<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Neoliberalism, Collegiality, and Authenticity: A discursive keynote about GAI by Dr Linda Amrane-Cooper</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-03-11 10:41:13 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-03-14 10:57:28 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Neoliberalism and Labour</title>
         <author>linda_acooper1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913729898</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>What is the risk that the wider adoption of GAI tools like ChatGPT will lead Senior Managers to focus on productivity and efficiency at the expense of scholarly engagement​?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-11 10:42:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913729898</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Loss of academic community</title>
         <author>linda_acooper1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913730300</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>How might the widespread adoption and use of GAI tools lead to more isolated, individual academic pursuits?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-11 10:42:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913730300</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Revolution or Status Quo</title>
         <author>linda_acooper1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913730760</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Will GAI tools, like ChatGPT, serve as a catalyst for rethinking of academic norms and practices? Or is there a danger that they entrench existing power structures and inequalities in academia?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-11 10:43:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913730760</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> Integrity and Authorship</title>
         <author>linda_acooper1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913731617</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>What are the ethical considerations around academic authorship, and integrity (for staff) that need to be addressed to maintain academic standards?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-11 10:44:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913731617</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Academic Identities</title>
         <author>linda_acooper1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913732521</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As these tools potentially take over some aspects of academic work, how might this change the perception of what it means to be an academic and the value placed on human intellectual contribution versus AI-generated content?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-11 10:45:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2913732521</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What are your thoughts on anthropomorphising GAI tools? Do you think we could change this approach by changing the narrative and talk about &quot;outputs&quot; rather then it &quot;responding&quot;?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2918741077</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-14 10:09:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2918741077</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Researchers using GAI</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2918746154</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if you came across this. Check the first sentence of the introduction section. It is disappointing that this got through reviews.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-14 10:14:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2918746154</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>It is unquestionable that the current use of GAI involves concerns about academic integrity, plagiarism, loss of creativity, and beyond that. Having said that, would we want to foster an academic environment wherein various LLMs, including GAI, are used more carefully and &quot;ethically&quot;, or would we want to totally discourage its inlcusion? </title>
         <author>sheriyasarin</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2918776994</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-14 10:40:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/linda_acooper1/x346pdoecj1wifsv/wish/2918776994</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
