Week 6 lesson 3 by Usic https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u en-us 2022-02-23 13:31:05 UTC 2022-02-24 14:07:31 UTC hello@padlet.com Group4 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064517896 1. “Nation states, have already lost their role as meaningful units of participation in the global economy of today’s borderless world
2. Technological changes has led to new relations between countries.
3. They are pessimistic globalists. Because they believe that local cultures are being eroded, mainly because of the expansion of international capitalism and the emergence of globalization
4. The nation-state has been threatened before. The Treaty on European Union came into force in November 1993, followed by the North American Free Trade Agreement in January 1994 and the World Trade Organization in 1995. In the United States and Europe, there was handwringing about deindustrialization as container ships queued outside booming Asian seaports.
5. Governments responded by developing sophisticated new methods of “insider threat detection” to prevent further leaks.
6. Internationalist because Because Internationalist advocates increasing cooperation across the national, Roberts think that "the reality is that the influence of the state over daily life is more extensive than ever"
7. Nation-State is ‘alive and well. Including economy,  technology and politics, they all play a great role in national development

]]> 2022-02-24 13:12:49 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064517896 Group3 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064524980 1. Economic globalization
2. The invention of the World Wide Web resulted in ubiquitous, real-time media coverage of events around the world. Some say that the CNN effect will weaken the autonomy of diplomatic and military commanders.
3.`Kenichi Ohmae is Transformationalist because he followed or promotes the theories of transformational grammar and Susan Strange is Globalist because she believed that economic and foreign policy should be planned in an international way.
4. yes， The advent of railways and the invention of long-range nuclear bombers also threatened national sovereignty.
5. Governments responded by developing sophisticated new methods of “insider threat detection” to prevent further leaks.
6.i think Alasdair Roberts is an internationalist, because internationalism are known as internationalists and generally believe that humans should unite across national, political and cultural.
7. The nation-state is not dead. The reality is that the influence of the state over daily life is more extensive than ever, with good consequences as well as bad. China is behaving like a conventional nation-state.

]]> 2022-02-24 13:17:37 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064524980 2 hchen1071 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064529059 1. Ohmae argues that in the Interlinked Economy, corporations and consumers are more closely connected across boarders than ever, and politicians, bureaucrats and the military are declining in importance.   
2.Technology has made it easier to farm, more feasible to build cities, and more convenient to travel, among many other things, effectively linking together all countries on earth, helping to create globalization, and making it easier for economies to grow and for companies to do business
3.  They are Globalist
4. the 40-yearconflict caused both superpowers to support autocratic client states in other parts of the world. Theend of the Cold War was heralded as a moment of liberation for many nations, but it provokedanxiety, too. Without an existential threat, there appeared to be no real check against the dissipation of order within democratic states, and in relations between them.  
5. governments responded by developing sophisticated new methods of “insider threat detection” to prevent further leaks. 
6. Alasdair Roberts is a  Internationalist 
7.  The nation state is alive and well, and the state's control over daily life is more widespread than ever, with both positive and negative repercussions. Nation-states are, without a doubt, subject to influence from other centers of power, as they have always been. However, this does not imply that the state's autonomy has been lost. ]]> 2022-02-24 13:20:16 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064529059 Group 1 xzhang282 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064529662 1. According to Ohmae (1994) political borders are becoming less and less important, as countries increasingly form a giant, interlinked economy – this is especially true of the most developing countries, such as America, Europe, and Japan, and these being joined by rapidly developing countries such as Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong. Ohmae argues that in the Interlinked Economy, corporations and consumers are more closely connected across borders than ever, and politicians, bureaucrats, and the military are declining in importance.
2. There were only 45 million Internet users in 1995, but this was still three times as many as there had been in 1993, when the first widely used web browser, NCSA Mosaic, was released. The general public was discovering the virtues of electronic mail.
3. I think they are Globalist, because the former believes that nation states have lost their role as meaningful units of participation in the global economy of today’s borderless world. Meanwhile, the latter believes that the government has lost the authority it used to have over the country's society and economy.
4. Yes, technological change has rewired the world with little regard for national boundaries. For instance, in the developed world, most households now have access to cable television and radio news. As a result, there are a lot of real-time coverage of events around the world. Some people believe that the CNN effect will weaken the autonomy of nation states.
5.How have states responded to challenges posed by the Internet according to Roberts? 
governments responded by developing sophisticated new methods of insider threat detection to prevent further leaks. Antagonists like Snowden (now exiled in Russia) and WikiLeaks Julian Assange (marking his third year of involuntary residence in Ecuador s London embassy, as he evades extradition to Sweden for questioning in sexual assault allegations) were shunted aside. And the leaks themselves proved to be less threatening to the established order than expected. Of course, there are other ways in which nation-states have asserted themselves. The United States did not hesitate to flex its military power after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
6. Internationalism. Increases in global flows of trade and finance are not
qualitatively different from ones that have taken place in the past.
Most economic activity happens not at a global scale but at a regional ( North America, Asia Pacific) or even at a national one .


]]> 2022-02-24 13:20:38 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064529662 Group 2- A2 xzhang282 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064580734 Our group disagree with that:
1. Countries top the list, starting with the US, followed by China and Japan (if we consider it as a single political entity, the eurozone is number one with over $5.6 trillion).
2.After World War II, the United States took advantage of globalization to export everything from products to culture. The spread of the American way of life through various channels to various parts of the world, threatening the integrity of local culture with its standardized skills; Unable to resist, the nation state has practically accepted American standards in everything from Coca-Cola to television to movies to the Internet.
3.States occupy the top rankings, with the US first followed by China and Japan But plenty of corporations are on par with some of the largest economies in the world: Walmart exceeds Spain and Australia, for example.
4.Businesses exist to be strong and promote their own country. Multinationals like Apple and Starbucks still wield amazing influence. They oversee vast supply chains, sell products around the world, and help shape international politics that serve their interests. In fact, these are all exporting the image of the United States to the world, such as mentioning Apple thinking of technology, so we will think of various large technology companies located in the United States and we will all feel that the United States is a technology power.]]> 2022-02-24 13:51:11 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064580734 Group4 A2 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064591394 I disagree with this view because I think globalization drives the economic, social and cultural development of a country. A large part of the population is following the path of globalization. From resource utilization to development and innovation, it all reflects the relationship between the country and globalization]]> 2022-02-24 13:55:45 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064591394 Group3 A2 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064599782 I disagree that the state has a lot of influence and that the state can limit the development of enterprises by changing policies]]> 2022-02-24 14:00:33 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064599782 Group 1 -A2 jwang347 https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064612499 disagree
1.because international relations are not a one-sided story of either state or corporate power. Globalization has changed the rules of the game, both empowering corporations and bringing back state power through new transnational state-company relationships. Russian gas pipelines, for example, operate through Gazprom in Eastern Europe.
2.Globalization has changed the role of the state to some extent, but it does not mean that the state has become irrelevant. The role of the state in the global world is primarily a regulatory role as a major factor in global interdependence, for example, governments are focusing on strengthening regulatory mechanisms through appropriate laws, rules, institutions, regulatory agencies, etc. Promote competition among all firms, whether private, public or foreign
3.the state remains the main provider of security within a given territory and, in the context of economic globalisation, still has greater control over the productive and financial structures within the territory]]> 2022-02-24 14:07:12 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/wu5d4mxw4rgeed9u/wish/2064612499