musket fire, throwing the British into retreat.</div><div>After re-forming their lines, the British attacked again, with much the same result. Prescott’s men were now low on ammunition, though, and when the Redcoats went up the hill for a third time, they reached the redoubts and engaged the Americans in hand-to-hand combat. The outnumbered Americans were forced to retreat. However, by the end of the engagement, the casualties of the Battle of Bunker Hill were high: Patriot gunfire had cut down some 1,000 enemy troops, with more than 200 killed and more than 800 wounded. More than 100 Americans perished, while more than 300 others were wounded. Three weeks later—on July 2, 1775—<a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/george-washington">George Washington</a> arrived in Cambridge, Massachusetts to take command of the Continental Army.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:45:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411100525</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Battle of Bunker Hill: Legacy</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411100850</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>The British had won the so-called Battle of Bunker Hill, and Breed’s Hill and the Charlestown Peninsula fell firmly under British control. Despite losing their strategic positions, the battle was a significant morale-builder for the inexperienced Americans, convincing them that patriotic dedication could overcome superior British military might. Additionally, the high price of victory at the Battle of Bunker Hill made the British realize that the war with the colonies would be long, tough and costly.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:46:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411100850</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lord Dunmore&#39;s &quot;Ethiopian regiment&quot;</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411103019</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Samuel Johnson wrote in 1775, "How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of Negroes?" The American revolutionaries called for freedom, but Johnson (among others) pointed out the hypocrisy in this proclamation of liberty from people who owned slaves. Thomas Jefferson is often cited as the perfect example of this disconnect between ideal and reality; while he so eloquently expressed the ideals of liberty, he was a slave-owner.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div>Slavery had been abolished in England in 1772, but in its colonies, the practice was still going strong. In 1775, <a href="http://history.howstuffworks.com/american-civil-war/crispus-attucks.htm">Crispus Attucks</a>, a black man, became the first martyr of the American Revolution, and black soldiers fought at the early important battles of the war: <a href="http://history.howstuffworks.com/revolutionary-war/lexington.htm">Lexington</a>, Concord and <a href="http://history.howstuffworks.com/revolutionary-war/battle-of-bunker-hill.htm">Bunker Hill</a>. But when Washington took charge of the Continental Army, he decreed that recruitment of black soldiers was at an end, and he later purged the remaining soldiers from his army. It seems the idea of armed blacks was a great enough threat to risk losing a war for.<br><br></div><div>With this ban, the embattled royal governor of Virginia, John Murray, earl of Dunmore, saw his chance. On Nov. 14, 1775, he issued a proclamation declaring that he'd free any slaves who joined the Loyalists in their fight -- if they belonged to Patriots, that is. (Loyalists could keep their slaves, continuing our theme of "freedom for everyone...when it suits our interests.") Three hundred men joined up almost immediately, and they became known as Lord Dunmore's Ethiopian Regiment. The white reaction to Dunmore's proclamation was predictably panicky -- <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2h42.html">according to PBS</a>, the Virginia Gazette advised slaves to "cling to their kind masters." It's estimated that 800 slaves fought in the regiment, wearing uniforms embroidered with "liberty to slaves." Colonel Tye is the most famous of the regiment, a guerrilla commander who terrified Patriot forces. <br><br></div><div>When the Continental Army fell apart due to smallpox and deserters, Washington was forced to reconsider the decision to ban black soldiers. Now that the cause was in dire straits, the slaves were needed. In the end, <a href="http://www.nps.gov/revwar/about_the_revolution/african_americans.html">according to the National Park Service</a>, it's estimated that at least 5,000 black soldiers fought as Patriots. Not that they were accorded the liberty that was won with their help.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:52:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411103019</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411104929</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>James Lafayette, who supported the American cause as a spy, may have been the inspiration for the figure on the right in the 18th-century engraving, in the Jamestown-Yorktown collection, depicting the Marquis de Lafayette at Yorktown.<br><br></div><div>Only 50 years after the defeat of the British at Yorktown, most Americans had already forgotten the extensive role black people had played on both sides during the War for Independence. At the 1876 Centennial Celebration of the Revolution in Philadelphia, not a single speaker acknowledged the contributions of African Americans in establishing the nation. Yet by 1783, thousands of black Americans had become involved in the war. Many were active participants, some won their freedom and others were victims, but throughout the struggle blacks refused to be mere bystanders and gave their loyalty to the side that seemed to offer the best prospect for freedom.<br><br></div><div>By 1775 more than a half-million African Americans, most of them enslaved, were living in the 13 colonies. Early in the 18th century a few New England ministers and conscientious Quakers, such as George Keith and John Woolman, had questioned the morality of slavery but they were largely ignored. By the 1760s, however, as the colonists began to speak out against British tyranny, more Americans pointed out the obvious contradiction between advocating liberty and owning slaves. In 1774 Abigail Adams wrote, “it always appeared a most iniquitious scheme to me to fight ourselves for what we are daily robbing and plundering from those who have as good a right to freedom as we have.”<br><br></div><div>Widespread talk of liberty gave thousands of slaves high expectations, and many were ready to fight for a democratic revolution that might offer them freedom. In 1775 at least 10 to 15 black soldiers, including some slaves, fought against the British at the battles of Lexington and Bunker Hill. Two of these men, Salem Poor and Peter Salem, earned special distinction for their bravery. By 1776, however, it had become clear that the revolutionary rhetoric of the founding fathers did not include enslaved blacks. The Declaration of Independence promised liberty for all men but failed to put an end to slavery; and although they had proved themselves in battle, the Continental Congress adopted a policy of excluding black soldiers from the army.<br><br></div><div>In spite of these discouragements, many free and enslaved African Americans in New England were willing to take up arms against the British. As soon states found it increasingly difficult to fill their enlistment quotas, they began to turn to this untapped pool of manpower. Eventually every state above the Potomac River recruited slaves for military service, usually in exchange for their freedom. By the end of the war from 5,000 to 8,000 blacks had served the American cause in some capacity, either on the battlefield, behind the lines in noncombatant roles, or on the seas. By 1777 some states began enacting laws that encouraged white owners to give slaves for the army in return for their enlistment bounty, or allowing masters to use slaves as substitutes when they or their sons were drafted. In the South the idea of arming slaves for military service met with such opposition that only free blacks were normally allowed to enlist in the army.<br><br></div><div>Most black soldiers were scattered throughout the Continental Army in integrated infantry regiments, where they were often assigned to support roles as wagoners, cooks, waiters or artisans. Several all-black units, commanded by white officers, also were formed and saw action against the British. Rhode Island’s Black Battalion was established in 1778 when that state was unable to meet its quota for the Continental Army. The legislature agreed to set free slaves who volunteered for the duration of the war, and compensated their owners for their value. This regiment performed bravely throughout the war and was present at Yorktown where an observer noted it was “the most neatly dressed, the best under arms, and the most precise in its maneuvers.”<br><br></div><div>Although the Southern states were reluctant to recruit enslaved African Americans for the army, they had no objections to using free and enslaved blacks as pilots and able-bodied seaman. In Virginia alone, as many as 150 black men, many of them slaves, served in the state navy. After the war, the legislature granted several of these men their freedom as a reward for faithful service. African Americans also served as gunners, sailors on privateers and in the Continental Navy during the Revolution. While the majority of blacks who contributed to the struggle for independence performed routine jobs, a few, such as James Lafayette, gained renown serving as spies or orderlies for well-known military leaders.<br><br></div><div>Black participation in the Revolution, however, was not limited to supporting the American cause, and either voluntarily or under duress thousands also fought for the British. Enslaved blacks made their own assessment of the conflict and supported the side that offered the best opportunity to escape bondage. Most British officials were reluctant to arm blacks, but as early as 1775, Virginia’s royal governor, Lord Dunmore, established an all-black “Ethiopian Regiment” composed of  runaway slaves. By promising them freedom, Dunmore enticed over 800 slaves to escape from “rebel” masters. Whenever they could, enslaved blacks continued to join him until he was defeated and forced to leave Virginia in 1776. Dunmore’s innovative strategy met with disfavor in England, but to many blacks the British army came to represent liberation.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-14 10:58:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/411104929</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Popular sovereignty</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412824970</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Popular sovereignty is the principle that the authority of a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives (Rule by the People), who are the source of all political power.  Popular sovereignty expresses a concept and does not necessarily reflect or describe a political reality. Benjamin Franklin expressed the concept when he wrote, "In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns".</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2019-11-18 16:39:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412824970</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dunmore’s proclamation</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412828404</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Dunmore's Proclamation is a historical document signed on November 7, 1775, by John Murray, 4th Earl of Dunmore, royal governor of the British Colony of Virginia. The proclamation declared martial law and promised freedom for slaves of American revolutionaries who left their owners and joined the royal forces.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-18 16:44:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412828404</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Valiant</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412838740</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>adjective<br>boldly courageous; brave; stout-hearted;</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2019-11-18 16:56:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412838740</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Three branches of government</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412840784</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The USA federal government has three parts. They are the Executive, (President and about 5,000,000 workers) Legislative (Senate and House of Representatives) and Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts).</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2019-11-18 16:58:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/412840784</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Federalists</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416822364</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves "Federalists." Their adopted name implied a commitment to a loose, decentralized system of government. In many respects "federalism" — which implies a strong central government — was the opposite of the proposed plan that they supported. A more accurate name for the supporters of the Constitution would have been "Nationalists."<br><br>The "nationalist" label, however, would have been a political liability in the 1780s. Traditional political belief of the Revolutionary Era held that strong centralized authority would inevitably lead to an abuse of power. The Federalists were also aware that that the problems of the country in the 1780s stemmed from the weaknesses of the central government created by the Articles of Confederation.<br><br>For Federalists, the Constitution was required in order to safeguard the liberty and independence that the American Revolution had created. While the Federalists definitely had developed a new political philosophy, they saw their most import role as defending the social gains of the Revolution. As James Madison, one of the great Federalist leaders later explained, the Constitution was designed to be a "republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican government."<br>The Federalists had more than an innovative political plan and a well-chosen name to aid their cause. Many of the most talented leaders of the era who had the most experience in national-level work were Federalists. For example the only two national-level celebrities of the period, Benjamin Franklin and George Washington, favored the Constitution. In addition to these impressive superstars, the Federalists were well organized, well funded, and made especially careful use of the printed word.<br><br>Most newspapers supported the Federalists' political plan and published articles and pamphlets to explain why the people should approve the Constitution.<br><br>In spite of this range of major advantages, the Federalists still had a hard fight in front of them. Their new solutions were a significant alteration of political beliefs in this period. Most significantly, the Federalists believed that the greatest threat to the future of the United States did not lie in the abuse of central power, but instead could be found in what they saw as the excesses of democracy as evidenced in popular disturbances like Shays' Rebellion and the pro-debtor policies of many states.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-26 18:22:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416822364</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Anti-Federalists/Republicans</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416824503</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Anti-Federalists, in early U.S. history, were a loose political coalition of popular politicians, such as <strong>Patrick Henry</strong>, who unsuccessfully opposed the strong central government envisioned in the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and whose agitations led to the addition of a Bill of Rights. The first in the long line of states’ rights advocates, they feared the authority of a single national government, upper-class dominance, inadequate separation of powers, and loss of immediate control over local affairs. The Anti-Federalists were strong in the key states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. In North Carolina and Rhode Island they prevented ratification of the Constitution until after the new government had been established. Stilling their opposition in order to support the first administration of U.S. Pres. <strong>George Washington</strong>, the Anti-Federalists in 1791 became the nucleus of the <strong>Jeffersonian Republican Party</strong> (subsequently Democratic-Republican, finally Democratic) as strict constructionists of the new Constitution and in opposition to a strong national fiscal policy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-26 18:25:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416824503</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gabriel&#39;s Rebellion - Death or Liberty</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416830008</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty..."</em><br><br>The activities of a literate slave named <strong>Gabriel</strong> in Richmond, Virginia, present a final critical view of Jeffersonian America. At the same time Gabriel also shows how fully African-Americans embraced central currents of American politics and culture. Gabriel remains a difficult figure to fully reconstruct from surviving historical evidence. In fact, his last name is not definitively known, though he is usually referred to as Gabriel Prosser, after the name of the man who owned him.<br><br>Gabriel was a skilled artisan with several advantages over most field-working slaves of his day. Partly due to his skill as a blacksmith, Gabriel was "hired out" to work in many different places and enjoyed more autonomy and mobility than most plantation slaves. As an artisan, Gabriel was among the broad group of urban workers whose actions played a crucial role causing the American Revolution. As an occupational group, they were among the Revolution's biggest winners.<br><br>However, as an African American and a slave the benefits of the Revolution were not extended to Gabriel. Nevertheless, the republican ideology of the Revolution and the anti-elitist thrust of the Democratic-Republicans helped shape Gabriel's vision in leading a slave revolt.<br><br>The organizational requirements of a conspiracy to overthrow slavery necessarily shrouded the movement in secrecy. Apparently, however, Gabriel, and a small group of artisan leaders, expected about 1,000 slaves to follow them in a well-coordinated attack upon Richmond that targeted Federalists and merchants who were the most prominent residents of the city.<br><br>Gabriel expected "the poor white people" as well as "the most redoubtable republicans" to join his cause to create a more democratic republic in Virginia. He especially identified Quakers, Methodists, and Frenchmen as those whites who were most "friendly to liberty." The purpose of the rebels was clearly expressed in a banner under which they planned to march, which eloquently stated "<em>death or liberty</em>." The assault planned for August 30, 1800, however, never came together. Torrential rain caused confusion and a traitor from within the group warned white authorities of the impending attack.<br><br>Gabriel's careful planning demonstrates that some enslaved people actively resisted slavery and were well informed about the world beyond their own harsh circumstances. Given the heightened political violence of the 1790s, Gabriel believed that he could forge an alliance with some Democratic-Republicans against a common Federalist enemy. The timing of the revolt, just before the 1800 election, makes it a radical expression of anti-Federalism. Gabriel also secretly met with two Frenchmen who seemed to have promised him international assistance. Gabriel was well aware that the French Revolution had helped trigger the great slave revolt in Haiti in 1791. Perhaps the charismatic and talented Gabriel could have become a successful black political leader like <strong>Toussaint L'ouverture</strong>.<br><br>Instead, Gabriel's slave conspiracy ended in severe repression. While no whites were killed in the revolt that never really got started, the state of Virginia executed 27 blacks, including Gabriel, by public hanging. Whites responded to the planned revolt, and another one linked to it in 1802, by tightening legal restrictions on slaves. For a brief period in the late 18th century white Virginians had modified certain elements of slavery.<br><br></div><div>Now many whites began to think that making the system slightly more humane had encouraged black resistance. As a result some of the advantages that slaves like Gabriel possessed were made illegal. For instance, literacy and allowing slaves to "hire out" for work in varied settings became illegal. Similarly, the Virginia legislature attempted to prevent enslaved people from piloting boats, a position from which they could travel too freely and learn about changes in the outside world that threatened white masters.<br><br></div><div>This newly repressive slave system was a tragic outcome for African-American collective action that had intended to liberate slaves. The reinvigorated slave societies of the south thrived in the 19th century and only ended with the massive violence of the Civil War. Nevertheless, the hypocrisy of slavery in a new nation dedicated to democracy was more obvious than ever before in American history. Though the brutal slave regime would continue to try and dehumanize the people it enslaved, it never fully succeeded.<br><br></div><div>As one member of <strong>Gabriel's Rebellion </strong>explained during the trial that would ultimately sentence him to death, "I have nothing more to offer than what General Washington would have had to offer, had he been taken by the British and put to trial by them. I have adventured my life in endeavoring to obtain the liberty of my countrymen, and am a willing sacrifice in their cause."</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-26 18:33:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416830008</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Coloured American Magazine</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416831814</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/423599273/b1f9f1e49d1e026af7131c0827823be9/Pat_H.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-26 18:36:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416831814</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>&quot;Bobalition&quot; Broadsides</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416833507</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/423599273/7217bd7822a00b4476672a2e0f8fe820/grandbobslav.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-26 18:38:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416833507</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Understanding race in the new Republic</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416871615</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Courtesy of the wave of Enlightenment ideas that had become widespread in the colonies during the 18th century, the notions of race and racial equality were in the process of becoming a more nuanced, if at times highly problematic and challenging, issue in the then still-developing American political discourse. The Enlightenment brought and established the four fundamental, noble principles which the Republic had been founded upon: the belief in common humanity, the push for societal progress, being capable of remaking oneself, and the importance of an individual's social and ecological environment; all could be said to have stood up to the entrenched hierarchical visions of the Old World.<br><br>However, another tendency of Enlightenment thinkers was the desire to classify and order the world around them. Although, by and large, this usually resulted in the extraordinary development of universal human knowledge (the Encyclopedia being but one example), it also induced tensions when it came to the proposed "theories" about race and the accompanying stereotypes it helped foster, due to prejudice against people of colour and the beliefs in white suprematism, which were common among most white Americans at the time. Thinkers such as Carolus Linnaeus, Comte de Buffon and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach constructed theories introduced the division of humans into racial "types", based upon the arbitrary criteria of skin color, cranial measurements and hair. Place of birth was also thought of as an important determining factor, claiming that African tropical climate had darkened the skin of African-Americans as well as reconfigured their skulls, whereas the comparatively colder European climates were responsible for the bright complexion of the "Caucasian" race. These ideas not only served to further reinforce the stereotype that people of color living in America should be unequal depending on their race, but also came forward with another suggestive claim - that, due to differences in physical features caused by native climate, differences in humankind could be observed as well. This highlights another important division between the slaves and the owners - the "primitive" and the "civilized", akin to two opposing sides on the scale of social progress. Additionally, there were a range of examples of theories illustrating racist prejudices among white Americans, such as the <strong>theory of polygenesis</strong>. The proponents of this theory maintained that people of color were incapable of mental improvement and that they might've originated from a separate ancestry. The view was even upheld by <strong>Thomas Jefferson</strong> himself, who declared them thus in his <em>Notes on the State of Virginia</em> in 1784; the aim of Jefferson with this theory wasn't to justify slavery so much as to make the scheme of a "white America" reality, perpetrated via the freed slaves' re-colonization of their native Africa, which many white Americans believed would finally solve America's racial issues.<br><br>Jefferson's ideas were met with outrage and backlash by the members of black and antislavery communities. <strong>Benjamin Benneker</strong>, a free African-American almanac author, surveyor, naturalist, and farmer from Baltimore County, Maryland, criticized Jefferson for upbearing such deleterious ideas and advised him to instead embrace the notion of universal equality among humankind, as well as accept the truth of all men possessing equal faculties at their disposal, and deserving equal rights and dignified treatment. On the other hand, Jefferson had his own defenders: <strong>Charles Caldwell</strong> and <strong>Samuel George Morton</strong>, who further solidified Jefferson's racial skepticism, with their arguments based upon the "biological" case for white Americans and African-Americans, going so far as to claim that they were two different species. Although few Americans held such dogmatic views on the matter, many still found themselves fancying the concepts proposed by white suprematism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-26 19:43:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/416871615</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>caprice</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417256256</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a sudden and unaccountable change of mood or behaviour.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-27 19:51:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417256256</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mercy Otis Warren - Womens&#39; Champion of Democracy</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417258835</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Mercy Otis Warren </strong>was a published poet, political playwright and satirist during the age of the American Revolution—a time when women were encouraged and expected to keep silent on political matters. Warren not only engaged with the leading figures of the day—such as John, Abigail, and Samuel Adams—but she became an outspoken commentator and historian, as well as the leading female intellectual of the Revolution and early republic.<br><br>Born on September 14, 1728 in Barnstable, Massachusetts, Warren was the third of thirteen children of James Otis and Mary Allyne Otis. Her exposure to politics began early; her father was an attorney who was elected to the Massachusetts legislature in 1745. Like most girls at the time, Warren had no formal education; hers came from sitting in on her brother’s lessons, where she took a particular interest in history and politics. She also made extensive use of her uncle’s large book collection to educate herself.  <br><br>In 1754, she wed the politically active James Warren, a classmate of her brother’s at Harvard, who encouraged her to pursue writing. The couple had five sons. After James Warren’s election to the Massachusetts Legislature in 1766, the Warrens began hosting leading citizens in their Plymouth home, particularly those opposed to British policies. In fact, Warren herself would maintain a lifelong, though at times tumultuous, friendship with John Adams, which included extensive letters on the nature of the new republic.<br><br>An avid patriot, Warren began writing political dramas that denounced British policies and key officials in Massachusetts, notably Governor Thomas Hutchinson. Her 1772 satire, “The Adulator" (published anonymously in the Massachusetts Spy newspaper), criticized the British colonial governor’s policies a full four years before Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence. Warren also published two additional plays skewering British colonial leaders, <em>Defeat</em> (1773) and <em>The Group</em> (1775.) She supported the Boston Tea Party and boycotts of British imports and urged other women to follow suit.<br><br>From the outset of the American Revolution, Warren began writing its history, which was published in 1805 as <em>History of the Rise, Progress and Termination of the American Revolution</em>. This was among the first nonfiction books published by a woman in America, and she was the third woman (after Anne Bradstreet and Phillis Wheatley) to publish a book of poems. Some of her other works—<em>Poems, Dramatic and Miscellaneous</em>, for example—were similarly influenced by her first-hand experiences with the war. Warren, who embraced the natural rights philosophy that undergirded the Patriot cause, was hopeful that it would lead to egalitarian and democratic policies in the new republic and beyond. A Jeffersonian Republican, she took a firm stand against ratification of the Constitution, which put her at odds with conservative political friend, John Adams, a champion of the document. Likely based on her personal experiences, she opposed women’s lack of access to formal education.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-27 20:03:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417258835</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mercy Otis Warren</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417258977</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/423599273/bcbdc5cae812176c28bd2d4e363209d5/Mercy_Otis_Warren.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-27 20:04:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417258977</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jeffersonian Democracy &amp; The Fall of Federalist Ideology</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417265438</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the aftermath of the American Revolution, the foundations of the newly-declared Republic followed and attempted to realize the democratic ideal that had been upheld by the colonists that fought the British Empire in order to achieve American liberty and independence. The presidential election of Thomas Jefferson in 1800 championed the triumph of the non-elite part of the white American population, and gave support to their aspiration to establish a more direct method of control over the government. This was, in turn, met with scorn by members of the elite, who argued that "pure" democracy would only lead to anarchy; a famous example is the claim made by Federalist Fisher Ames who proposed that due to its unavoidable dependence on public opinion, which "shiftswith every current of caprice", and for whom Jefferson's presidency represented a "slide down into the mire of a democracy".<br><br>The political engagement of those among ordinary citizenry proved crucial to Jefferson's political successes, and he himself was inclined to label it a sort of "revolution", a one as significant as the American Revolution itself. However, it was also important for Jefferson to highlight that this "revolution" wasn't carried out by means of war and bloodshed, but rather by peaceable democratic reform, decided on through the voting of ordinary people. Jefferson sought to communicate his position that a government that answers directly to the people would lead to lasting national union, instead of, as Federalists opined, chaotic divisions among Americans, as such should be the system in which free citizens would be able to govern themselves democratically. This would be defined by means of voluntary bonds between fellow citizens and between the citizens and the government, among which the most examplary were those citizens that acted with the confidence of rationally-inclined, sensible human beings.<br><br>The Federalists, as proponents of a union based upon expansive state power and the rule of aristocracy, were enraged by Republican activity in this period of the Republic. In a move to champion the nation's republican principles, the Republicans used the image of George Washington in 1799 - through so doing, they attempted to connect Washington's republican virtue to Jefferson's advocacy for democratic liberty. For this reason, Jefferson has been heralded as the nation's peacefully-elected philosopher-patriot who had not fought for American independence through the use of gun and sword, but rather with his pen.<br><br>However, Jefferson was not exempt from ample criticism voiced by his political adversaries. His foreign policy towards Europe weakened the Republic's economy. In attempt to demand the respect the neutrality of American ships from European countries, the Embargo Act of 1807, elicited Federalist outrage. England, France and Spain refused to adhere to American desires of neutrality; the British went so far as to resume their policy of impressment towards American ships, and proceeded to seize thousands of American sailors and force them to fight for the British navy. After the British attack on <em>USS Chesapeake</em> in 1807, Jefferson and the Congress decided on the policy of "peaceable coercion", as under the Embargo Act, American ports were closed off to all foreign ships, with the hopes of evading potential war conflicts. On the one hand, this was a surefire way of providing a non-violent solution in order to avoid war with European nations, but on the other, the Embargo Act was an economic blow to the Republic and even Jefferson himself, and thus when the American people resorted to smuggling goods out of the country, the president tried to coerce them into compliance via extended governmental powers, which led to popular outcry that branded him a tyrant.<br><br>Other Federalist accusations and attacks on Jefferson went even further; for example, the Federalists lamented the alleged decline of educational standards for children, and moreover, James Callender voiced the allegation that Jefferson had had a sexual relationship with Sally Hemings, one of his slaves, which Callender further suggested had compromised Jefferson's racial integrity. There were other instances of Federalist hostility towards Jefferson's racial policy, such as that of William Loughton Smith who had opined in one scathing pamphlet on the matter that Jeffersonian democracy was a "slippery slope" towards dangerous racial equality.  Even so, the Federalists' anti-democratic positions on the Republic proved less effective than the democratic principles of Jeffersonian Republicans. The Federalists accused Jefferson of acting against the interest of the public he had been elected to serve, and yet, their own ideology - steeped in 18th century beliefs in virtue and morality, the rule of wealthy aristocrats, and the citizens' newly-shifted inclination towards an elite evaluated by merit - was no longer justifiable and steadily declining in political relevance. Thus, their further addressing of the public proved a shift in contemporary politics, as both sides now strove to champion the political involvement of ordinary citizenry, and this ultimately led the American populace to openly seek more direct access to political power in future years. Two other presidents succeeding Jefferson - James Madison and James Monroe - would manage to facilitate the difficulties of obtaining land and property for ordinary American citizens, in order to encourage the electoral turnout. And thus the Federalist ideology was rendered obsolete, and they would never again manage to regain political dominance over either Congress or the presidency.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-27 20:33:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417265438</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>embargo</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417266559</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>an official ban on trade or other commercial activity with a particular country; <em>historical</em>: an order of a state forbidding foreign ships to enter, or any ships to leave, its ports.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-27 20:39:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417266559</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Questions</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417274667</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Why were the Federalists and their ideals rendered obsolete and finally rejected by the majority of the American public? Which factors contributed to such a state of affairs, considering the political circumstances at the time of the newly-established Republic?<br>2. Why is Thomas Jefferson considered the champion of non-elite white American population?<br>3. What was the impact of theories based upon the division of human beings into "racial" types? What assumptions could be said to have been made about American people of color by the proponents of such theories?<br>4. Why was the notion of reinforcing racial prejudice rooted in the values and principles of the Enlightenment? <br>5. Why did the politicians and partisans of Jeffersonian America seek to include a greater involvement of ordinary citizenry in the nation's political discourse? What broader implications could be drawn from this practices when it comes to the future of democracy in America?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-27 21:19:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417274667</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>impressment</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417274921</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>colloquially "the press" or the "press gang", it is the practice of taking men into a military or naval force by compulsion, with or without notice.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-27 21:20:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417274921</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Negotiating American Indian Treaties</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417434395</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A treaty is simply an agreement between two sovereign nations. In the American political system, a treaty involves three basic steps:<br><br></div><div>(1) First, there is negotiation. Representatives from the U.S. government meet with representatives of the other governments, discuss mutual concerns, and arrive at some sort of agreement.<br><br></div><div>(2) This is then followed by Senate confirmation. The Senate, according to the Constitution, advises the President on international matters. Thus, the Senate has the opportunity to debate and discuss the agreement, and to confirm it.<br><br></div><div>(3) Finally it is signed-proclaimed-by the President.  <br><br></div><div><br></div><div>From the time the U.S. Constitution was adopted in 1787 until 1871, the United States government, following the legal view that Indian tribes are nations, negotiated and signed treaties with Indian nations. The process of negotiating Indian treaties can best be viewed as a form of internal diplomacy and foreign affairs and provides some insights into how the United States deals with other countries.<br><br></div><div>Legally a treaty is a form of law which is superior to state and local law. George Washington envisioned treaties with Indian nations as binding on both parties in perpetuity. He felt that both the power and the honor of the federal government would be pledged to their enforcement.<br><br></div><div>In the first Indian treaty negotiated under the Constitution-a treaty with the Creek Confederacy in 1789-George Washington interpreted the constitutional requirement to obtain “the advice and consent” of the Senate as meaning that he had to appear in person before the Senate prior to treaty negotiations. This proved to be a bit of a fiasco and never again would a President appear in person to seek the advice and consent from the Senate on a treaty. Hereafter, the treaty would be sent to the Senate for their approval after it had been negotiated.<br><br></div><div>The first problem in negotiating an Indian treaty was to determine with whom it should be negotiated. In 1787, in his Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States, John Adams recommended that political leaders pay attention to the governmental structures of Indian nations, particularly the separation of political powers and their democratic legislative structure. Unfortunately no-one paid any attention to Adams’ advice.<br><br></div><div>In general, the United States was unaware of how most American Indian governments worked and the fact there was great diversity in these governments. Wishing to negotiate with as few sovereign entities as possible, the American negotiators failed to understand Native American concepts of sovereignty. On the Great Plains, for example, each band was an autonomous unit, but the Americans tended to ignore this fact and simply grouped bands who spoke a somewhat similar language together as a single tribe. The concept of tribe, as we use it today in referring to Indian nations, is actually a concept which was superimposed upon Indian peoples.<br><br></div><div>Many American Indian governments in the nineteenth century were participatory democracies in which all had a right to speak and be heard in council. No single leader had the right to tell another person what to do. Leadership was by persuasion and example, not by authority and force. Deliberations would generally continue until all agreed and those who disagreed would simply leave and would, therefore, not be bound by the council decisions.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div>American negotiators preferred to deal with dictatorships rather than democracies. Since almost no Indian nations were dictatorships, this meant that the United States simply appointed the chiefs with whom they negotiated. In this way, the United States only had to deal with a handful of Indian leaders, leaders who tended to be agreeable to American interests as they had been appointed by American officials. The United States often ignored leaders who were chosen by Indian people and preferred to deal with the “puppet dictators” which it had set up. The Americans maintained their chiefs by putting them on the payroll and by putting them in charge of distributing gifts and money to their people. By encouraging graft and corruption, the Americans hoped to gain the loyalty of the leaders they appointed.<br><br></div><div>Very often the men appointed as chiefs by the Americans were not men who were recognized as traditional leaders. In addition, the Americans refused to recognize the existence of women leaders. In fact, they often refused to allow Indian women to participate in the treaty negotiations.