<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Ted Talk Fridays. by 2020Peter Hamill</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg</link>
      <description>Economics/</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-02-02 13:19:06 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-05-15 12:35:35 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Sneakers Friday Feb 2</title>
         <author>9961066</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/227464201</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) I don't think that this industry should be regulated at all because all Nike is doing is marketing with a massive fan base. Nike is not doing anything wrong because all they are doing is creating new shoes that have a very large need with a very limited supply.<br><br>2) I don't think that sneakers are a good investment opprotunity because there are way to many diffrernt sellers and they will all be selling their shoes at different&nbsp; prices and not having a set all around price. Plus the industry is so young it needs much more time to grow and then people will have a set value.<br><br>3) No Nike is not manipulating the Market Unfairly because they are a business and they are going about it in a very legal way.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-02 13:22:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/227464201</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The New American Dream Feb 16</title>
         <author>9961066</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/232308167</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) To me being better off means to have enough to live comfortably. I think of it as being able to get by and then have a little left over for other items or to save. That is what being better off means to me.&nbsp;<br>2) I think a nations success should be measured by what the country started off with and what they have to this day and a countries success should be measured by a group of leaders.<br>3) A soultion for poverty would be to set up massive programs to combat poverty and fix ghetto's and slums.&nbsp;<br>4)I would not agree with that because then no matter what you do there is no drive or want to do better. Therefore nothing will be achieved.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-16 13:20:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/232308167</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Earth is Full March 2012</title>
         <author>9961066</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/234209931</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) Yes we should have a balance between growth and limited resources because sooner or later there will not be anything left. There needs to be a shift from fossil fuels to energy and solar power. If you don't make a balance then there will not be anything left.<br>2) You should always want to be proactive because you can have a plan for the future and know what steps to take when you reach that point.I think economic policies can help a lot to prolong the resources running out.<br>3)A government has a big role in its economy because the government can control/have a say in what companies do for production.<br>4) I do believe so because there is such a huge investment in the oil industry as well as there being a massive need for oil and coal. But there can always be change and a new way of looking at the world.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-22 13:56:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/234209931</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Curtis Carroll 2016</title>
         <author>9961066</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/240148621</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>How I learned to read stocks- and trade in prison.<br>1) The US economics system is a very tough way to be able to make a safe way to live. Everything is all about the mega rich and helping their needs by producing bigger and better when they are very few in numbers.<br>2) The problem can be solved by having the US Government make it a point to teach it in places such as prisons or schools.<br>3) I believe it is much easier to become financially responsible as an adult rather than any other moment in time because as an adult you have a stable job, steady income. Being in prison however is 2x as hard you have to come back from just being there, and then starting a brand new life. Being financially responsible is a very hard task at hand.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-09 14:06:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/240148621</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Scott Galloway October 2017</title>
         <author>9961066</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/242780221</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) I think that to a degree they should be regulated to a degree because they are all controlling their own monopolies. But I think that they should have limited power because of how large they are as a company. The fact that Amazon has a larger GDP than India is absolutly insane. To a degree it is good. But only to&nbsp; a point.&nbsp;<br>2) I dont think so because they are just trying to see what shoppers are drawn too. Like at Market Basket when you walk through the Isles and end caps you have all the impulse buys and the foods people like most closest to the checkout. This shows the store what makes the shoppers the most happy in the store.<br>3) I believe that this is a very fair ammount to pay in taxes. 64 Billion dollars is an absurd ammount of money to pay but that just shows how much money Walmart has made.&nbsp;<br>4) The problem with Amazon is that what will happen is they will move more and more to the internet which means that people are need less and less. This is not good because there will be much more people looking for jobs. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-16 12:40:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/242780221</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>&quot;The Death of the American Mall&quot;</title>
         <author>9961066</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/247481267</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) I think that the "experience" could work to save the New England Based malls by adding things that are not from around the north to create more of a hype or a want to visit. This will get more people to come inside. Making a mall fun and turning it into the place to go and hang out at. It is all about having fun and malls don't give the same experience as of right now.<br>2) I think that outlets can comeback against internet shopping by adding fun things to do outside and coming up with new stores, there will always be a combat against the internet and it must always be unique to make people want to go there.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-30 12:57:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/247481267</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Daniel Susskind Dec 2017</title>
         <author>9961066</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/260811309</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3 Myths of Automation<br><br>I think that the automation decreases the economic pie because robots will be used in ways to create more economic involvement so there can be less of a need for humans. Such as robots that can detect cancer in freckles creates less of a need for humans to do those jobs.<br><br>I do not believe that it matters that economists have fallen into the intelligence myth because robots do not need to have emotion in order to get jobs done. There does not need to be emotion for a robot to check the pattern of a freckle to test if it has irregular patterns for cancer. Robots can only get smarter and become more effective.<br><br>I do not think that human jobs should be sacrificed for robots unless if there are more jobs for those people to do. Robots will put many many families out of business and will then create more economic problems such as unemployment.<br><br>I think that we are on our way to solving the economic problem. We are getting closer because as a world we are earning and owning much more money to be able to live a better life.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-15 12:17:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/9961066/wk0jw6ystjjg/wish/260811309</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
