https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n en-us 2021-11-22 15:05:16 UTC 2025-10-04 02:02:15 UTC hello@padlet.com mccater https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1906351874 This topic interests me because it is a big question that will effect our country greatly. I know that many pick a side on this topic and stick to it no matter what happens. The two sides in this situation are; we should keep our second amendment to bear arms or, we should take away the second amendment. Both sides having justification for their beliefs. I have more of neutral view on this topic however, I tend to agree more with keeping the second amendment.]]> 2021-11-22 15:15:58 UTC https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1906351874 mccater https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1908601631 This source is heavily biased towards the right side. This source wants self defense to be more protected under the constitution opposed to how you need to fight in court for the right to it. This source wants to persuade you to keep gun laws the way they are and to make it easier to fight a self defense case in court. This source also promotes the red side of the argument making it a very clear bias.]]> 2021-11-23 14:50:21 UTC https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1908601631 mccater https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1908622721 This source is rated center from the all sides websites and I agree with this. It only states facts with nothing opinion related. However, the title is a little weird for an unbiased article. This article quotes Kyle many times, mostly things that he said to news casters. It also states a fact about a shooting of an armed black man. I feel like without saying it, the article has the agenda of conveying that the case is about race without saying it directly.]]> 2021-11-23 14:59:08 UTC https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1908622721 mccater https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1908648673 This source is heavily biased to the left side as stated by all sides media. This article is mostly focused on the dangers of 400 millions guns circulating in the US and how relaxed the gun laws are. The main point they want to get across is that gun laws must be more strict. They also talk about how nothing will get done due to the republican Supreme Court appointed by Trump. This article conveys that they want to lower the amount of guns bought, increase background checks and doing these two will decrease shooting and specifically homicide rates.]]> 2021-11-23 15:09:49 UTC https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1908648673 mccater https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1920773912 2021-11-30 16:04:03 UTC https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1920773912 mccater https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1920813283 After researching gun control, I think that it is very important that people care about this topic. This topic will affect you now and your future. The articles that I read had two solutions coming from the right and left sides. The right side wants to leave gun laws the way they are stating things such as "when there's a will there's a way”. They believe that if someone wants a gun they will get it regardless of the legality so it is better to have more people with guns to protect against them. The left side offers the solution of restricting access to guns, meaning more background checks and mental health evaluations before buying guns. I see both of these solutions as good but they could be better. I think a combination of the two would work best. I believe that they should do more mental health and background checks before allowing gun purchases, however, they should still keep guns assessable to those who want them by legal means. This would hopefully appease both sides allowing for the best conclusion to this problem.]]> 2021-11-30 16:19:06 UTC https://padlet.com/mccater/xtliuxwbgkqoti2n/wish/1920813283