<br><br></div><div>One example of the Americans inability to deal with women leaders can be seen in 1831 in their negotiations with Black Hawk’s Sauk in Illinois. The band had returned to their traditional home of Saukenuk, an area which they had farmed for many generations. They were met by an American militia force who insisted that the Sauk had no right to be in Illinois, nor to farm their traditional lands. The Sauk met in council with the Americans to see if they could settle the matter peacefully. Black Hawk told the Americans that the women owned the fields, not the men. Then a woman selected by the other women addressed the Americans. In her short speech she declared the land-especially the cornfields and gardens-actually belonged to the women rather than the whole tribe, and let it be known that the women had never sold any of the land nor consented to the transfer of it to the United States. The American negotiator simply dismissed her comments and said that the President did not send him to make treaties with women nor to hold council with them.<br><br></div><div>There are numerous examples of the American negotiators engaging in “making chiefs” by appointing the men they want as “supreme” chiefs. At the Fort Laramie Treaty Council in 1851, for example, each tribe was asked by the American negotiators to provide a single chief of the whole nation. After council with his people, chief Terra Blue of the Brulé (one of the Sioux tribes), said: “we have decided differently from you, Father, about this Chief for the nation. We want a Chief for each band.” The Americans responded by selecting a single chief-Frightening Bear–to represent the entire Sioux nation.<br><br></div><div>At the 1855 treaty council in Walla Walla, Washington, the Americans lumped 14 autonomous, culturally distinct, and sovereign Indian nations together under the designation “Yakama” and then declared Kamiakin as head chief. While the Americans claimed that Kamiakin signed the treaty on behalf of the 14 “confederated” bands, Kamiakin insisted that he touched the pen to the paper only for himself and only to indicate his personal friendship with the Americans. He made no claims of representing any group.<br><br></div><div>While the concept of negotiation might conjure up an image of give and take, of talking and listening, the American negotiators often seemed to be incapable of listening. They came to the councils with an outcome already predetermined by their ideology and had no intention of letting either facts or opposing viewpoints get in their way. They often came with a treaty that they wanted to impose upon the Indian nations. At the Walla Walla treaty council, Governor Isaac Stevens became frustrated with the Indians’ reluctance to simply sign the treaty he had brought with him that he held the treaty up and told them: “If you do not accept the terms offered and sign this paper you will walk in blood knee deep.”<br><br></div><div><br></div><div>In the treaty negotiations with the Creek Confederation in 1787-the one that President Washington had sought a priori Senate approval for– Alexander McGillivray, the Creek Head Chief, told the Americans that he would not have this treaty crammed down his throat. He gathered up his 900 warriors and left. Secretary of War Henry Knox informed President George Washington: “We have the Mortification to inform that the Parties have separated without a treaty.”<br><br></div><div>The United States stopped making treaties with Indian nations in 1871. Angered by the budget considerations in the Indian treaties, the House of Representatives attached a rider to an appropriations bill which stopped all treaties. Since that time there have been agreements with the Indian nations, but these agreements, unlike treaties, have to be approved by both houses of Congress.<br><br></div><div>Today there are many American Indian people who feel that the dealings and negotiations that the United States is having with the tribal peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan are similar to the negotiation process of the American Indian treaties.  <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 10:37:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417434395</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417435059</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><br>The United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall have Power . . . To regulate Commerce . . . with the Indian Tribes.” It is no surprise that American Indian tribes are mentioned in our Constitution. Indian tribes have always played a major part in the non-Indian exploration, settlement, and development of this country. When Christopher Columbus thought he had discovered the “New World” in 1492, it is estimated that 10-30 million native people lived in North America, that is, in the present day countries of Mexico, United States and Canada. These millions of people lived under governments of varying sophistication and complexity. These native governments were viable and fully operational political bodies which controlled their citizens and their territories and were an important factor in the development of the United States government we live under today.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>The European countries that colonized North America dealt with the native tribal governments as sovereign governments, that is, as governments that had independent and supreme authority over their citizens and territories. Especially in the area of the present day United States, the European powers interacted with American Indian tribal governments through official diplomatic means. Starting with England as early as 1620, and France, Spain, and Holland, the European powers negotiated with Indian tribes through official government to government council sessions and by entering treaties which recognized tribal governmental control over the territory of this “New World.” The European countries had a selfish motive for dealing with American Indian tribes in this fashion. The European governments wanted to legitimize the transactions they entered with Indian tribes to buy tribal lands. Thus, they wanted to make the transactions look official and legal by buying Indian lands through governmental treaties so that other European countries could not contest or object to these land sales.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>The United States adopted this tradition of dealing with Indian tribes as sovereign governments from the European powers. From the very beginning of its existence, the U.S. dealt with Indian tribes on an official governmental and treaty making basis. Political involvement in Indian affairs was a very important part of governmental life in early America. Indian tribes were very powerful in the 1700s and early 1800s in America and were a serious threat to the new United States. Hence, the United States government was heavily involved in negotiating and dealing with tribes as part of its governmental policies. The United States ultimately negotiated, signed and ratified almost 390 treaties with American Indian tribes. Most of these treaties are still valid today. The United States did not give Indian tribes anything for free in these treaties. Instead, the treaties were formal government to government negotiations regarding sales of land and property rights that the tribes owned and that the United States wanted to buy. The United States Supreme Court stated in 1905 that United States and Indian treaties are “not a grant of rights to the Indians, but a grant of rights from them — a reservation of those not granted.” Thus, while tribal governments sold some of their rights in land, animals, and resources to the United States for payments of money, goods, and promises of peace and security, the tribes held onto or reserved to themselves other lands and property rights that they did not sell in the treaties. The United States Supreme Court has likened these Indian treaties to contracts between “two sovereign nations.”<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>When the thirteen American colonies decided to rebel against England and seek their independence, they formed the Continental Congress to manage their national affairs. This Congress operated from 1774-1781 and dealt with Indian tribes on a diplomatic, political basis and signed one treaty with the Delaware Tribe in 1778. The political interest of the United States at that time was to keep the tribes happy with the new American government and to keep Indian tribes from fighting for the English in the American Revolutionary War during 1775-1781. This Congress engaged in diplomatic relations with tribes by sending representatives to the tribes bearing many gifts and promises of peace and friendship to keep the tribes neutral in the United States’ war with England.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>The thirteen American colonies then adopted the Articles of Confederation in 1781 and convened in a new Congress to manage their affairs on the national level. This Congress also had to manage Indian affairs and keep the tribes from fighting against the United States. The new Congress also sent diplomatic representatives to the tribes and promised friendship and peace, and ultimately it signed eight treaties with Indian tribes between 1781-1789, including treaties with the Iroquois Confederacy, the Cherokee Tribe, the Shawnee Tribe and numerous other tribes. However, this Congress’ power in Indian affairs was limited because the Articles of Confederation did not clearly give this Congress the exclusive power to deal with tribes. Thus, various states meddled in Indian affairs and actually caused wars between tribes and Georgia and South Carolina, for example, because the states were trying to steal Indian lands. The problems caused by states getting involved in Indian affairs led many people to call for the formation of a new and stronger United States government wherein the exclusive power over Indian affairs would be placed only in the hands of the national government and would be taken completely away from the states.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>When the representatives of the thirteen colonies/states started drafting the United States Constitution, to form the United States government we now live under, the “Founding Fathers” of this nation had to carefully consider the role of Indian tribes in the political arrangement of the new nation. As James Madison pointed out, much of the trouble that England and the thirteen colonies had suffered with Indian tribes from the 1640’s forward arose when individual colonists or colonial governments tried to greedily take Indian lands. In those instances, the colonies and individual colonists would negotiate with tribes without the permission or the involvement of the English King or the American national leadership. The drafters of the U.S. Constitution tried to solve this problem by taking Indian affairs out of the hands of the colonies/states and individuals and placing the sole power to deal and negotiate with tribes into the hands of the U.S. Congress. Thus, Indian tribes and their people, and the United States relationship with tribes are addressed in the U.S. Constitution.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>In Article I, the United States Constitution accomplishes the goal of excluding states and individuals from Indian affairs by stating that only Congress has the power “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes . . . .” The United States Supreme Court has interpreted this language to mean that the Congress was granted the exclusive right and power to regulate trade and affairs with the Indian tribes. The very first United States Congress formed under our new Constitution, in 1789-1791, immediately assumed this power and in the first five weeks of its existence it enacted four statutes concerning Indian affairs. In 1789, the new Congress, for example, established a Department of War with responsibility over Indian affairs, set aside money to negotiate Indian treaties, and appointed federal commissioners to negotiate treaties with tribes. In July 1790, this Congress passed a law which forbids states and individuals from dealing with tribes and from buying Indian lands. This law is still in effect today.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>Indian tribes are also referred to, but are not expressly designated, in Article VI of the Constitution where it is made clear that all treaties entered by the United States “shall be the supreme Law of the Land.” In 1789, the United States had only entered a few treaties with European countries while it had already entered nine treaties with different Indian tribes. Consequently, this treaty provision of the U.S. Constitution states that the federal government’s treaties with Indian tribes are the supreme law of the United States.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>Individual Indians are also mentioned in the Constitution of 1789, Article I, and again in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution which was ratified in 1868. In counting the population of the states to determine how many representatives a state can have in Congress, Indians were expressly not to be counted unless they paid taxes. In effect, Indians were not considered to be federal or state citizens unless they paid taxes. After the Civil War when citizenship rights were extended through the Fourteenth Amendment to ex-slaves and to “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States,” that Amendment still excluded individual Indians from citizenship rights and excluded them from being counted towards figuring congressional representation unless they paid taxes. This demonstrates that Congress still considered Indians to be citizens of other sovereign governments even in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. This view was correct because most Indians did not become United States citizens until 1924 when Congress passed a law making all Indians United States citizens. For many years after 1924, states were still uncertain whether Indians were also citizens of the state where they lived and in many states Indians were not allowed to vote in state elections.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>American Indian tribes have played a major role in the development and history of the United States and have engaged in official, diplomatic governmental relations with other sovereign governments from the first moment Europeans stepped foot on this continent. Indian tribes have been a part of the day to day political life of the United States and continue to have an important role in American life down to this day. Tribes continue to have a government to government relationship with the United States and they continue to be sovereign governments with primary control over their citizens and their territory. It is no surprise, then, that the relationship between Indian people, tribal governments and the United States is addressed in the provisions of the United States Constitution.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>Side bar - The Doctrine of Discovery<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>From 1492 forward, European countries and the United States justified their dealings with the natives and American Indian tribes in North and South America under the “doctrine of discovery.” Under this principle, the European country that first discovered a new area where Christian Europeans had not yet arrived could claim the territory for their own country. This did not mean that the natives lost the right to live on the land or to farm and hunt animals on it but it did mean that the natives could only sell their land to the one European country that “discovered” them and that they should only deal politically with that one European country. In most situations, the Europeans also enforced the doctrine of discovery against themselves because they recognized and agreed to be bound by the principle that the discovering country earned a protectible property right in newly discovered territories. The audacity of one country “discovering” and claiming lands already occupied and owned by American Indians came from the idea that Christians and white Europeans were superior to people of other races and religions. When European countries first came to the New World, they were not strong enough militarily to just take the land from the Indian tribes. Thus, they entered treaties with tribes to make the transactions look legal and valid, and they bought the lands they wanted. In addition, influential scholars in England and Spain, for example, believed that Indians had a legal right as free people to continue to own their lands and that a European country could only take lands by force in an honorable war.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>In exercising its control over the American continent, the United States also enforced the doctrine of discovery. Thus, as the United States Supreme Court stated in 1823, in the case of Johnson v. McIntosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat) 543 (1823), the United States acquired the sole right to buy lands from Indian tribal governments under the doctrine of discovery. Thus, sales of land that Indians had made to persons other than to the United States government were invalid. Tribes continued to have the right to use and occupy their lands but their governmental sovereign powers were restricted in that they could only sell their lands to the United States. Johnson, 21 U.S. at 573-74. The United States gained this power under the doctrine of discovery from England and from other European countries as the U.S. bought or acquired the “discovery” authority of these European countries over various parts of the American continent.<br></strong><br></div><div><strong><br>In upholding this power of discovery over Indian tribes for the United States, the Supreme Court had to ignore its own opinion that Indians possessed natural rights to their lands. In fact, the Supreme Court refused to say why American farmers, “merchants and manufacturers have a right, on abstract principles, to expel hunters from the territory they possess” or to limit the tribal rights. Instead, in determining tribal rights to sell their lands, the Court relied on the doctrine of discovery and the fact that the United States had beaten some tribes in war to decide that only the United States could buy Indian lands. “Conquest gives a title [to the land] which the Courts of the conqueror cannot deny . . . .” Id. at 588.<br></strong><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 10:40:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417435059</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Native American sovereignty and Constitution</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417436319</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States">United States Constitution</a> mentions Native American tribes three times:<br><br></div><ul><li>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 states that "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States ... excluding Indians not taxed."According to <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commentaries_on_the_Constitution_of_the_United_States">Story's <em>Commentaries on the U.S. Constitution</em></a>, "There were Indians, also, in several, and probably in most, of the states at that period, who were not treated as citizens, and yet, who did not form a part of independent communities or tribes, exercising general sovereignty and powers of government within the boundaries of the states."</li><li>Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution states that "Congress shall have the power to regulate Commerce with foreign nations and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes", determining that Indian tribes were separate from the federal government, the states, and foreign nations;and</li><li>The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 2 amends the apportionment of representatives in Article I, Section 2 above.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_United_States#cite_note-5"><sup>[5]</sup></a></li></ul><div><br>These basic provisions have been changed or clarified by various federal laws over the history of the United States. <em>Regulate</em> historically meant <em>facilitate</em>, rather than control or direct in the more modern sense. Therefore, the Congress of these United States was to be the facilitator of commerce between the states and the tribes.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_United_States#cite_note-6"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>These Constitutional provisions, and subsequent interpretations by the Supreme Court (see below), are today often summarized in three principles of U.S. Indian law:<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_United_States#cite_note-9"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><ul><li><strong>Territorial sovereignty</strong>: Tribal authority on Indian land is organic and is not granted by the states in which Indian lands are located.</li><li><strong>Plenary power doctrine</strong>: Congress, and not the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Executive_Branch">Executive Branch</a> or <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Judicial_Branch">Judicial Branch</a>, has ultimate authority with regard to matters affecting the Indian tribes. Federal courts give greater deference to Congress on Indian matters than on other subjects.</li><li><strong>Trust relationship</strong>: The federal government has a "duty to protect" the tribes, implying (courts have found) the necessary legislative and executive authorities to effect that duty.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 10:44:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417436319</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Historical Context Preceding Treaty Negotiation in the 1820s</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417439538</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>In the early years of the nineteenth century Native Americans leaders in the Great Lakes region were well schooled personally and through knowledge shared with them by theirelders regarding ways to exploit European rivalries within North America . This was not abstract knowledge. Understanding the nature of European conflict was critical information used by Indian leaders in their negotiations with Europeans. They also understood that Indian military prowess played an important role in European considerations. Indians had historically been an effective fighting force. They could forward their own interests by force of arms; use this force on behalf of Europeans as allies and in exchange for concessions, or promise peace, for the right price.<br><br></div><div>Skillful exploitation of European differences, coupled with the significant military forces Indiannations could bring to bear for or against European interests, created opportunities through which to win diplomatic victories for Indian nations. Indian leaders in theGreat Lakes region had used their military strength and ability to exploit European differences to obtain favorable outcomes in negotiations for at least a half-century.<br><br></div><div>Indian leaders first discovered the power of this strategy when they spoke with the rival colonial empires of France and England . Threats to the Indians created by large-scale British settlements could be played against French economic interests far more concerned with the fur trade and willing to arm and supply Indian allies who would oppose the British. Similarly, disadvantageous French economic decisions could be countered byrecourse to British colonial officials seeking to limit the possibility of Indian warfare against the ever-expanding British colonial population.<br><br></div><div>Tension between England and France in other parts of the world sometimes createdopportunities in which either country was willing to reward the NativeAmerican population if they would either pledge peace or offer to take up arms. Indian leaders became skilled at playing one European power against the other, to maximize tribal interests.<br><br></div><div>The ability of Indian leaders to manipulate European rivalries for their own benefit was endangered in 1760s when French military forces in North America were crushed by the British. With the exception of a few small islands off the Canadian shoreline, all of New France was formally and permanently ceded to Britain . The victorious British treated Native Americans as if they, like the French, had been vanquished. In the war'simmediate aftermath various forms of support were lessened or abolished. Key Britishofficials, focused on saving money after theexpenses of war, failed to understand that theirpolicy angered Native American leaders who had sided with them and who believed they deserved a share of the victor's spoils. The policy also angered the leaders of France 's Native American allies who were quite clear in their own minds that it had been the French, not they, who had surrendered.<br><br></div><div>In 1763 Britain 's shortsighted policy led to Pontiac 's Revolt; a pan-Indian movement that developed a coordinated military strategy with the objective of driving the British from all settlements west of the Alleghany Mountains . The revolt failed in its military objective but the narrowness of Britain 's victory made clear the military prowess of NativeAmericans. This realization made the conflict important politically. British officials quickly changed policies in an effort to win Native American good will.<br><br></div><div>The realization of the continued military significance of Native American tribes came at a time when Britain was coming into increasing conflict with its own colonies in North America . Within a generation of the collapse of New France , Native Americans would again find their interests advanced by balancing two great powers against one another: the British in Canada against the newly established United States of America . America 's insatiable westward expansion had grave implications for the Indian nations and potentially disturbing political ramifications for the British. Each had good reason to support the other in checking the Americans advance.<br><br></div><div>The era of British-American conflict on the North American continent lasted approximately fiftyyears. The War of 1812 was the final opportunity for Native American nations in the Northwest Territory to ally themselves with a European power, Britain , in an effort to limit the expansionist goals of the Euro-Americans residing in the United States . The War of 1812 would also represent the last time the tribes of the Great Lakes region could muster sufficient military strength to challenge directly the United States military. We know this today, but nineteenth-century leaders, both Native American and Euro-American, who were responsible for negotiating treaties with one another could not be so sure about the course of future events.<br><br></div><div>At the close of the War of 1812 the United States , in particular, had to weigh carefully the course of future Native American relations. Provisions of the American constitutionin 1787 had provided for the negotiation of treaties with Native Americans. The American military's history in the Northwest Territory prior to the War of 1812 strongly suggested that negotiations, rather than an initial recourse to military force, would be a wise policy for the leaders of the new Republic to follow. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn1"><sup>[1]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>In the 1780s Native American leaders in the Northwest Territory developed a pan-Indian alliance similar to that led by Pontiac in the 1760s. This alliance created a military force very much the equal of that available to the United States on the frontier. A series of battles andlesser skirmishes occurred on the western frontier. In these battles the pan-Indian alliance proved itself quite capable of defeating the new Republic's military.<br><br></div><div>In the fall of 1790, militia units led by General Josiah Harmar suffered a humiliating defeat in an attack against members of the Miami tribe in present-day Ohio . Harmar encountered not only The Miami led by the chief Little Turtle and aided by his Shawnee counterpart BlueJacket, but also many warriors from the Potawatomi, Ottawa , Chippewa, and Delaware tribes. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn2"><sup>[2]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>A year later a second military force, under the command of Arthur St. Clair, experienced the same outcome. St. Clair and his 1,400 militia troops were attacked by a united band of Chippewa, Potawatomi, Ottawa , Miami , Delaware , Wyandot, Shawnee , Mingo, and Cherokee Indians. The surprise attack cost St. Clair half of his command. The defeat also led the federal government to reconsider its use of local militias as the primary means of combating Native Americans on the frontier. If the Native Americans' military power was to be matched, Congress would need to finance a professional army to do it. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn3"><sup>[3]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>The use of professional soldiers gave the American government the means to match the Native Americans. In August 1794 at the Battle of Fallen Timbers, Anthony Wayne and his 3,000 soldiers defeated the confederated tribes who were attempting an ambush. Because the number of casualties was approximately equal, some scholars contend that labeling the battle a “victory” for Wayne is a misnomer. However the battle was a victory forthe Americans in that it severely damaged the inter-tribal alliances among the Native Americans and led to the first negotiations between the American government and Native American leaders in the region. The result was finalized in the Treaty of Greenville, signed in August 1795.<br><br></div><div>The treaty in large part reflected the aims of the federal government. It allowed the establishment of military posts in the Northwest, and ceded the United States all of present-day Ohio , southern Indiana , and Illinois . However, the military success of the tribes in the early 1790s was not forgotten, either by the tribes or the negotiators from Washington . The treaty allowed some provisions favorable to the Native Americans in order to end the fighting on the frontier. In particular the document required that payments be made by the federal government of a thousand dollars per year to many of the tribes in the area. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn4"><sup>[4]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>The treaty of Greenville demonstrated serious practical shortcomings in the pan-Indian alliance, but the dream of an alliance remained alive among some Native American leaders. Nor did the Battle of Fallen Timbers put an end to the military power of the Native Americans. Native American leaders remembered both their strength and their traditional negotiating tool of playing one European community against another. By 1811 Tecumseh, a Shawnee leader, along with his brother, The Prophet, had resurrected the Native American alliances of the 1780s and again threatened to counter Euro-American settlement with military force. In November 1811, errors in judgment on the part of The Prophet led to a Native American defeat at the Battle of Tippecanoe. Although the battle went badly for the Native Americans, as at the battle of Fallen Timbers the more serious problem was a fracturing of the pan-Indian alliance.<br><br></div><div>With the outbreak of war in 1812 between Britain and the United States Tecumseh, who unlike the now-discredited Prophet retained a significant pan-Indian following, allied himself with the British. Tecumseh's Indians played a major role in the British capture of Detroit , an extremely disheartening loss suffered by the Americans in the war's first year. In 1813, however, Tecumseh died in southern Ontario at the Battle of the Thames . There was no Native American leader of sufficient stature to take his place, causing the pan-Indian alliance to further falter. Adding to the Indians' problems, at the war's close the British home government ordered that support for Native Americans be severely curtailed or completely ended. The Native American nations of the Great Lakes found themselves lacking a unifying figure, their military power greatly diminished by significant casualties in several years of ongoing war, and without significant support from the British in their struggle against the United States.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 10:52:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417439538</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Treaty Making on the Great Lakes in the 1820s</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417442398</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>During the 1820s the situation confronting Native American leaders was disheartening. Britain no longer was willing to support them. Their own resources through which to make war had diminished. Most importantly, the settlers from the United States kept coming in ever larger numbers. Given their situation many Native American leaders seemed to believe that their only recourse was to negotiate the best possible treaty with the United States government. It was likely, however, that most Native American leaders realized even the best possible treaty with the land-hungry Americans would not be very much.<br><br></div><div>The United States , too, had seen a great deal of war, and Washington also wished to find a negotiated way to resolve the “Indian problem” in the Great Lakes . As Euro-American westward expansion forced Native tribes and settlers into increasing geographical and cultural contact, the federal government sought comprehensive policies and treaties that aimed at achieving five objectives:<br><br></div><ul><li>Gaining allegiance from tribes that previously had sided with Britain</li><li>Gaining title to the land for westward settlement</li><li>Ensuring the safety of those settlers</li><li>Accessing land for the purposes of extracting resources, particularly Michigan copper</li><li>Ensuring total control over the region—legally, politically, and militarily</li></ul><div>To accomplish these comprehensive objectives; Washington 's negotiators typically sought three components in treaties. The major treaties between the government and the Great Lakes tribes drafted during the 1820s included:<br><br></div><ul><li>Well-defined boundaries of land for specific tribes to occupy</li><li>Policies that encouraged tribal members and leaders to become “civilized”</li><li>Frameworks for supplying tribes with goods and resources to survive while tribal members learned “civilized” ways</li></ul><div>In truth, the leaders of the new nation in Washington were uncertain what the nation's policy should be toward Native Americans. In the first years of the 1820s the political majority in Washington argued that the solution to the “Indian problem” was “civilization.” Native Americans were to be shown the benefits of European lifestlye and progressively brought under that culture's norms and expectations.<br><br></div><div>The first step in civilizing the Native American population was to convince them to live as Euro-Americans' did; in settled communities that had well-defined boundaries. Thus, in this period the treaties that were negotiated and ratified made an effort to assign specific land with well-defined borders to each tribe. Boundaries rarely served Native American interests. For the tribes who already resided in the land, they usually meant less land on which to live and less mobility to follow game. In many cases it required abandoning lands that tribes had traditionally occupied and which possessed ceremonial or cultural significance for them.<br><br></div><div>Once boundaries were established the objective was to persuade Native Americans to abandon their traditional values and lifestyle. More specifically, Washington encouraged Native Americans to replace hunting with farming. Supplementing and supporting this change, Washington believed, was the adoption by Native Americans of Christian values and principles to replace indigenous beliefs. In theory at least the political leaders in Washington also realized that Native Americans would need food, trade goods, and other resources such as access to Euro-American educational facilities to help them successfully make this transition.<br><br></div><div>An alternate view that emerged in Washington asserted that Native Americans had little interest in European ways, preferring to retain their own cultural heritage. Those who despaired of “civilizing” Indians generally came to conclude that the only solution was to send Native Americans away, usually far away, from Euro-American settlements. By the late 1820s a policy of relocation, rather than civilization was gaining ascendancy in Washington . Native American representatives sitting at treaty sessions within the Great Lakes region during the 1820s faced an uncertain federal policy which sometimes sought “civilization” as its goal while at other times simply wanted to remove Native Americans to somewhere in the West.<br><br></div><div>Regardless of whether the federal government wished to civilize Native Americans or remove them, separating warring tribes was always a critical concern. Thus at Prairie du Chien, a hamlet in present day Wisconsin, in the summer of 1825, the Bureau of Indian Affairs sent Michigan Territorial Governor Lewis Cass and Army General William Clark to resolve long-standing inter-tribal disputes among the Sioux, Chippewa, Sauk and Fox, Winnebago, Iowa, and Illinois. The Sioux and the Chippewa stood at the brink of full war. Indian agents expressed concern that the tribal wars threatened white settlements. Indeed, Indian agents feared the hostilities might expand to all tribes in the Mississippi and Great Lakes region. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn5"><sup>[5]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>The negotiations at Prairie du Chien centered on establishing permanent boundaries for tribes in order to end the inter-tribal violence, but they also showed the tendency of Washington 's negotiators to insert other, unstated agendas into the negotiation. William Clark told the tribes that had assembled that, “the Great Fathers were displeased with the squabbles of his red children,” and “he did not come here seeking land.” Although this was not a complete falsehood, Clark and Cass, in drawing specific boundaries for each tribe, also created through the treaty at Prairie du Chien “empty spaces” available for Euro-American settlement.<br><br></div><div>It is likely that Native Americans at the negotiations understood what was happening, but their lack of unity made it difficult to create a collective opposition to this result. The speeches of tribal leaders at several treaty proceedings during the 1820s made obvious the collapse of the pan-Indian alliance masterminded by Tecumseh. In particular, response to the federal government's unending request for land, whether directly stated or indirectly achieved, varied dramatically.<br><br></div><div>There were those who steadfastly opposed giving land to the Euro-Americans. The Chippewa chief Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin ( Figured Stone) eloquently exemplified this position. At the treaty negotiations at Fond du Lac , Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin, who had repeatedly suggested that he would resist White settlement, rejected efforts on the part of the federal negotiators to change his position. As the conference drew to its close Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin observed one of the federal government's negotiators seated on a tree stump. Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin made his way to the same stump and sat very close to the negotiator, practically pushing him off the tree. When the negotiator moved to another log Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin followed him, eventually pushing the negotiator onto the ground.<br><br></div><div>Looking at the man laying in front of him, Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin spoke:<br><br></div><div><em>There, my Father, that is the way in which you serve your poor red children. The Great Spirit hears me, and I will speak. I came and asked you for a seat on which to rest my limbs; you gave it to me. Not contented with this, I urged you for more until you gave and I again demanded more until you had none left. Many moons ago, our Father crossed the Big water [ Atlantic Ocean ] and begged of his red children a small piece of land on which he might build his wigwam. It was given him; but not being satisfied, he again asked his red children for more. This was given, and still more, until his red children abandoned the homes and hunting grounds of their fathers to make way for the white man. Now when the great chiefs and braves of their nations are at rest, our Father is for sending us further west to where the sun sets and sinks into the Big Lake [Pacific Ocean].</em> <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn2"><sup>[6]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin, however, was not the only voice to be heard among the tribal leaders. He likely represented a minority of those Native Americans who had come to negotiate a treaty. Other Native American leaders were willing to forfeit their lands. Their motives for doing this are often unclear. They were sometimes accused of selling their tribal land in order to curry favor with Washington . At Fond du Lac , one Chippewa leader from the Ontonagon commented,<br><br></div><div><em>My Father, you gave me a medal and a flag at the Ontonagon. They say I have sold my country for these things. You, father, know better you told me to sit still and hold down my head, and if I hear bad birds singing, to bend it still lower. My friends held down their heads when I approached. When I turned bad words went out of their mouths against me</em>.<a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn7"><sup>[7]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>Those who took the position that the land could be given up often sounded weary of conflict and resigned to the inevitable. They may have believed that the old game of playing one European power off against another was ended, as was the possibility of successful military actions against the Euro-Americans. Thus, they could only make the best out of a bad situation.<br><br></div><div>At Prairie du Chien the Sioux Chief, Waa-Ba-Shaw (also spelled as Wahpasha) demonstrated this attitude of weariness and resignation. During the proceedings he commented on the affects of the westward expansion on his tribes and on his own land ownership, stating,<br><br></div><div><em>I will relinquish some of my lands for the sake of peace, -- I formerly owned the land on which we now are but I do not claim it now because it belongs to the Whites. </em><a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn8"><sup>[8]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>Waa-Ba-Shaw himself was a well-regarded chief among his band of Sioux and a man whose family had wide experience in dealing with Europeans. He was believed to have been born sometime around 1773. Waa-Ba-Shaw's father (also known as Waa-Ba-Shaw) was an important tribal leader. Upon the death of Waa-Ba-Shaw the elder in 1806, his son, Waa-Ba-Shaw, took control of the band and established an encampment near present day Winona , Minnesota . Although in the 1820s many considered Waa-Ba-Shaw a pacifist, during the War of 1812 he aligned himself and his warriors with the British forces and apparently served the king with distinction. At the close of the war, however, Waa-Ba-Shaw believed the British had betrayed him and his people. Waa-Ba-Shaw signaled his deep displeasure with the British by refusing British tokens of respect offered him at Michilimackinac. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn9"><sup>[9]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>In abandoning the British, Waa-Ba-Shaw lost the ability to play European against European. Without the British supplying weapons, he seemingly concluded that making peace with the Americans was his only option. Waa-Ba-Shaw, historians report, enjoyed relatively friendly relations with the American settlers who moved into the frontier. He met with all the explorers and agents sent to the region and even visited Washington in 1824. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn10"><sup>[10]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>Although Waa-Ba-Shaw may have foresworn war as a tool of diplomacy, leaders such as Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin made it clear to officials in Washington that there was still the possibility of Native Americans militarily opposing Euro-American settlement. Nor could Washington rest easy that Britain might not once again use Indians as part of an anti-American policy. These fears wee reflected in two clauses found in the treaty signed at Prairie du Chien. The clauses required that:<br><br></div><ul><li>The tribes recognize the authority of the United States to direct the course of Native American relations and treaties</li><li>Statements in which the Native American signers relinquished all ties to any other powers and people in the region</li></ul><div>The ghosts of the War of 1812 and the fear that not all of the Great Lakes' Indian leaders had come to believe, as did Waa-Ba-Shaw, that there was no alternative to accepting endless Euro-American settlement are clearly written into these clauses.