The attendance in risky activities cannot ensure the safety and other serious wound on sportspeople health. To be more specific, both professional and amateur athletes must deal with unpreventable occupational accidences as these unwelcomed risks can come even if it just an insignificant mistake during the contest. For instance, Formula 1 – a well-known car racing championship, appears many clashes a year, which causes physical injuries or paralysis. This circumstance directly implies that prohibit dangerous activities can prevent acute results of crashing and heath problems for risky sport enthusiasts.

People indulge themselves in participating extreme sporting events not only self-creating their own high-risk problems together with life-threatening but also make an argumentative atmosphere between the contestants. In other words, extreme sports like racing, boxing, rugby… commonly sports contain antagonistic contradiction, sometimes also effect the viewers. For example, in Russia, there has been a kickboxing match between two Russians, after competing violently, one lost his life right at the ring. It suggests that governments should create the enactment stringently to prevent the undesirable upcoming results.

In recapitulation, although it would be humanity to let the hazardous sport enthusiasts doing what they are desire. Athletes’ health and life rank first in the order of importance. Therefore, the freedom of engaging in dangerous sports should be kept moderately and prohibited if necessary. 

  Although extreme sports are sometimes risky, such sports should not be banned as they offer great benefits to the participants. As today's dangerous sports organizations and sponsors become increasingly meticulous about their procedures and protective equipment, it should be ensured that individuals are safe while participating in these activities. Thus, players will have the opportunity to satisfy these interests after being stressed by the pressure at work and have the enjoyable experience of playing stimulating games such as extreme sports. Moreover, such extreme sports are often enjoyed by audiences of all ages as they can get the ultimate excitement from watching the show, so athletes can also have a lot of fun. much fame and wealth. Equally important, citizens have the right to do whatever they want, and that should be respected, not prohibited by law.

 These types of sports tend to pose various issues regarding the safety of the players as they can be seriously injured or even killed. For example, a broken bone deprives them of essential activities that can be detrimental to their daily lives. Besides, collapsing while participating in extreme sports can activate plant life for athletes and the recovery rate is very low. Furthermore, some dangerous sports, such as boxing, mixed martial arts, mostly exhibit violence. As a result, spectators of these sports, especially teenagers, may be encouraged to have aggressive thoughts or improper behaviors in their lives.

  In conclusion, I reckon that with the development of equipment and extreme sports today, people can comfortably play dangerous sports without worrying about their drawbacks.

 

Undoubtedly, practicing extreme sports will make citizens feel full of energy, freedom, and power as the adrenaline generated when people exercise these activities. Simply put, dangerous sports help push citizens' limits, get rid of fear, and reach new goals. Therefore, a considerable way to get to know oneself better and to achieve liberty.

Without proper management, it can be easy to ensure the safety and life of the participants. It means extreme sports have higher rates of injury than most traditional sports owing to their dangerous nature, environmental element, and lack of access to medical care. As follows, a traumatic injury and blood loss are habitually the cause of death such as climbing, skiing, mountain biking. On top of that, banning people from participating in extreme sports seems very hard, so restricting some extreme sports and expanding protection measures for participants is a top priority. It implies that paying closer attention to safety way is certainly reduce the accident rate. 

In conclusion, any sport has its pros and cons, but extreme sports have the potential to have unpredictable consequences if not properly monitored and managed. That is why I believe that limited control is not only the concept to balance the sportspeople's freedom but also ensure their lives while participating in these activities.

 Hazardous sports has a high chance of serious injury or death because they often have a high level of difficulty and challenge. No matter how modern the device is, no matter how experienced the player is, nothing is certain. Anything can happen in life. There are many cases of players being seriously injured or even killed by adventure games. An instance of this is bungee jump. A Polish tourist participated in this game at a height of 100m. He scarcely jumped down when the rope suddenly slipped. Fortunately he survived, but he suffered severe injuries to his neck and internal organs.

 Many extreme sports such as boxing represent violence. Violent sports can affect the thoughts and actions of players and spectators. Currently, boxing is often shown directly on TV, both adults and children can watch it. So the most negative impact will probably be on the intelligence and perception of children. It encourage aggressive thoughts and behaviours of viewers, especially adolescent. 

In recapitulation, although people have human rights, 
the government should still abolish some risky games to ensure the safety of the people.

There have been divergent opinions revolving around the permission of risky sports. Governors and sportspeople have argued about whether such activities shall be prohibited, or they should permit every athletic. Although the ban helps to avoid severe permanent injuries, people can amuse better if it were to be free open-wide. I am in accord with the former view.

Undoubtedly, having the autonomy to participate in hazardous sports makes players fulfill their happiness. Many researchers show that while doing adventurous activities, the brain would release a huge of dopamine chemicals, which relieve stress and trigger mental ecstasy. A salient example is that climbers from challenge themselves will enjoy the invigorating experience of standing on top of a mountain peak. Besides, extreme sports are favored by spectators at various ages as they get ultimate excitement when watching the shows, so athletes also have amusement and fame.

Without the authority’s careful censorship, athletes’ safety would not be improved. It is appearances that extreme sports enthusiasts are more likely to be vulnerable than players of ordinary sports, owing to dangerous nature, environmental elements, and lack of medical care. A mountain climber, for instance, is always prone to fatal falls even with the protection of climbing equipment. On top of that, completely prohibiting people from taking part in dangerous sports seems infeasible, so restricting extreme sports is the first preference to reduce the accident rate.

In recapitulation, although dangerous sports offer enjoyment to both athletes and audiences, it is undeniable that sportspeople have to be faced with ample unpredictable consequences to their health, which is always the top priority in life if they are not supervised. Therefore, restraining these sports is the only way to balance players’ freedom and also minimize at least the undesirable upcoming results.

Those in support of the freedom of choice indicate that people can amuse better if dangerous sports were to be open-wide. Intrinsically, in some people's perspective, applying themselves to a heavy body workout is the best way to de-stress after an intense day working. Options for personal activities depend on each person, and undeniably, the most appropriate and suitable choice would maximize their entertainment. To put it simply, freedom of choice provides them with varied selections in sports and activities, which in turn push their amusement to the peak. 

On the other hand, the imposition of a prohibition on perilous sports would prevent irreversible injuries. To illustrate, in some cases, it is not the carelessness or amateurism but the malfunction of facilities that engenders injuries, or even fatalities. Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania have figured out that up to 90% of sportsperson imperil their lives by being conservatively absorbing themselves in dangerous sports that bring them precarious happiness. That explains why introducing a ban from authorities would minimize the rate of permanent injuries. 

To recapitulate, people have every reason to maintain the legalization of sportsperson like justified freedom of choice every people deserve. Despite this, I still support the opinion of phasing out perilous sports since it is more advantageous in terms of injuries prevention, and it literally aims for the long-run betterment.