<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>3C: Critical Response on Social Media &#39;Slacktivism&#39;&#39; by Manjusri Secondary</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/best_of_mjr/xuwcr5g4wjn047r3</link>
      <description>In order for you to critically review the article in a body paragraph, 
1. Pick out a salient point in the article, and describe it. 
2. Do you agree or disagree with it, and why? You may also evaluate the idea using the questions on page 19, under Reflection. </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-02-03 01:19:45 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-04-24 09:46:57 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mrs Heng</title>
         <author>best_of_mjr</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/best_of_mjr/xuwcr5g4wjn047r3/wish/2026569934</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sample of Critical Response<br><br>What I had hoped to see in The Social Dilemma was a sober, evidence-based dissection of these complex realities (<strong>EVALUATION</strong>). I was disappointed when <strong><mark>the film instead advanced a narrative that depicted social media, YouTube, Google and so many other tech platforms, tools, and companies as mind-controlling monoliths that are "hijacking" our brains, leaving us to do what they want with no resistance (Descriptions).</mark></strong> I was also dismayed to see disregard for research that would have challenged its conclusions. Above all, I was alarmed that the film did nothing to inform its viewers what they could do to solve the problems it&nbsp; showcases (EVALUATION).&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-02-03 01:19:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/best_of_mjr/xuwcr5g4wjn047r3/wish/2026569934</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
