https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd The Four Futures that can help the U.S change the World en-us 2017-04-21 18:07:18 UTC 2023-03-28 18:52:52 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Shakinghands.png evely_sa3510 https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/167563369 World Views:
Today's world is interdependent and interconnected.

Beliefs:
We live in an interdependent world. We must work cooperatively to address global problems that affect us all, such as international terrorism, the destruction of tropical rain forest, refugee crises, deadly epidemics, and nuclear proliferation.

Policies:
Engage in military action abroad only with the cooperation or approval of the UN or another regional institution.

Argument for:
To live securely and peacefully in this interdependent world, we must take the initiative to bring the nations of the world together.

Argument against:
It is the responsibility of wealthier nations to assist impoverished ones.

]]> 2017-04-21 18:20:46 UTC https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/167563369 becki_va3695 https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/167563463 World Views: 
The U.S. foreign policy must strive for order and security and engage with the world selectively. 

Beliefs:
Protecting ourselves is much more important than helping other nations.
The stability and security if other nations depend largely on the United States, and therefore has the strength to keep these other countries in check.
The United States benefits from stability, so efforts to change the international system can cause disorder and conflict.

Policies:
Building alliances with other countries can protect our interests and security abroad.
The increase of flexibility of our military can help to quick responses to future threats. 
Pursue environmentally-friendly technologies and products and also encourage other nations to do so.

Arguments for:
It is good to maintain alliances, as involvement can reduce war. A forceful but selective U.S. can discourage other powers with just the U.S.'s presence. The U.S. can also benefit from expansion. 

Arguments against: 
The U.S. would be resented, and alliances with dictators will cause controversy. It also does not help the larger issues at hand. These small issues are only distractions. Even if everything is planned out carefully, it will eventually collapse.

]]> 2017-04-21 18:21:06 UTC https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/167563463 mia_sy9081 https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/167563506 World Views:
The U.S must encourage our way of running our country to other nations and allow them to see that our actions are best.

Beliefs:
-We are to protect U.S values to protect our nation, we will even act alone if we have to.
- We should not hesitate to use military services to check up on other countries 
- Having the world following our economic and political principles will allow us to secure.

Policies:
- Lead a Worldwide offensive against terrorism
-Impose trade boycotts on countries that do not adopt U.S political and economic principles. 

Argument for:
If we wait until the world's bullies become so powerful that we must confront them militarily, as we did with Adolf Hitler in World War II, the cost will be enormous. 

Argument against:
Stressing the division between democratic and undemocratic countries will split the world into two opposing camps, as in the Cold War. Valuable allies, such as Saudi Arabia, will be lost while emerging powers in the developing world, such as China, will be branded as enemies. ]]> 2017-04-21 18:21:14 UTC https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/167563506 yesen_va5849 https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/168183794 World view - United states can no longer be counted on to solve the worlds problems.
- U.S troops overseas should be brought home and strict limits put on military spending. They have to put their needs first.

Beliefs - It is time to turn their national attention to the real threats facing.
- Nations first responsibility is to defend its citizens troops.
-U.S borders cannot be solved by the United States .
-The military and foreign built up during the cold war are now a burden on our country.

Policies - phase alliances outside North America and make it clear that we will join other countries when directly being threatened.
-Redesign armed forces to focus on defending north America.
-Build up intelligence capacity   
- Protect U.S industries from unfair foreign competition.

Argument for - By not interfering in other parts of the world
-Eliminating costly and ill conceived foreign policy ventures.
-Cutting U.S military spending will encourage other leaders to powers.
Argument against- Afford to abound commitments around the world. pulling troops out of Europe, middle East and East Asia. Cutting military power leave U.S of standing up for democracy. Gulf war us that economic having their limits and military straights. Acting like the fate of the rest of the world matters with foolish and dangerous. 

]]> 2017-04-25 17:36:23 UTC https://padlet.com/mia_sy9081/wewp188oqsvd/wish/168183794