Seven Laws of Teaching by Buhr, Scott

sbuhr7 — 2025-08-21 16:01:57 UTC

Sample Post

Breaking this law would look like....

2025-09-12 17:05:57 UTC

Breaking the law of not knowing the lesson correctly could look like if a student asked a question to the teacher in a math class and the teacher doesn't know how to correctly solve to find the answer but just reads out of the answer key the solution. Instead, the teacher should know how to solve for the answer.

rhiannavandyke — 2025-09-19 17:51:39 UTC

A way a teacher could break one of the laws is by not understanding your students well enough to know how they learn (because not every student learns the same way.). If you don't know their experiences, the way the apply things, and their senses, you will not be able to teach them in a way that they will thrive in their future classes.

lilyrands4 — 2025-09-22 01:21:26 UTC

Breaking the law of the language would look like teaching your students in words that they do not understand or do not know yet, and failing to explain the terms or language you are using.

2025-09-22 16:17:59 UTC

Breaking the law of the learning process could be when a teacher fails to go back and sufficiently review what he has taught. This could also be when a teacher does not require students to test their knowledge.

sydney324 — 2025-09-23 22:00:07 UTC

Breaking the Law of the Lesson would be when the teacher simply gives the information to the student rather than having the student think of how to remember it. A teacher is supposed to use the student's mind to think in the way desired, and this should be achieved by asking questions or by giving examples rather than by only stating a fact to be memorized.

2025-09-24 17:06:31 UTC

Breaking the second law of when a student should listen to the lesson with interest would look like a student sleeping in class. The lesson is being taught, but the student is not paying attention or showing any type of interest in the lesson. This is the learner's error and instead of sleeping, he should sit up and attend with interest the lesson that is being taught.

umanzorm — 2025-09-24 20:31:36 UTC

Breaking the Law of Lesson can be when a teacher skips reviewing prior knowledge, students often get lost. For example, if an Algebra teacher dives into solving quadratic equations without reminding students about basic multiplication and exponents, many will be unable to follow along. The connection between old and new knowledge is missing.

emmajoyc08 — 2025-09-26 14:42:51 UTC

One example of a teacher breaking the third law is when they do not study their lesson before hand and when it comes time for class they are frantically reading the book and trying to understand it. The students can notice that the teachers do not fully understand the content and it can make it more confusing for the students. John Milton Gregory says in his book, "Teaching, in its simplest sense, is the communication of knowledge." (Gregory 20) When a teacher does not understand the content of the lesson the knowledge cannot be transferred to the students.

2025-09-27 01:17:18 UTC

For breaking the law of language the teacher uses jargon or overly complex words that the students don’t understand, like using advanced scientific terms with elementary students. The words go “over their heads,” and communication fails

gracerobinson21 — 2025-09-28 02:29:32 UTC

Breaking the law of the unknown must be explained by the known could look like a teacher going over an unfamiliar term or concept without explaining it well, or going over unfamiliar things before more familiar things. The teacher should instead go over what's familiar, and then go over what's unfamiliar in the best way possible.

gracegray2 — 2025-09-29 00:31:08 UTC

Breaking a law of teaching could look like assuming student already know a concept and moving on to the next one. For example, if a student doesn’t know how to solve an equation like y = 2 + x, it may be more difficult to solve an equation like y = -3x -(-56). Breaking this law leads to confused students, low grades, and missing fundamental concepts.

agran416 — 2025-09-30 01:21:55 UTC

A situation where an educator breaks the law of the teacher is when they do not understand the material themselves. When the students ask questions, the teacher does not know the answer, contradicts himself, and confuses each student. The students then leave the class even more confused than before, which does not allow for proper learning. Students are not allowed to grasp the concept when this law is ignored.

2025-09-30 21:30:04 UTC

One way to break the Law of the Teaching process would be unnecessary memorization. This is when instead of teaching by helping your students draw connections between truths, you simply tell them something and expect them to remember. Anyone can tell students something, not everyone can teach. For example, in any kind of history class the teacher can take two very different approaches. The first approach is when the teacher just lists dates, events, and documents in a one sided way. In a way that does not cause the student to draw any conclusions about the significance of these facts about history. The second approach is when the teacher shares the dates, events, and documents. However in this approach the teacher asks questions that force a student to come to conclusions about the significance of the events. Overall, it is important to note the distinct difference recalling something and truly thinking about its applications.

