<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>ENG4801 Group Project 2 or 3 Q&amp;A by Joanne Lim</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-04-18 06:35:27 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-05-21 06:10:37 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hi all, you can post your question for Group Project 2 or 3 here. We will answer the question within 1-2 days.  Questions without group number will not be entertained. Remember to enter your group number/name in the post.</title>
         <author>joannelim1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3414899002</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-18 06:37:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3414899002</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Doubts on WBS for M2</title>
         <author>dwij0024</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3417353612</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li><p>Should the WBS include the project manager's work (e.g., EVM) as well?</p></li><li><p>For the WBS, should the staff and management be included (what’s under the structural QA inspector ) for the subprojects?</p></li><li><p>Can I leave lower-level tasks combined (since I cannot fit all the details into 60 lower-level tasks)? (Image attached)</p></li><li><p>Do we need to include technical goals under the goal section</p><ol><li><p>The construction can withstand XX Wind Load</p></li></ol></li></ol><p><br/></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Dulhan.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/3720970008/fae6c90eb96fdfc1ef1c543528fc8faf/Screenshot_2025_04_21_144837.png" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-21 07:01:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3417353612</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>WBS Questions (Group 2E)</title>
         <author>mwon0065</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3417403663</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li><p>Are we restricted to only 3 levels in the WBS, or is it acceptable to extend the structure to a 4th level if needed for clarity and task distribution?</p></li><li><p>Is it acceptable to have multiple level 1 items, or should we move the 2 main projects to level 2 under a top-level title? (image attached)</p></li><li><p>Can we have a same team for 2 main projects, as the tasks are similar (image attached)</p></li></ol><p><br></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Ming Hang</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/3721014522/09994af589f9d59a571810814c86b0f0/image.png" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-21 07:50:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3417403663</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>WBS related Questions </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3423466053</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li><p>For sub-project, is it legit to classify with different specialization instead of functional unit?</p><p>For instance:</p><p>Level 2: Mech / Elec / Automation</p><p>or</p><p>Level 2: Dosing Unit, Intake Unit ...</p></li><li><p> The rubrics stated that we have to specify milestone in WBS. However in the FAQ recently, milestone were stated to be in table format. I guess we could just have a WBS chart and a standalone milestone table?</p></li><li><p>Do we need to estimate the duration of each task in M2 and include this in our report&amp;presentation?</p></li><li><p>The WBS and precedence diagram is too complex to be visually appealing if we attached it in our report. Could we provide a hyperlink to the original image instead? Or if there were any other ways recommended?</p></li></ol><p><br/></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Yee Xun</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/3739134952/8bb24d02c21969ce41a3c64608608b85/Screenshot_2025_04_24_at_9_57_38_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-24 14:10:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3423466053</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>PD query</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3423534705</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Group 1A</p><p><br/></p><p>The rubrics mentions 'All tasks and milestones are shown with correct precedence', meaning only the order of tasks. Hence, can we ask if it is required to calculate all ES, EF, LS, LF, and F values for the precedence diagram, or it is sufficient to just show the order of tasks and the respective task durations in the precedence diagram, like shown in the attached image?</p><p><br/></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Rachel.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/3739416089/ffbe178ef25aa8ae7ea45431c6c933fe/image.png" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-24 14:58:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3423534705</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Milestone 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3427573376</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p><br/></p><p>Do we have to submit the SOW, WBS and precedence diagram separately? Like three different documents in the submission box or just on one document is fine?</p><p><br/></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Rehan</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-28 07:11:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3427573376</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Responsibility Matrix clarification</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3458973723</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>Should our responsibility matrix tasks reflect our group tasks according to the team project deliverables (e.g. conduct ESG analysis, identification of project stakeholders) or should it reflect the project tasks we are "roleplaying" as managers (e.g. wbd elements which are product/deliverable oriented)? Thank you</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-05-20 08:32:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/monashmalaysia1/wsp4h19cpba4vy47/wish/3458973723</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