<br><br></div><div>Article 12 of the Prairie du Chien treaty was in some ways an admission that, whatever other merits it might have, the treaty had failed in its primary purpose. The article called for a new round of negotiations in the next year to establish clear demarcation between Sioux and Chippewa land.<a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn11"><sup>[11]</sup></a> The significance placed on this new round of talks was signaled when Thomas McKenney, head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs in Washington , D.C. , traveled from the capitol and joined Michigan 's territorial governor Lewis Cass. Together the men went to Fond du Lac , an outpost near Lake Superior for this new round of talks.<br><br></div><div>This meeting brought together leaders of the Chippewa tribe, many of whom had been absent from the proceedings at Prairie du Chien a year prior. Once again while the primary goal stated by government officials was to further reduce contact and therefore hostilities between the Chippewa and Sioux tribes, other agendas became evident in the discussions. These agendas reflected the many goals of the federal government's Indian policy.<br><br></div><div>The commissioners urged that the tribes resolve their disputes by becoming “civilized.” Washington 's representatives argued that tribal conflict stemmed from confrontations over hunting grounds. If the tribes took up farming as their principal means of livelihood instead of hunting, these conflicts would be minimized. Furthermore if the tribes' members became farmers and resided on small plots of land, whites could more easily mine the region's copper. “This copper does you no good,” the Native Americans were told, “and it would be useful for us to make into kettles, buttons, bells, and a great many other things.” <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn12"><sup>[12]</sup></a>A Native American culture based on an agricultural lifestyle would minimize interaction and conflict between Sioux and Chippewa tribal members and also open the land for resource exploitation free from the fear of Native American arms.<br><br></div><div>The notes taken at Fond du Lac , and subsequently at negotiations a Butte Des Mortes, reinforce the example of Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin and makes clear that not all Native American leaders were willing to follow Waa-Ba-Shaw's model of cooperation with the hope of thus gaining good will. Not all leaders where as direct as Shing-Gaa-Ba-W'OSin in their opposition to Washington 's objectives. Sometimes resistance was indicated by the simple act of not showing up at the appointed place and time. Treaties could not be negotiated if the Native Americans failed to appear. At other times resistance was shown through demands that Washington first offer sufficient tokens of good faith in order to obtain the desired concessions from the Native American leaders. These demands were usually placed in the context of the very real hunger and ill health of the tribe and the need for Washington to address these problems.<br><br></div><div>The Chippewa leaders present at the Fond du Lac conference in August 1826 expressed a willingness to work with the officials, but also stressed the dire situation that confronted the tribe. They pointed to hunger, especially among the women and children, and drew a clear connection between the effects of this situation and the attitude of the tribe toward the government.<br><br></div><div>O-Hya-Wa-Nim-Ce-Kee (Yellow Thunder), a Chippewa Chief, explained that more of his band would have attended the council at Fond du Lac , however, “the poverty of my women and children plead for them, and I have left some of my young men to provide for their wants.” <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn13"><sup>[13]</sup></a>A second Chippewa chief, Pe-Schick-Ee (also spelled Peezhickee), appealed to the “Great Fathers,” for provisions because, “Our women and Children are very poor. You have heard it. It need not have been said. You see it.” But Pe-Schick-Ee was not simply asking for humanitarian aid. He stressed that food was necessary for establishing trust between the government and the tribes. Many Native Americans, Pe-Schick-Ee claimed, had departed or altogether avoided the prior conferences because of ill-will. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn14"><sup>[14]</sup></a>The politically astute Pe-Schick-Ee suggested that the assistance and provisions from the government was necessary not simply because it was the right thing to do but rather because it would aid in repairing a division that was endangering the ability of Washington to sign treaties.<a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn15"><sup>[15]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>The dire poverty of the Chippewa did not go unacknowledged. In the Fond du Lac treaty language was included obliging the federal government to provide the Chippewa tribe an annuity of $2,000. However, the treaty stipulated that the payment would continue only at the pleasure of Congress. In exchange for the annual payment, the Chippewa had to recognize the authority of the federal government, relinquish trade with other parties, and accept the land boundaries given to them from the federal government. It is difficult to understand when or how the federal government planned to stop payments to the tribe as negotiators conceded that the land allotted to the Chippewa was “unfit for habitation and destitute of game,” thus making the tribe dependent on an annual payment from Congress for survival. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn16"><sup>[16]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>Regardless of the merits of the deal struck in Fond du Lac, negotiating tactics such as failing to appear at the appointed time and place or demanding tokens of good faith from Washington before negotiations could proceed were used by Native American leaders to the frustration of the Euro-American negotiators. To resolve this problem Washington 's commissioners sometimes resorted to personally selecting tribal spokesmen. By appointing representatives who were eager to cooperate commissioners were often successful in negotiating terms to Washington 's liking. The legitimacy of the resulting document was often questionable and frequently failed to be seen as binding by other tribal leaders. For example, the treaty of Fond du Lac explicitly refers to the agreement signed a year earlier at Prairie du Chien and directly raises the question of its legitimacy:<br><br></div><div><em>Whereas owing to the remote and dispersed situation of the Chippewas, full deputations of their different bands did not attend at Prairie du Chien, which circumstance, from the loose nature of Indian government, would render the treaty of doubtful obligation, with respect to the bands not represented …<br></em><br></div><div><em>Art. 1: the chiefs and warriors of the Chippewa tribe of Indians hereby fully assent to the treaty concluded in August last at Prairie du Chien, and engage to observe and fulfil the stipulations thereof.<br></em><br></div><div>Whether the problem was the “remoteness” of some Chippewa leaders, as the treaty writer assumes, or a subtle way of undermining the treaty by Native Americans, a point Washington's negotiators would likely prefer not to put in writing, the result was that a subsequent treaty was needed to re-ratify a past agreement. This example point out why Native American treaty signers were sometimes appointed by Washington rather than by their own people, but also the limitations of this strategy.<br><br></div><div>The last treaty negotiation of this period in the Great Lakes occurred at Butte Des Mortes, near Green Bay , in the summer of 1827. As with previous treaties, Butte Des Mortes attempted to establish well-defined tribal boundaries, this time between the Chippewa and the Menomonee. The negotiations at Butte Des Mortes also resulted from increased hostilities between Brothernton Indians and the citizens of Green Bay , and a desire to investigate what must have been a bone-chilling rumor of a pan-Indian uprising near Prairie du Chien. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn17"><sup>[17]</sup></a> Over thirteen hundred Indians had arrived at Butte Des Mortes by July, and eighteen hundred were in attendance by the time the conference began. <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn18"><sup>[18]</sup></a> Those present included the Menomonee, Winnebagoes, and Chippewa, as well as the New York Iroquois who had previously been displaced. As with the treaties from the previous years, the federal government sought to establish clear geographic parameters for each tribe, require the recognition of the authority of the federal government, and develop an annuity schedule for each of the tribes that would both pacify tribal leaders and forward the work of “civilization.”<a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn19"><sup>[19]<br></sup></a><br></div><div>The treaty's concluding ceremony unknowingly ended an era for the tribes of the Great Lakes . The Removal Act would become law in three years. Its passage marked the abandonment of the concept of allowing “civilized” Indians to live in close proximity to Euro-American settlement. Instead, official federal policy became one of relocating tribes far away from Euro-American settlement to lands west of the Mississippi River . While relocation would not become law until 1830, official Washington was already advocating voluntary removal in 1827. Thomas McKenney, the head of the BIA, traveled south to meet with tribes there to persuade them to move west of the Mississippi River . <a href="http://clarke.cmich.edu/resource_tab/information_and_exhibits/native_american_treaty_signers/essays.html#ftn20"><sup>[20]</sup></a> Lewis Cass, who was a federal negotiator at many of the Great Lakes treaties, would become Secretary of War in Andrew Jackson's administration. His primary task was the repudiation of the “civilizing” clauses found in many of the treaties he personally had negotiated as territorial governor of Michigan and the implementation of President Jackson's removal policy<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:01:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417442398</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Diplomatic and military relations, American Indian</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417444890</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>How did American Indians shift from being essential allies with the ability to shape imperial destinies to being marginalized dependents of the <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/places/united-states-and-canada/us-political-geography/united-states">United States</a>, a new nation determined to dominate the continent? Between 1754 and 1815, American Indians and colonizers shared in the creation of diplomatic and military customs that underscored the interdependence of both societies. However, the dramatic events of the Revolutionary and early national eras foreshadowed Indian removal. By the end of those eras, American Indians long accustomed to selecting their own leaders from the village to the tribal levels found themselves residing on reservations monitored by American bureaucrats who worked to create national tribal governments modeled after the <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/places/united-states-and-canada/us-political-geography/united-states">United States</a>. American Indian destinies were shaped by inexorable environmental, technological, and demographic changes that neither side controlled. Nevertheless, the continental vision of early Americans, the belief that the United States could possess the continent and exploit its natural resources to become a powerful nation, ultimately determined that American Indians and Americans would live in separate societies. Americans used the dependency of native peoples to estrange them from their homelands and consolidate their control of the land and the people within it.<br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:08:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417444890</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Formation of an indian policy</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417445892</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>War and disease contributed to the attrition of Indian communities throughout the eastern United States. A series of immediate and unforgiving consequences followed. After the Revolution, land replaced deerskins as the primary unit of trade. By 1800 approximately six hundred thousand American Indians faced just over five million whites and <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/african-americans">African Americans</a>. The weakness of the <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/articles-confederation">Articles of Confederation</a> created a vacuum of power that a host of competing entities exploited. Using the conquest theory, between 1784 and 1786 land companies, state governments, and private individuals signed a number of treaties with American Indians. In their rush to acquire Indian land, fraudulent treaty makers failed to negotiate with approved tribal leaders and rarely received congressional approval for their actions.<br><br></div><div><br>Endemic warfare, particularly north of the Ohio River, began to undermine the <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/sociology-and-social-reform/sociology-general-terms-and-concepts/social-21">social order</a> of Indian communities. The Shawnee town of Chillicothe, originally located along the Scioto River in south-central Ohio, was attacked by Kentuckians and reconstituted by Shawnees four times between 1774 and 1794. Indian men, accustomed to clearing fields, hunting, and regulating the civil affairs of their communities, were long absent. Time-honored harvest ceremonies were interrupted. Kin groups weakened from the loss of members and leadership turned to their culturally related neighbors for support. Native peoples increasingly reconstituted themselves according to their disposition toward war and peace, militant resistance or accommodation.<br><br></div><div><br>In August 1786 the Confederation Congress attempted to stem the violence on American frontiers when it created Indian departments north and south of the Ohio River. Under <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/us-history-biographies/henry-knox">Henry Knox</a>, secretary of war under both the <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/articles-confederation">Articles of Confederation</a> and President George Washington, these departments evolved into a series of Indian agencies. Similarly, Congress passed the <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/northwest-ordinance">Northwest Ordinance</a> of 1787, which was designed to reverse the years of mayhem that had accompanied Indian-white relations during the Revolution. Among other things, the <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/northwest-ordinance">Northwest Ordinance</a> ended both the conquest theory and the preemption rights that followed from it. After 1787, land west of the Mississippi had to be purchased from the Indians, regardless of their disposition toward the United States. Moreover, treaty making became the exclusive privilege of the United States and its agents.<br><br></div><div><br>These policy changes did not diminish hostile actions between Indians and whites. Settlers continued to push north from Kentucky into what is now Ohio. In response, the Miami and Shawnee tribes assembled another multitribal alliance to stem the invasion of their lands. Between 18 and 22 October 1790, Brigadier General Josiah Harmar retaliated by launching the first major assault against the Ohio tribes. The multitribal alliance achieved a decisive victory over Harmar, with 183 of his 1,500 men reported killed or missing. In retaliation, President Washington ordered General Arthur St. Clair to launch another attack on the Ohio tribes. Little Turtle of the Miami tribe and Bluejacket of the Shawnee led an estimated one thousand men against two thousand soldiers under St. Clair in a series of engagements that climaxed on 4 November 1791. At sunrise, a force of Wyandot, Seneca, Ottawa, Potawatomi, Ojibwa, Shawnee, Delaware, and Miami warriors surprised St. Clair's forces. The Americans lost 630 killed, with another 283 wounded, in what amounted to the second-worst defeat of a European force north of Mexico.<br><br></div><div><br>It took the United States another three years to mount an effective campaign against the Ohio tribes. On 20 August 1794, Major General <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/us-history-biographies/anthony-wayne">Anthony Wayne</a> engaged what remained of Bluejacket and Little Turtle's multitribal confederacy in the Battle of Fallen Timbers. In a series of conflicts earlier that summer, the comparatively undisciplined members of the Indian alliance had steadily withdrawn. Little more than four hundred warriors faced thirty-five hundred Americans. The American victory ended large-scale conflict between Indians and whites north of the Ohio for more than fifteen years. On 3 August 1795, Wayne forced the Ohio tribes to cede all of south and central Ohio to the United States in the Treaty of Greenville.<br><br></div><div><br>Under Washington, <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/us-history-biographies/henry-knox">Henry Knox</a> further developed the civilization strategy. Knox understood that warfare strained both the federal budget and the U.S. military. He argued that a policy of appeasement involving the establishment of Christian missions and the active promotion of Indian leaders willing to compromise made far more sense than indiscriminate, genocidal warfare against native peoples. Also, the Indian trade had to be regulated and linked to land cessions. Between 1796 and 1822, Congress oversaw a factory system in which the U.S. Treasury Department operated a series of trading houses in which traders were licensed and regulated by the United States. The factory system was essential to Thomas Jefferson and other American presidents, who used the trading houses to accelerate the acquisition of Indian land.<br><br></div><div><br>Following the Indian wars of the 1790s, the United States redoubled its commitment to what became known as the "civilization strategy." Benjamin Hawkins served as U.S. Indian agent to the Creeks from 1796 to 1816. During his tenure, Hawkins played a vital role in maintaining peaceful relations between Indians and whites. Frequent correspondence with Thomas Jefferson during his two terms as president (1801–1809) underscored the importance of his post. The Creeks referred to Hawkins as an <em>isti atcagagi,</em> or "beloved man," a title that denoted respect and political power among the Creeks.<br><br></div><div><br>As president, Jefferson inherited an increasingly effective civilization program. The Eastern Woodland tribes had been significantly weakened by the long backcountry revolution, spanning the years roughly from 1774 to 1794. They soon came to the negotiating table. Jefferson's civilization program had four essential points: (1) traders should charge high rates so that hunters would become indebted and consequently would be forced to sell their lands; (2) influential chiefs should be bribed with land and money; (3) friendly leaders should be formally recognized with trips to the nation's capital and other symbolic gestures designed to bolster their authority and to overawe them with the power of the United States; and (4) if tribes refused to negotiate, traders and government agents should threaten a trade embargo or war. Jefferson's policy achieved remarkable success during his tenure as president. Between 1801 and 1809, he and his associates acquired nearly 200,000 square miles of land that laid the basis for the future states of Indiana, Illinois, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Missouri. His agents negotiated thirty-two treaties in those years as well.<br><br></div><div><br>On 30 April 1803, when the United States purchased Louisiana from France, Jefferson created the conditions necessary for the eventual removal of American Indians from the eastern United States. Branches of tribes, including the Chickamauga Cherokees, Delawares, Shawnees, Kickapoos, Weas, Piankashaws and others of the Great Lake area, began to move westward in a series of voluntary removals designed to forestall the deep cultural changes demanded by the United States. In justifying the purchase of French lands beyond the Mississippi, Jefferson argued that western lands might act as a <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/science-and-technology/technology/technology-terms-and-concepts/safety-valve">safety valve</a> for the "Indian problem" further east.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:11:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417445892</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tecumseh</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417448155</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Tecumseh was born in 1768 near Chillicothe, Ohio. His father, Puckshinwau was a minor Shawnee war chief. His mother Methotaske was also Shawnee. Tecumseh came of age during the height of the French and Indian War and in 1774 his father was killed at the Battle of Point Pleasant during Lord Dunmore’s War. This had a lasting effect on Tecumseh and he vowed to become a warrior like his father. As a teenager he joined the American Indian Confederacy under the leadership of Mohawk Chief Joseph Brant. Brant encouraged tribes to share ownership of their territory and pool their resources and manpower to defend that territory against encroaching settlers. Tecumseh led a group of raiders in these efforts, attacking American boats trying to make their way down the Ohio River. These raids were extremely successful, nearly cutting off river access to the territory for a time. In 1791 he further proved himself at the Battle of the Wabash as one of the warriors who defeated General Arthur St. Clair and his army. Tecumseh fought under Blue Jacket and Little Turtle and the American Indian Confederacy was victorious slaying 952 of the 1,000 American soldiers in St. Clair’s army. St. Clair was forced to resign. In 1794 Tecumseh also fought in the Battle of Fallen Timbers. This decisive conflict against General Anthony Wayne and his American forces ended in a brutal defeat for the American Indian Confederacy. A small contingency of about 250 stayed with Tecumseh after the battle, following him eventually to what would become Prophetstown and a new pan-Indian alliance.<br><br></div><div><br>Tecumseh’s brother Tenskwatawa joined him at Prophetstown, also known as Tippecanoe in Indiana Territory and in 1808 the two men began recruiting a large multi-tribal community of followers under a message of resistance to settlers, the American government, and assimilation. Tecumseh traveled north to Canada and south to Alabama in an effort to recruit men to his cause. Meanwhile, William Henry Harrison, governor of Indiana Territory was negotiating treaties and utilizing American forces to put pressure on those tribes still in Indiana and especially those allied with Prophetstown. In 1809 Harrison, signed the Treaty of Fort Wayne which allotted him a massive amount of American Indian territory thus increasing Tecumseh’s efforts and amplifying his message. Tecumseh was away from Prophetstown on a recruitment journey when Harrison launched a sneak attack now known as the Battle of Tippecanoe. The American forces cleared the encampment and then burned it to the ground. It was a severe blow to the confederacy and a harbinger of war to come.<br><br></div><div><br>On June 1, 1812 under the advisement of President Madison, Congress declared war on Great Britain. In the Northwest Territory, American Indian tribes found themselves pulled in two separate directions – side with the British or with the Americans. Tecumseh and his confederacy sided with the British. He and his men were assigned to overtake the city of Detroit with Major General Isaac Brock. The siege of Detroit was a success due in no small part to Tecumseh’s military strategy. He continued to support British efforts under Major-General Procter at the Siege of Fort Meigs. The siege failed and morale waned as a result.<br><br></div><div><br>In the fall of 1813 as conditions around Detroit worsened, Procter began a retreat east toward Niagara. Tecumseh requested arms so that his men could stay in the Northwest Territory and continue to defend their lands. Procter agreed to make a stand at the forks of the Thames River. However, when forces reached the site communication broke down and some men deserted while others continued east. When the Americans attacked, large sections of forces broke leaving about 500 hundred American Indians to hold back 3,000 Americans. Tecumseh was fatally wounded in the battle. It is unknown who killed him or what happened to his remains. His death began a rapid decline in American Indian resistance and the War of 1812 is marked as the beginning of removal in the upper Midwest.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:19:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417448155</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tecumseh &amp; the Pan-Indian Confederation</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417449680</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>In the two centuries prior to the War of 1812, Native Americans had either been pushed out by <br>European settlers or forced to sign treaties which tended to benefit the other side. The Europeans were <br>not the only ones capable of guile. For example, on more than one occasion Britain signed land treaties <br>with the Iroquois Confederation for land the Five Nations did not actually control. In practice, this<br>meant the Iroquois benefitted from selling the land belonging to another nation. The Thirteen Colonies <br>and New France expanded their influence through the signing of treaties; however, something changed <br>in the early 19th century making the whole treaty process more difficult. Actually, it’s not that <br>something changed but rather that someone emerged who was both capable and willing to challenge <br>the signing of any future treaties with Indians. He belonged to the Shawnee Nation and his name was <br>Tecumseh. <br>In the 16th Century, the Shawnee dwelled in the Virginia/Pennsylvania area. They had the misfortune of <br>being one of the first indigenous peoples forced to leave their ancestral homeland because of the <br>encroachment of white settlers. In fact, they were forced to move westward (twice) to escape the <br>expansion of white settlements. The fate of the Shawnee was shared by dozens of other nations, e.g. <br>Potawatomi, Huron, etc. The Shawnee were essentially mercenaries (or professional soldiers). They <br>were hired by militarily weaker peoples to defend and/or fight for them. Though the Shawnee lived in <br>towns and were accomplished agriculturalists, their additional talent as warriors meant they were <br>adaptable and mobile; and their mobility meant they had made important contacts with indigenous <br>groups living well inside the interior of North America. These contacts, and their reputation as warriors, <br>proved useful for two reasons: firstly, the fearsome (albeit weakened) Iroquois ceded land to them in <br>the Ohio Valley in 1788 where they settled for the third and final time; and secondly, the military <br>network established by the Shawnee Nation enabled them to spread a message to the Indian nations of <br>the West, i.e. the Americans were coming. As early as the 1680s, the Shawnee had warned their clients<br>and allies about the threat posed by the whites. By the early 1800s warnings turned into an active <br>attempt by Tecumseh to establish a pan-Indian Confederacy spanning what remained of North America <br>not yet settled by whites. In particular, the pan-Indian Confederacy was established to stop the <br>westward expansion of the United States. <br>A confederacy spanning the entire continent of North America required effective leadership and <br>organization. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:24:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417449680</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417450133</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Tecumseh was such a <br>person. He was a Shawnee war captain. He was also an effective orator; moreover, he earned the <br>respect of many native leaders when he defended Indian rights by openly opposing the signing of the <br>Treaty of Fort Wayne (1809). In this treaty, a delegation of half-starved Delaware, Potawatomi, Miami, <br>and Kickapoo Indians, agreed to give away 12,000 square kilometers to the United States. Although <br>neither Tecumseh nor the Shawnee had any claim on the land sold, he insisted that Indian land was held<br>in common by all tribes; therefore, no land could be sold without the agreement of every single Indian <br>nation then residing in North America. Due to the pressure placed upon the Americans by Tecumseh the <br>Treaty of Fort Wayne was the final treaty signed by the Americans with an Indian delegation. <br>Tecumseh’s interference actually led to open warfare between the United States and his Indian alliance. <br>In fact, the Americans abandoned diplomatic approaches for expanding their presence westward for the <br>remainder of the 19th century. Instead of treating with Native Americans the United States would <br>eradicate and remove the unwanted Indians. <br>The Shawnee knew full well that they could not retreat forever. At some point, they had to make a <br>stand. Their only hope of success was to unify native peoples into a single, powerful military force <br>before it was too late. If Indians stood as one against the Americans, then there was hope they might<br>hold on to their lands. Unfortunately for Tecumseh and his dream of a confederacy, indigenous peoples<br>were not in full agreement with one another when it came to the “American Problem.” Some tribes <br>hoped that if they accommodated the United States they would be spared the fate of the Shawnee, e.g. <br>The Civilized Tribes (Creek, Cherokee, Chickasaw, Seminole, and Choctaw). Consequently, Tecumseh <br>found it impossible to convince entire tribes to join his cause. Instead, he had to settle for individual <br>villages, ones often dissenting from the wishes of their mother tribes, joining him. Another reason why <br>some nations chose not to join his confederacy was that some groups did not feel the need. They felt <br>they lived well out of the reach of the Americans. The Dakota of the Great Plains, for instance, reasoned <br>that even the infamous American lust for land would be satisfied well before they got to Dakota <br>Territory. The Dakota were wrong. The Dakota did not understand the Americans like Tecumseh and <br>they lost their land like every other indigenous group. The only difference between the Dakota and <br>Indian Confederacy was timing: whereas the Confederacy was destroyed at the Battle of the Thames in <br>1813, the Dakota lost everything by 1862 during the U.S-Dakota War (a small war part of the larger <br>genocidal Indian Wars fought by the United States as it settled the West).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:25:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417450133</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pan Indian Confederacy</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417451341</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://books.google.rs/books?id=i8VgBwAAQBAJ&amp;pg=PA3&amp;lpg=PA3&amp;dq=pan+indian+confederacy&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=s6G74WGLDb&amp;sig=ACfU3U3JuKE0HiTjoxzjWtLZtKJbF53tPQ&amp;hl=sr&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjpmL6x5ozmAhXlolwKHQ-zCxw4ChDoATAEegQICBAB#v=onepage&amp;q=pan indian confederacy&amp;f=false</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:29:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417451341</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417452655</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries, the first white settlers in America inhabited the eastern seaboard. There the whites either made treaties with the Native American groups to buy land or they forcibly took Indian land. By the Revolution's end and on into the early 19th century, Native Americans were being displaced across the Appalachians and toward what is today the Midwest. For these exiled groups, there were few places left to go.<br><br></div><div>Outright military conflict with native groups in the northwest preceded the formal declaration of war in 1812. In fact, the "<strong>WESTERN WAR</strong>" in many ways represented a continuation of the American Revolution with many autonomous <strong>INDIAN NATIONS</strong> again choosing to ally with the British against Americans who fundamentally threatened their survival.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div>The American invasion from the east deeply disrupted native groups and generally caused a sharp division within Indian nations between "<strong>ACCOMMODATIONISTS</strong>," who chose to adopt some Euro-American ways versus "<strong>TRADITIONALISTS</strong>," who called for native purity by rejecting contact with whites. Both sides were authentically Native American, but they each chose different routes to deal with a terrible situation.<br><br></div><div>Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa, <strong>SHAWNEE</strong> brothers, were leading Indian traditionalists, and together they crafted a novel resurgence among native peoples in the west. <strong>TECUMSEH</strong>, a political and military leader, is the better known of the two, but it was their combined skills that made them especially powerful. Tecumseh had fought at <strong>FALLEN TIMBERS</strong> in 1794, but refused to participate in the peace negotiations that produced the <strong>TREATY OF GRENVILLE</strong> the following year. Instead, he removed to east-central Indiana where he led a band of militant young warriors.</div><div>Tecumseh traveled to Tukabatchi, the capital of the Creek people, to try and recruit Natives to join the Indian Confederacy, but he was met with resistance. Legend has it that he said he would return home to Ohio and stamp his foot with such force, they would feel the earth move in Tukabatchi. Several days after he left, a small earthquake did hit the Creek Capital.</div><div>His younger brother <strong>TENSKWATAWA</strong> provided the essential vision to launch a much broader Indian social movement. Also known as the <strong>PROPHET</strong>, Tenskwatawa combined traditional native beliefs with some aspects of Christianity to call for a pan-Indian resistance against American intruders from the east. He explained that when native peoples joined together and rejected all contact with Americans and their ways (from alcohol to private property), God would restore Indian power by "overturning the land so that all the white people will be covered and you alone shall inhabit the land."<br><br></div><div>Tecumseh gradually converted to the Prophet's vision and together they built a broad movement that revived the <strong>WESTERN CONFEDERACY</strong> of the 1790s and even reached out to southern tribes with stronger accommodationist factions. In 1808 they founded <strong>PROPHETSTOWN</strong> at the sacred junction of the Tippecanoe and Wabash Rivers, from which they built a strong Indian alliance that directly challenged the U.S. government.<br><br></div><div>This growing Indian force threatened American plans to move west and seemed especially dangerous since it received economic and military support from the British in Canada. In November 1811 the U.S. destroyed Prophetstown during the <strong>BATTLE OF TIPPECANOE</strong>, under the leadership of future president <strong>WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON</strong>. Tecumseh was away at the time recruiting southern Creeks to the confederacy.</div><div>Tecumseh's successful military resistance continued and threatened white settlements throughout the northwest. Tecumseh had so profoundly challenged U.S. plans in the northwest that when he was finally killed at the <strong>BATTLE OF THE THAMES</strong> in October 1813 it was seen as a major American victory even though it meant quite little strategically.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:33:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417452655</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417454389</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The Western Confederacy, also called Tecumseh’s Confederacy was an organization of Aboriginal peoples based largely around the teachings of Tenskwatawa, the Prophet brother of Tecumseh.<br><br></div><div>The decades that preceded the War of 1812 resulted in vast swaths of Native land being bought or stolen by European settlers and American frontiersmen. For example, in 1795 the Treaty of Greenville negotiated between the United States and the western nations saw large expanses of territory, including most of Ohio, part of Indiana, and small strategic positions in Illinois and Michigan surrendered to the Americans. Even after the boundaries were drawn, American settlers ignored them and began settling within the still Native-owned territory, while the government exploited divisions among the heavily defeated Aboriginal peoples to buy more territory along the new boarders [1].<br><br></div><div>By the late 1790s Tecumseh, a Shawnee chief, began a push for Aboriginal unity and a settling of past differences between the tribes. Around the same time, in 1805, his brother, then known as Lalawethika began experiencing a series of visions which drastically changed his life. In his words:<br><br></div><div>***<br><br></div><div><em>“My brothers! My sisters! I have been given a great power. I have been told by Our Creator to use this power to save you.<br></em><br></div><div><em>My name is Tenskwatawa (He-Who-Opens-The-Door). I have been shown how to open the door that has shut us out from happiness.<br></em><br></div><div><em>I died and went to the World Above, and saw it. I had done every sin against my people and myself. You knew me! I was a sinner, I was a drunkard! I had another name then. That name is so smeared with the filth of my old sins that my mouth will not utter it, for my mouth is now pure! Tenskwatawa has never spoken a lie or an obscenity, and never will. I have come back cleansed. I am as we were in the Beginning! In me is a shining power! </em><br><br></div><div>***<br><br></div><div>According to Tenskwatawa, now also called the Prophet, the Master of Life had become angry with his peoples for abandoning the things he had provided for them, such as the rich lands on which to grow food, animals to hunt, and other resources for them to use, instead being fooled into trading with the White Man for steel and iron tools, and liquor. Tenskwatawa argued that the Native peoples should reject the American and European goods and learn to live as they once had, off the things provided to them by the Master of Life <br><br></div><div>Tecumseh saw the message of his brother’s religious revival as complimentary to his desire for Aboriginal unity and developed the Prophet’s religion into a movement dedicated to retaining Native land and refraining from ceding any lands to the United States, as well as calling for an end of Native reliance on White goods. Beginning in 1808, he traveled up and down the Eastern United States in an attempt to convince more tribes to join his confederacy.</div><div><br></div><div>While Tecumseh did have some success recruiting members for his cause in Ohio, Kentucky and the Indiana Territory, there were a large number of Natives who rejected his ideas. His most prominent opponents were Black Hoof, a Shawnee, Little Turtle, Tarhe, Five Medals and Topinbee, both Potawatomi. These Native leaders, often referred to as ‘nativists’ due to their allegiance to, collaboration with, or sympathies towards the United States, often for a profit. Rather than establish a pan-Indian government, their aims were instead to sell more land to the United States, as well as to adopt White culture and tradition, to self-assimilate into American culture. The objections of these Native leaders drove Tenskwatawa and his followers to establish a breakaway city-state which operated under its own sovereignty, rather than under the authority of traditional leaders <br><br></div><div>By 1811 tensions between the Americans and this new Western Confederacy had grown to the point where some Americans began to feel threatened by its existence. Governor of Ohio William Henry Harrison was one of those men. Upon hearing that Tecumseh would be traveling south in an effort to spread his message to the Native tribes in those territories, Harrison organized an attack on Prophetstown, the home base of the Confederacy [6].<br><br></div><div>While the attack, known as the Battle of Tippercanoe devastated the Confederacy, the War of 1812 quickly took precedent over Aboriginal unity. Unfortunately, any hope of a Pan-Indian government died along with Tecumseh on October 5, 1813 at the Battle of Moraviantown<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 11:40:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417454389</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Treaty of Ghent</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417593834</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>was the peace treaty that ended the War of 1812 between the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Both sides signed it on December 24, 1814, in the city of Ghent, United Netherlands (now Belgium). The treaty restored relations between the two nations to status quo ante bellum, restoring the borders of the two countries to the lines before the war started in June 1812.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 20:55:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417593834</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>American trade 1809 - 1816</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417595470</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Although domestic opposition forced the embargo to be abandoned just fifteen months later, in March 1809, a non-intercourse measure was then imposed banning trade with Britain and France for part of 1809. This was suspended for most of 1810, but in 1811 a non- importation measure was put in place against Britain. When these measures failed to ease tensions on the Atlantic, Congress declared war on Britain in June 1812. The conflict severely disrupted trans-Atlantic trade. The United States maintained its embargo against Britain, but a British blockade of the North American seaboard thwarted American attempts to continue trading with other parts of the world. The war and blockade almost completely eliminated U.S. foreign trade in 1813 and 1814. The value of U.S. imports for consumption fell from $70 million in 1812 to $13 million in 1814, a decline of over 80 percent. The Treaty of Ghent ended the conflict in December 1814 and normal trade was restored in the spring of 1815. The resumption of commerce brought a flood of imports into U.S. ports: the value of imports surged to $79 million in 1815 and then $134 million by 1816, before falling back.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 21:06:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417595470</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Monroe Doctrine</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417609459</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> was a United States policy of opposing European colonialism in the Americas beginning in 1823. It stated that further efforts by various European states to take control of any independent state in North or South America would be viewed as "the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States." At the same time, the doctrine noted that the U.S. would recognize and not interfere with existing European colonies nor meddle in the internal concerns of European countries. The Doctrine was issued on December 2, 1823 at a time when nearly all Latin American colonies of Spain and Portugal had achieved, or were at the point of gaining, independence from the Portuguese and Spanish Empires.</div><div><br></div><div>President James Monroe first stated the doctrine during his seventh annual State of the Union Address to Congress. The term "Monroe Doctrine" itself was coined in 1850.[2] By the end of the 19th century, Monroe's declaration was seen as a defining moment in the foreign policy of the United States and one of its longest-standing tenets.