<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>FA3 Standardisation by Usic</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-02-01 11:45:42 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-02-01 14:53:28 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>usictech</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464444343</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Example A</strong><br><br><strong>Part A</strong><br>Headings<br><br>Sources<br><br>Notes<br><br>Gap<br><br><strong>Part B</strong><br>Intro&nbsp;<br><br>Structure<br><br>Sources&nbsp;<br><br>Voice</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-01 11:52:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464444343</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>usictech</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464444453</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Example A</strong><br><br><strong>Part A</strong><br>Headings<br><br>Sources<br><br>Notes<br><br>Gap<br><br><strong>Part B</strong><br>Intro&nbsp;<br><br>Structure<br><br>Sources&nbsp;<br><br>Voice</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-01 11:52:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464444453</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>usictech</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464444571</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Example A - generally a 3.</strong><br><br><strong>Part A</strong><br>Headings<br>Subheadings were vague - factors? - and long and complex/ messy.&nbsp; Not general to specific.&nbsp; Perceptions is irrelevant and too specific at end.&nbsp; Audit quality is not mentioned and it doesn't have a logic overall progression.&nbsp; 1 - Amber 2. -2<br><br>Sources<br>4 - good selection / more may be needed when the headings are developed. <br><br>Notes<br>Well-focussed but a couple of points may be overlooked or not focussed enough.&nbsp; -3 <br>More strong support or details from research (setting)<br>5 - 2<br>6 - 3<br>7 - 3<br><br>Gap<br>The could phrased more clearly gap - may need some revision when writing the final section has been written. Will need citations.&nbsp; -3<br><br><strong>Part B</strong><br>Intro&nbsp;<br>Too brief, unclear scope.&nbsp; Outline doesn't match part A -2.<br>Structure<br>10 - 3 more focus needed<br>11 - 2 lacks clarity&nbsp;<br><br>Sources&nbsp;<br>12: Support used but synthesis is poor - more linking needed. -3<br><br><br>Voice<br>13 - No interpretation 1<br>14 - Basic geographical critique and unclear mention of sample size but critique at least attempted.&nbsp; -2<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-01 11:52:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464444571</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>usictech</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464445387</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Example B</strong><br><br><strong>Part A</strong><br>Headings<br><br>Sources<br><br>Notes<br><br>Gap<br><br><strong>Part B</strong><br>Intro&nbsp;<br><br>Structure<br><br>Sources&nbsp;<br><br>Voice</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-01 11:53:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464445387</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>usictech</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464446706</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Example B - high 1</strong><br><br><strong>Part A</strong><br>Headings<br>Too general and descriptive / essay-like with the wrong structure (overview is the most general).&nbsp; Subheadings too long and one <br>2 for both criteria.<br><br>Sources<br>only 5 sources - 1.&nbsp; <br><br>Notes<br>4 - unfocussed, general descriptive 2<br>5 - same topic throughout / poor 2<br>6 - inappropriate support<br>7 1 - some headings have one or no citations<br>Cut and paste <br><br>Gap<br>1 - no gap<br><br><strong>Part B</strong><br>Intro&nbsp;<br>1 - where is the research?<br><br>Structure<br>10 - 1 no focus<br>11- mostly digression -1 <br>12 - Hint of synthesis in the last paragraph but links needed.&nbsp; Support not in Part A so impossible to evaluate the support.&nbsp;-2<br><br><br>Sources&nbsp;<br>13 - no interpretation<br>14 - no critical comment<br>Voice</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-01 11:54:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/xhg9cpk7t5oucfwq/wish/2464446706</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