2025-10-01 15:38:38 UTC

Breaking the law of the teacher would look something like this. You wake up and, that day you need to teach a lesson on World War 1, which you are not familiar with. So instead of preparing and studying to teach the lesson, you just go for it and you fill your student's brains with false ideas. Your students now think they know what it is but it is all incorrect information. Instead, the teacher must study their lessons thoroughly so they teach their students the correct things.

2025-10-01 20:09:12 UTC

For breaking the law of the learning process, I think that it could be an example of the teacher teaching material that they themselves don’t understand and they end up greatly relying on the textbook. Then testing the students on topics and questions from that material they don’t even fully understand themselves. This results in the teachers not being able to answer students questions accurately or with confidence. Some could also be upset and question why the student doesn’t know the answers when the teacher doesn’t know it themselves.

erdentel — 2025-10-01 20:31:55 UTC

One way to break the Law of Teaching Process would be a teacher who would just lecture all the time. This is breaking the law because there would be no student interaction, and the students would not have any interaction with the information. Therefore, they would not be able to grasp the topic as well because they would not be able to work with the information or ask questions.

2025-10-01 22:01:23 UTC

An example of breaking the law of teaching could be a teacher who simply tells her kindergarteners that 3+3=6 and doesn't take the time to lead their young minds to understand the "why" behind the fact. They need to understand that if you have three pieces of candy and put it with three other pieces of candy you now have six pieces. She needs to lead their minds to discover new truths and connect dots for themselves.

2025-10-02 03:53:00 UTC

An example of breaking a law of teaching would be if the teacher does not know the material to begin with. For example if they were teaching about long division and they were not confident in the material that will cause the students to be confused. Then they will not learn the material properly and will not learn the concept well.

2025-10-02 17:07:35 UTC

An example of breaking the law of the learner would be if a student was not involving himself in class. The student would break the law by rejecting any teaching given to him. If he does not attempt to show interest in the class, then he will inevitably learn nothing from the teacher. The student must be involved and interested for teaching and learning to work.

2025-10-02 17:19:52 UTC

A teacher could break this law if they never revisit old lectures and concepts. If they teach a lesson without any follow up like assigning homework or having a quiz or test it would also be breaking this law. One way you could carry out this law is by tying new concepts and lessons to other ones the students have already learned. This step is important because if a student does not remember what they learned there is no point in teaching them.

ltjones238 — 2025-10-02 17:33:59 UTC

II. Gain and keep the attention and interest of the pupils

upon the lesson. Refuse to teach without attention. (pg 24)

Breaking the Law of the teacher can be seen when the teacher says that they are just going to keep teaching, and if the students aren’t listening or paying attention, then the students are going to miss out on what they have to say. Yes, the students are responsible for paying attention to what the teacher has to say. However, the teacher also has a responsibility to retain that attention. Some students, especially younger children, struggle to focus for long periods of time, and the teacher should not ignore the lack of focus and attention in their classroom.

cartertopolewski — 2025-10-02 19:37:52 UTC

This would look like a teacher and a student having study time, and one speaking Latin while the other is speaking Swahili. This would break the law of having a common medium and having a common language between the pupil and the teacher.

paigedehaven — 2025-10-02 19:41:34 UTC

Breaking the law of not knowing the lesson or truth to be taught would look like a teacher giving the student the problem of 4+18-3=19, but the teacher not knowing this answer. A way to fix this would be to review and study the material given and to learn the lesson plans before handing out any problems.

remyallen — 2025-10-02 20:22:31 UTC

The law of the teacher is that before teaching a lesson or subject they must understand that subject themselves. An example of this rule being broken would be if I walked into my chemistry class and my teacher was very vague about the subject she was teaching. As a result I have questions because I don't understand what she is teaching, and she is unable to answer my questions. So, then she attempts to explain it and does so incorrectly leaving me with false knowledge. Ultimately, my teacher was confused about the material herself and was therefore unable to give understanding to me.

gracebutterfly893 — 2025-10-02 21:33:36 UTC

An example of breaking the law would be when a teacher uses complex language to appear more knowledgeable about the subject they are teaching. Not only does this make it difficult to understand simple concepts, but it may also deter students from pursuing the subject altogether.

ceshleman — 2025-10-02 23:47:43 UTC

According to The Law of the Teacher, teachers should be a good example to their students. Their actions in the classroom should always reflect a Biblical worldview. Besides parents, the teacher is the main role model for the children they are teaching. If an educator is upset or frustrated with a student, and puts them down with their words, they are breaking The Law of the Teacher. Teachers should be encouraging and patient with their students.

