https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl Made with no regrets, whatsoever en-us 2016-11-04 13:23:22 UTC 2016-11-04 14:02:20 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363897 2016-11-04 13:25:05 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363897 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363938 Yes, we should have a DNA database in the U.S., because
in just North Carolina alone, CODIS has been able to aid in 3,072 cases. In the entire country, CODIS has been able to assist in 332,776 investigations. If the U.S. had everyone's DNA, then it would be even easier for CODIS to help with investigations.
https://www.fbi.gov/services/laboratory/biometric-analysis/codis/ndis-statistics]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:11 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363938 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363987 Yes we need a genetic database. The way we test people to see if they are guilty or not is unfair, minorities are over represented and creates an anti-police feeling between them. 2/5 blacks have their DNA on record, as in 1/10 whites have DNA on record.
http://www.theweek.co.uk/uk-news/35669/pros-and-cons-compulsory-dna-database]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:18 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363987 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363994 Yes, I believe using a database to find a DNA profile match helps to identify a suspect in 41.6% of cases in the UK, where the outcome was counted by the police, followed by a match on the NDNAD, therefore it could help improve the correct matches for crime in the United States. ]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:19 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135363994 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364039 Yes, there should be a national DNA database. If everyone is added, using enhance kinship analysis the database will help identify missing persons. CODIS will become very advanced to do things like this.

https://www.fbi.gov/services/laboratory/biometric-analysis/codis]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:24 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364039 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364044 In my opinion, i believe we shouldn't have a national DNA database, Because there isn't enough evidence that supports there were more crimes to be solved, and identities could be stolen. http://www.yourgenome.org/debates/is-it-ethical-to-have-a-national-dna-database]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:24 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364044 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364047 Yes, the National DNA Index System(NDIS) has over 12 million offender profiles and has aided in over 330,000 cases.  If we had everyone's DNA to check against it would make identifying a Criminals DNA so much easier
https://www.fbi.gov/services/laboratory/biometric-analysis/codis/ndis-statistics]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:25 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364047 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364103 No, we should not have a data base. Because jobs that we apply for, would and be determind by our genes and DNA not our skill or knowledge. It would take a lot of our privacy away. It would also be very costly, and take a lot of time just to collect everyones DNA.
Facts-
United Kingdom took more than 10 years to complete the data base

Many people in the United Kingdom get wrongfully accused due to there DNA being made a suspect
http://dnapolicyinitiative.org/]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:32 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364103 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364184 Yes, we should have a national DNA database because 10,000 people are wrongly convicted per year. Having a database would lead to less misidentification and we could easily test DNA from crimes. There could be restrictions on how this database is used, that way it does not interfere with jobs and privacy.
http://dnapolicyinitiative.org/on-dna-prosecutors-cant-handle-the-truth/
https://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/ronhuff.htm]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:41 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364184 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364203 estimations show that 2 to 10 percent of rape cases are falsely accused because of inaccurate dna tests and never tested rape kits. the "making a difference" project proved 7 percent of rape cases were falsely accused . with the help of proper DNA testing this can put the "making a difference" project into use and solve more falsely accused rape cases and get the real suspects into the place they belong.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/09/the-truth-about-a-viral-graphic-on-rape-statistics/]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:44 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364203 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364240 no, we shouldn't have a DNA database because when the UK protections of freedoms bill tried to enforce the states duty to protect individual's right to privacy, however that caused 1,766,000 DNA profiles taken from innocent adults anatabase,  as well as 1,672,000 fingerprint records.]]> 2016-11-04 13:25:48 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364240 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364382 Yes, I believe that we should have a national data base that holds everyone's DNA so that no innocent person would be convicted as a felony because of misidentification. If we have everyone DNA we wont have to worry as much about misidentification. 1 in 4 strangers eyewitness identifications are wrong. This is due to the human memory tends to reconstruct incidents because humans do not have the capability to remember everything, another reason is that most witnesses tend to focus on a or the weapon and not the person doing the crime.
http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/pageDocuments/EKJ6C2KFBT.pdf
http://dnapolicyinitiative.org/resources/forensic-dna-databases/https://californiainnocenceproject.org/issues-we-face/eyewitness-identification/

]]> 2016-11-04 13:26:05 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364382 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364438 Yes, I think we should have a DNA database because not only would it  help solve more crimes but it would also discharge innocent people who have been wrongly convicted.
Source:
http://scienceandtechlaw.org/concerns-associated-with-expanding-dna-databases/]]> 2016-11-04 13:26:12 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364438 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364716 No, we should not have a DNA database because when taking DNA from a crime scene, you could find blood from a person who has been there before the crime was committed and that be the only blood you find and then send an innocent person to jail, and laboratory contamination is a possible thing to happen when looking at people's DNA. If someone inside the government work force was corrupt and was into some bad things could illegally sell other people's DNA to even more bad people.
http://www.theweek.co.uk/uk-news/35669/pros-and-cons-compulsory-dna-database
http://dnapolicyinitiative.org/resources/talking-points-2/]]> 2016-11-04 13:26:48 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135364716 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135365789 yes, In the UK the have started doing this and they have found this effective in crime rates, they say it is 60% more effective to find the suspect. http://www.yourgenome.org/debates/is-it-ethical-to-have-a-national-dna-database]]> 2016-11-04 13:28:58 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135365789 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135367985 i think we should have a DNA data base because we can track people if they do crimes or if they go missing. http://dnapolicyinitiative.org/resources/dna-databases-and-human-rights/]]> 2016-11-04 13:33:55 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135367985 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135371399 2016-11-04 13:41:35 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135371399 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135376860 Yes. In the UK, between 1st April 2013 and 30th June 2013 the National DNA Database produced 37 matches to murder, 103 to rape, and 6,141 to other crime scenes such as car theft and burglary. This is proof that the DNA database makes solving crime much easier.

http://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-the-uk-national-dna-database

]]> 2016-11-04 13:53:15 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135376860 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135376865 The main function of a forensic DNA database is to find matches for crime scene stains. DNA is a string of numbers that can be stored in a computer database. If there is a group of known suspects for the crime a DNA database it can help figure out who did the crime.  http://dnapolicyinitiative.org/resources/dna-databases-and-human-rights/]]> 2016-11-04 13:53:16 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135376865 https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135378128 Yes we should have a national database because the UK has one and it has helped them by far. The information derived from each profile can be a powerful tool in the fight against crime. They can use this DNA information as evidence for demonstrating if an individual is guilty of a crime. It has a 60% success rate of helping to see if someone is guilty or not. It has put many rapist, murderess, and criminals in jail, even if they are not of the state the committed the crime in.
http://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-the-uk-national-dna-database]]> 2016-11-04 13:56:24 UTC https://padlet.com/alaine_miller1/xsevauseerpl/wish/135378128