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-28 23:11:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/417609459</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>exorbitant</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419585272</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(of a price or amount charged) unreasonably high</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 12:43:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419585272</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>rampant</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419586087</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>(especially of something unwelcome) flourishing or spreading unchecked</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 12:45:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419586087</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>all the bubbles burst</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419586827</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A bubble is a fast rise in an asset’s price followed by a contraction. Bubbles happen when the price is not justified by the asset itself but rather by the over-exuberant behavior of investors. When there are no more investors willing to pay the overinflated price, people panic and sell and the bubble bursts.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 12:48:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419586827</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>confidence man</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419587706</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Old-fashioned term for con man. The National Police Gazette coined the term "confidence game" a few weeks after Houston first used the name "confidence man". A confidence trick is also known as a con game, a con, a scam, a grift, a hustle, a bunko (or bunco), a swindle, a flimflam, a gaffle, or a bamboozle.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 12:50:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419587706</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>counterfeit</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419588345</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>made in exact imitation of something valuable with the intention to deceive or defraud</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 12:52:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419588345</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to access credit</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419590438</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Access to finance is the ability of individuals or enterprises to obtain financial services, including credit, deposit, payment, insurance, and other risk management services. Those who involuntarily have no or only limited access to financial services are referred to as the unbanked or underbanked, respectively.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 12:57:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419590438</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>prone to sth</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419590940</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>likely or liable to suffer from, do, or experience something unpleasant or regrettable</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 12:58:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419590940</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>hub</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419591910</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the effective centre of an activity, region, or network; a central airport or other transport facility from which many services operate</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:00:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419591910</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>cash economy</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419592509</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>an economic system, or part of one, in which financial transactions are carried out in cash rather than via direct debit, standing order, bank transfer, or credit card</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:02:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419592509</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>barter and trade</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419593044</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>exchange (goods or services) for other goods or services without using money</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:03:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419593044</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>corporate charter</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419593602</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A corporate charter is a document to be filed with the secretary of state when incorporating a business. It is also known as certificate of incorporation. The details of a charter will vary based on specific regulations and the size of a company.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:04:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419593602</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to stipulate</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419594879</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>demand or specify (a requirement), typically as part of an agreement</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:07:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419594879</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>manumission</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419595532</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>also known as affranchisement, is the act of an owner freeing his or her slaves</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:09:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419595532</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to leverage</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419596757</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>use borrowed capital for (an investment), expecting the profits made to be greater than the interest payable; use (something) to maximum advantage</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:12:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419596757</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Market Revolution - political, social and economic bulwark of change</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419607651</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>The Market Revolution</strong>, which occurred in 19th century United States, is a historical model which argues that there was a drastic change of the economy that disoriented and coordinated all aspects of the market economy in line with both nations and the world. Charles Grier Sellers, a leading historian of the Market Revolution, portrays it as a highly negative development that marked the triumph of capitalism over democracy. He argues that this was one of the most significant transformations of America within the first half of the nineteenth century - indeed, the defining event of world history - the evolution from an agrarian to a capitalist society. Sellers observes:<br><br><em>While dissolving deeply rooted patterns of behavior and belief for competitive effort, it mobilized collective resources through government to fuel growth in countless ways, not least by providing the essential legal, financial, and transport infrastructures. Establishing capitalist hegemony over economy, politics, and culture, the market revolution created ourselves and most of the world we know.<br><br></em>Traditional commerce was made obsolete by improvements in <strong>transportation</strong> and <strong>communication</strong>. This change prompted the reinstatement of the mercantilist ideas that were thought to have died out. Increased industrialization was a major component of the Market Revolution as a result of the <strong>Industrial Revolution</strong>. Northern cities started to have a more powerful economy, while most southern cities (with the marked exception of free labor metropolises like St. Louis, Baltimore, and New Orleans) resisted the influence of market forces in favor of the region's <strong>slave system</strong>. It also was in part influenced by the need for national mobility and the highlighted the importance of improving communication, shown to be a problem during the War of 1812, after which the government increased production of early roads, extensive canals along navigable waterways, and later elaborate railroad networks - all known as the <strong>Transportation Revolution</strong>. The state legislatures also provided state-chatered banks with capital, the number of which skyrocketed  from 1 in 1783, to 1371 in 1860. American infrastructure was heavily influenced with European capital as well, as by 1844, a declaration of one British traveler stated that "the prosperity of America, her railroads, canals, steam navigation, and banks, are<br>the fruit of English capital."<br><br>Following the War of 1812, the American economy was altered from an economy dependent on imports from Europe to one that evolved greater internal production and commerce. In 1817 James Monroe replaced James Madison as president of the United States. The Democratic-Republicans continued policies begun in Jefferson's administration. With a new generation of leaders, the Democratic-Republican Party came to embrace the principles of government activism and the development of large-scale domestic manufacturing. Despite all of the promises that characterized the United States, discrepancies loomed: the survival of slavery, treatment of the Native Americans, the deterioration of some urban areas, and a mania for speculation. The nation was not just growing through the addition of land, but population shifts brought about new states to the Union and when Missouri petitioned for statehood in 1819, the issue of slavery was thrust on the national agenda. Thomas Jefferson wrote that the issue awakened him "like a fire bell in the night." That the Missouri question coincided with the nation's worst financial crisis awakened anxieties in many Americans. By the 1820s Americans recognized a rough regional specialization: plantation-style export agriculture in the south, a north built on business and trade, and a frontier west. The regions were interdependent but in time their differences would become more obvious, more important, and increasingly more incompatible.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:33:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419607651</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Market Revolution - technological and agricultural developments</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419610353</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Market Revolution also brought about a change in industry and agriculture. <strong>Eli Whitney</strong> perfected a system of producing muskets with interchangeable parts. Prior to Whitney's invention, most muskets - and all other goods - had been handmade with parts specially designed for each particular musket. The trigger of one musket, for example, could not be used to replace a broken trigger on another musket. With interchangeable parts, however, all triggers fit the same model of the musket, as did all ramrods, all flash pans, all hammers, and all bullets. Manufacturers in many different industries soon took advantage of Whitney's invention to make a variety of goods with interchangeable parts.<br><br>Many new products revolutionized agriculture in America. <strong>John Deere </strong>invented the horse-pulled steel plow to replace the difficult oxen-driven wooden plows that farmers had used for centuries. The steel plow allowed farmers to till soil faster and more cheaply without having to make repairs as often.<br><br>In the 1830s, <strong>Cyrus McCormick</strong> invented a mechanical mower-reaper that quintupled the efficiency of wheat farming. Prior to the mower-reaper, wheat farming had been too difficult, so farmers had instead produced corn, which was less profitable. As in the South after the cotton gin, farmers in the West raked in huge profits as they acquired more lands to plant more and more wheat. More importantly, farmers for the first time began producing more wheat than the West could consume. Rather than let it go to waste, they began to transport crop surpluses to sell in the manufacturing Northeast.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:38:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419610353</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Market Revolution - King Cotton &amp; slavery</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419622766</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Market Revolution further exacerbated sectional tensions in the United States. Slave labor helped the Market Revolution prosper, but by the early 19th century, states north of the Mason-Dixon Line started including legislative acts for the purpose of abolition and emancipation of the enslaved black communities in their state constitution, as well as other significant government policies. However, this did not mean the immediate release of all enslaved human beings, as many northern states also adopted gradualism, which meant that they only promised to liberate future children born to enslaved mothers. These laws also demanded that children remain in indentured servitude to their mother's master, to compensate for the slaveholder's loss.<br><br>Voluntary manumission, escape or direct emancipation by masters were quicker routes to achieving liberty for the enslaved population, but they were not only rare, but also often more dangerous than remaining in the clutches of human bondage. Nonetheless, emancipation in the North proceeded slowly, but steadily. A growing number of members of freed black communities saw the rise of the African-American struggle for civil rights, which were brought to fruition, for instance, in numerous New England locales, as there free African-Americans were allowed to vote and enrol their children in state public schools. On top of this, most northern states ensured their black citizens the right to own property and the right to trial by jury. <br><br>But even so, the national trend was different, as the slave population saw further growth, especially in the fertile cotton industry which had been established in the South and which demanded more labor forces in order to maintain productivity. As <strong>King Cotton</strong> became the primary crop in the South,  the increased use of slaves was essential in producing and exporting crops. The North and European countries banned slavery in their countries/regions, and attempted to push the South to abolish slavery as well. <br><br>Although the slave trade ended, slavery did not end, due to the increase of speculation on slavery brought about by the boom in the textile industry; as it drastically increased in the North, changing women and children's roles and further revolutionizing family structure, the demand for raw products such as cotton increased as well, meaning an increase in the South's demand for more labor. Ironically, this Northern demand for more cotton for the textile industry increased the Southern demand for slavery, making it harder for the North to end slavery in the South. This increase of labor and industry brought the United States into the world picture for economy and commerce, planting the seed for the United States to increase in wealth and power majority of the time.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 13:59:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419622766</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Apprentices and master craftsmen </title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419908409</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The growing opportunities within manufacturing attracted a new batch of entrepreneurs: men who may not have had experience in a particular trade, but knew how to organize production and access the capital needed to operate on a large scale. These "merchant-capitalists," with their more efficient and cost-effective scale of production, quickly drove many of the small craftsmen out of business, or probably, to be more precise, into the ranks of wage earners employed by merchant capitalists.</div><div><br></div><div>More than the master craftsmen and small shop owners were affected by the arrival of merchant capitalists, so too were the apprentices and journeymen working for the master craftsmen. In the past, a master craftsman may have employed a handful of people, and master and employee worked side by side and often lived in the master craftsman's home. Certainly the apprentices did. </div><div><br></div><div>In fact, room and board were part of the arrangement along with the understanding that the master was responsible for the oversight of the young men placed in his charge. But when these master craftsmen were driven into the employment of merchant capitalists, the apprentices and journeymen were driven out of their former homes. They too may have found work with the larger manufacturers, but they now lived independently, in boarding houses or rented rooms.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 20:08:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419908409</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Terms of employment </title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419915432</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The turn to wage labor meant friction over terms. How the price and hours of labor should be set and enforced became the object of intense debate from the 1780s onward, accompanied by resort to association on both sides and competing declarations of standards for a trade throughout a given locality. Journeymen enforced their declarations by "turn outs"—refusals to work except on the terms they prescribed or with any person not part of their fraternity. These tactics earned them indictment, and usually conviction, for conspiracy. Between 1806 and 1815 at least half a dozen conspiracy trials took place in Philadelphia, Baltimore, and New York. The depression of 1819 put a halt to journeymen's organizing activities, but another cluster of prosecutions came between 1823 and 1829 as the economy revived. Shoemakers and tailors were the most frequent defendants, but urban textile workers—spinners and weavers—were also indicted. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 20:22:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419915432</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Riots and strikes</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419915799</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Journeymen's associations recapitulated traditions of craft organization with roots deep in the English past and with scattered precursors in the colonies. They were, however, certainly not the new nation's only expression of concerted labor action. Riots and strikes over working and living conditions also occurred among unskilled workers: canal diggers, mostly working in rural areas (particularly as the economy began to improve after 1825); waterfront workers on several occasions in the second half of the 1820s; and New York's building laborers (1816). Strikes also occurred among urban female tailors (New York, 1825) and among rural textile factory workers—the first in Pawtucket, Rhode Island (1824), another at the Slater Mills in Dudley, Massachusetts (1827).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 20:22:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419915799</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Male and female gender roles </title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419931767</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As household production by women declined and the traditional economic role of women diminished, the “home” appeared as a topic to be discussed and an ideal to be lauded. Less a place of production than a spiritually sanctified retreat from the hurly-burly of economic life, the home was where women nurtured men and children into becoming morally elevated beings. It could be said that what we think of as the traditional “home” was actually an invention of nineteenth-century Americans.</div><div><br></div><div>In colonial America, men were considered superior to women – in all ways, even in terms of morality. In a world of strict patriarchal hierarchy, men controlled not only wealth and political power but also how their children were raised, religious questions, and all matters of right and wrong. In the early part of the nineteenth century, however, many Americans experienced a revolution in gender. What we now view as old-fashioned and even oppressive was then new and potentially liberating. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 20:53:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419931767</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Separate spheres</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419932318</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The doctrine of “separate spheres” maintained that woman’s sphere was the world of privacy, family, and morality while man’s sphere was the public world – economic striving, political maneuvering, and social competition. Each sex, according to Catherine Beecher, was superior within its assigned sphere, and thus a sort of equality was achieved. Beecher believed that “it is in America, alone, that women are raised to an equality with the other sex.” This very influential woman, the daughter of the prominent minister Lyman Beecher and the sister of the author Harriet Beecher Stowe, wrote in her “Treatise on Domestic Economy,”</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 20:54:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419932318</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Divorce in 19th century America</title>
         <author>avanturistkinja</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419934565</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the middle to the end of the nineteenth century, the rates of divorce in the U.S. rose relatively rapidly, with Americans obtaining more divorces annually than were granted across Europe. The increase in divorce rates can be caused by lowering prices and facilitating divorce for people with limited resources. In the past, mainly the middle and high-class divorces were granted because of its costs.</div><div>In the early 20th century, the rate of divorce continued to rise. Three pairs per thousand were divorced in 1890 and eight couples per thousand divorced by 1920.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-04 20:58:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/419934565</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Bank War</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420133185</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Bank War was the name given to the campaign begun by President Andrew Jackson in 1833 to destroy the Second Bank of the United States, after his reelection convinced him that his opposition to the bank had won national support. The Second Bank had been established in 1816, as a successor to the First Bank of the United States, whose charter had been permitted to expire in 1811.<br><br>In 1832, Jackson had vetoed a bill calling for an early renewal of the Second Bank’s charter, but renewal was still possible when the charter expired in 1836; to prevent that from happening, he set out to reduce the bank’s economic power. Acting against the advice of congressional committees and over the opposition of several cabinet members, and after replacing two resistant secretaries of the treasury with a more amenable appointee (Roger Taney), Jackson announced that, effective October 1, 1833, federal funds would no longer be deposited in the <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/bank-of-the-united-states">Bank of the United States</a>. Instead, he began placing them in various state banks; by the end of 1833, twenty-three ‘pet banks’ (as they were popularly known) had been selected.<br><br>The president of the Bank, Nicholas Biddle, anticipating Jackson’s actions, began a countermove in August 1833; he started presenting state bank notes for redemption, calling in loans, and generally contracting credit. A financial crisis, he thought, would dramatize the need for a central bank, ensuring support for charter renewal in 1836. In fact, Biddle’s campaign appears to have had less effect than either his supporters or his detractors believed at the time, but the Bank War became a matter of intense debate in Congress, in the press, and among the public. Deputations of businessmen descended on <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/us-states/washington">Washington</a>, complaining about business conditions and seeking an end to the Bank War, while administration spokesmen argued that Biddle’s capacity to disrupt the economy only highlighted the dangers of a central bank. The federal deposits were not returned to the Second Bank, and its charter expired in 1836. President Jackson had won the Bank War.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:39:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420133185</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Who won the bank war?</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420133505</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The <strong>Bank War</strong> was the name given to the campaign begun by President Andrew Jackson in 1833 to destroy the Second <strong>Bank</strong> of the United States, after his reelection convinced him that his opposition to the <strong>bank</strong> had <strong>won</strong> national support.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:40:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420133505</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The National Bank</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420134857</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>National Bank</strong>, in the United States, any <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/commercial-bank">commercial bank</a> chartered and supervised by the federal government and operated by private individuals.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div><strong>first Bank of the United States</strong></div><div>First Bank of the United States, Philadelphia; now part of Independence National Historical Park, U.S. National Park Service.</div><div><br></div><div>QUICK FACTS</div><div><strong>RELATED TOPICS</strong></div><div><br></div><div>The first <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bank-of-the-United-States">Bank of the United States</a> (1791–1811) and the second Bank of the United States (1816–36) had functioned as agents of the U.S. Treasury and competed with the state, or private, banks, thereby ensuring that the private banks redeemed their banknotes at full value. In spite of its contribution to national <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monetary">monetary</a> stability, the second Bank of the United States had come under attack by President <a href="https://www.britannica.com/biography/Andrew-Jackson">Andrew Jackson</a>, and its charter failed to be renewed in 1836; a chaotic period of state banking resulted that lasted until the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/event/American-Civil-War">American Civil War</a>. The difficulties in financing that war pointed to the need for a better banking system and a sounder currency.<br><br>The <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Bank-Act">National Bank Act</a> of 1863 provided for the federal charter and supervision of a system of banks known as national banks; they were to circulate a stable, uniform national currency secured by federal bonds deposited by each bank with the comptroller of the currency (often called the national banking administrator). The act regulated the minimum capital requirements of national banks, the kinds of loans they could make, and the reserves that were to be held against notes and deposits; it also provided for the supervision and examination of banks and for the protection of noteholders. The 1863 act did not prohibit state banks from issuing their own currency, but Congress did impose a 10 percent tax on state banknotes that effectively eliminated such a rival currency.</div><div><br></div><div>The inflexibility of national banknote supplies and a lack of reserves led to the formation of the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Federal-Reserve-System">Federal Reserve System</a> in 1913. By 1935 the national banks had transferred their note-issuing powers to the Federal Reserve. National banks have become primarily commercial in nature, although some also maintain savings and trust functions. The Federal Reserve shares supervisory and regulatory authority with the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Office-of-the-Comptroller-of-the-Currency">Office of the Comptroller of the Currency</a>, which charters, regulates, and supervises national banks.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:44:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420134857</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The First and Second Bank </title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420135236</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When the United States first came into existence, the Founding Fathers had many different opinions about how the new country should be run. Who should have more power, the federal government or the states? Where should the new capital be, in the North or the South? How should the federal government manage its money? This last question was very controversial. Men like Alexander Hamilton thought the United States should have a national bank to hold its tax revenues and to pay off the country's debts. Others, such as Thomas Jefferson, disagreed; nowhere in the Constitution does it say the government can create its own bank. Ultimately, the <strong>First Bank of the United States</strong> was created in 1791 and had a 20-year charter. The bank would expire in 1811 unless Congress decided to renew its charter.<br><br></div><div>By 1811, the debate over a national bank was still very heated. The anti-bank faction let the First Bank of the United States die. For five years, the country went without a national bank, but the War of 1812 (which happened during this time) had created a problem: to fight a war against England, the U.S. had to borrow money from other countries. It was decided that there should once again be a central bank to help deal with the national debt. In 1816 the <strong>Second Bank of the United States</strong> was created, and like the First Bank, had a 20-year charter.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:46:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420135236</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The problems with the Second Bank</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420135888</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Second Bank, just like the first, met steep opposition. Northern and Eastern businessmen were in favor of the bank, largely because it gave them access to loans for their various ventures and speculations. Meanwhile, farmers in the South and West didn't trust the bank, and disliked that it catered to the interests of the North and East. Many questioned whether the Second Bank of the United States was <strong>constitutional</strong>, or something Congress could legally do based on the Constitution.<br><br></div><div>The way the Second Bank was run was also a concern. All of the federal government's money was deposited at the Second Bank, but the government was not actually in charge of running the bank. Instead, it was overseen by a board of directors made up of private citizens and businessmen. For many Americans, this did not make any sense...how could they be sure the board of directors would act responsibly? What if the directors were corrupt?<br><br></div><div>The Second Bank found itself in a sticky situation in 1819. The Supreme Court case <em>McCulloch v. Maryland</em> brought up the constitutionality of the bank. Ultimately, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the bank was in fact constitutional, but that did not do much to change the minds of the American public. That same year, the Second Bank took measures to help control <strong>inflation</strong> (the value of money relative to how much things actually cost) by calling in loans and decreasing the amount of credit it offered. Many businessmen were unable to pay back their debts; this along with falling crop prices sent the country into a depression. Referred to as the <strong>Panic of 1819</strong>, people across the country suffered, especially Western farmers. Even though the depression didn't last long, the image of the Second Bank was severely damaged<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:48:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420135888</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Responses to the crisis</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420137143</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>President Monroe, interpreting the economic crisis in the narrow monetary terms then current, limited governmental action to economizing and ensuring fiscal stability. He acquiesced in suspending specie payments to bank depositors, setting a precedent for the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1837">Panics of 1837 &amp; 1857</a>.Although Monroe agreed that improved transportation facilities were needed, he refused to approve appropriations for <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_improvements">internal improvements</a> without constitutional amendments.<br><br></div><div><br>In 1821, Congress passed the Relief for Public Land Debtors Act. The bill allowed debtors who owed money on land purchased from the government to keep the part of land they had already paid for and relinquish the remaining amount. It further extended the schedule of payments by several years, with a discount for quick payment. With the exception of New England states, most of the country strongly supported the measure. Many state legislatures, particularly in rural western states, passed extra relief measures for debtors.<br><br></div><div><br>Another response to the panic was monetary expansion, primarily at the state level. In Tennessee, Kentucky and Illinois, state banks suspended specie payments and issued large amounts of inconvertible notes. However, most other states avoided inflationist policies and enforced the payment of specie. Every state witnessed vigorous debate on the merits of each policy. Treasury Secretary Crawford advocated restricting bank credit as a measure to prevent a future crisis. Banking regulation was seen as primarily a state responsibility, and several states passed regulations in the years following the panic that required banks to maintain certain fixed ratios of capital to ensure their ability to convert to specie.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1819#cite_note-Rothbard_p._137-113"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>A further effect of the Panic of 1819 was increased support for protective tariffs for American industry. Vocal protectionists, such as Philadelphia printer <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathew_Carey">Mathew Carey</a>, blamed <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_trade">free trade</a> for the depression and argued that tariffs would protect American prosperity. In general, support for tariffs was strongest in the mid-Atlantic states and was opposed by export-heavy southern states.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:53:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420137143</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Long-term impacts</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420137519</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The Panic brought attention, for the first time, to issues regarding debt-relief policy, as well as poor relief.City and state governments began to more effectively approach the public policy reform issues surrounding the poor; a classification system was also created (able-bodied vs. disabled, temporary vs. long-term, etc.). Public attention to solving poverty issues consequently led to public education systems.<br><br></div><div><br>Public support was great once again for protective tariffs. However, when the "<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_of_Abominations">Tariff of Abominations</a>" was implemented in 1828, regional discontent led to the outbreak of the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis">Nullification Crisis</a>. The Crisis is seen as a "critical precedent for democratic action."<br><br></div><div><br>On a more contemporary note, many economic historians today agree that the Panic of 1819 marked the United States' entrance into the modern business cycle.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1819#cite_note-115"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:54:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420137519</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Inflation of the War of 1812</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420138134</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Panic of 1819 is a good case in point. Neptune in Sagittarius had created in inflation due to the War of 1812. The war led to a price inflation that sent wholesale prices up 35% from 1811 to 1815. From 1811 to 1815, the number of banks rose from 117 to 212. With foreign trade cut off by the conflict, some important commodities rose by 70%.Banks tended to inflate the currency in the following way. They held legal money, specie (gold and silver), but they issued notes in excess of the amount of money that they had on deposit. As a result, bank notes tended to depreciate in proportion to their distance from the home office because transportation costs were high and communication was poor. Up sprang a generation of money brokers, who would buy up bank bills and travel to the bank to demand payment.During this time, there was a transiting T-square of Neptune opposite the Uranian planet Apollon*, both square Pluto. Pluto is the planet of government, and they played a big part in the inflationary boom. Here is how. During the panic of 1819, the states of Pennsylvania and Maryland enacted laws on February 15 that compelled banks to pay off their bills in specie, or lose their charters. Two days later, the states passed laws relieving the banks of such obligations to brokers, <em>“the major force ensuring the people of this state from the evil arising from the demands made on the banks of this state for gold and silver by brokers.” </em>The governments protected the banks by blocking those who sought legal money for their paper. The government (Pluto) aided in the fraud (Neptune).</div><blockquote><br>*Apollon symbolizes peace, honor, fame, pursuit of glory. Note that a statue of the god Apollo depicts him as chasing the Sun. This planet brings a desire to pursue or to be on a quest. Apollon-Mercury would confer a desire to know. Whereas Jupiter represents size, Apollon represents many. Apollon brings multiplication or proliferation. A man with Mercury/Apollon= MC was a magazine distributor. Jupiter-Apollon represents money in circulation. This planet rules free trade, as we will see in the horoscope of President Andrew Jackson.<br><br></blockquote><div><strong><em>What happened to those who tried to extract their legal money from a bank?</em></strong>In 1808, a Boston man named Hireh Durkee demanded $9000 in notes from the state-owned Vermont State Bank. He was met with an indictment, being called an <em>“evil-disposed person”</em> to <em>“realize a filthy gain.”</em> In Georgia, a businessman was told that he could have his $30,000 back, if he accepted payment in pennies. Some depositors were charged outrageous fees. In Connecticut, Isaac Bronson sued NY banks, only to lose and then be called an agent of misery and ruin by the NY press.Government chose to protect those who benefited from the inflation. Professor Murray Rothbard called it <em>“….one of the most flagrant violations of property rights in American history.”</em> We should also note that there was widespread fraud, as symbolized by Neptune-Apollon, right out of the Uranian Book of Rules for Planetary Pictures. From August of 1814 to February of 1817, banks were permitted to issue fiat money with no backing in gold.<br><br>In <em>The Rationale of Central Banking</em>, Vera Smith makes the point that this is not ‘free banking.’ In a free system, banks would be treated like any other business. That is, they would be required to meet contractual obligations like any other enterprise. In the USA at the time, banking was protected by the government.In 1816, the Democrats established the second bank of the US, a privately-owned corporation in which the government owned a small part of the shares. Hard money advocates insisted that this bank honor its obligations to pay in specie. This was agreed, but the requirements were relaxed and the banks went on with their unsound practices. Widespread fraud (Neptune-Apollon) abounded, especially at the Philadelphia and Baltimore branches.<strong><em>The Panic of 1819</em></strong>The inflation ended in 1819 with Neptune in late Sagittarius as Saturn moved up to square it. The solar eclipse on September 19, 1819 opposed Saturn and Pluto and squares Neptune and Uranus, thus serving as a trigger for the deflationary aspects that had formed in the sky. Also note that this was only one of six eclipses that occurred in 1819, adding to the tendency for this year to be a turning point. Note that the series began in the Aries-Libra axis and ended in the money signs of Taurus-Scorpio.<strong><em>Taurus-Scorpio</em></strong>The Taurus-Scorpio axis is frequently energized at financial turning points. In 1638 with Pluto in Taurus and Jupiter was in Scorpio, the English King Charles I needed money shortly before the outbreak of civil war. In those days, there were no banks of deposit, so merchants placed their gold in the royal mint. Charles confiscated the bullion, calling it a loan. He did return it, but the episode shook the confidence of the merchants who began to deposit their loot with private goldsmiths. They, in turn, issued paper receipts. In the 1660s, the smiths succumbed to the temptation to issue more receipts than they had gold (inflation). In 1740, the Massachusetts Land Bank issued notes and lent them out backed by real estate. This first venture in private banking occurred when Pluto was in Scorpio and Jupiter was in Taurus. The Panic of 1837 was accompanied by eclipses in Taurus and Scorpio.<strong><em>The Aftermath</em></strong>In the spring of 1818, the bank realized its precarious position and began to contract the money supply, cutting it in half over the course of the next year. This led to a mass of defaults, bankruptcies, and falling land prices.The entire episode can be summed up by an exchange between the English economist David Ricardo and America’s first economist, Condy Raguet. The latter wrote to Ricardo in 1821:<em>“You state in your letter that you find it difficult to comprehend, why persons who had the right to demand coin from the banks in payment of their notes, so long forebore to exercise it. This no doubt appears paradoxical to one who resides in a country where an act of parliament was necessary to protect a bank, but the difficulty is easily solved. The whole of our population are either stockholders of banks or in debt to them. It is not the interest of the first to press the banks and the rest afraid. This is the whole secret. An independent man, who was neither a stockholder nor debtor, who would have ventured to compel the banks to do justice, would have been persecuted as an enemy of society.”</em>The preceding quote is reflective of the fire-sign mentality. As happens in inflationary economies, a segment of the population learns how to benefit from the economic climate, so a pro-inflation lobby forms. This has occurred in many South American economies in recent times.<strong><em>Similarity to 1980</em></strong>Neptune was in Sagittarius in the 1970s. The great commodity inflation ended when Saturn squared Neptune in March of 1980. On the day of the square, the Hunt Brothers attempted corner on the silver market collapsed, and so did the great inflation.</div><div><em>updated 08/18/2005 </em></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 10:57:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420138134</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Inflation rate from 1812. to 2019.</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420139063</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index, today's prices in 2019 are 1,834.93% higher than average prices throughout 1812. The dollar experienced an average inflation rate of 1.44% per year during this period, meaning the real value of a dollar decreased.