2025-10-03 00:36:11 UTC

One way a teacher could break one of the laws of teaching is by using complex language in the classroom. In order to be successful, a teacher needs to get down on the student's level. If that does not happen, the student will not be able to comprehend what is being taught and will therefore fail in his/her education. A teacher should be able to explain the concepts in clear, concise language so his/her pupils can excel in their studies.

bv2ds29gx8 — 2025-10-03 01:17:16 UTC

Breaking the law of the teacher could look like a couple of things. A few examples are when the teacher jumps into a lesson and has no idea what they are teaching without preparation, but expects the students to understand it. Without understanding it themselves. Another example could be when the teacher gets annoyed with the students so they just give up, and stop teaching the class because of that one student. The teacher should have patients with the student and students like how God is patient with us.

2025-10-03 01:35:57 UTC

Breaking the law of language would look like a teacher using big words a student does not understand. It is like a teacher using the word "bolstering" on a test and not explaining what the definition of it is. A teacher can explain terms in order to grow a student's vocabulary. Using confusing words can weaken a student's understanding.

2025-10-03 03:55:18 UTC

Breaking the law of the learner could be when you don't pay attention to your students and how each one of them learn. If you have half the class who really understands the material and then the other half who doesn't understand but you keep pushing it the same many will be overwhelmed. If you don't stop to make sure that everyone as a whole understands and not just a couple people, confusion can stir up. Without stopping to ensure that everyone is caught up and understands it can lead to students who are stressed about not knowing exactly what to do, bad grades, confusion, and maybe even comparison on how thinking they aren't as smart when really some people just need more time and explaining than others.

ihenz — 2025-10-03 13:40:36 UTC

An example of breaking a law of teaching could be a teacher who comes to class without really knowing the lesson, because they can’t explain the material clearly or make it interesting, this leaves the students confused and bored. To fix this, the teacher could prepare the lesson ahead of time, review the material, and plan activities or examples to make it easier and more fun for the students to understand.

nshen8 — 2025-10-03 14:12:18 UTC

Teacher don't assigned good activities that interested students, especially for young kids, they want to hear about fun things, not just boring knowledge point. For example, teachers just talk by themselves, with no chance to ask questions and interacts, this will make students feel bored really quickly, which breaks the law of the learner.

2025-10-03 18:07:20 UTC

To break the Law of the Learning process is simple: never review, revisit, or build off of previous lessons. Assume that when the student first learns of a concept, they will have all knowledge of that concept needed for the future. As an example, A biology teacher spends one class period discussing hormones. The subject is then never reviewed or connected to future discussions.

dgordon113 — 2025-10-03 18:30:15 UTC

Breaking the law of keeping the pupils interested would look like a teacher being boring and only reading straight from the notes. not keeping the pupils interested would look like in History class the teacher is reading straight from the book and being monotone.

2025-10-03 18:36:03 UTC

The way the teacher teaches can make it easier and more understandable for the learner who attends the class. If they don't enjoy the subject maybe they will enjoy it because of the way the teacher teaches the class. It will be more fun.

2025-10-03 18:51:00 UTC

Breaking the law of learning as a student can be like not changing your point of view when provided new info or ideas. Not listening to the lesson or lecture can also cause you to break this law and it can make you a very inconvincible person and hard to talk to.

2025-10-03 19:13:39 UTC

Mrs.xxxxxxx repeatedly ignores quieter or struggling students, only engaging with high-achievers. When a student named Jamal asks a question, she dismisses him, making him feel unvalued. As a result, he and others stop participating. This results in breaking the law of respecting students and making sure they feel valued, this isn't illegal but it is damaging to a students young mind.

