At all levels of a society, freedom of expression is critical. It is, nonetheless, crucial for government. A government that is unaware of how its citizens feel and think is in a hazardous situation. In the 1980s, communist regimes in Eastern Europe were overthrown in this manner. The same thing is happening in other parts of the world now. Governments that stifle free speech risk inciting their citizens to act destructively or rebel.

Furthermore, no political action or resistance to injustice and oppression is possible without free speech. Elections would be meaningless without free speech. Only via free speech do contestants' policies become known to the public and respond to public opinion. Citizens' openly stated opinions serve to curb tyrannical governance between elections. It is useless to expect political or, by extension, economic independence without this freedom.

Finally, I feel that the value of free speech as a fundamental and important attribute of a free society cannot be overstated. It may be difficult for society to allow differences of opinion to be expressed openly. Nevertheless, the long-term implications of curbing free speech are likely to be more harmful.

 

Freedom of expression is essential for everyone, whether he is a two-year-old child or a sixty-year-old man. It gives people the confidence to communicate in order to make decisions and work on them. For example, politicians speak in public places to make commitments and plans for the country's development. The audience patiently listens to them, analyzes their words, and votes for him to win so that he can work on his promises and commitments.

Furthermore, freedom is the perfume of a lovely society. It makes you an extrovert and make your desire to achieve a specific goal. Currently, this privilege is only available to politicians. Those who are not politicians and speak the truth about someone can be killed or murdered if the opposing is stronger. It also restricts anyone's ability to make decisions and forces you to think before speaking in public..

 

In conclusion, I firmly believe that citizens should be free to speak out in support or opposition to anyone. Instead of giving up on the problems, we must band together and work together

There are numerous grounds to support this concept, including the following. 

To begin with, when people share their viewpoints and expertise, they are providing others with new perspectives, ideas, and so on. 

This is because we all have different views, and we can only progress together if we communicate. 

A group discussion, for example, is considered effective when a variety of arguments are generated creatively by a diverse set of people.
Second, people should express themselves by raising their voices, particularly when discussing unfavorable topics. 

Because words are so powerful, they can be used to deter crime and even be used as a devastating weapon against opponents. 

The voices of international journalists changed the public's perception of the Vietnam War, forcing the US army to retreat in some way. 

Last but not least, speeches allow us to express ourselves. 

We don't have to live up to other people's expectations or live in the shadow of others. 

Every person is unique, and we speak up to find our place in the world. 

A case involving LGBT people is an excellent example of this. 

A boy is meant to love a girl, but if he has feelings for the same gender, he should not try to be normal and accept his true feelings. 

Finally, we must encourage one another.

Freedom of speech has become an indispensable part in our daily lives. For example, when you comment about a video shown on Facebook, it means that you are executing this right. Besides, it is undeniable that people benefit a lot from this right. Being able to speak freely creates an opportunity to exchange ideas and share perspectives with other people regardless of frontiers; which, in turn, is easier to communicate and enhance knowledge with an unconcern about government censorship. Regarding to politic, freedom of expression is permitted in many democratic countries contrary to dictatorship, which is prohibited. Therefore, how could a country develop and improve when their citizens’ voices can’t be heard? How could a community bring about change when people are fearful to express their thoughts? Because of that, it can be said that freedom of speech is essential and has a major impact to an open society.

On the flip side, the entitlement of liberal speaking has adverse effects that should be considered. Owing to the growth of social media, it is effortless to spread false information and make people trust its accuracy. Moreover, when someone disagree with a problem on the media, non-verbal abuse and violence are two methods that they would frequently use. For instance, a person is allowed to comment and criticize rudely on social networks without limitations and sanctions.

To summarize, although freedom of expression is a double-edged sword, I totally agree that people should have freedom to speak but they must be cautious because it is easy to be at stakes. 

    It is important for everyone to have a freedom in speech, since it, as well as the freedom in listening, looking and working, are the basis of a human. People have the rights to speak up their own point of view to the statement. In the social media, for instance, users can freely comment, whether approve or disapprove to most of the posts on the Internet. Not only that, the more idea and opinions given by people, the more enhanced can individual’s knowledge be. There are many possible ways to solve a problem, and by taking in every solution from everyone, we can find the most appropriate and easiest way to solve it, that’s why students are encouraged to be divided into groups when it comes to solving a complex exercise, so that they can discuss and share their own ideas, and finally come up with the best answer.

    Although that people are allowed to free speech is emphasized, it should have its limitations. People can freely talk, but it doesn’t mean people can talk whatever they want. In terms of morality, obscene insults, whether by accident or on purpose, could adversely affect to the emotion of someone, resulting in depression and isolation if the victims get criticism for a long time. In addition, talking about sensitive topic such as politic, racism or gender is a no go. And for that, laws about free speech limitations have been put forward in some nations to avoid negative impacts that a speech could lead to.

    In conclusion, every human have the rights to speak, as long as it doesn’t violate the rules in some countries, or hurt to people’s feelings and everyone’s sensitive problem. 

 

            If a society lets people speak freely, they can enjoy expressing their own ideas, thoughts and emotions. Therefore, people can understand and gain knowledge of speakers’ ideas. Secondly, people can exchange our ideas together. Therefore, we can share speakers’ ideas with other people. For instance, from Elon Musk’s Tesla Car invention, many people around the world share ideas together about power and convenience in Tesla car’s use. As a result, they can talk together about Elon Musk’s invention.

 

            People will stop requirement if speech’s freedom is existed in a society. Moreover, people have their own specific behavior. If people have their own freedom in speech, they will remove unlawful activities. Additionally, individuals will understand and be careful if they are troubled by unlawful activities. In particular, as there are criminal issues in the USA like shooting, selling drug, the Americans gives out their speech freely about how to reduce those crime, solution if they face again and arrest murders. This can lead to some Americans understanding and removing some unlawful activities.

 

To sum up, it is discussed whether people should have freedom of speech in society essentially or not. I totally agree that freedom of speech should exist in a free society. The reasons are that if freedom of speech is existed,  individuals can express, exchange ideas together and stop requirement, unlawful issues.