<br><br></div><div><br>In other words, $173,000,000 in 1812 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $3,347,432,932.33 in 2019, a difference of $3,174,432,932.33 over 207 years.<br><br></div><div><br>The 1812 inflation rate was 1.53%. The current inflation rate (2018 to 2019) is now 1.76%<a href="https://www.officialdata.org/articles/consumer-price-index-since-1913/"><sup>1</sup></a>. If this number holds, $173,000,000 today will be equivalent in buying power to $176,051,794.29 next year. <br><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:00:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420139063</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>News headlines from 1812</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420139728</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div><br>Politics and news often influence economic performance. Here's what was happening at the time:<br><br></div><ul><li>Arthur Wellesley, first Duke of Wellington, orders British troops to storm Ciudad Rodrigo after a 10-day-long siege.</li><li>The 1812 War begins as the United States declares war against Britain.</li><li>Napoleon's occupation of Moscow begins.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:03:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420139728</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420140922</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/421312199/64016347c5e600ad979abb54b356ca90/20191205_120559.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:08:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420140922</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>To diminish</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420141746</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>to </strong><a href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/reduce"><strong>reduce</strong></a><strong> or be </strong><a href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/reduced"><strong>reduced</strong></a><strong> in </strong><a href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/size"><strong>size</strong></a><strong> or </strong><a href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/importance"><strong>importance</strong></a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:11:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420141746</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420142505</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.infoplease.com/primary-sources/government/presidential-speeches/state-union-address-andrew-jackson-december-3-1833" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:13:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420142505</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420144000</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/421312199/8e2d5c622b49b725264641eced50746d/FAQs_about_Federal_Land_Sales.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:19:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420144000</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420144733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/11/golds-effect-currencies.asp" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:23:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420144733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420146407</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Multiple types of <strong>banknotes of the United States dollar</strong> have been issued, including <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Note">Federal Reserve Notes</a>, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_certificate_(United_States)">Silver Certificates</a>, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_certificate">Gold certificates</a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Note">United States Notes</a>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:29:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420146407</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420147112</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>However, President Andrew Jackson vetoed a bill to renew the Bank's charter, withdrew United States Treasury funds from the Bank, and ceased all United States Government involvement in the Bank's operations. In 1837, the trustees of the Bank secured a charter from the State of Pennsylvania. Then, they paid the United States Government for its outstanding interest and swapped old stock for new stock on a one-to-one share basis. The Bank's name changed to the Bank of the United States of Pennsylvania.<br><br></div><div><br>After 1837, the history of the Bank was very rocky. On February 4, 1841, the Bank closed its doors. This action left many creditors, including the London Merchant Bank, Baring Brothers, and the Rothschild family, with over $25 million in claims. They were lucky to receive one-third value for their claims.<br><br></div><div><br>Because the Treasury Department did not issue these notes, we have no way of verifying their authenticity or figuring out their value. It is likely, though, that the is part of a series of antiqued reproductions issued in various denominations and forms for use in advertising campaigns. The most popular of these bear the serial number 8894. These notes are so widespread that they were the subject of an August 5, 1970, article in COIN WORLD.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:31:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420147112</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420147883</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://numismatics.org/a-history-of-american-currency/" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:34:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420147883</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420149477</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The crisis followed a period of <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_expansion">economic expansion</a> from mid-1834 to mid-1836. The prices of land, cotton, and slaves rose sharply in these years. The origins of this boom had many sources, both domestic and international. Because of the peculiar factors (<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specie_Circular">Specie Circular</a>) of international trade at the time, abundant amounts of silver were coming into the United States from Mexico and China. Land sales and tariffs on imports were also generating substantial federal revenues. Through lucrative cotton exports and the marketing of state-backed bonds in British money markets, the United States acquired significant capital investment from Great Britain. These bonds financed transportation projects in the United States. British loans, made available through Anglo-American banking houses like <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baring_Brothers">Baring Brothers</a>, fueled much of the United States's westward expansion, infrastructure improvements, industrial expansion, and economic development during the antebellum era.<br><br><br><br>This hunger in America was not felt by England, as her wheat crops improved every year from 1831 to 1836, and European imports of American wheat had dropped to "almost nothing" by 1836. The directors of the Bank of England, wanting to increase monetary reserves (And cushion American defaults) indicated that they would gradually raise interest rates from 3 to 5 percent. The conventional financial theory held that banks should raise interest rates and curb lending when faced with low monetary reserves. Raising interest rates, according to the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand">laws of supply and demand</a>, was supposed to attract species since money generally flows where it will generate the greatest return (assuming equal risk among possible investments). In the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_economy">open economy</a> of the 1830s, characterized by <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_trade">free trade</a> and relatively weak <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_barrier">trade barriers</a>, the monetary policies of the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegemony">hegemonic power</a> – in this case, Great Britain – were transmitted to the rest of the interconnected global economic system, including the U.S. The result was that as the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England">Bank of England</a> raised interest rates, major banks in the United States were forced to do the same.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1837#cite_note-8"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><div><br></div><div>An 1837 <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caricature">caricature</a> blames <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson">Andrew Jackson</a> for hard times.</div><div><br>When New York banks raised interest rates and scaled back on lending, the effects were damaging. Since the price of a bond bears an inverse relationship to the yield (or interest rate), the increase in prevailing interest rates would have forced down the price of American securities. Importantly, demand for cotton plummeted. The price of cotton fell by 25% in February and March 1837. The United States economy, especially in the southern states, was heavily dependent on stable cotton prices. Receipts from cotton sales provided funding for some schools, balanced the nation's trade deficit, fortified the US dollar, and procured foreign exchange earnings in <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_pound_sterling">British pound sterling</a>, the world's <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_currency">reserve currency</a> at the time. Since the United States was still a predominantly agricultural economy centered on the export of staple crops and an incipient manufacturing sector,a collapse in cotton prices had massive reverberations.<br><br></div><div><br>Within the United States, there were several contributing factors. In July 1832, President <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson">Andrew Jackson</a> <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_War">vetoed the bill</a> to recharter the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bank_of_the_United_States">Second Bank of the United States</a> (BUS), the nation's <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank">central bank</a> and fiscal agent. As the BUS wound up its operations in the next four years, state-chartered banks in the West and South relaxed their lending standards, maintaining unsafe reserve ratios.Two domestic policies exacerbated an already volatile situation. The <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specie_Circular">Specie Circular</a> of 1836 mandated that western lands could be purchased only with gold and silver coin. The circular was an executive order issued by Andrew Jackson and favored by Senator <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hart_Benton_(politician)">Thomas Hart Benton</a> of Missouri and other hard-money advocates. The intent was to curb speculation in public lands, but the circular set off a real estate and commodity price crash as most buyers were unable to come up with sufficient hard money or "specie" (gold or silver coins) to pay for the land. Secondly, the Deposit and Distribution Act of 1836 placed federal revenues in various local banks (derisively termed "pet banks") across the country. Many of these banks were located in western regions. The effect of these two policies was to transfer specie away from the nation's main commercial centers on the East Coast. With lower monetary reserves in their vaults, major banks and financial institutions on the East Coast had to scale back their loans, which was a major cause of the panic along with the real estate crash.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1837#cite_note-11"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>Americans at the time attributed the cause of the panic principally to domestic political conflicts. Democrats typically blamed the bankers. Whigs blamed Jackson for refusing to renew the charter of the Bank, resulting in the withdrawal of government funds from the bank.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Van_Buren">Martin Van Buren</a>, who became president in March 1837, was largely blamed for the panic even though his inauguration preceded the panic by only five weeks. Van Buren's refusal to use government intervention to address the crisis (such as emergency relief and increasing spending on public <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructure">infrastructure</a> projects to reduce unemployment) according to his opponents, contributed further to the hardship and duration of the depression that followed the panic. <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacksonian_democracy">Jacksonian Democrats</a>, on the other hand, blamed the National Bank, both in funding rampant speculation and in introducing inflationary paper money. Some modern economists view Van Buren's deregulatory economic policy as successful in the long term, and argue that it played an important role in revitalizing banks after the panic.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:40:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420149477</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Recovery</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420150014</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Most economists agree that there was a brief recovery from 1838 to 1839, which then ended as the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England">Bank of England</a> and Dutch creditors raised interest rates.Economic historian <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Temin">Peter Temin</a> has argued that, when corrected for deflation, the economy grew after 1838. According to economist and historian <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard">Murray Rothbard</a>, between 1839 and 1843, real consumption increased by 21 percent and real gross national product increased by 16 percent, while real investment fell by 23 percent and the money supply shrank by 34 percent.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1837#cite_note-21"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>In 1842, the American economy was able to rebound somewhat and overcome the five-year depression, but according to most accounts, the economy did not recover until 1843.The recovery from the depression intensified after the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_gold_rush">California gold rush</a> started in 1848, greatly increasing the money supply. By 1850, the U.S. economy was booming again.<br><br></div><div><br>Intangible factors like confidence and psychology played powerful roles, helping to explain the magnitude and depth of the panic. Central banks had only limited abilities to control prices and employment at the time, making <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_run">runs on banks</a> common. When a few banks collapsed, alarm quickly spread throughout the community, heightened by partisan newspapers. Anxious investors rushed to other banks, demanding to have their deposits withdrawn. When faced with such pressure, even healthy banks had to make further curtailments – calling in loans and demanding payment from their borrowers. This fed the hysteria even further, leading to a downward spiral or snowball effect. In other words, anxiety, fear, and a pervasive lack of confidence initiated devastating, self-sustaining feedback loops. Many economists today understand this phenomenon as an <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_asymmetry">information asymmetry</a>. Essentially, bank depositors reacted to imperfect information: they did not know if their deposits were safe, and fearing further risk, they withdrew their deposits, even as this caused more damage. The same concept of downward spiral was true for many southern planters, who speculated in land, cotton, and slaves. Many planters took out loans from banks under the assumption that cotton prices would continue to rise. When cotton prices dropped, however, planters could not pay back their loans, jeopardizing the solvency of many banks. These factors were particularly crucial given the lack of <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deposit_insurance">deposit insurance</a> in banks. When bank customers are not assured that their deposits are safe, they are more likely to make rash decisions that can imperil the rest of the economy. Economists today have concluded that suspension of <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convertibility">convertibility</a>, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deposit_insurance">deposit insurance</a>, and sufficient capital requirements in banks can limit the possibility of bank runs.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:42:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420150014</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Key Terms</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420151332</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>The Panic of 1837 was a financial crisis based on speculative fever: Inflation rose after federal deposits were withdrawn due to the assumption that the government was selling land for state bank notes of questionable value.</li><li>The Panic of 1837 was partly caused by the economic policies of President Jackson, who created the Specie Circular by executive order and refused to renew the charter of Second Bank of the United States.</li><li>The Panic of 1837 was followed by a five-year depression characterized by failed banks and unprecedented unemployment levels.</li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li><strong>specie</strong>: Money, especially in the form of coins made from precious metal, that has an intrinsic value; coinage.</li><li><strong>speculative fever</strong>: A term used in the housing market that represents the frequent action of buying and selling housing properties.</li><li><strong>Second Bank of the United States</strong>: The nation’s federally authorized central bank during its 20-year charter from February 1817 to January 1836.</li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:47:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420151332</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420152147</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/panic-of-1837/" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:49:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420152147</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420153107</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.thebalance.com/the-history-of-recessions-in-the-united-states-3306011" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:53:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420153107</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The long depression</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420153756</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The <strong>Long Depression</strong> was a worldwide price and economic <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recession">recession</a>, beginning in <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1873">1873</a> and running either through the spring of 1879, or 1896, depending on the metrics used.It was the most severe in Europe and the United States, which had been experiencing strong economic growth fueled by the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Industrial_Revolution">Second Industrial Revolution</a> in the decade following the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War">American Civil War</a>. The episode was labeled the "Great Depression" at the time, and it held that designation until the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression">Great Depression</a> of the 1930s. Though a period of general <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deflation">deflation</a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recession">a general contraction</a>, it did not have the severe economic retrogression of the Great Depression.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Depression#cite_note-2"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>It was most notable in Western Europe and North America, at least in part because reliable data from the period is most readily available in those parts of the world. The United Kingdom is often considered to have been the hardest hit; during this period it lost some of its large industrial lead over the economies of continental Europe.While it was occurring, the view was prominent that the economy of the United Kingdom had been in continuous depression from 1873 to as late as 1896 and some texts refer to the period as the <strong>Great Depression of 1873–1896</strong>.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Depression#cite_note-Glasner2-4"><sup><br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>In the United States, economists typically refer to the Long Depression as the <strong>Depression of 1873–1879</strong>, kicked off by the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1873">Panic of 1873</a>, and followed by the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1893">Panic of 1893</a>, book-ending the entire period of the wider Long Depression.The U.S. <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bureau_of_Economic_Research">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> dates the contraction following the panic as lasting from October 1873 to March 1879. At 65 months, it is the longest-lasting contraction identified by the NBER, eclipsing the Great Depression's 43 months of contraction.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Depression#cite_note-NBER1-6"><sup>[</sup></a>In the United States, from 1873 to 1879, 18,000 businesses went bankrupt, including 89 railroads.Ten states and hundreds of banks went bankrupt.<sup>[</sup>Unemployment peaked in 1878, long after the initial financial panic of 1873 had ended. Different sources peg the peak <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment_in_the_United_States">U.S. unemployment</a> rate anywhere from 8.25% to 14%<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:55:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420153756</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Monetary responses</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420154290</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div><br>In 1874, a year after the 1873 crash, the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress">United States Congress</a> passed legislation called the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation">Inflation</a> Bill of 1874 designed to confront the issue of falling prices by injecting fresh <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Note">greenbacks</a> into the money supply.Under pressure from business interests, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States">President</a> <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulysses_S._Grant">Ulysses S. Grant</a> <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veto">vetoed</a> the measure.In 1878, Congress overrode President <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutherford_B._Hayes">Rutherford B. Hayes</a>'s veto to pass the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bland%E2%80%93Allison_Act">Silver Purchase Act</a>, a similar but more successful attempt to promote "easy money".<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 11:57:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420154290</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420155222</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Like the later <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression">Great Depression</a>, the Long Depression affected different countries at different times, at different rates, and some countries accomplished rapid growth over certain periods. Globally, however, the 1870s, 1880s, and 1890s were a period of falling price levels and rates of economic growth significantly below the periods preceding and following.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-05 12:00:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/420155222</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>to flock</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/423404719</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>move or go together in a crowd</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-12 17:20:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/423404719</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>revivalist preacher</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/423405429</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a member of the clergy who travels about to conduct revivals</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-12 17:21:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/423405429</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>itinerant preacher</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/423409154</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>(also known as an itinerant minister or evangelist or circuit rider) is a Christian evangelist who preaches the basic Christian redemption message while traveling around to different groups of people within a relatively short period of time</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-12 17:26:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/423409154</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Religious shifts in antebellum America</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/425666832</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In accordance with the emergence of newly-established powerful social and political currents of the day, the early nineteenth century in America saw the rise of numerous religious revivals across the land, all collectively known as the <strong>Second Great Awakening</strong>. Revivalist and itinerant preachers travelled across the nation and, through their newly-acquired prophesizing which accentuated individual believers as opposed to the more tradition-oriented institutional models, reshaped the religious landscape of America. Revivals largely provided the faithful with unifying sense of moral order and a close-knit, spiritual community, especially to those struggling with the enormous changes taking place at the time (the Market Revolution, western expansion, European immigration), which posed a great challenge to the established bonds of authority. Thus the revivalist camps and communition spread throughout the American soil, and inspired positive trends of increasing church membership, establishing new Christian denominations, promoting social reform as well as promising equal measures of excitement and order for all.<br><br>One of the earliest revivalist camps was based in <strong>Cane Ridge, Kentucky</strong>, gathered over a one-week period in August 1801. It brought together thousands of believers, and this assembly was very different from previous annual gatherings of the faithful in rural areas for the purpose of receiving communion: these Methodist, Baptist and Presbyterian preachers, as opposed to their counterparts from other denominations, delivered passionate sermons which encouraged their crowds to seek the salvation of their souls by themselves. These sermons were held inside buildings, outdoors under the open sky; the preachers sometimes even went so far as to use tree stumps as makeshift pulpits, all for the purpose of reaching their faithful and enthusiastic flock as much as possible with their advent. Even women were allowed to exhort, which was a break from common practice; all in all, all attendees were often moved by the preachers' religious ecstacy and responded with oftentimes delirious crying, jumping, speaking in tongues or even fainting. <strong>The Cane Ridge Revival</strong> and other similar revivalist denominations abandoned the formal style of worship which dominated the well-established Congregationalist and Episcopalian churches in favor of embracing more impassioned forms of worship which included a number of eccentric practices, such as spontaneous jumping, shouting and gesturing found in the up-and-coming revivalist alternatives. This evangelical fervour spread to such an extent, in fact, that one swath of western and central New York came to be known as the <strong>Burned-Over District</strong>. The term was coined by Charles Grandison Finney, an influential revivalist preacher, who explained it by claiming that the residents of these areas had experienced so many revivals by a multitude of different religious groups that there were no more souls left that still needed to be awakened to the fire of spiritual conversion.<br><br>What historians now refer to as the American spiritual marketplace has been created by the removal of government support of churches. <strong>Methodism</strong> was the denomination which won the most success, enjoying the highest denominational increase in American history, and by 1850 becoming the most popular Christian denomination among Americans, constituting 34% of total American church membership by the mid-nineteenth century. After the Methodist leaders' departure from the Church of England in order to form an independent American denomination in 1784, the <strong>Methodist Episcopal Church (MEC)</strong> achieved the aforementioned growth via means of innovation: itinerant preachers, also known as circuit riders, which won converts by following the routes of western expansion which went over the Alleghenies and into the Ohio River Valley, and sought to bring spiritual awakening to new settlers hungry to have their religious needs attended to. The practice of circuit riding brought these preachers into homes, meetinghouses and churches, all mapped out over a journey which took approximately two weeks to complete.<br><br>The idea of spiritual egalitarianism was another significant transformation which emerged in the wake of the Second Great Awakening, as revolutionary rhetoric also largely informed the theological critique pushed forward by orthodox Calvinism which produced far-reaching consequences for religious individuals as well as society as a whole. Calvinists believed all of humankind to be eternally mired by sin, and only some were predestined for salvation by God. Attitudes such as these began to be seen as overly pessimistic by the majority of American Christians, who had increasingly started to take the responsibility for their individual spiritual fates by adopting those theologies which accentuated human action in the process of achieving salvation - a cultural shift which revivalist preachers were swift to observe and elaborate on. Radicals, such as Finney, evangelized the crowds by appealing to their hearts and emotions, putting arbitrary theological disputes aside, while even more conservative leaders, such Lyman Beecher, a Congregationalist preacher, sought to appeal to younger generations by purporting a less orthodox approach to the Calvinist doctrine. Although these two men never really saw eye to eye, both gave their own contribution to the emerging consensus among the faithful: that all souls are equal in salvation and each person can be saved by surrendering themselves to God.<br><br>Besides the many divisions between evangelical and nonevangelical religious cohorts brought about by the Second Great Awakening, later revivalist endeavours which produced subsquent evangelical expansion also revealed strains within the Methodist and Baptist churches, with each witnessing several schisms during the 1820s and 1830s which saw an emergence of advocates demanding the return of earlier practices and policies. Many abandoned mainstream Protestantism altogether, instead opting to establish their own churches. Alexander Campbell and Barton Stone, for example, advocated the restoration of New Testament Christianity, which would be stripped of centuries of additional teachings and practices. Others sought to further the trends posited by evangelical churches through criticizing the mainstream Protestant denomination as well as seeking to traverse beyond the boundaries established by contemporary Christian orthodoxy; self-proclaimed prophets declared that God had summoned them to errect new churches and restore the lost teachings, forms of worship and scripture of early, 'pure' Christianity.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-18 20:06:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/425666832</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Opposition against revivalism</title>
         <author>danicabozovic777</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/425685509</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Second Great Awakening sparked a wildfire of a multitude of revolutionary and unorthodox practices which spread all across the American continent and shook traditionally-established religious and ethical norms to their foundation. But mot everyone took to the revivals: the early nineteenth century also saw the rise of <strong>Unitarianism</strong>, as a group of ministers and their followers came to question and ultimately reject the key aspects of Protestant dogma, such as the divinity of Christ. The Christians of New England participated in Unitarianist debates as Harvard University was becoming a contested center in the Unitarianist and Trinitarianist struggle for authority. A group of Unitarianist ministers significantly impacted the world of reform by founding the <strong>Transcendental Club</strong> in 1836. It met for four years and included Ralph Waldo Emerson, Bronson Alcott, Frederic Henry Hedge, George Ripley, Orestes Brownson, James Freeman Clarke and Theodore Parker as its members. It was at first limited to ministers and former ministers, but it managed to expans swiftly by counting the membership of many literary intellectuals of the day, such as Henry David Thoreau, the profeminist literary critic Margaret Fuller, as well as the educational reformer Elizabeth Peabody.<br><br><strong>Transcendentalism</strong> had no established creed, but this was so intentionally. Transcendentalists found unison through their belief in a higher spiritual principle which each person had within themselves and which would guarantee that each person could be entrusted with discovering the truth, guidance toward moral action and artistic inspiration; this principle was often referred to as <em>Soul, Spirit, Mind or Reason.</em> It also drew deep influences from British romanticism and German idealism and their celebration of individual artistic creation and inspiration and spiritual experience, also encompassing those aspects of human existence which could not easily be explained via means of logic and reason. By developing distinctly American ideas which highlighted the ideals of individualism, optimism, oneness with nature and a modern orientation towards the future instead of the past granted the Transcendentalists an enduring and profound legacy.<br><br>Emerson proposed a religious worldview wherein God, 'the eternal ONE', was embodied by and manifested through the special harmony between individual souls and nature. In his works "<em>The American Scholar</em>" (1837) and "<em>Self-Reliance</em>" (1841), he emphasized the reliability and sufficiency found in each soul and encouraged his audience to overcome the "long apprenticeship to the learning of other lands." This meant that, in Emerson view, Americans were ready declare their intellectual independence alongside their political independence from Europe. Thoreau's idea of 'rugged individualism' also promoted ideals of simple living and communion with nature, also yielded "<em>Resistance to Civil Government</em>" (1849). <br><br>Several Transcendentalists also participated in communal living experiments; in the 1840s, for example, George Ripley, alongside other members of the utopian Brook Farm community, began to promote <strong>Fourierism</strong>, which envisioned a society founded upon cooperative principles, as a viable alternative to capitalist exploitation.<br><br>In conclusion, many of the different types of responses espoused by each denomination toward the religious turmoil at the time met at similar endpoints in that they promoted the embracement of voluntary association and social reform work. Many American Christians responded by organizing themselves to alleviate the pressures brought on by industrialization and urbanization and by aiming to adress specific social needs. These problems included intemperance, vice and crime among others, which reached new and distressing scales that older solutions, such as almhouses, weren't fit to handle anymore. Voluntary benevolent societies were established in order to tackle the widespread issues of poverty and illiteracy; they printed and distributed Protestant tracts, taught Sunday school, provided outdoor relief and held sermons in frontier towns and urban slums alike. These associations and their initiatives also lent moral backing and workers eager to carry out large-scale social reform projects, including the temperance movement which sought to curb consumption of alcohol, promoted the abolitionist campaign to eradicate slavery, and supported womens' claim to political and economic rights. Evangelical Christians thus formed a 'benevolent empire' which became one of the significant headstones of the antebellum period in America.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-18 20:53:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/425685509</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Antislavery Connections</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426299775</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Neither Ballots nor Bullets: The Contest for Civil Rights<br></strong>"Women can neither take the Ballot nor the Bullet . . .therefore to us, the right to petition is the one sacred right which we ought not to neglect<em>.</em>"<br><a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/susan-b-anthony.htm"><strong>Susan B. Anthony</strong></a>, <em>Address to the American Anti-Slavery Society</em>,1863<br><em><br></em>"It is, perhaps, too late to bring slavery to an end by peaceable means, -- too late to vote it down. For many years I have feared, and published my fears, that it would go out in blood. These fears have grown into a belief."<br><a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/gerrit-smith.htm"><strong>Gerrit Smith</strong></a>, <em>Utica</em> <em>Daily Observer</em>, 1859<br><br></div><div>Two great early 19th-century social movements sought to end slavery and secure equal rights for women. Gerrit Smith and <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/susan-b-anthony.htm"><strong>Susan B. Anthony</strong></a> helped shape these two movements. The anti-slavery movement grew from peaceful origins after the American Revolution to a Civil War, or War Between the States, that effectively ended slavery while severely damaging the women's rights movement.<br><br></div><div>Wielding the ballot and the bullet as well as the petition to win the legal, political, and military contest of the Civil War, abolitionists decided the fate of slavery with the 1865 passage of the 13th Amendment. Seeking their own rights, women used more peaceful tactics but suffered long delays. Not until 1920 did women add the ballot to their arsenal of political tools.<br><br></div><div>The women's rights movement was the offspring of abolition. Many people actively supported both reforms. Several <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/participants-of-the-first-womens-rights-convention.htm"><strong>participants</strong></a> in the 1848 <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/the-first-womens-rights-convention.htm"><strong>First Women's Rights Convention</strong></a> in <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/seneca-falls-in-1848.htm"><strong>Seneca Falls</strong></a> had already labored in the anti-slavery movement. The <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/organizers-of-the-first-womens-rights-convention.htm"><strong>organizers</strong></a> and their families - the Motts, Wrights, Stantons, M'Clintocks and Hunts - were active abolitionists to a greater or lesser degree. Noted abolitionist and former slave <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/frederick-douglass.htm"><strong>Frederick Douglass</strong></a> attended and addressed the 1848 Convention.<br><br></div><div>Both movements promoted the expansion of the American promise of liberty and equality - to African Americans and to women. How did these two movements develop and how were they related to each other? How did each develop strategies and deal with the contradiction of violence and war that results from the advocacy of peaceful change?<br><br></div><div><strong>"...the flagrant injustice and deep sin of slavery"<br></strong><strong><em>Preamble to the</em></strong> <strong><em>Philadelphia</em></strong> <strong><em>Female Anti-Slavery Constitution, 1833</em></strong><br>After the American Revolution, northern states began to abolish slavery. Many slaveholders in the upper South also freed slaves. In 1817, the American Colonization Society formed to resettle freed slaves in Africa. However, the South depended on slave labor as cotton production expanded after the 1793 invention of the cotton gin. Repressive laws and public justification of slavery followed southern slave revolts in the 1820s and 1830s.<br><br></div><div>Religious revivals during the Second Great Awakening intensified anti-slavery activity after 1830. Seeking to perfect society, adherents targeted slavery as an evil that destroyed individual free will as moral beings. Abolitionists began to demand immediate, uncompensated emancipation of slaves.<br><br></div><div>In 1833, William Lloyd Garrison, editor of The Liberator, Quaker <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/lucretia-mott.htm"><strong>Lucretia Mott</strong></a>, and several others formed the American Anti-Slavery Society. Women were a large part of the general membership and formed separate, local female anti-slavery branches. Mott also helped found the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society in 1833, an organization, noted for its promotion of racial and gender equality, that included African American and white women as leaders and members.<br><br></div><div>Many anti-slavery reformers, like the Quakers, came from pacifist backgrounds or espoused nonviolent social reform. They shaped public opinion by distributing newspapers and tracts, sending out organizers and lecturers, and hosting fundraising fairs. Garrison, who saw the U.S. Constitution and federal government as pro-slavery forces, observed Independence Day as a day of mourning. <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/lucretia-mott.htm"><strong>Lucretia Mott</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/thomas-mclintock.htm"><strong>Thomas M'Clintock</strong></a> helped form the Philadelphia Free Produce Society, which boycotted slave-made products.<br><br></div><div>Between 1838 and 1840, the American Anti-Slavery Society split in three, in part over the issue of women's leadership, specifically Abby Kelley's appointment to the business committee. Radical abolitionists and women's rights supporters, known as "Garrisonian" abolitionists, remained in the American Anti-Slavery Society. The newly formed American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society restricted membership to males, with auxiliaries for females. The politically minded formed the Liberty Party, limiting women's participation to fundraising. The discrimination of women in abolition and other reform movements led them to advocate for women's rights.<br><br></div><div><strong>"Justice and Equality:" Antislavery and Women's Rights<br></strong>"…this is the only organization on God's footstool where the humanity of woman is recognized, and these are the only men who have ever echoed back her cries for justice and equality…. All time will not be long enough to pay the debt of gratitude we owe these noble men…who roused us to a sense of our own rights, to the dignity of our high calling."<br><a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/elizabeth-cady-stanton.htm"><strong>Elizabeth Cady Stanton</strong></a>, Address to the American Anti-Slavery Society, 1860.<br><br></div><div>At the 1848 First Women's Rights Convention, the <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/declaration-of-sentiments.htm"><strong>Declaration of Sentiments</strong></a>, drafted by <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/elizabeth-cady-stanton.htm"><strong>Elizabeth Cady Stanton</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/elizabeth-mclintock.htm"><strong>Elizabeth</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/mary-ann-mclintock.htm"><strong>Mary Ann M'Clintock</strong></a>, was read and signed by <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/signers-of-the-declaration-of-sentiments.htm"><strong>100 men and women</strong></a>. Claiming that "all Men and Women are created equal," the signers called for extending to women the right to vote, control property, sign legal documents, serve on juries, and enjoy equal access to education and the professions.