2025-10-03 19:54:25 UTC

Teachers are the greatest influence in a students life. That is exactly why they should be well versed in a subject and know a substantial amount about the subject their teaching. An example of a teacher not following this rule is if a teacher was teaching a subject and they have no clue what the answer is to a question a student asked.

2025-10-04 00:52:53 UTC

Breaking the law of using words understood by both teacher and pupil in the same sense—language clear and vivid alike to both could result in chaos. Confusion in the classroom can easily start if the lesson taught or instructions given were unclear or spoken poorly. It is important to make sure that everything that comes out of a teacher's mouth is clear, spoken slowly, and with grace. Along those lines, a teacher needs to understand her students; for example, a high school teacher should not be giving instruction like she would to second graders. Overall, It's clear that speaking unclearly could bring a classroom down.

2025-10-04 04:33:29 UTC

an example of the first law being broken could be seen as the teacher not having properly prepared for the lesson thus leading to them not being able to teach it properly as well as not being able to clarify any questions their students might have.

2025-10-04 14:41:37 UTC

Breaking the law of not following Biblical principles in your classroom would be very detrimental for your students because they most likely will follow every action. If you use the wrong language and openly judge others your students will become like you and learn to not follow the key principles in the Bible. Teachers should be good examples and life Godly lives for everyone to follow.

2025-10-04 15:58:25 UTC

Breaking this law would look like using words and speech that is over the learner's comprehension level. For example, if a teacher would teach a first grade class using words at a twelfth grade level, the students would not understand or learn what the teacher is attempting to teach. The students would lose attention and fail to grasp the concepts.

2025-10-04 17:16:22 UTC

Breaking this law would look like teaching Algebra to a 3rd grader. You cannot explain Algebra without first explaining simple math concepts and then building on those concepts. If the unknown is not explained by the known, no learning can be done.

allisonbrubaker — 2025-10-04 17:43:04 UTC

Breaking the Law of Language could look like a teacher using large words that students are unfamiliar with. For example, if a teacher is explaining the Scientific method to 2nd graders and starts using words such as Analysis, Empirical Data, and Qualitative evidence, the teacher has broken this law. The teacher needs to use words that accurately convey what they need to address while also being understandable to the students. If teachers break this law, the students will not be able to digest the information and may lose interest in learning altogether.

ashleymoeller1 — 2025-10-04 18:00:31 UTC

Breaking the third law of teaching (teaching requires a knowledge of the subject and can be taught in many ways) may look something like this: A teacher has an opinion on a subject, but lacks the knowledge of it said topic. They continue to present their opinion of the topic to the class without any real evidence to support it and no presentation of fact. The teacher is therefore giving students information based on solely their views, rather than teaching a subject that they have an actual knowledge and study in. This would be misleading to the students and would be breaking the third law.

kayleneking — 2025-10-04 18:35:30 UTC

One way of breaking the law of teaching would be if a teacher did not fully know the material that they are in charged of teaching. This could look like a student asking questions about the material being taught and the teacher does not know how to properly answer. It could also look like not being well prepared when teaching a lesson. This often leads to confusion and less interesting lessons. Teachers should be well prepared and educated in what they are to teach so that a clear message comes across and good understanding happens in the classroom.

graciecallison — 2025-10-04 18:46:41 UTC

To break the law of the learning process is where the teacher could be teaching their students to believe everything they are learning. But the student is taking all this information that they are taught without critically thinking about it. The principle of learning is understanding, and how is a student going to learn without doing their part which is to ask reasonable questions and critically think about what is taught? This is also wrong because clearly in the law it states that "the learner must reproduce in his own mind the truth to be acquired". Meaning what the student is learning, they should be able to ask reasonable questions and critically think about the material and be able to understand it. Breaking this law creates an atmosphere in schools for students to have a habit of just doing everything and not learning anything. Which ultimately creates a society of people who do everything they are told rather than critically think about the decision.

nedfam7us — 2025-10-04 19:18:13 UTC

Breaking the Law of the Language

A high school physics teacher uses complex scientific jargon (“quantum entanglement,” “inertial reference frames”) without explaining it in simple terms. The students stare blankly and stop trying to understand.
→ This breaks the Law of the Language because the teacher and students don’t share a common vocabulary.

