<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>My Ethical Wall by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux</link>
      <description>Made by Keisler and Hunter</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-11-16 14:03:28 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-11-19 14:35:50 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>To what extent should the arts have a moral function?</title>
         <author>hkthompso104</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207670231</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/07/graham-ovenden-art" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 14:21:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207670231</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Are scientists morally responsible for how their discoveries are used?</title>
         <author>klcotting412</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207672558</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/apr/05/einstein-equation-emc2-special-relativity-alok-jha" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 14:24:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207672558</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>To what extent should the arts have a moral function?</title>
         <author>hkthompso104</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207674993</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the article we found, it said that art should not be censored because it is unethical. There was a cartoon that had 8 frames but 3 of them were censored because of unethical ideals such as incest, abuse, and sexual experimentation. In my opinion, there are ideals that I do not agree with, but they should not be censored. Art is a way to express yourself personally and if we choose to censor certain things it will set a precedent for censorship in the future.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 14:28:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207674993</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Are scientists morally responsible for how their discoveries are used?</title>
         <author>klcotting412</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207675018</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the article, it talks about Einstein and his discovery of the E=mc^2 equation. This equation was later used to make the atomic bomb that killed many people. The debate is whether Einstein should be held responsible for the damages and losses that his discovery caused. In my opinion, Einstein should not be held responsible for the destruction his discovery caused. I feel that he never meant for what he made to be used for bad, but other people turned it into something bad. If people were to not invent something because something bad might come out of it, then they're limiting the good and successful things that could happen as well.&nbsp;So, if scientist were always scared for what bad their discoveries could bring, then we wouldn't have any new discoveries in the world because there is always a way to use something in a bad way.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 14:28:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hkthompso104/xgufgnvdxnux/wish/207675018</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