<br><br></div><div>Arguments for women's rights came from experiences in the anti-slavery movement. Angelina and Sarah Grimké of South Carolina were Quakers and effective anti-slavery speakers, although it was considered improper for women to speak before "promiscuous" audiences composed of both men and women. During a petition drive in Massachusetts in 1837, male listeners thronged to female-only lectures. While condemning slavery, the Grimkés upheld "the cause of woman as a moral being." "Sister Sarah does preach up woman's rights most nobly and fearlessly," reported Angelina to a friend. Rebuked by Congregational ministers and others for speaking to promiscuous audiences, they held their ground. To do otherwise would have been "…a violation of our fundamental principle that man &amp; woman are created equal, &amp; have the same duties &amp; the same responsibilities as moral beings."<br><br></div><div>As reformers, women developed organizational skills necessary for a successful social movement. They learned to write persuasively, raise funds, organize supporters and events, and speak to large groups of men and women about important political and social issues. In the service of anti-slavery, women found their voices. Between 1850 and 1860, women's rights advocates held state and <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/more-womens-rights-conventions.htm"><strong>national conventions</strong></a> and campaigned for legal changes.<br><br></div><div><strong>The Emergence of Violence</strong><br>By 1848, the Liberty Party, which had earlier split from the American Anti-Slavery Society, joined a coalition to create the Free Soil Party. Free Soilers sought to limit slavery by denying it to new territories entering the union. In July, 1848, a Free Soil Convention was held in Seneca Falls, just before the Women's Rights Convention. Some male village residents attended both conventions. <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/jacob-p-chamberlain.htm"><strong>Jacob P. Chamberlain</strong></a> and Saron Phillips, who signed the Declaration of Sentiments, were chosen as delegates to the Free Soil Party's national convention.<br><br></div><div>The 1850 passage of the Fugitive Slave Law authorized federal marshals to seize and return fugitive slaves. Northern free blacks had little protection against false claims by southern slaveholders. While many free blacks fled to Canada, previously neutral northerners were enraged at the injustice.<br><br></div><div>As the U.S. expanded, Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, allowing each new area to decide whether it would allow slavery. Slavery and anti-slavery supporters rushed into Kansas to claim it for their side. In 1856, after anti-slavery settlers died during an attack in Lawrence, Kansas, John Brown led a raid against pro-slavery homes along Pottawatomie Creek, killing five men in retaliation.<br><br></div><div>With a warrant out for his arrest, John Brown returned east to plan a daring raid. He hoped to create a large slave insurrection in Virginia. Brown sought support among prominent abolitionists like <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/frederick-douglass.htm"><strong>Frederick Douglass</strong></a>. <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/elizabeth-cady-stanton.htm"><strong>Elizabeth Cady Stanton</strong></a>'s cousin, Gerrit Smith, provided financial support. A decade earlier, he had sold Brown a parcel of land in a settlement for free blacks in the Adirondacks. Now, Brown asked Smith to help finance his scheme. Smith agreed, becoming one of the "Secret Six" financiers of John Brown's raid.<br><br></div><div>On October 16, 1859, John Brown and twenty-one followers launched an attack on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia. When the anticipated slave revolt failed to materialize, the raid ended in dismal failure. Brown and his men were tried, convicted, and hanged. A letter in Brown's possession incriminated Smith, who went insane as a result of the publicity and threat of prosecution. A martyr in the eyes of non-violent abolitionists, Brown became a symbol of escalating violence in pursuit of emancipation.<br><br></div><div><strong>"How Glass Our House Is:" An Uneasy Truce with the War<br></strong>"The death of my father, the worse than death of my dear cousin Gerrit, the martyrdom of that great and glorious John Brown, all conspire to make me regret more than ever my dwarfed womanhood.…in times like these, everyone should do the work of a full grown man."<br><a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/elizabeth-cady-stanton.htm"><strong>Elizabeth Cady Stanton</strong></a> to <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/susan-b-anthony.htm"><strong>Susan B. Anthony</strong></a>, 1859<br><br></div><div>Many nonviolent reformers, concluding that slavery could only be purged by war, welcomed the outbreak of the Civil War in April, 1861. Even Quaker pacifists reluctantly supported the war if it would bring an end to slavery. <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/martha-c-wright.htm"><strong>David Wright</strong></a>'s support of the war brought no criticism from sister-in-law <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/lucretia-mott.htm"><strong>Lucretia Mott</strong></a>, considering, "how glass our house is." She hoped the war "would be prosecuted with energy and faith since it was founded on so good a cause." When Horace Greeley and others pointed out that these hardly seemed the words of a pacifist, she responded, "…as the natural result of our wrong-doings and our atrocious cruelties, terrible as war must ever be, let us hope it will not be stayed by any compromise which shall continue the unequal, cruel war on the rights and liberties of millions of our unoffending fellow beings.…"<br><br></div><div>Meanwhile, the national conventions for women's rights ended. In 1864, the <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/more-womens-rights-conventions.htm"><strong>National Woman's Loyal League</strong></a>, headed by <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/elizabeth-cady-stanton.htm"><strong>Elizabeth Cady Stanton</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/susan-b-anthony.htm"><strong>Susan B. Anthony</strong></a>, gathered 400,000 signatures on a petition for an immediate end to slavery. Having neither access to the vote nor military service, women used the petition to support the 13th Amendment.<br><br>The Civil War ended in 1865, followed by passage of the 13th Amendment which outlawed slavery. In 1870, the 15th Amendment gave African-American men the right to vote. Stanton and others fought, and lost, the battle to include women in expanded suffrage.<br><br></div><div>In victory over slavery, decades-long alliances were broken. The women's rights movement split and old friends in the abolition and women's rights movements parted company. Just as anti-slavery forces had divided, so too did organizations struggling for women's suffrage.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:16:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426299775</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426300396</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/abolition-womens-rights-and-temperance-movements.htm" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:18:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426300396</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How was the women&#39;s rights movement and abolition similar?</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426301022</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>Seeking their own <strong>rights</strong>, <strong>women</strong> used more peaceful tactics but suffered long delays. ... The <strong>women's rights movement</strong> was the offspring of <strong>abolition</strong>. Many people actively supported both reforms. Several participants in the 1848 First <strong>Women's Rights</strong> Convention in Seneca Falls had already labored in the anti-slavery <strong>movement</strong>.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:20:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426301022</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Suffraggetes and slaves</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426302821</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> </div><div>We are in the midst of a global commemorative epoch. The Great War ended a century ago, an anniversary that has been widely celebrated. The centenaries of the Easter Rising and the Russian Revolution were observed in 2016 and 2017 respectively, while 2018 saw South Africa hail the 100th anniversary of Nelson Mandela’s birth. This year, Britain has observed 100 years of women’s suffrage by honouring the Representation of the People Act of 1918, while New Zealand celebrated 125 years of women’s enfranchisement. The United States will soon witness the centenary of the Nineteenth Amendment in 2020, that enfranchised most American women.<br><br></div><div>With all this commemorative fervour, social media and popular culture have become platforms that offer insight into what our feminist foremothers said to advocate for women’s enfranchisement. To celebrate the Representation of the People Act, for example, the UK bookseller Waterstones chose a historical quotation from the leader of the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), Tweeting: ‘I would rather be a rebel than a slave.’ – Emmeline Pankhurst #vote100’ on 6 February 2018.<br><br></div><div>Waterstones had missed the memo. Their since-deleted Tweet quoted a slogan that had become infamous only three years earlier. Prior to the October 2015 release of Sarah Gavron’s much-anticipated film <em>Suffragette</em>, a regrettable photoshoot was produced with the magazine <em>Time Out London</em>, for which the film’s stars Carey Mulligan, Romola Garai, Anne-Marie Duff and Meryl Streep wore promotional T-shirts emblazoned with the slogan: ‘I’d rather be a rebel than a slave.’ This created a furore on social media, which then spread to various other media outlets. Why has this rallying cry become so inflammatory in the 21st century?<br><br></div><div>Suffrage histories illustrate both the best and the worst of the early 20th-century women’s movement. In today’s commemorative moment, many of us have been confronted – sometimes for the first time – with the hard, incontrovertible evidence of the racism and classism in the history of feminism. Seen from a 21st-century viewpoint, this particular Pankhurst quote is typical of much turn-of-the-century feminist rhetoric. It is illustrative of the exclusionary character of the global campaign for women’s suffrage.<br><br></div><div>In 1918, the Representation of the People Act did not, in fact, enfranchise all British women. Only those above 30 years of age who also met certain property or educational requirements were eligible to vote under this legislation. To earn the right to cast her ballot in 1918, a British woman needed to live in a home valuable enough to pay the £5 annual property tax (around £270 in 2017 figures) or be a university graduate – lofty bars by any measure, especially since few universities admitted women students at the time. It was another decade before all British women were enfranchised through the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act of 1928. At the end of 2018, many Britons are likely more aware of these important nuances than they had been at the start of the year, because historians and journalists have been at pains to illustrate the minutiae of the nation’s suffrage history.<br><br></div><div>Across the world, other early suffrage legislation was characterised by even more exclusionary legislative provisions. In 1893, New Zealand became the first self-governing colony in the British empire to enfranchise all women over the age of 21. But when Australia extended the franchise in 1902, the new legislation applied only to women of European descent. A similar situation transpired in South Africa, where only white women were enfranchised in 1930. In the US, a federal suffrage amendment finally passed in 1920 but, even then, various judicial and extrajudicial methods of exclusion meant not all African-American women – or men – could exercise their right to vote. Only after the gains achieved by the civil rights movement of the 1950s and ’60s could more African Americans cast their ballot, while Australia extended the vote to indigenous people as late as 1962. Following the fall of South Africa’s apartheid regime, the country’s black people were finally enfranchised in 1994.<br><br></div><div>As noted by Mari Takayanagi, a senior archivist at the UK’s Parliamentary Archive and co-curator of the recent <a href="https://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/vote-100/voice-and-vote/">exhibition</a> <em>Voice and Vote: Women’s Place in Parliament</em>, the realities of suffrage history make the celebration of suffrage centenaries a challenging enterprise. Since it became impolitic to describe disenfranchisement in terms of slavery only quite recently, suffrage history is littered with what now seems to be scandalous rhetoric – such as that Pankhurst quote. Countless challenges emerge when we reflect closely on exactly what was said by advocates of women’s suffrage. Some of these details are both surprising and disturbing.<br><br></div><div>Mary Wollstonecraft’s <em>A Vindication of the Rights of Woman</em> (1792) is a work long recognised as an early <a href="https://aeon.co/classics/to-end-patriarchy-woman-must-first-seize-power-over-herself">classic</a> of feminist philosophy. Wollstonecraft argued for women’s education and opportunities in society beyond the confines of marriage; to do so, she repeatedly used analogies between slavery and the status of women. This approach might seem odd and even untenable to many of us today. Of course, previous generations often expressed their thoughts in language that can seem antiquated and inappropriate to the contemporary reader. But just as Wollstonecraft inspired many subsequent generations of women’s rights reformers, suffragists and feminists, the process of comparing women’s oppression to that of enslaved peoples is <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17533171.2018.1404752">actually</a> a form of political rhetoric that has both persisted and taken on new connotations in the centuries since.<br><br></div><div>How exactly did Wollstonecraft express these ideas in her most famous work? Women, she wrote, ‘may be convenient slaves, but slavery will have its constant effect, degrading the master and the abject dependent.’ The 18th century, we must recall, was an era that witnessed the expansion of the transatlantic slave trade. Many of her contemporaries, men such as Thomas Paine, embraced the slavery analogy to articulate the rights of man – rights that they did not necessarily view as extending to women. As the historian Moira Ferguson <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/1395131">observes</a>, <em>A Vindication of the Rights of Woman</em> made more than 80 references to slavery. This was in deep contrast to Wollstonecraft’s <em>A Vindication of the Rights of Men </em>(1790), which referred to slavery on only a handful of occasions. It is difficult to fully account for such a stark difference, yet this suggests that she viewed slavery as a more apt analogy for the condition of women than for the condition of humanity.<br><br></div><div>Wollstonecraft was far from alone in advocating for women’s rights using the slavery analogy. Other British women, from the 18th-century writer Mary Astell to the 19th-century abolitionist Harriet Martineau, embraced similar rhetoric. So did John Stuart Mill, a renowned British philosopher and member of parliament (MP). Alongside women such as Helen Taylor, Frances Power Cobbe, Emily Davies, Millicent Garrett Fawcett and other members of the London National Society for Women’s Suffrage, Mill and fellow MP Henry Fawcett were some of the earliest and most vocal supporters of women’s enfranchisement in Britain. Mill’s classic work <em>The Subjection of Women</em> (1869) – which was much influenced by conversations with Taylor – also described women’s oppression in terms of slavery. As he wrote: ‘[N]o slave is a slave to the same lengths, and in so full a sense of the word, as a wife is.’<br><br></div><div>This language gained even greater currency in the US. Chattel slavery was a far more visible institution in the new world than the old. Across the 17th and 18th centuries, the British colonies that would later become the US grew more and more reliant on the transatlantic slave trade. As part of the discontent that led to the American Revolution, British settlers – some of whom were slaveholders – described their own taxation and disenfranchisement by the British crown as a form of slavery. By the early 19th century, the northern states had begun to pursue the gradual abolition of chattel slavery. However, despite a growing antislavery movement, the institution continued to expand in the agrarian economy of the American South until the eve of the nation’s Civil War (1861-65).<br><br></div><div><br>Suffragists proved all too willing to descend to racist arguments in support of women’s enfranchisement<br><br></div><div>The 1830s witnessed the emergence of an antislavery movement dedicated to the immediate, rather than gradual, abolition of chattel slavery. Through a growing network of female antislavery societies, more and more American women became involved in advocating abolitionism. In the process, some articulated a sense that their own lack of legal and political rights was in some way comparable to that of enslaved people of African descent. While some historians question the degree to which this represented political rhetoric or personal epiphany, the manner in which these women expressed themselves was clear enough. For example, in her influential work <em>Letters on the Equality of the Sexes and the Condition of Woman</em> (1837), the abolitionist and women’s rights reformer Sarah Grimké signed each letter with: ‘Thine in the bonds of womanhood.’ Since ‘bonds’ were understood to be symbolic of chattel slavery, the historian Nancy F Cott in 1977 suggested that Grimké endowed the phrase with a double meaning: ‘womanhood bound women together even as it bound them down’.<br><br></div><div>From the 1850s onwards, women’s rights periodicals in the US were littered with examples of this kind of rhetoric. Counterintuitively perhaps, this trend actually increased after the abolition of chattel slavery in 1865. These years were defined by an impasse between social reformers: those who supported the federal government’s plan to enfranchise formerly enslaved African-American men and those who believed that women, too, should be included in these new voting provisions. Suffragists in the latter camp, including Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B Anthony, proved all too willing to descend to racist arguments in support of women’s enfranchisement.<br><br></div><div>Stanton and Anthony’s radical but short-lived suffrage periodical, <em>The Revolution,</em> testified to the increasing racism of many white suffragists in the aftermath of the civil war. ‘Slavery is not yet abolished in the United States,’ read an article in 1870 entitled ‘The Slave-Women of America’. Although it described how all women remained disenfranchised and therefore disempowered, the article – despite its title – spoke less of those formerly enslaved women who had only recently been emancipated, and more of the nation’s free – ostensibly white – women. ‘They should no longer tamely submit to the bondage in which custom and education have for ages held them,’ the article emphasised, ‘but break off the shackles which bind them.’<br><br></div><div>This refiguring of language – from an era when ‘bonds’ had a double meaning to an era when white suffragists made attempts to co-opt such concepts for themselves alone – coincided with the emergence of Charles Darwin’s theories of evolution and natural selection. When first applied to humans by the scientist Francis Galton in the 1880s, this became known as eugenics. As the women’s suffrage movement expanded in both the US and Britain at the turn of the 20th century, earlier rhetorical ploys were repeated but now combined with eugenic imagery.<br><br></div><div>At the 1901 convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association, for example, Laura Clay, the co-founder of the Kentucky Equal Rights Association, delivered a speech grounded in eugenicist thought. Clay believed that the ‘common stock’ could be ‘improved and invigorated by the acquired qualities of individuals, without regard to sex’, yet she suggested that social and political traditions had impeded human development on account of the ‘shackles which bound her’ – ‘her’ being the supposedly ‘universal’ woman, who most white suffragists envisioned as a middle-class white woman. ‘The world is not more called upon to rejoice in the triumphs of his genius in freedom than to mourn over the wasted possibilities of hers in bonds.’<br><br></div><div>Looking back today, it can be useful for us to think about this language as being both connected to and disconnected from ideas about chattel slavery. What is clear, however, is that generations of women’s rights reformers and suffragists developed specific imaginative and rhetorical connections to achieve certain ends, and they exploited these connections when they perceived it would be to their benefit.<br><br></div><div>Since the 1970s, historians and feminist scholars, including luminaries such as bell hooks and Angela Y Davis, have condemned the language that so many white women reformers used to express themselves. Others have criticised the racism of the suffrage movement more generally, a phenomenon connected to the white supremacist politics and science in which so many white suffragists were embroiled by the end of the 19th century.<br><br></div><div>Social reformers used the language of slavery to denounce the legal and political subjugation of women. Indeed, women had few legal and political rights or privileges before the 20th century. For women who could not vote and whose civic engagement was discouraged, it could be impossible to gain redress against violent husbands, obtain a divorce, be granted custody of children or become economically self-sufficient. The problem was that, in using such language, many women’s rights reformers and suffragists came to focus on the situation of middle-class white women alone. In doing so, many social reformers sidelined the differing situations of formerly enslaved African Americans as well as immigrant and working-class women.<br><br></div><div>This is the complex legacy with which popular culture is confronted as we commemorate suffrage centenaries. The social-media response to the marketing campaign for the film <em>Suffragette</em> was swift, insightful, and unforgiving. As BuzzFeed reported at the time, onlookers had been ‘upset’ by the choice of slogan on the T-shirts. Many historically astute Tweets directed attention towards the racial limits of so many of the original suffrage provisions at the same time as they criticised the film’s lack of diversity: <em>Suffragette</em> envisioned a cross-class suffrage movement but gave no thought to people of colour, including prominent South Asian suffragettes such as Princess Sophia Duleep Singh, who had been very active in Britain. In <em>The</em> <em>Daily</em> <em>Telegraph</em>, Radhika Sanghani observed how the film’s marketing campaign very clearly reflected the racism of the suffrage movement itself.<br><br></div><div><br>These women clearly understood associations of such words as ‘slavery’, ‘bonds’ and ‘shackles’<br><br></div><div>That marketing campaign was certainly all these things. Few, however, alluded to the far deeper historical roots of the quote ‘I’d rather be a rebel than a slave.’ The publicity developed by <em>Time Out London</em> in 2015, and commemoratively repeated by Waterstones in 2018, was based on a speech that Pankhurst delivered at a WSPU meeting in 1913. This speech was later published in its newspaper, <em>The Suffragette</em>. At this meeting, Pankhurst declared to her fellow suffragettes: ‘I would rather be a rebel than a slave. I would rather die than submit; and that is the spirit that animates this movement.’<br><br></div><div>Under Pankhurst’s leadership, the WSPU led a militant campaign for women’s voting rights in the decade prior to the First World War. These suffragettes and their contemporaries found what they saw as a relevant historical example in the idea of slavery; the metaphor could refer to ‘both the enslavement of Africans in the Americas and to the sexual enslavement of white British women’, as the historian Laura E Nym Mayhall put it. The first pages of Pankhurst’s autobiography <em>My Own Story</em> (1914) described the antislavery education that her parents had instilled in her since childhood: ‘Young as I was … I knew perfectly well the meaning of the words slavery and emancipation.’ This suggests that these women clearly understood the imaginative and emotional associations that could be fostered through such words as ‘slavery’, ‘bonds’ and ‘shackles’.<br><br></div><div>We might wonder how the analogy between women and enslaved people has surfaced with such force in popular culture today. But this rhetoric was not only used in the meetings of the WSPU. It was equally evident in other publications, such as the suffrage newspaper <em>Votes for Women</em>. In 1912, Emmeline’s daughter Christabel Pankhurst – also a leading figure in the WSPU – declared in support of suffragette militancy: ‘Woman Suffrage … is a case of one sex being held in bondage by the other sex.’ All these words and phrases were central to how the suffragettes presented themselves to the world, making it no surprise that they should reemerge in the 21st century.<br><br></div><div>One hundred years later, <em>Suffragette</em> cast Meryl Streep in the role of Emmeline Pankhurst. The film features her only in brief cameo, when a fictionalised Pankhurst delivers a rousing speech from a balcony to a crowd of devoted WSPU followers below. ‘We do not want to be law-breakers,’ she tells the militants gathered before her. ‘We want to be law-makers.’ The fictionalised Pankhurst then declares: ‘I would rather be a rebel than a slave!’ before being whisked away to avoid arrest and further imprisonment.<br><br></div><div>Some commentators have been reluctant to focus too closely on this phrase, which has so clearly failed the test of time. As Tiffany Thomas suggested in Bustle, we might seek inspiration in Pankhurst’s many other speeches and writings. This is certainly true: Pankhurst is a laudable figure who should be duly celebrated. Her vision and valiant leadership were crucial to the success of the suffrage movement. Her speeches and writings are no small part of this legacy.<br><br></div><div>But Pankhurst was equally a product of her time. As she reflected in her autobiography: ‘[I]f civilisation is to advance at all in the future, it must be through the help of women, women freed of their political shackles, women with full power to work their will in society.’ Pankhurst went on to attack the idea that women should endure the ‘bonds of slavery’ to maintain the veneer of respectability. Such utterances bely the idea that looking beyond an offensive quotation here and there allows us to see historical figures more clearly, for their ideas should really appear in equal parts inspiring and alien to us today. ‘If it is right for men to fight for their freedom,’ Pankhurst continued, ‘then it is right for women to fight for their freedom and the freedom of the children they bear. On this declaration of the faith the militant women of England rest their case.’<br><br></div><div><br>Using slavery as an analogy demeans the history and the racism experienced by people of African descent<br><br></div><div>After all British women above the age of 21 were finally enfranchised in 1928, the former suffragettes began to curate and create the historical memory of their own movement. In doing so, many attested to the significance this rhetoric held in the 1910s by embracing it as part of their legacy. For example, Christabel Pankhurst’s history of the WSPU was titled <em>Unshackled: The Story of How We Won the Vote</em> (1959).<br><br></div><div>The controversy that engulfed <em>Suffragette</em> only days before its 2015 release illustrated just how quickly one very public misstep can dominate the media coverage of a historical film. It also suggests that something has changed in present-day expectations for public discourse. The kinds of language our foremothers used to describe women’s oppression and disenfranchisement have undergone criticism to such an extent that certain modes and words are neither commonplace nor tolerated today. As more and more feminists have come to realise, using slavery as an analogy is not acceptable; it demeans the history of chattel slavery and the racism that people of African descent continue to experience. What’s more, as the historian Gerda Lerner reflected in 1979, it fails to evoke the many and varied kinds of oppression experienced by women. And yet, in spite of what might be seen as an emergent collective insight, we continue to witness the language of slavery being embraced to celebrate the heroic achievements of the suffragettes.<br><br></div><div>Our commemoration must be more judicious. We should not venerate the suffragettes’ hard-won successes by esteeming their worst oratorical moments. Interestingly, the Pankhurst quote had been just one of the film’s advertising slogans. Widely circulated posters, graced by the visages of Mulligan and Streep as well as their co-star Helena Bonham Carter, featured far more innocuous words: ‘Mothers. Daughters. Rebels.’ But neither should we cherrypick our memorialisation to the degree that we forget about the racism, classism and other shortcomings of the suffrage movement. Both approaches fail to do justice to their complex legacy. As I <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-suffragettes-were-rebels-certainly-but-not-slaves-48673">wrote</a> in 2015: ‘To understand the suffragettes, we need to consider what they said and why they said it; to view them as the fallible products of their time as well as the radicals they were.’<br><br></div><div>The same must be said of their American sisters, the suffragists. As we approach the centenary of women’s enfranchisement in the US, important insights can be drawn from Emmeline Pankhurst’s legacy as it has emerged on social media and in popular culture. Arguably, white suffragists in the US embraced the language of slavery with far greater frequency and vigour than their British sisters. Ironically, theirs was a movement that actively excluded African-American women and cooperated with white supremacist politics. As we approach 2020, we must ensure justice is accorded to both their achievements and their shortcomings.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:27:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426302821</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Woman&#39;s rughts activist during the Civil War</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426303608</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>During the Civil War, reformers focused on the war effort rather than organizing women’s rights meetings. Many woman's rights activists supported the abolition of slavery, so they rallied to ensure that the war would end this inhumane practice.<br><br></div><div>Some women’s rights activists, like Clara Barton, served as nurses. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony established the Women’s Loyal National League. The group called for the immediate end of slavery and full citizenship rights for newly freed blacks. Women’s rights activists also were part of the United States Sanitary Commission, a large national volunteer association that raised money and sent supplies to Union soldiers.<br><br></div><div>African American women played a crucial part in the war effort. Harriet Tubman had been helping slaves escape to freedom since 1851. Because of her network of friends and familiarity with the landscape, she also became a spy for the Union Army during the war. The Women’s Loyal National League raised money to support Tubman’s work. Sojourner Truth, the prominent reformer and lecturer, envisioned what life would be like for newly freed men and women and led efforts to settle freed people in Kansas.<br><br></div><div>Although the Civil War temporarily disrupted the women’s rights movement, women’s efforts and the organizations they created laid the foundations for a stronger movement after the war.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:30:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426303608</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426304797</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/abolition/abolition_women_article_01.shtml" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:36:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426304797</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426305262</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><br>Sarah Moore Grimké</strong> (1792–1873) and <strong>Angelina Emily Grimké</strong><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimk%C3%A9_sisters#cite_note-NPS-1"><sup>[1]</sup></a> (1805–1879), known as the <strong>Grimké sisters</strong>, were the first American female advocates of <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolitionism_in_the_United_States">abolition of slavery</a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_rights">women's rights</a>.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimk%C3%A9_sisters#cite_note-Birney-2"><sup>[2]</sup></a><sup>[</sup><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources"><em><sup>page needed</sup></em></a><sup>]</sup> They were writers, orators, and educators.<br><br></div><div><br>They grew up in a slave-holding family in the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_United_States">Southern United States</a> but moved to the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_United_States">North</a> in the 1820s, settling for a time in <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia">Philadelphia</a> and becoming part of <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Yearly_Meeting">its substantial Quaker community</a>. They became more deeply involved with the abolitionist movement, traveling on its lecture circuit and recounting their firsthand experiences with slavery on their family's plantation. Among the first American women to act publicly in <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_reform">social reform movements</a>, they were ridiculed for their abolitionist activity. They became early activists in the women's rights movement. They eventually developed a private school.<br><br></div><div><br>Learning that their late brother had had <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treatment_of_slaves_in_the_United_States#Mixed-race_children">three mixed-race sons</a>, they helped the boys get educations in the North. <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archibald_Grimk%C3%A9">Archibald</a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_James_Grimk%C3%A9">Francis J. Grimké</a> stayed in the North, Francis becoming a Presbyterian preacher, but their younger brother John returned to the South.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:37:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426305262</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Social activism</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426305759</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Sarah was twenty-six when she accompanied her father, who was in need of medical attention, to <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia,_Pennsylvania">Philadelphia, Pennsylvania</a>, where she became acquainted with the Quakers. The Quakers had liberal <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quakers_in_the_Abolition_Movement">views on slavery</a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quakers#Role_of_women">gender equality</a>, and Sarah was fascinated with their religious sincerity and simplicity, and also their disapproval of gender inequality and slavery. Because of her father's death, Sarah had to leave Philadelphia in 1818, and return to Charleston. There, her abolitionist views grew stronger, while she also influenced Angelina.<br><br></div><div><br>Sarah left Charleston for good a short time later and relocated to Philadelphia, where Angelina joined her in 1829. The sisters became very involved in the Quaker community.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimk%C3%A9_sisters#cite_note-8"><sup>[8]</sup></a> In 1835 Angelina wrote a letter to <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Lloyd_Garrison">William Lloyd Garrison</a>, editor and publisher of <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Liberator_(newspaper)"><em>The Liberator</em></a><em>,</em> which he published without her knowledge.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimk%C3%A9_sisters#cite_note-9"><sup>[9]</sup></a> As Quakers of the time were strict on traditional manners, as well as on individuals' deference to all decisions of the congregation before taking public actions, immediately both sisters were rebuked by the Quaker community — yet sought out by the abolitionist movement. The sisters had to choose: recant and become members in good standing in the Quaker community, or actively work to oppose slavery. They chose the latter course.<br><br></div><div><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_S._Rossi"><br>Alice S. Rossi</a> says that this choice "seemed to free both sisters for a rapidly escalating awareness of the many restrictions upon their lives. Their physical and intellectual energies were soon fully expanded, as though they and their ideas had been suddenly released after a long period of germination." Abolitionist <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Weld">Theodore Weld</a>, who would later marry Angelina, trained them to be abolition speakers. Contact with like-minded individuals for the first time in their lives enlivened the sisters.<br><br></div><div><br>Sarah was rebuked again in 1836 by Quakers when she tried to discuss abolition in a meeting. Following the earlier example of the African American orator, Maria. W. Stewart of Boston,<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimk%C3%A9_sisters#cite_note-10"><sup>[10]</sup></a> the Grimké sisters were among the first female public speakers in the United States. The Grimké sisters first spoke to "parlor meetings," which consisted of women only, as was considered proper. Interested men frequently sneaked into the meetings. The sisters gained attention because of their class and background in having slaves, and coming from a wealthy planter family.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimk%C3%A9_sisters#cite_note-11"><sup>[11]<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>As they attracted larger audiences, the Grimké sisters began to speak in front of a mixed audience (both men and women.) They challenged social conventions in two ways: speaking for the antislavery movement at a time when there was widespread disapproval of this; many male public speakers on this issue were criticized by the press. Secondly, their very act of public speaking was criticized, as it was not believed suitable for women. A group of ministers wrote a letter citing the Bible and reprimanding the sisters for stepping out of the "<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_sphere">woman's proper sphere</a>," which was characterized by silence and subordination. They came to understand that women were oppressed and, without power, women could not address or right the wrongs of society. They became ardent feminists.<br><br></div><div><br>Angelina Grimké wrote her first tract, "Appeal to the Christian Women of the South" (1836), to encourage Southern women to join the abolitionist movement for the sake of white womanhood as well as black slaves. She addressed Southern women in sisterly, reasonable tones. She began her piece by demonstrating that slavery was contrary to the United States' <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Independence">Declaration of Independence</a> and to the teachings of Christ. She discussed the damage both to slaves and to society. She advocated teaching slaves to read, and freeing any slaves her readers might own. Although <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_codes">legal codes of slave states</a> restricted or prohibited both of these actions, she urged her readers to ignore wrongful laws and do what was right. "Consequences, my friends, belong no more to you than they did to [the] apostles. Duty is ours and events are God's." She closed by exhorting her readers to "arise and gird yourselves for this great moral conflict."<sup>[</sup><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed"><em><sup>citation needed</sup></em></a><sup>]<br></sup><br></div><div><br>The sisters created more controversy when Sarah published "Epistle to the Clergy of the Southern States" (1836) and Angelina republished her "Appeal" in 1837. That year they went on a lecture tour, addressing <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congregational_church">Congregationalist</a> churches in the Northeast. In addition to denouncing slavery, the sisters denounced race prejudice. Further, they argued that (white) women had a natural bond with female, black slaves. These last two ideas were extreme even for radical abolitionists. Their public speaking for the abolitionist cause continued to draw criticism, each attack making the Grimké sisters more determined. Responding to an attack by <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharine_Beecher">Catharine Beecher</a> on her public speaking, Angelina wrote a series of letters to Beecher, later published with the title <em>Letters to Catharine Beecher.</em> She staunchly defended the abolitionist cause and her right to publicly speak for that cause. By the end of the year, the sisters were being denounced from Congregationalist pulpits. The following year Sarah responded to the ministers' attacks by writing a series of letters addressed to the President of the abolitionist society which sponsored their speeches. These became known as <em>Letters on the Equality of the Sexes,</em> in which she defended women's right to the public platform. By 1838, thousands of people flocked to hear their <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston">Boston</a> lecture series.<br><br></div><div><br>In 1839 the sisters, with Weld, edited <em>American Slavery as It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses,</em> a collection of eyewitness testimony and stories from Southern newspapers.<br><br></div><div><br>Until 1854, Theodore was often away from home, either on the lecture circuit or in Washington, DC. After that, financial pressures forced him to take up a more lucrative profession. For a time they lived on a farm in New Jersey and operated a <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boarding_school">boarding school</a>. Many abolitionists, including <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Cady_Stanton">Elizabeth Cady Stanton</a>, sent their children to the school. Eventually, it developed as a <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative">cooperative</a>, the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raritan_Bay_Union">Raritan Bay Union</a>. Although the sisters no longer spoke on the lecture circuit, they continued to be privately active as both abolitionists and feminists.<sup>[</sup><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed"><em><sup>citation needed</sup></em></a><sup>]<br></sup><br></div><div><br>Neither Sarah nor Angelina initially sought to become feminists, but felt the role was forced onto them. Devoutly religious, these Quaker converts' works are predominantly religious in nature, with strong biblical arguments. Indeed, both their abolitionist sentiments and their feminism sprang from deeply held religious convictions. Both Sarah, who eventually emphasized feminism over abolitionism, and Angelina, who remained primarily interested in the abolitionist movement, were powerful writers. They neatly summarized the abolitionist arguments which would eventually lead to the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War">Civil War</a>. Sarah's work addressed, 150 years early, many issues that are familiar to the modern feminist movement.