2025-10-04 19:31:34 UTC

Breaking the law of a learner not wanting to learn could look a teacher teaching with great enthusiasm and skill, but the student just falls asleep in class and gets poor grades because he is not interested in learning, and not willing to put any effort into his work

2025-10-04 19:35:07 UTC

Breaking the law of teaching material that does not build off of what a student has already learned will result in zero understanding of the material. It would be comparable to putting wheels on a vehicle that doesn't have an axle to put the wheels on.

2025-10-04 19:56:28 UTC

An example of breaking the law of Teaching would be if the teacher only knows some of the lesson. For instance, if they are teaching how to multiply by fractions, and they know how to multiply plain numbers but not fractions. This will confuse the students. Also, if the teacher does not know how to do the lesson that they are teaching, they will not be able to answer the students' questions or clearly explain to the students how to do a problem.

2025-10-04 20:22:57 UTC

Breaking the law of teaching would be like a teacher showing up to her class with no lesson plan, no notes of highlights or thoughts from her teacher copy textbook. Some just start reading off the textbook with no expression and sometimes no comprehension. Instead, a teacher should try to make lesson plans for the whole week and study the material of the class they are put to teach. Students, especially little kids, need to know the basics of the subject and how the basics applies to the lesson.

2025-10-04 20:30:19 UTC

Breaking the Law Of The Teaching Process would look like a teacher who does not take time to answer or ask questions. The students engage in what the teacher is expressing through asking good questions so as to make connections in their brains and fully understand what is being taught. The teacher also must ask students thought-provoking questions to challenge a student to use the brain God gave them to comprehend something new.

crichard63 — 2025-10-04 20:46:49 UTC

Breaking the sixth law would look like a student just copying what the teacher does, instead of actually understanding it and thinking through it on their own. If a student isn't thinking through the information, then if the situation that they will use that information is even slightly different than what they were taught, they won't be able to use it at all because they didn't think into what makes that information true.

2025-10-04 21:05:26 UTC

To beak the Law of the learning process is very common. For instance, I have a core subject teacher who will read information directly from the book and never re-visit it. She assumes we will remember what she has told (but not taught) us or that we will re-visit the information on our own. This causes confusion later on the test or when we learn a new topic built off of this, all because she had not taken the time to follow this rule and deepen it's impression on us.

2025-10-04 21:15:36 UTC

Breaking the rules of language can influence your students to learn words incorrectly or become confused. If you use uncommon words, it could make the students lose interest in the lesson. This could make communication with the student more difficult and could unmotivate them to learn.

2025-10-04 21:43:17 UTC

Imagine a high school science teacher who is assigned to teach a unit on electricity and magnetism but hasn’t studied the topic in years. Instead of reviewing the material ahead of time, the teacher relies solely on the textbook during class and often mispronounces terms or gives vague, inaccurate explanations when students ask questions. As a result, students become confused and frustrated, and their understanding of the subject remains shallow. In this situation, the teacher has broken the Law of the Teacher by not mastering the content before attempting to teach it.

lavellea1 — 2025-10-04 22:27:36 UTC

One way a teacher might break one of the “laws” of teaching is by not using language their students actually understand. For example, imagine a science teacher trying to explain photosynthesis but only using really complicated words like “photophosphorylation” and “chemosynthetic pathways.” The teacher keeps going on, thinking everyone is following along, but most of the class is totally lost. Some students might nod or pretend to get it because they don’t want to seem confused, but deep down they have no idea what’s going on. Since the teacher never stops to explain the terms in simpler words or check for understanding, the lesson becomes frustrating instead of helpful. This breaks the Law of the Language because the teacher and students aren’t really communicating. When that happens, the whole point of the lesson is lost — the students don’t learn, and the teacher doesn’t realize why.

maleaallgyer — 2025-10-04 23:05:17 UTC

Breaking the law as a learner could be simply the student not caring about his assignments. While the learner is doing their homework instead of figuring out the problems for himself or doing a little extra research the learner just uses ChatGPT.

2025-10-04 23:37:46 UTC

Breaking the law of the teacher would look like a teacher would look like a teacher standing in front of the class, giving information without understanding the students need, failing to guide them, and leaving them confused, bored,and unable to apply what they are learning

2025-10-04 23:39:22 UTC

An example of a teacher breaking a law of teaching would be said teacher going to teach without a lesson plan in advance. This would be wrong on so many levels since it robs the students of well, thought out education. It reduces the material they learn to a last minute lesson that has no thought put into it. It's extremely irresponsible on the teachers part. It'd be like the blind leading the blind. If you, as a teacher, have no idea what you're doing, neither will your students.

