Period 4-Vaccine SOAPSTone by https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w en-us 2021-01-28 19:49:52 UTC 2021-02-02 03:49:35 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f489.png Take a moment to compare and contrast the articles. jocelyn_barrera https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1138349622 Reflect on your findings in the SOAPSTone activity.

What major differences did you notice between the articles?
What made you consider that one source might have been more reliable than the other?
What perspectives or biases did you find from each article? How did you determine this?
Why does it matter if fake news stories are shared more than legitimate or reliable ones?
What are the dangers of sharing fake information?

Once you have taken the time to compare and contrast the articles, also take a moment to respond to 2 or more of your peers by commenting on what they had to say. Remember, be respectful and foster conversation! :D]]> 2021-01-28 19:49:52 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1138349622 510696 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1142224845 The first article didn't look very neat and kept going on about the military and saying things that they couldn't possibly know about a vaccine that had not yet been created yet. The author was writing about something outside of his field and was very conspiracy like. The second article was published after the vaccine was made, was much cleaner and aimed to clear any uncertainties people might have about the vaccine. Unlike the first this article had two speakers that were experts in the field of medicine and health. If fake news like the first article is shared then people could get hurt, say if someone wrote that the vaccine wasn't real and I believed it and disregarded the quarantine I could hurt my friends, family and myself.]]> 2021-01-29 19:33:52 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1142224845 https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1142605187 The first article talks about the COVID vaccine but I'm realizing the date it was published and think there´s no way they had all that information about Covid if not they would have a vaccine a long time ago. we don´t even have a vaccine yet and there talking about all this information about there´s no way.  If the first article were somehow to be real there would be a mess with all the fake information, different with article 2 we can believe more information about what it's telling us because of the date it was written and the type of information about the vaccine and also how it can make a copy of covid in our immune system and fight once u get it again so overall the major difference I found was the first article was full of lies. and last difference was that the first guy talking in the first article was a random person and in the second article it was 2 experts explaining Covid-19. - David Garcia


]]> 2021-01-29 21:39:14 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1142605187 Sharing false information in an article I think is a very dangerous and unfair thing to do. By doing this you can make someone fall for believing your opinion instead of actual facts and can lead into a never ending cycle of people believing false information. I wouldn't want to think that I am being told the truth when reading an article and find out they are lying to me. I could be putting myself in danger without even knowing it. In the two articles I read I realized one articl;e was more reliable than the other by paying attention to the dates the articles were published in. The article by health ranger was published on May 13 of 2020, at that time the COVID-19 vaccine was not out to the public. How can I know for sure that the information they are providing me is true when the vaccine isn't out yet. On the other hand the other article that featured Gabor David Kelen M.D who is director of the Johns Hopkins Office of critical event Preparedness and Responses, and Lisa Lockered Maragakis M.D, M.P.H. who is senior director of the Infection prevention was published on January 13 of 2021 which means the COVID-19 vaccine has already been out for the public to use. Which means they have information on the vaccine on how it works and it's reactions to others. - Genevieve Cruz https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1151744591 2021-02-02 03:48:55 UTC https://padlet.com/jocelyn_barrera/x4x37vdokyzov85w/wish/1151744591