<br><br></div><div><br>Before the Civil War, the sisters discovered that their late brother Henry had had a relationship with Nancy Weston, an enslaved mixed-race woman, after he became a widower. They lived together and had three mixed-race sons: <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archibald_Grimk%C3%A9">Archibald</a>, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_James_Grimk%C3%A9">Francis</a> and John (who was born a couple of months after their father died). The sisters arranged for the oldest two nephews to come north for education and helped support them. Francis J. Grimké became a Presbyterian minister who graduated from <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_University_(Pennsylvania)">Lincoln University (Pennsylvania)</a> and Princeton Theological Seminary. In December 1878, Francis married <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Forten_Grimke">Charlotte Forten</a>, a noted educator and author, and had one daughter, Theodora Cornelia, who died as an infant. The daughter of Archibald, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelina_Weld_Grimke">Angelina Weld Grimké</a>, (named after her aunt) became a noted poet.<br><br></div><div><br>When Sarah was nearly 80, to test the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution">15th Amendment</a>, the sisters attempted to vote<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:39:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426305759</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The African American Odyssey: A Quest for Full Citizenship</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426306686</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Black and white abolitionists in the first half of the nineteenth century waged a biracial assault against slavery. Their efforts proved to be extremely effective. Abolitionists focused attention on slavery and made it difficult to ignore. They heightened the rift that had threatened to destroy the unity of the nation even as early as the Constitutional Convention.<br><br></div><div>Although some Quakers were slaveholders, members of that religious group were among the earliest to protest the African slave trade, the perpetual bondage of its captives, and the practice of separating enslaved family members by sale to different masters.<br><br></div><div>As the nineteenth century progressed, many abolitionists united to form numerous antislavery societies. These groups sent petitions with thousands of signatures to Congress, held abolition meetings and conferences, boycotted products made with slave labor, printed mountains of literature, and gave innumerable speeches for their cause. Individual abolitionists sometimes advocated violent means for bringing slavery to an end.<br><br></div><div>Although black and white abolitionists often worked together, by the 1840s they differed in philosophy and method. While many white abolitionists focused only on slavery, black Americans tended to couple anti-slavery activities with demands for racial equality and justice.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:42:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426306686</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The culture of domesticity</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426307264</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>The <strong>Culture of Domesticity</strong> (often shortened to <strong>Cult of Domesticity</strong><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-1"><sup>[1]</sup></a>) or <strong>Cult of True Womanhood</strong><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#endnote_Anone"><sup>[a]</sup></a> is a term used by historians to describe what they consider to have been a prevailing value system among the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_class">upper</a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class">middle classes</a> during the 19th Century in the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States">United States</a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-FOOTNOTEKeister2011228-2"><sup>[2]</sup></a> and the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom">United Kingdom</a>. This value system emphasized new ideas of femininity, the woman's role within the home and the dynamics of work and family. "True women", according to this idea, were supposed to possess four cardinal virtues: piety, purity, domesticity, and submissiveness. The idea revolved around the woman being the center of the family; she was considered "the light of the home".<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWelter1966152-3"><sup>[3]</sup></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-Cult_of_Domesticity-4"><sup>[4]<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>The women and men who most actively promoted these standards were generally <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people">white</a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism">Protestant</a>; the most prominent of them lived in <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_England">New England</a> and the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeastern_United_States">Northeastern United States</a>.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-5"><sup>[5]</sup></a> Although all women were supposed to emulate this ideal of femininity, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people">black</a>, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_class">working class</a>, and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration">immigrant</a> women were often excluded from the definition of "true women" because of social prejudice.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-6"><sup>[6]</sup></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-7"><sup>[7]</sup></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-8"><sup>[8]</sup></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-9"><sup>[9]<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>Since the idea was first advanced by Barbara Welter in 1966, many historians have argued that the subject is far more complex and nuanced than terms such as "Cult of Domesticity" or "True Womanhood" suggest, and that the roles played by and expected of women within the middle-class, 19th-Century context were quite varied and often contradictory; for example, it has been argued that much of what has been considered as anti-feminist in the past, in fact, helped lead to feminism.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-10"><sup>[10]<br></sup></a><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:45:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426307264</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Virtues</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426307580</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Part of the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separate_spheres">separate spheres</a> ideology, the "Cult of Domesticity" identified the home as women's "proper sphere".<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-12"><sup>[12]</sup></a> Women were supposed to inhabit the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_sphere">private sphere</a>, running the household and production of food (including servants), rearing the children, and taking care of the husband.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-13"><sup>[13]</sup></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-14"><sup>[14]</sup></a> According to Barbara Welter (1966), "True Women" were to hold and practice the four cardinal virtues:<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWelter1966152-3"><sup>[3]<br></sup></a><br></div><ol><li><strong>Piety</strong> – Religion was valued because—unlike intellectual pursuits—it did not take a woman away from her "proper sphere," the home, and because it controlled women's longings.</li><li><strong>Purity</strong> – Virginity, a woman's greatest treasure, must not be lost until her marriage night, and a married woman had to remain committed only to her husband.</li><li><strong>Submission</strong> – True women were required to be as submissive and obedient "as little children" because men were regarded as women's superiors "by God's appointment".</li><li><strong>Domesticity</strong> – A woman's proper place was in the home and her role as a wife was to create a refuge for her husband and children. Cooking, needlework, making beds, and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horticulture">tending flowers</a> were considered naturally feminine activities, whereas reading anything other than religious biographies was discouraged.</li></ol><div><br>According to Welter, an ideal True Woman was "frail", too mentally and physically weak to leave her home. The care of her home supposedly made her feminine, and she depended on men to protect her within the shelter of it.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-15"><sup>[15]</sup></a> Wilma Pearl Mankiller agrees, claiming that a "True Woman" was expected to be delicate, soft, and weak. She should not engage in strenuous physical activity that would damage her “much more delicate nervous system."<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-FOOTNOTEMankiller1998%5Bhttpsbooksgooglecombooksidd9lhBw8t410CpgPA571_571%5D-16"><sup>[16]<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>Frances B. Cogan, however, described an overlapping but competing ideology that she called the ideal of "Real Womanhood," in which women were encouraged to be physically fit and active, involved in their communities, well educated, and artistically accomplished, although usually within the broader idea that women were best suited to the domestic sphere. The conflation of "Domesticity" and "True Womanhood" can be misleading in that dedication to the domestic sphere did not necessarily imply purity, submission, or weakness.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-Cogan,_Frances_B._2010-17"><sup>[17]<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>The characteristics of "True Womanhood" were described in <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sermon">sermons</a>, books, and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tract_(literature)">religious texts</a> as well as <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_magazine">women's magazines</a>.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-18"><sup>[18]</sup></a> <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-FOOTNOTEDuBois_&amp;_Dumenil2005188-19"><sup>[19]</sup></a> Prescriptive literature advised women on how to transform their homes into domestic sanctuaries for their husbands and children. Fashion was also stressed because a woman had to stay up to date in order to please her husband. Instructions for seamstresses were often included in magazines.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-20"><sup>[20]</sup></a> Magazines which promoted the values of the "Cult of Domesticity" fared better financially than those competing magazines which offered a more progressive view in terms of women's roles.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-Endres-11"><sup>[11]</sup></a> In the United States, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterson's_Magazine"><em>Peterson's Magazine</em></a> and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godey's_Lady's_Book"><em>Godey's Lady's Book</em></a> were the most widely circulated women's magazines and were popular among both women and men.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-Matthews-21"><sup>[21]</sup></a> With a circulation of 150,000 by 1860,<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-22"><sup>[22]</sup></a> <em>Godey's</em> reflected and supported some of the ideals of the "Cult of True Womanhood."<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-Endres-11"><sup>[11]</sup></a> The magazine's paintings and pictures illustrated the four virtues, often showing women with children or behind husbands. It also equated womanhood with motherhood and being a wife, declaring that the "perfection of womanhood (...) is the wife and mother".<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-23"><sup>[23]</sup></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-24"><sup>[24]</sup></a> The magazine presented motherhood as a woman's natural and most satisfying role and encouraged women to find their fulfillment and their contributions to society mainly within the home.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-25"><sup>[25]</sup></a> At the same time, the long-time editor of <em>Godey's</em>, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Josepha_Hale">Sarah Josepha Hale</a>, encouraged women to improve themselves intellectually, to write, and to take action that would improve the moral character of their communities and their nation. Hale promoted Vassar College, advocated for female physicians, and published many of the most important female writers of the nineteenth century.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-26"><sup>[26]</sup></a> Frances B. Cogan argued that <em>Godey's</em> supported "Real Womanhood" more than "True Womanhood." Reflecting the ideals of both "True Womanhood" and "Real Womanhood," <em>Godey's</em> considered mothers as crucial in preserving the memory of the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolution">American Revolution</a> and in securing its legacy by raising the next generation of citizens<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:46:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426307580</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Connection to the movement</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426307905</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_rights"><br>Women's rights</a> advocates of the late 18th and early 19th Centuries, such as <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Wollstonecraft">Mary Wollstonecraft</a>, <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Wright">Frances Wright</a>, and <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Martineau">Harriet Martineau</a>, were widely accused of disrupting the natural order of things and condemned as unfeminine. "They are only semi-women, mental hermaphrodites," wrote <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_F._Harrington_(priest)&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1">Henry F. Harrington</a> in the <em>Ladies' Companion</em>.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWelter1966173-33"><sup>[33]</sup></a> However, after the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacksonian_Era">Jacksonian Era</a> (1812 to 1850) saw the expansion of voting rights to virtually all white males in the United States, many women believed it was their opportunity for increased civil liberties. Early <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism">feminist</a> opposition to many of the values promoted by the Cult of Domesticity (especially concerning women's suffrage, political activism, and legal independence) culminated in the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seneca_Falls_Convention">Seneca Falls Convention</a> in 1848.<br><br></div><div><br>Susan M. Cruea postulated that although the “Cult of True Womanhood” set many societal restrictions that took away women's working rights and freedom, it nonetheless laid the groundwork for the later development of feminism by crediting women with a moral authority which implicitly empowered them to extend their moral influence outside the home. The ideal woman was expected to act as a status symbol for men and reflect her husband's wealth and success, and was to create babies and care for them so that her husband’s legacy of success would continue, but she was also seen as the “<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_in_the_House">Angel in the House</a>” whose purpose was to guide her family morally. Because of the perceived importance of the role, this ideology was imprinted on girls at a very young age; these girls were taught to value their virginity as the “‘pearl of great price’ which was her greatest asset” and to develop the skills to manage a household and rear children, but they were also taught to see themselves as “a pillar of strength and virtue” who was key not only in providing her husband a proper image but in raising boys who would later have a direct impact on the success of the nation.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-34"><sup>[34]<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>During the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era">Progressive Era</a>,<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-35"><sup>[35]</sup></a> the ideal of the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Woman">New Woman</a> emerged as a response to the Cult of True Womanhood.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-36"><sup>[36]</sup></a> The New Woman, frequently associated with the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_suffrage">suffrage movement</a>,<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-37"><sup>[37]</sup></a> represented an ideal of femininity which was strongly opposed to the values of the Cult of True Womanhood.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-38"><sup>[38]</sup></a> With demands expressed in the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Sentiments">Declaration of Sentiments</a>, written at the Seneca Falls convention in 1848, women finally gained ratification of a constitutional amendment and the right to vote in 1920. After emancipation, these New Women could be identified by as “cigarette-smoking, lipsticked and rouged, jazz-dancing, birth-control-using types known as ‘modern girls’ or flappers.”<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-39"><sup>[39]<br></sup></a><br></div><div><br>World War II brought about a restructuring of the labor market as women stepped into the war effort on the home front. In the era after World War II, many of the ideas of the "Cult of Domesticity" were stressed again as American society sought to integrate veterans and emphasize the revival of family life. Once the troops returned home, men were encouraged to embrace family life and enter companionship marriages. Veterans returned home to be the head of the family and women who had been involved in high-paying and high-skilled wartime jobs were pushed back into the home. The remaking of the private life was central to this era. Anticommunism structured much of the American life, emphasizing the free enterprise system which brought about a period of economic prosperity and a consumer culture.<br><br></div><div><br>In the 1950s television shows often presented series that depicted fictional families in which the mother's primary work was to raise the children and run the household. Men's and women's spheres were increasingly separated as many families lived in suburban settings, from which men commuted to other cities for work. However, this image of separate spheres disguised the reality that all groups of women continued to work for pay; many did not stop working after the men returned home from the war, they were instead forced into lower-paying jobs. Wages were low and there was little room for advancement. Women that did enter into professional fields were under intense scrutiny for going against the feminine domestic ideal. Despite neo-domestic ideals, many middle-class mothers were burdened by women’s double shift of working in the home and also a job. At the same time, women had independent lives during the day and were often active in volunteer and community activities, particularly around issues of education, health, children, and welfare. The "Cult of Domesticity" paved the way for the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_family">nuclear family</a>.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWegener200536-40"><sup>[40]</sup></a> Betty Friedan’s <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Feminine_Mystique"><em>The Feminine Mystique</em></a> summed up the expectations of female nature of this time, with a focus on “consumerism, sexualized marriage, and civic activism.”<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity#cite_note-41"><sup>[41]</sup></a> Opposition to those ideas influenced the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-wave_feminism">second wave of feminism</a>.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:48:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426307905</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426308838</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://psmag.com/social-justice/the-21st-century-cult-of-domesticity" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:51:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426308838</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>True Womanhood/Cult of Domesticity</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426309398</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><br></strong><br></div><div>In a manual entitled Female Piety, or a Young Woman’s Friend and Guide Through Life to Immortality, published in New York in 1853, Congregationalist preacher John Angell James wrote that<br><br></div><div><em>‘woman was the finishing grace of the creation. Woman was the completeness of man’s bliss in Paradise. Woman was the cause of sin and death to our world. The world was redeemed by the seed of the woman. Woman is the mother of the human race; our companion, counselor, and comforter in the pilgrimage of life; our tempter, scourge, and destroyer. Our sweetest cup of earthly happiness, or our bitterest draught of sorrow is mixed and administered by her hand. She not only renders smooth or rough our path to the grave, but helps or hinders our progress to immortality. In heaven we shall bless God for her aid in assisting us to reach that blissful state; or amidst the torments of unutterable woe in another region, we shall deplore the fatality of her influence. (1)<br></em><br></div><div>This text was among the numerous edifying publications, which rolled off American presses in the mid-to-late nineteenth century, urging female readers to cultivate the virtues of piety, purity, submission, and domesticity. (2 ) These four attributes became the cornerstone of an ideology first conceptualized by historian Barbara Welter as ‘True Womanhood’ in her seminal monographic study Dimity Convictions (1976). (3 )<br>‘True Womanhood’ provided a narrative through which women could invest their existence and their role in the world with meaning and purpose. In Victorian America, in fact, middle- and upper-middle-class women were not admitted to centers of public power; being relegated to the private sphere, namely, the domestic milieu, they had only one socially respectable function (4) – that of a wife and mother – while the masculine sphere of action was the public one, the realm of business and politics.<br>This rigid role differentiation, which affirmed the social supremacy of men over women, was allegedly sanctioned by God and by nature as well. Being divinely ordained, it would tolerate no refutation. From a sociopolitical viewpoint, this ethos, which has been referred to also as ‘The Cult of Domesticity’(5), can be construed a unifying ideological force, which was instrumental in providing order and stability in the country at a time of massive social, political, and economic transformations.<br><br></div><div><strong>2. The Republican mother<br></strong><br></div><div>Barbara Welter, who employs the manuals of conduct published in the mid-nineteenth century to show how the ideology of ‘True Womanhood’ was purveyed, observes that the wifely role was not only about subservience and compliance. Marriage, in fact, was also deemed an opportunity for women to rise in status. (6)<br>In <em>The Sphere and Duties of Woman: A Course of Lectures</em>, Unitarian minister George Washington Burnap states that marriage elevates the female character not only because ‘it puts her under the best possible tuition, that of the affections, and affords scope to her active energies, but because it gives her higher aims, and a more dignified position’. (7) As a consequence, it was in middle- class women’s best interest to promote and secure the Cult of Domesticity, as it was the only way for them to gain some power, even if it was limited to the private sphere.<br>The natural consequence of marriage was motherhood, which was regarded as an additional source of social prestige. From the 1790s to the first decades of the 1800s, a new emphasis was, in fact, placed on women’s responsibility for the moral and religious training of children in the domestic environment. This phenomenon invested motherhood with a new political meaning, thus giving rise to the concept of ‘Republican Motherhood’.<br>Historian Mary Beth Norton states that citizens of the new Republic sincerely believed that the success of the newly formed country was firmly based on the collective and personal virtues of the population. What is more, she concurs (8) with Linda K. Kerber’s claim that women expressed their political voice within the homes as nurturers and supporters of patriotic values, which they went on to instill in their children.(9)<br>Given that the future of the Republican society was entrusted to mothers, a failure in this supremely important function might have serious, if not downright catastrophic consequences.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 17:53:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426309398</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426311238</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In 1838, women in Brookline, Massachusetts, reacted with “astonishment and alarm” at the recently adopted gag rule, which tabled all antislavery petitions. They signed their names to a brief but searing petition to the U.S. House of Representatives: “Your memorialists ‘consider this resolution a violation of the Constitution of the United States—of the right of the people of the United States to petition—and the right of their Representatives to freedom of speech.’” For women, who, before the ratification of the 19th Amendment, could not vote, petitions enabled them to engage with the political process and find their voices as citizens.</div><div><br></div><div>Petitioning is a right granted by the 1st Amendment of the Constitution (“Congress shall make no law . . . abridging . . . the right of the people . . . to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”). In the case of House records, petitions are requests for relief or action from an individual, group, or organization, sent to the U.S. Congress. They are among the most voluminous, complex, and emotionally charged categories of House records. They are also part of the bedrock of American civic life. Americans in the early Republic dearly valued the right to petition; colonial frustrations about the lack of representation in Great Britain were still very fresh.  The issue was so important that the Founders included petitioning in the Bill of Rights as a way for citizens to interact with their new government.<br><br></div><div>Between 1820 and 1860, the nation’s economic and political growth had far-reaching effects on women’s lives. They found increased opportunities for education, work, and public roles. Middle class women began to engage with politics in unprecedented ways.<br><br></div><div><strong>Petitions for the Public Good<br></strong><br></div><div><strong>I. Indian Removal<br></strong><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br>Memorial from the Ladies of Steubenville, Ohio, Protesting Indian Removal, February 15, 1830</div><div>For most of its early history, petitioning was a right exercised almost exclusively by men. Women first petitioned on political issues during the debate over proposed legislation to remove Indian tribes in the Southeast to the West to accommodate white settlement. Very little was expected, let alone permitted, of women in terms of intellectual ability. However, they were perceived as paragons of virtue and particularly in tune with sentiments like empathy. Causes like Indian removal, tinged with a moral imperative, allowed women to participate in the political conversation of the time without upending it.</div><div><br></div><div>In 1830, women in Steubenville, Ohio, signed a <a href="https://catalog.archives.gov/id/306633">petition</a> that read: “When, therefore, injury and oppression threaten to crush a hapless people within our borders, we, the feeblest of the feeble, appeal with confidence to those who should be the representatives of national virtues as they are the depositories of national powers, and implore them to succor the weak &amp; unfortunate.” Members of Congress publicly ridiculed their efforts. Senator <a href="https://history.house.gov/People/Listing/B/BENTON,-Thomas-Hart-(B000398)/">Thomas Hart Benton</a> responded to the tide of petitions by saying, “I would recommend to these ladies, not to douse their bonnets, and tuck up their coats, for such a race, but to sit down on the way side, and wait for the coming of the conquerors.”<br><br></div><div>Although the Indian Removal Act became law in 1830, the experience women gained mobilizing for a cause set the stage for the antislavery movement and transformed the way women interacted with their government and the political process. It also equipped them with new and necessary skills, such as outreach, education, political acumen, and crafting of persuasive arguments that translated to effective petitions.<br><br></div><div><strong>II. Antislavery<br></strong><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br>Petition to Rescind Gag Rule, February 14, 1838</div><div>Beginning in the 1830s, abolitionists inundated Congress with petitions, many the result of nationwide drives to gather signatures. In 1836, the House passed the “gag rule,” which immediately tabled all antislavery petitions. This meant no action would be taken on the petitions, including hearing their contents. In 1838, women in Brookline, Massachusetts, <a href="https://history.house.gov/HouseRecord/Detail/15032436228">petitioned Congress</a>, asking that the gag rule be rescinded: “Your memorialists . . . regard it as an assumption of authority, at once dangerous and destructive to the fundamental principles of republican government, to the rights of minorities, to the sovereignty of the People and TO THE UNION OF THESE UNITED STATES.” Emboldened by work on the antiremoval cause, the initially subservient tone of women’s petitions started to change, showing that they now viewed themselves as political participants rather than bystanders. The top two signers are sisters Sarah M. Grimké and Angelina E. Grimké, ardent abolitionists and early women’s rights activists, who operated far outside the boundaries of acceptable behavior for women at the time. During an 1837 women’s antislavery convention in Boston, Angelina Grimké introduced a resolution saying that “the right of petition is natural and inalienable, derived immediately from God, and guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.” Any attack on this right was a “high-handed usurpation of power, and an attempt to strike a death-blow at the freedom of the people.” Just days after this petition was signed, Angelina became the first woman in the United States to speak before a legislative body, when she addressed a committee of the Massachusetts legislature on the subject of slavery.</div><div><br></div><div>The antislavery debate completed the transformation of women's use of the petition first begun during the antiremoval protests. Although barred from making their voice heard at the polls, women forced some recognition of their opinions through petitions. Women started to ask: What did it mean to be a female citizen? What were women’s rights?<br><br></div><div><strong>III. Women’s Suffrage<br></strong><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br>Petition for Woman Suffrage Committee, April 10, 1917</div><div>The conception of female citizenship continued to widen in the 1860s, as women worked in and contributed to realms outside the home during the Civil War. However, women were excluded from the “equal protection of the laws” guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution when it was ratified in 1868. The moment arrived for women to use the experience gained during the antiremoval and antislavery petition campaigns for their own benefit.</div><div><br></div><div>As the women’s suffrage movement made its final push in the 1910s, president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association Carrie Chapman Catt demonstrated the fruit of previous petition drives. Using the political savvy developed and honed by her predecessors, she expertly petitioned Speaker of the House <a href="https://history.house.gov/People/Listing/C/CLARK,-James-Beauchamp-(Champ)-(C000437)/">Champ Clark</a> in 1917 for a <a href="https://history.house.gov/HouseRecord/Detail/15032436242">Committee on Woman Suffrage.</a> She deftly appealed to his vanity as a powerful man, by turning the stereotypical female petition on its head. Her tone is ostensibly one of supplication, but it’s accompanied by a sly wink. Catt knew she was on the right side of the argument—and history—and used flattery and guile to her advantage. “You have had a long and successful political career and that means you know men and women . . . . Mr. Speaker, the women of our country appreciate the fact that you are yourself an advocate of our cause, but we do not presume upon your interest when we ask for a House Suffrage Committee. We ask it because the world is calling to the Congress of the United States to make better time if it would hold its place as Leader in the march of world democracy.” Catt understood that the creation of a House committee to consider a constitutional amendment for women’s suffrage would finalize the movement started with hundreds of petitions. The House Committee on Woman Suffrage was created in 1917, and the <a href="https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1901-1950/The-19th-Amendment/">19th Amendment</a> granting women national suffrage was ratified in 1920.<br><br></div><div>Recycling many of the tactics and connections and some of the rhetoric used during previous campaigns, at the end of the 19th century and turn of the 20th, the women’s suffrage movement used the petition to make women’s voices heard in Congress and spread their message nationally.<br><br></div><div><strong>Petitions for Private Relief<br></strong><br></div><div>Relief from individual hardship characterized many petitions sent to Congress. Without full citizenship, women could not seek remedies available to men in times of personal struggle, leaving them vulnerable to economic hardship. Instead, tragedy or personal crisis often forced women to seek public relief. <br><br></div><div><strong>IV. Divorce<br></strong><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br>Petition Seeking Divorce, 1804</div><div>Ann Alricks <a href="https://history.house.gov/HouseRecord/Detail/15032436235">petitioned Congress for a divorce</a> in 1803. Alricks was 15 when she married. She lived together with her husband for four years “very unhappily” before he abandoned her. Alricks pleads, “That your petitioner being yet possessed of youth and health, and not destitute of respectable friends and connections, indulges the hope, that a prudent and discreet conduit, might enable her to better much her situation, was she freed from those matrimonial obligations contracted with Mr Alricks, almost in her infancy, which have long since become equally embarrassing and intolerable to them both.” To obtain relief from her situation, Alricks was forced to expose the deeply private and intimate details of her life to Congress. Early divorces could be obtained only by a legislative act of the state, when they could be obtained at all, meaning the process was public, potentially lengthy and costly, and required a certain level of understanding of how the political system worked. In the District of Columbia, without statehood, Congress received petitions for divorce under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution.</div><div><br></div><div>Unfortunately, Alricks’s situation was not unique in early America—dependent on her husband for her social standing and financial well-being and unable to improve her station/situation without the permission of other men. Until 1801, no divorces were granted by Congress to residents of the District. In 1801, jurisdiction over separation and alimony cases was moved from Congress to the Circuit Court, and in 1860, so was jurisdiction over divorce. This shift was in line with what was taking place in other states, as the number of petitions for divorce grew steadily in the first half of the 19th century. Alricks was ultimately granted a divorce by the district court of the District of Columbia. Divorce petitions, although limited, specific, and personal, were the first incremental steps for women in crafting a political identity separate from men by taking ownership of the right to request relief.<br><br></div><div><strong>V. Widows’ Pensions<br></strong><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br>Petition of Mary Todd Lincoln, January 26, 1869</div><div>Unable to support themselves without their husbands, widows and dependents requested pensions, or payments, for soldiers who died during the Civil War. Even a destitute former First Lady swallowed her pride and exercised her right to petition Congress for relief in 1869.</div><div><br></div><div>Mary Todd Lincoln, widow of President <a href="https://history.house.gov/People/Listing/L/LINCOLN,-Abraham-(L000313)/">Abraham Lincoln</a>, <a href="https://history.house.gov/HouseRecord/Detail/15032436241">petitioned Congress</a> four years after her husband’s death, seeking a pension. Although her husband did not die on the battlefield, she regarded his death as a direct result of the Civil War. Mary Lincoln, ill and living abroad, used language familiar from other women’s petitions. She emphasized her distress and desperation, and threw herself on the mercy of men in a position to relieve her suffering. “In consideration of the great services my dearly beloved husband has rendered to the United States and of the fearful loss I have sustained by his untimely death his martyrdom I may say, I respectfully submit to your Honorable body this petition hoping that a yearly pension may be granted me.” Finding no other options for relief from her difficult circumstances, in 1870, a bill was passed giving Mary Lincoln $3,000 per year.<br><br></div><div>For the first half of American history, petitions were one of the only formal means available for women to participate in politics. Writing and disseminating petitions expanded the role of women in politics, leading to national suffrage, and ultimately to women serving in Congress. The petitions that women signed and sent to Congress tell the story of the United States as it expanded and changed. But the petitions also chronicle the stories of individual women as citizens of this country, told in their own words.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:00:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426311238</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reforms on the Lecture Circuit</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312076</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Before women’s rights activists established national organizations in 1869, the women’s rights movement was oriented around grassroots, local activism. Women met at annual conventions, read women’s rights newspapers, and attended lectures. Going to a lecture might not sound fun to us, but they were a very popular form of entertainment in the nineteenth century. Speakers discussed a range of topics, such as politics, spiritualism, vegetarianism, and phrenology (the study of the contours of your head to determine your strengths and weaknesses).<br><br></div><div><br>In the 1860s and 1870s, women’s rights activists took to the lecture circuit to win supporters for their cause. Anna Dickinson was one of the most popular speakers of the era. She even spoke before Congress. <a href="http://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/sojourner-truth">Sojourner Truth</a> attracted attention as one of the few black women who lectured widely in support of the rights of women and African Americans. In 1872, Victoria Woodhull—a popular lecturer, stockbroker, and self-proclaimed psychic—became the first woman to run for president. <a href="http://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/elizabeth-cady-stanton">Elizabeth Cady Stanton</a> traveled the nation to support women’s rights, an activity she preferred to organizational duties. Some women’s rights lecturers spoke as many as 200 nights a year. The money they earned from their lectures helped support them and their cause.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:03:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312076</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312270</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://books.google.rs/books?id=nvLBBRnRr4YC&amp;pg=PA393&amp;lpg=PA393&amp;dq=lecture+circuits+women&#39;s+rights&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=qEANQJESJW&amp;sig=ACfU3U2I20ft_owbo6kGznCYIWt4EA7NZA&amp;hl=sr&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwi8q_f358TmAhVRuXEKHfRnB0YQ6AEwFHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&amp;q=lecture circuits women&#39;s rights&amp;f=false" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:04:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312270</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Free Love, Socialism, and Women’s Rights</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312660</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>Scottish freethinker Frances “Fanny” Wright was among the first women to go on the lecture circuit. Her utopian socialist ideas and unconventional lifestyle attracted women’s rights advocates, including women’s education proponent Emma Willard and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who had worked with Wright’s protégée Ernestine Rose to reform married women’s property laws in 1840s New York. Stanton acknowledged Wright’s influence by placing the Scotswoman’s picture on the frontispiece of volume one of the <em>History of Woman Suffrage</em>.<br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:06:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312660</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312899</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.nps.gov/articles/flexing-feminine-muscles-strategies-and-conflicts.htm" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:07:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426312899</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abolitionists and the Fight for Freedom in the 19th Century</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426314227</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br>Presley gives a rundown of some of the many black women, both famous and lesser-known, who worked toward the abolition of slavery.<br><br></div><div>We’ve all heard of Sojourner Truth and Harriet Tubman. Many other black women made important contributions to the abolitionist movement, too. But the collective efforts of black women had been largely ignored until scholarship in the late 20<sup>th</sup> century. Though some black women abolitionists came from comfortable middle-class families, many others were working-class women relegated to the poorly paid jobs of laundress and domestic. The Forten family and Sarah Douglass were freeborn, but many others were former slaves. But, for all these women, abolition had a different and more personal meaning than it did for whites. Though black men welcomed them, says <a href="https://books.google.com/books/about/Black_Women_Abolitionists.html?id=mwKjNpmh2uIC"><strong>historian Shirley Yee</strong></a>, the expectation that they would play subsidiary roles confined to “women’s sphere” was no different than the expectations of white men abolitionists in regard to white women’s participation. Not surprisingly, both the white and the black women saw things differently than the men.<br><br></div><div><strong><br>Champions of Justice<br></strong><br></div><div>Black women were in the forefront of abolitionist lecturing and writing.<br><br></div><div>In September, 1832, free black domestic <a href="http://www.womenhistoryblog.com/2013/02/maria-stewart.html"><strong>Maria W. Stewart</strong></a> (1803-1879) became the first American women to address a public audience of women and men. She spoke out against slavery, criticizing black men for not standing up and being heard on the subject of rights. Maria wrote both pamphlets and speeches for William Lloyd Garrison’s <em>The Liberator</em> till she retired in 1833. Another black woman, <a href="http://abolition.e2bn.org/people_37.html"><strong>Mary Prince</strong></a> (1788-c. 1833) wrote a book, The <em>History of Mary Prince: A West Indian</em> <em>Slave</em>, which exposed the horrors of the Caribbean slave trade. She was the first woman to present an anti-slavery petition to Parliament.