2025-10-05 00:04:49 UTC

Breaking the law of teaching would be knowing that your students learn a certain way but teach the opposite. Or using certain teaching methods that the students are not clearly learning from

annabelle138 — 2025-10-05 00:22:13 UTC

Breaking the law of language would look like skipping over (or not taking advantage of) any of the steps listed. For example, the medium of communication couldn't be utilized well, resulting in a student confused, not understanding the concept as aimed.

2025-10-05 00:24:11 UTC

If a teacher is trying to explain something to his elementary students, and he uses a confusing analogy or a five syllable word, then the students are going to be completely lost. They might miss the point of the lesson, or be unable to grasp the concept. A teacher should take into account the vocabulary and comprehension levels of the students and try his best to explain the lesson accordingly. For example, if a teacher is trying to explain that his sister always seems to be tired, but instead of using the word tired he calls her "lethargic", the students might have no idea what he means. They could think he is saying something rude, and go home and tell their parents that he said something horrible, when in reality he was explaining that she has an actual medical condition. He has broken the third law, which says that a teacher should use language that is understood by both parties: teacher and student. (Disclaimer: I have no idea how this condition works, and this is not meant to be offensive, I only chose it as an example.)

2026marissaoberholtzer — 2025-10-05 00:38:26 UTC

Breaking this could look like the teacher not knowing or understanding the content themselves but goes off of notes and lesson plans from previous teachers and the textbook, expecting the students to get enough out of it to complete homework and tests. Not only does this not help the students understand, but it ruins the experience for them because the teacher doesn't care enough themselves to learn the material they are teaching.

kierstenfrancis126 — 2025-10-05 00:52:05 UTC

Breaking the law of teaching would look similar to this: a teacher has a lesson on solving quadratic equations. Instead of doing their own studying, the teacher arrives to the lesson unprepared. On the fly, the teacher stumbles their way through the lesson, making contradictory statements and being unable to answer the student's questions. Not only will the student be confused because of the lack of confidence the teacher holds, but what the teacher did relay will more than likely be wrong. The student is now unprepared for other lessons in the future and any assessments that may be given. On the other hand, the teacher also will have not thoroughly done their job and made a fool of themself.

juliannabackoski — 2025-10-05 01:36:29 UTC

Breaking the law of teaching by a teacher who does not show interest in what they are teaching. Let's say that you are in a class with a teacher who is teaching math, and they just gave this long, confusing lecture about parabolas. Then he or she looks at you and goes ok, do your homework, or don't, this math doesn't really matter. Or say a student asks a question and the teacher gives the most basic answer and doesn't really explain. What are you going to think? I would think that if my teacher, who does this math, thinks it doesn't really matter why should I, I mean, it's confusing and I don't want to spend time trying to figure it out, so I might as well not do it.

this kind of teacher can lead students to fail in life. while this specific topic might not be the most relatable in real life it's still important to because it teaches a kid how to deal with difficult things. but if a teacher is disinterested in what they're doing, kids will be as well. Students are influenced by their teachers.

calipac22 — 2025-10-05 02:14:26 UTC

Breaking the law of "teaching" if using the definition used in the chapter which states, "Teaching ...is the communication of knowledge," would look like having a dishonest or confused teacher. They may be communicating the knowledge in a way that is misleading as well.

2025-10-05 03:00:20 UTC

If a teacher breaks the law of not knowing the lesson could look a lot of different ways. One way this could look is if the teacher dose not know the answers to your questions. Or if when they are is teaching they are just reading off there computer and they are not really making much sense. It shows that they are not really prepared and that can lead to less learning and growth in the classroom.

2025-10-05 03:06:59 UTC

One example of breaking one of the laws would be if the learner has no interest to learn. A teacher can tell the student of the subject but unless he takes it to heart he will not actually learn it. The learner should instead take an interest in the subject to fully learn and understand it. As the teacher teaches it is the learners choice to “break” the law and not be in tune to the lesson or he could listen and fully learn the subject.