<br><br></div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Mapps_Douglass"><strong>Sarah Mapp Douglass</strong></a> (1806-1882) was an abolitionist, writer and educator. The freeborn daughter of Robert and Grace Douglass, a distinguished black abolitionist family in Philadelphia, she joined her mother Grace as a founding member of the bi-racial Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society (PFAS) in 1833. Throughout her abolitionist career, Douglass also served as recording secretary, librarian, and manager for the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society, contributed to both the <em>Liberator</em> and the <em>Anglo-African Magazine</em>, became a fundraiser for the black press, and gave numerous public lectures. She ran a school for free black children in Philadelphia. “A passionate educator,” she also taught black children and adults in New York.  In 1853, she took over the girls’ preparatory department at the Philadelphia Institute for Colored Youth, offering courses in literature, science, and anatomy. Douglass maintained a long and close friendship with prominent white abolitionists Sarah and Angelina Grimké, daughters of South Carolina slaveholders.  In her letters to Sarah Grimké, Douglass revealed the pain of encountering race prejudice among fellow Quakers.<br><br></div><div>Grace Douglass and daughter Sarah, along with white feminist Lucretia Mott, were often able to persuade white organizations to include a black abolitionist perspective. Thus, as historian <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/2717236?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents"><strong>Janice Sumler-Lewis</strong></a> points out, they became not just well-meaning ladies but an “aggressive, persistent force for change in the Philadelphia area.”<br><br></div><div><a href="http://www.fofweb.com/History/MainPrintPage.asp?iPin=AFEBW0879&amp;DataType=Women&amp;WinType=Free"><strong>The Forten women</strong></a> (mother Charlotte; daughters Sarah, Margaretta, and Harriet; granddaughter Charlotte L.) were major driving forces in the abolitionist movement. Through three generations, the Fortens remained active members of and financial contributors to the abolitionist movement. Not only did they organize informational fairs and run petition drives, they published and lectured as well as assisting runaway slaves. They were so admired by Garrison and other abolitionists that Quaker poet John Greenleaf Whittier lauded them in his poem “<a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=9m87AQAAMAAJ&amp;pg=PA1139&amp;lpg=PA1139&amp;dq=poem+%E2%80%9CTo+the+Daughters+of+James+Forten.%E2%80%9D&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=CXMSLO80Ik&amp;sig=VyJnTcx5g5GbXbKSQEQSqUS2rD4&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjOhbjBl-LKAhVGMyYKHS-dAVcQ6AEIMDAH#v=onepage&amp;q=poem%20%E2%80%9CTo%20the%20Daughters%20of%20James%20Forten.%E2%80%9D&amp;f=false"><strong>To the Daughters of James Forten</strong></a>.”  <a href="http://establisher.angelfire.com/sarah-forten-purvis.html"><strong>Sarah Forten</strong></a> (1814-1893), a regular contributor to <em>The Liberator,</em> recruited her mother, Charlotte, and her two sisters, Margaretta and Harriet to join in founding PFAS. Sarah Forten, along with Sarah Douglass, were among the most articulate and persistent voices in the antislavery movement. Sarah Forten served three consecutive terms on the Board of Directors of PFAS. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Forten_Grimk%C3%A9"><strong>Charlotte L. Forten Grimke</strong></a> (1837-1914), granddaughter of Charlotte, contributed to <em>The Liberator </em>and was a poet and educator.<br><br></div><div><strong><br>Sojourner Truth and Harriet Tubman: Icons of the Movement<br></strong><br></div><div><a href="http://galenet.galegroup.com.ez.ccclib.org/servlet/History/"><strong>Sojourner Truth</strong></a> (c. 1791-1883) was born as Isabella, a slave of Dutch-speaking settlers in New York. As a result of her experiences of injustice and inequality, as well as contact with feminists and abolitionists, she lectured extensively on antislavery and women’s rights, becoming one of the most well-known and respected heroes of the abolitionist movement. By 1846 Sojourner Truth had joined the antislavery circuit, traveling with Abby Kelly Foster, Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison, and British member of Parliament George Thompson. An electrifying public orator, she soon became one of the most popular speakers for the abolitionist cause. Her fame was heightened by the publication of her <em>Narrative</em> in 1850, related and transcribed by Olive Gilbert. With proceeds from its sale she purchased a Northampton home. In 1851, speaking before a National Women’s Convention in Akron, Ohio, Sojourner Truth defended the physical and spiritual strength of women, in her famous “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech. In 1853 Sojourner’s antislavery, spiritualist, and temperance advocacy took her to the Midwest, where she settled among spiritualists in Harmonia, Michigan.<br><br></div><div>“I cannot read a book,” said Sojourner Truth, “but I can read the people.” She dissected political and social issues through parables of everyday life. The Constitution, silent on black rights, had a “little weevil in it.” She was known for her captivating one-line retorts. An Indiana audience threatened to torch the building if she spoke. Sojourner Truth replied, “Then I will speak to the ashes.” In the late 1840s, grounded in faith that God and moral suasion would eradicate bondage, she challenged her despairing friend Douglass with “Frederick, is God dead?” In 1858, when a group of men questioned her gender, claiming she wasn’t properly feminine in her demeanor, Sojourner Truth, a bold early feminist, exposed her bosom to the entire assembly, proclaiming that shame was not hers but theirs.<br><br></div><div>Every American school child has heard of <a href="https://www.nwhm.org/education-resources/biography/biographies/harriet-tubman/"><strong>Harriet Tubman</strong></a> (1820-1913), undoubtedly the best known of all the female abolitionists. Called “General Tubman” and the “Moses of her people,” she has taken on a larger-than-life persona. Frederick Douglass <a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Harriet_Tubman.aspx"><strong>said</strong></a> of Tubman: “The midnight sky and the silent stars have been the witness of your devotion to freedom and of your heroism.” In her own day she was called “the most remarkable woman of her age for her courage and success in guiding fugitive slaves out of slave territory in the 1850s and for her Union service behind Confederate lines,” reports one of her biographers, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harriet-Tubman-Stories-Wisconsin-Autobiography/dp/0299191206"><strong>Jean Humez</strong></a>.<br><br></div><div>Escaping from slavery in 1849, Tubman quickly became involved with abolitionism. Though she was not a lecturer, partly because of a speech impediment from an injury sustained while a slave, she was a tireless activist, making alliances with women’s rights groups as well as abolitionist groups. Respected by both blacks and whites, she worked with abolitionists as part of the Underground Railway, and probably even brought fugitives to the home of Frederick Douglass.<br><br></div><div>Though she did not start the Underground Railway, Tubman is the name most associated with it. Recent scholarship suggests that the number of slaves she spirited away from the South may be less than once thought, but this in no way diminishes her courage and cleverness. The estimates range from as few as 10 trips up to about 19, with the number rescued ranging from 57 to 200. But nonetheless, she risked her life to rescue many slaves, both relatives and other men and women, leading them through dangerous and difficult Southern terrain to freedom in the North and in Canada. Her successes were due to both clever disguises and unwavering courage. Fierce in her determination, she would not tolerate slaves who were faint-hearted along the way, even threatening some with guns. Babies were given paregoric (a kind of sedative) to keep them from crying. She became so notorious for her exploits that that a large reward of $12,000 was offered by the South for her capture.<br><br></div><div><strong><br>Other Prominent Black Women Activists<br></strong><br></div><div>There were many more black women abolitionist activists than will fit in this column. But there are some who should be mentioned for their outstanding courage and ability.<br><br></div><div><a href="http://www.blackpast.org/aah/freeman-elizabeth-mum-bett-1742-1829"><strong>Elizabeth Freeman</strong></a> (1742-1829) was born into slavery in Claverack, New York in 1742. Upon suffering physical abuse from her master’s wife, Freeman escaped her home and refused to return. She found a sympathetic ear with attorney Theodore Sedgwick, the father of the writer Catherine Sedgwick. Apparently, as she served dinner to her masters, she had heard them speaking of freedom—in this case freedom from England—and she applied the concepts of equality and freedom for all to herself.<br><br></div><div>In 1781 Freeman, with the assistance of Sedgwick, initiated the case <em>Brom and Bett v. Ashley</em> that set a precedent for the abolition of slavery in Massachusetts. According to the Massachusetts Judicial Review, the 1781 Berkshire county case of <em>Brom and Bett v. Ashley</em>, often referred to as the “Mum Bett” or “Elizabeth Freeman” case, was unique because it occurred less than one year after the adoption of the Massachusetts Constitution and because, in contrast to prior freedom suits, there was no claim that John Ashley, the slave owner, had violated a specific law. This case was a direct challenge to the very existence of slavery in Massachusetts.<br><br></div><div>Once free, Freeman stayed with the Sedgwick family as a servant. Sedgwick, in arguing a later case, used the example of Freeman when he said in defense of the abolition of slavery, “If there could be a practical refutation of the imagined superiority of our race to hers, the life and character of this woman would afford that refutation.”<br><br></div><div><a href="http://www.blackpast.org/aah/remond-sarah-parker-1824-1894"><strong>Sarah Parker Remond</strong></a> (1824-1894) was an African-American lecturer, abolitionist, and agent of the American Anti-Slavery Society. Born of free blacks, she made her first speech against slavery when she was only sixteen years old. As a young woman, Remond delivered antislavery speeches throughout the Northeast United States. She traveled to England to gather support for the abolitionist cause in the United States. When she was older, she became a physician in Italy where she stayed until her death.<br><br></div><div>Poet and orator <a href="http://www.biography.com/people/frances-ew-harper-40710"><strong>Frances E.W. Harper</strong></a> (1825-1911), the child of two free black parents, advocated for abolition and education in her speeches and publications. Her first poem collection, <em>Forest Leaves</em>, was published around 1845. The delivery of her public speech, “Education and the Elevation of the Colored Race,” resulted in a two-year lecture tour for the Anti-Slavery Society.<br><br></div><div><a href="http://www.biography.com/people/mary-ann-shadd-cary-214141#synopsis"><strong>Mary Ann Shadd Cary</strong></a> (1823-1893) was the first female black newspaper editor, starting a publication titled <em>The Provincial Freeman</em> in Canada. Her abolitionist activities came naturally to her. Her father worked for the <em>Liberator</em> run by famed abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison. After the war, Cary earned in 1883 a law degree from Howard University, making her the second African-American woman in the United States to earn this degree.<br><br></div><div><a href="http://www.blackpast.org/aah/craft-william-and-ellen-1824-1900-1826-1891"><strong>Ellen Craft</strong></a> (1826–1891) along with her husband William Craft (1824–1900) were slaves who escaped to the North in 1848 by traveling openly by train and steamboat, finally arriving in Philadelphia.  She posed as a white male planter and he as her personal servant. The light-skinned daughter of a mulatto slave and her white master, Ellen Craft used her appearance to pass as a white man, dressing in appropriate clothing. Their daring escape was widely publicized, making them among the most famous of fugitive slaves. Abolitionists featured them in public lectures to gain support in the struggle to end the institution.<br><br></div><div>The Crafts lectured publicly about their escape. In 1860 they published a written account, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Running_a_Thousand_Miles_for_Freedom;_Or,_The_Escape_of_William_and_Ellen_Craft_from_Slavery&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1"><strong><em>Running a Thousand Miles for Freedom; Or, The Escape of William and Ellen Craft from Slavery</em></strong></a>. One of the most compelling of the many slave narratives published before the American Civil War, their book reached wide audiences in Great Britain and the United States. After their return to the US in 1868, the Crafts opened an agricultural school for freedman’s children in Georgia and worked the farm until 1890.<br><br></div><div><strong><br>Conclusion<br></strong><br></div><div>Thus there was far more to the abolitionist movement than just the more well-known William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass, and even more than just the heroic Truth and Tubman. Many black women (as well as white women, whom I will write about next month) helped make the abolitionist movement a success. Other black women contributed to the cause of equality in the 19<sup>th</sup> century as well. In a time when women were supposed to be quiet, submissive, and apolitical; when racial prejudice was rampant in the North as well as the South; these women dared to speak out. They should not be forgotten.<br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:13:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426314227</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Declaration on Sentiments</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426314889</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>The Declaration of Sentiments begins by asserting the equality of all men and women and <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reiterates">reiterates</a> that both genders are endowed with unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It argues that women are oppressed by the government and the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/patriarchy">patriarchal</a> society of which they are a part. The text then lists 16 facts illustrating the extent of this oppression, including the lack of women’s <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/suffrage">suffrage</a>, participation, and representation in the government; women’s lack of <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/property-law">property rights</a> in marriage; inequality in <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/divorce">divorce</a> law; and inequality in education and employment opportunities. The document insists that women be viewed as full citizens of the United States and be granted all the same rights and privileges that were granted to men.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:16:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426314889</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426315283</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><br>The Declaration of Sentiments<br></strong><br></div><blockquote><br>When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one portion of the family of man to assume among the people of the earth a position different from that which they have hitherto occupied, but one to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes that impel them to such a course.<br><br><br>We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer. while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the women under this government, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to demand the equal station to which they are entitled. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.<br><br><br>The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyrranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.<br><br><br>He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.<br><br><br>He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.<br><br><br>He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men--both natives and foreigners.<br><br><br>Having deprived her of this first right of a citizedn, the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.<br><br><br>He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.<br><br><br>He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.<br><br><br>He has made her, morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master--the law giving him power to deprive her of her liberty, and to administer chastisement.<br><br><br>He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes, and in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given, as to be wholly regardles of the happiness of women--the law, in all cases, going upon a flase supposition of the supremacy of man, and giving all power into his hands.<br><br><br>After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single, and the owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.<br><br><br>He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty remuneration. He closes against her all the avenues to wealth and distinction which he considers most homorable to himself. As a teacher of theoloy, medicine, or law, she is not known.<br><br><br>He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education, all colleges being closed against her.<br><br><br>He allows her in church, as well as state, but a suborinate position, claiming apostolic authority for her exclusion from the ministry, and, with some exceptions, from any public participation in the affairs of the church.<br><br><br>He has created a false public sentiment by giving to the world a different code of morals for men and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude women from society, are not only tolerated, but deemed of little account in man.<br><br><br>He has usurped the prerogative of Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of action, when that belongs to her conscience and to her God.<br><br><br>He has endeavored, in every way that he could, to destroy her conficence in her own powers, to lessen her self-respect, and to make her willing to lead a dependent and abject life.<br><br><br>Now, in view of this entire disfranchisement of one-half the people of this country, their social and religious degradation--in view of the unjust laws above mentioned, and because women do feel themselves aggrieved, oppressed, and fraudulently deprived of their most sacred rights, we insist that they have immediate admission to all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of the United States.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:18:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426315283</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> The Declaration of Sentiments</title>
         <author>milena_nikolic97</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426316067</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one portion of the family of man to assume among the people of the earth a position different from that which they have hitherto occupied, but one to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes that impel them to such a course.<br><br></div><div>We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly, all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves, by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the women under this government, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to demand the equal station to which they are entitled.<br><br></div><div>The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.<br><br></div><div>He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.<br><br></div><div>He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.<br><br></div><div>He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men - both natives and foreigners.<br><br></div><div>Having deprived her of this first right of a citizen, the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.<br><br></div><div>He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.<br><br></div><div>He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.<br><br></div><div>He has made her, morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes, with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master - the law giving him power to deprive her of her liberty, and to administer chastisement.<br><br></div><div>He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes of divorce; in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given, as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of women - the law, in all cases, going upon the false supposition of the supremacy of man, and giving all power into his hands.<br><br></div><div>After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single and the owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.<br><br></div><div>He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty remuneration.<br><br></div><div>He closes against her all the avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known.<br><br></div><div>He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education - all colleges being closed against her.<br><br></div><div>He allows her in Church as well as State, but a subordinate position, claiming Apostolic authority for her exclusion from the ministry, and with some exceptions, from any public participation in the affairs of the Church.<br><br></div><div>He has created a false public sentiment, by giving to the world a different code of morals for men and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude women from society, are not only tolerated but deemed of little account in man.<br><br></div><div>He has usurped the prerogative of Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of action, when that belongs to her conscience and her God.<br><br></div><div>He has endeavored, in every way that he could to destroy her confidence in her own powers, to lessen her self-respect, and to make her willing to lead a dependent and abject life.<br><br></div><div>Now, in view of this entire disfranchisement of one-half the people of this country, their social and religious degradation, - in view of the unjust laws above mentioned, and because women do feel themselves aggrieved, oppressed, and fraudulently deprived of their most sacred rights, we insist that they have immediate admission to all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of these United States.<br><br></div><div>In entering upon the great work before us, we anticipate no small amount of misconception, misrepresentation, and ridicule; but we shall use every instrumentality within our power to effect our object. We shall employ agents, circulate tracts, petition the State and national Legislatures, and endeavor to enlist the pulpit and the press in our behalf. We hope this Convention will be followed by a series of Conventions, embracing every part of the country.<br><br></div><div>Firmly relying upon the final triumph of the Right and the True, we do this day affix our signatures to this declaration.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 18:21:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426316067</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Revivalist preacher</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426340271</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It is a preacher who revives ideas, costumes, institutions etc of a religion.  In the 19th century in America many religions were revived and this new wave of renewed practices was called The Second Great Awakening. The preachers travelled on the horseback and shared the message to everyone they met.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 20:09:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426340271</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Impassioned forms of worship</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426342051</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Many revivalists abandoned formal worship which included a strictly determined pattern of rituals which were mostly performed in silence or while chanting prayers,  and adopted a more spontaneous way of worship which implied loud singing, dancing, exclamations,  hands-clapping, etc.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 20:18:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426342051</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Circuit rider</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426344904</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Circuit riders were preachers of the Methodist Episcopal Church who had a mission to spread their religion to specific territories and to convert the settlers and to organize congregation. They were quite successful.<br><br>The following is an illustration of a circuit rider by Edward Eggleston made in 1874.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/427243053/3486879de3d70dc0f330a9a790ca2c2e/Circuit_rider_illustration_Eggleston.png" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 20:33:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426344904</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Spiritual egalitarianism</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426347680</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This is a spiritual concept that all soul can be saved regardless of their position in the world, and that all people can achieve Heaven if they surrender to God. This idea was very well received by settlers.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 20:48:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426347680</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Strict celibacy</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426349581</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Is a religious lifestyle where the practitioner is abstinent from  sexual activities, thoughts and words as well as indulgence in sense gratification, like eating opulent foodstuff, listening to mundane music for enjoyment, dress attractively etc. Such celibacy was observed by Shakers. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 20:57:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426349581</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Transcendental Club </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426350975</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Transcendental Club (Hedge's club, initially called) was founded in 1836 by a small group of Harvard graduates.  Although without a framed religion or philosophy, they shared their views on spirituality. They believed that a person should develop their inner life which pertained to spiritual aspect of existence,  innate morality, respect of genuine instincts and emotions, reconnection to nature, and inspired action. They were influenced by British Romanticism, German Idealism and Eastern philosophies.  <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 21:05:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426350975</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Spread information</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426357341</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Transportation revolution spurred the communications revolution. Congress funded a telegraph line from Washington DC to Baltimore. The news now travelled much faster which was a great deal for many affairs going on in the States, as their reaction to distant event was now prompt.   </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 21:44:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426357341</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Specie Circular</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426358281</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Specie Circular is a United States presidential executive order issued by President Andrew Jackson in 1836 pursuant to the Coinage Act. It required payment for government land to be in gold and silver.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 21:49:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426358281</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bank Run</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426358514</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A bank run (also known as a run on the bank) occurs when many clients withdraw their money from a bank, because they believe the bank may cease to function in the near future.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 21:51:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426358514</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Panic of 1837</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426358875</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Panic of 1837 was a financial crisis in the United States that touched off a major recession that lasted until the mid-1840s. Profits, prices, and wages went down while unemployment went up. Pessimism abounded during the time. The panic had both domestic and foreign origins. Speculative lending practices in western states, a sharp decline in cotton prices, a collapsing land bubble, international specie flows, and restrictive lending policies in Great Britain were all to blame.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 21:53:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426358875</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Loose alliance</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426359303</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a union or association formed for mutual benefit, especially between countries or organizations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 21:56:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426359303</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Nullification Crisis</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426359626</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Nullification Crisis was a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–33, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government. It ensued after South Carolina declared that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and therefore null and void within the sovereign boundaries of the state.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 21:58:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426359626</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jim Crow</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426360528</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Jim Crow persona was a racist theatre character by Thomas D. Rice and an ethnic depiction in accordance with contemporary white ideas of African-Americans and their culture. The character was based on a folk trickster named Jim Crow that had long been popular among black slaves. Rice also adapted and popularized a traditional slave song called "Jump Jim Crow" (1828).</div><div><br></div><div>The character is dressed in rags and wears a battered hat and torn shoes. Rice blackened his face and hands using burnt cork and impersonated a very nimble and irreverently witty African American field hand who sang, "Come listen all you galls and boys, I'm going to sing a little song, my name is Jim Crow, weel about and turn about and do jis so, eb'ry time I weel about I jump Jim Crow.”</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:04:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426360528</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Female Anti-Slavery Society</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426360979</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society (PFASS) was founded in December 1833 and dissolved in March 1870 following the ratification of the 14th and 15th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:06:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426360979</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tidewater aristocrats </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361179</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>refers to very rich people who lived on a region called Tidewater or Coastal Plain. They owned tobacco plantations and become very wealthy by forcing imported slaves to work for them </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:07:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361179</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>pecuniary </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361295</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>relating to or consisting of money </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:08:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361295</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>dual effect </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361398</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>is a set of ethical criteria about permissibility of acting when one’s otherwise legitimate act may also cause an effect one would otherwise be obliged to avoid, promoted by Christian philosophers and some others.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:09:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361398</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>homespun clothing </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361865</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>clothes made from cloth that has been manufactured at home </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:11:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361865</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>monopoly </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361944</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the exclussive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:12:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426361944</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Intolerable Acts </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362073</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. They were ment to punish the Massachusetts colonists.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:12:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362073</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Continental Association </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362194</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a system for implementing a trade boycott with Great Britain by the First Continental Congress in 1774 </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:13:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362194</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>religious refuge</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362712</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>this is a place where religious people can practice their religious life (most often in a community) protected from  mundane world affairs.  William Penn  created one in his colony.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:16:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362712</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>embargo</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362943</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>an official ban on trade or other commercial activity with a particular country</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:18:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426362943</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>turn a profit</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363352</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>to obtain a profit from an investment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:21:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363352</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Religious freedom </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363491</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This is a human right to practise the  religion one wants without punishment from the government, or other repercussions.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:22:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363491</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The French Revolution</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363493</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The French Revolution was a period of far-reaching social and political upheaval in France and its colonies beginning in 1789. The Revolution overthrew the monarchy, established a republic, catalyzed violent periods of political turmoil, and finally culminated in a dictatorship under Napoleon who brought many of its principles to areas he conquered in Western Europe and beyond. Inspired by liberal and radical ideas, the Revolution profoundly altered the course of modern history, triggering the global decline of absolute monarchies while replacing them with republics and liberal democracies.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:22:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363493</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>embroil</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363680</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>involve (someone) deeply in an argument, conflict, or difficult situation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:23:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426363680</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>war hawk</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426364278</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A war hawk, or simply hawk, is a term used in politics for someone favoring war in a debate over whether to go to war, or whether to continue or escalate an existing war. War hawks are the opposite of doves. The terms are derived by analogy with the birds of the same name: hawks are predators that attack and eat other animals, whereas doves mostly eat seeds and fruit and are historically a symbol of peace.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:27:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426364278</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>the starving time</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426364499</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>refers to  time when early settlers of Jamestown almost died of poor health and hunger caused by frequent fights with natives , lack of food and winter. It lasted for a few months.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:29:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426364499</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Indian Confederacy</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426364605</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Tecumseh's Confederacy was a confederation of Native Americans in the Great Lakes region of the United States that began to form in the early 19th century around the teaching of Tenskwatawa (The Prophet). The confederation grew over several years and came to include several thousand warriors. Shawnee leader Tecumseh, the brother of The Prophet, developed into the leader of the group as early as 1808. Together, they worked to unite the various tribes against the American settlers coming across the Appalachian Mountains and onto their land. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:30:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426364605</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>USS Constitution</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426365023</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>USS Constitution, also known as Old Ironsides, is a wooden-hulled, three-masted heavy frigate of the United States Navy. She is the world's oldest commissioned naval vessel still afloat. She was launched in 1797, one of six original frigates authorized for construction by the Naval Act of 1794 and the third constructed.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:33:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426365023</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>indentured servants </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426365074</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>were young and poor English people who signed in England in order to work in Chesapeake colonies on tobacco plantations. They worked for a couple of years and received freedom dues which included food and other provisions, and in some cases a land. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:33:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426365074</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>HMS Guerriere</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426365130</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Guerrière was a 38-gun frigate of the French Navy, designed by Forfait. The British captured her and recommissioned her as HMS Guerriere. She is most famous for her fight against USS Constitution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:34:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426365130</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Star-Spangled Banner</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426366361</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem of the United States. The lyrics come from the Defence of Fort M'Henry, a poem written on September 14, 1814, by the then 35-year-old lawyer and amateur poet Francis Scott Key after witnessing the bombardment of Fort McHenry by British ships of the Royal Navy in Baltimore Harbor during the Battle of Baltimore in the War of 1812. Key was inspired by the large U.S. flag, with 15 stars and 15 stripes, known as the Star-Spangled Banner, flying triumphantly above the fort during the U.S. victory.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:38:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426366361</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>a peasant</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426366613</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a person coming from a rural region, usually land lass and jobless because of the transition from agriculture to live-stock raising.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:41:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426366613</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>a pagan </title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426367015</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>a word used for people who practise religion which in not prominent in a certain area. It usually referred to polytheism. In the beginning of colonialism of America, non-Christians were considered pagans.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:44:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426367015</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Treaty of Ghent</title>
         <author>t_blagojevic011</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426367209</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Treaty of Ghent was the peace treaty that ended the War of 1812 between the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Both sides signed it on December 24, 1814, in the city of Ghent, United Netherlands (now Belgium). The treaty restored relations between the two nations to status quo ante bellum, restoring the borders of the two countries to the lines before the war started in June 1812.</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:46:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426367209</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Promoters of English colonization in North America</title>
         <author>sanjannk</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426367889</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>People who hoped to gain something from colonization (like getting more profit from import and export of raw materials and goods, expansion of market, spread Protestantism), promoted advantages of life in America to those who lost land or job in England, even though they had never been to the New World themselves. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-20 22:51:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/danicabozovic777/y0tq101d6chb/wish/426367889</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