2025-10-05 03:11:07 UTC

Breaking the law of the teacher could look like not assigning or specifying that there is homework, then expecting the students to have read your mind and have it completed the next day. Yes, a student is expected to have their work completed, but a teacher is also expected to explain the assignment to said student so they can understand it and complete it properly.

2025-10-05 03:17:59 UTC

Breaking the law of the teaching process would cause many things to happen. The main thing that would happen is that the students would become very confused because they would have a hard time following the what the teacher is trying to say.

2025-10-05 03:21:06 UTC

For a teacher to breaking the law of instructions, it would be just them giving to hard to comprehend instructions. This would mean telling them to write their name if they were kindergarteners, but they did not know how to yet, because they didn't learn all their letters.

2025-10-05 03:47:48 UTC

A student breaking the law where a student must be interested could look like when a student is not giving a single care about what is being taught. The student is talking with his friends, being disruptive during class, and is giving the teacher attitude when the teacher tries to correct him. Some of the other students around him think he is being a nuisance, while others don't really care. The teacher after class gives him demerits. But this student has received too many to count, and doesn't really care. He doesn't care about school because he doesn't see school as important and believes it to be a waste of time. To fix this, the student needs to be disciplined in a way that will get him to think about his actions. Or he needs to realize the value of school and what it can truly offer him

2025-10-05 03:58:28 UTC

A teacher could break the second law of teaching by beginning a lesson with a classroom that is not focused yet, or by simply not giving an effort to control the class' attention. Even if some of the students are paying attention, if the teacher does not at least give the rest of the class a chance to refocus, they will have broken this law of teaching.

2025-10-05 04:15:32 UTC

Breaking the law of the language could look something like teaching a chemistry lesson to an Algebra 2 class. The words and definitions will probably go right over their heads, and they probably won't understand anything you are saying, therefore making your teaching pointless.

2025-10-07 02:45:12 UTC

An example of breaking the law teaching could be a teacher explaining a lesson with no concept of specifically how they will be explaining it. One morning as they review, he shows a different way to solve the problem then the other morning. The teacher is struggling to be consistent and the students soon become confused because many different problem-solving ways have been used.

2025-10-07 04:26:08 UTC

An example of the first law being broken is when the students ask the teacher a question, but the teachers does not know how to respond because they did not study ahead. The student may begin to wonder why this is even important because the teacher didn't take the the time to learn about the subject their teaching.

2025-10-07 13:18:39 UTC

breaking the law of teaching would be like a teacher going into class not prepared at all for the lessons for the day. And not sure how to teach the material for that day in a good accurate, orderly way. The teacher should go into class with prepared lesson plans and ready to answer any questions the kids may have.

sophiakaufman1 — 2025-10-07 15:09:39 UTC

Breaking the Law of the Teacher could look like not putting in effort to the things you are teaching, not trying to understand what teaching methods your students need, and not communicating effectively. It is crucial for teachers to consistently do their part to help students while teaching, reviewing work, and answering questions.

A situation that happened to me in a class is not building rapport with students. The only thing that the teacher did was read off the board so we can take notes. The teacher knew what he was teaching, but didn’t truly understand what we needed to fully succeed.

masonstoltzfus — 2025-10-08 23:40:40 UTC

breaking the law of the learning process would be when a lesson is taught, and not reviewed. Our brains create pathways by repeatedly doing something, and the same is true about learning. If the material is not reviewed properly, the students will most likely forget it. It is the teachers responcibility to make sure the material is being reviewed so it is not forgotten.

2025-10-09 04:06:42 UTC

Breaking the law of review and application would defeat the entire purpose of learning things in the first place. Though I do feel that students shouldn't believe that grades are life or death, if nothing gets tested, the teacher cannot fully know that the students retained what they were taught. With the knowledge of an upcoming test, they would be more inclined to pay attention and earn the material. This also helps prepare them for real life application.

2025-11-07 16:32:20 UTC

The teacher is to have a plan of study, but needs to study beyond the plan. This means that the teacher needs to engage beyond their curriculum. By poorly planning a teacher is breaking this rule.

2025-12-18 18:07:15 UTC

breaking the laws of teaching would be if a teacher should up to his without a lesson planned and so he made the students to random work because he had nothing planned