The Campaign of 1828 Group C by Course Materials

INSTRUCTIONS

coursematerialbackup — 2022-03-18 17:08:49 UTC

After watching "War and Politics in the Early 1800s" part 1 and looking at the 1828 election ads make TWO posts:

ONE: Choose one of the political ads and create a post including:

- A screenshot of your chosen ad

- Who you believe the ad shows and who it supports

- What you believe the ad is trying to say about the election of 1828

- How effective you think the ad would be to the voters of the 1820s

- Be sure to include some piece of evidence from the textbook or lecture

(Each cartoon may be used by only one group member)

TWO: Make a substantive reply to another group member’s post. You may agree, disagree or expand on what they say. Like all posts, however, remember to tie it directly to evidence from the documents.

Be sure to put your name in the title of both of your posts!

.

coursematerialbackup — 2022-03-18 17:08:49 UTC

Gombas - 10.1 Discussion

2025-03-26 18:35:46 UTC

This ad shows Kentucky Senator Henry Clay sewing President Andrew Jackson's mouth shut. This ad is trying to show how outraged Clay was over Jackson vetoing his charter renewal. What this means is that there was conflict between the banks and the power of the presidency. Jackson was not a proponent of the Second Bank of America. This cartoon represents Clay trying to sew Jackson's mouth shut so he is unable to express his views on the bank and other issues, because Clay did not include Jackson's censure in news posted regarding his opposition to the bank. Considering this happened after Jackson was already the president, it might encourage voters not to reelect Jackson later on considering his track record for, "battling unconstitutional schemes to expand the powers of the federal government" (Johnson 179). It's tough to predict how everyone reacted to Jackson as president because he is considered a very controversial moment in history, but this ad in particular was meant to represent him being silenced for voicing his opinions and discontent with the state of financial affairs.

Emily Conley

2025-03-26 19:10:51 UTC

The ad primarily highlights Andrew Jackson and positions him in support of the common man. It contrasts his image against incumbent President John Quincy Adams, suggesting Adams is out of touch with the average citizen.

This ad underscores the deepening divide between the elite and the working class during the election of 1828. It emphasizes Jackson's populism and presents him as a champion of the common people, while portraying Adams as aristocratic and elitist. The ad aims to galvanize support among those feeling disenfranchised by the political establishment.

I believe the ad would be quite effective for voters in the 1820s, especially given the rising sentiment for a more representative government that favored the interests of the common man over the elite. Many citizens were frustrated with the existing political order, and this ad capitalizes on that discontent to rally support for Jackson.

According to our textbook, the election of 1828 was marked by intense and sometimes vicious campaigning, reflecting the significant social changes occurring at the time. The text notes that Jackson's campaign effectively mobilized support from new voters who felt marginalized by previous administrations, which would further validate the ad's appeal to the average American.

Response to Gombas(Emily Conley)

2025-03-26 19:14:07 UTC

Emily Conley

The political cartoon you're discussing captures the intense conflict between Senator Henry Clay and President Andrew Jackson, especially regarding the Second Bank of the United States. By depicting Clay attempting to sew Jackson's mouth shut, it symbolizes the frustration and desire from certain political factions to stifle dissent or limit Jackson's influence.

The struggle between the presidency and the banking system during this period highlights the broader themes of power, governance, and economic control in the early 19th century. Jackson’s opposition to the bank was rooted in his belief that it represented elite interests over the common citizen, and Clay's actions in the cartoon reflect a moment of political maneuvering that could sway public opinion.

Regarding Jackson's controversial presidency, the divide in reactions likely speaks to his populist style and the broader socio-economic changes occurring in the U.S. during his time in office. His resistance to perceived overreach by federal entities certainly resonated with many voters, but it also stirred significant opposition that manifested in moments like this cartoon.

Rob Meyers - Gombas Reply

2025-03-27 20:20:58 UTC

I really liked how you mentioned that Andrew Jackson veto'd his charter renewal and how you mentioned Andrew Jackson went after people while trying to expand the federal gov't power. I also agree that its hard to predict how people would have reacted to Jackson.

Week 10 Unit 1 Discussion - Courtney Salow

salowc1 — 2025-03-27 22:42:38 UTC

The ad I chose shows a man being hanged from a tree while another man looks like he's cheering or proud of it. It's a really intense image, and I think it was made by people who were against Andrew Jackson, probably supporters of John Quincy Adams. To me, it's trying to show Jackson as violent and dangerous, someone who didn't follow the rules and took things too far. This matches what we read in the textbook. In Section IV, it talks about how Jackson led military attacks without clear permission. For example, during the First Seminole War, "U.S. soldiers and their Creek allies had already destroyed the "Negro Fort," a British-built fortress on Spanish soil, killing 270 formerly enslaved people and executing some survivors" (The American Yawp, Chapter 9, Section IV). Later, Jackson crossed into Florida again and "executed two British subjects" for helping the Seminoles, which caused an international crisis. That's probably the kind of thing the cartoon is referring to, showing Jackson as someone who takes justice into his own hands. Section II of the textbook also helps explain why people were scared of leaders like Jackson. At the Constitutional Convention, Alexander Hamilton warned about "the "vices of democracy" " and said the British system of government was "the best in the world" (The American Yawp, Chapter 9, Section II). Another founder, Elbridge Gerry, said, "The evils we experience flow from an excess of democracy." Basically, the founding elites were nervous about giving too much power to one person or letting the people choose leaders who might act out of control. I think this ad would have made a big impact on voters in the 1820s. It's dramatic and emotional, and it plays into real fears people had about Jackson being too extreme. If I were a voter back then and saw this, I think it would've made me question if he was the right person to lead the country.

Reply to Emily Conley (Courtney Salow)

salowc1 — 2025-03-27 22:52:18 UTC

Hey Emily,

I really liked how you explained the ad showing Jackson as a man of the people and Adams as out of touch. I agree that a lot of voters in the 1820s were frustrated with the political elites, and this ad probably made them feel like Jackson understood them. I thought you made a strong connection to the textbook, which really helped me think about why the ad would've been so effective. Do you think Jackson really followed through on supporting the "common man," or was it more of a campaign strategy?

Cory H. Week 10 Unit l

hartm20_1 — 2025-03-27 22:57:20 UTC

The ad features a picture of Andrew Jackson and a quote from Thomas Jefferson praising his legacy, “Honor and gratitude to the man who has filled the measure of his country's glory.” What stuck to me was the support of assembly candidates George H. Steuart and John V. L. McMahon, associating them with Jackson's reputation to gain voter support. What this ad is saying to me is that these men are putting their own reputations on the line with their support for Jacksonian ideals.

The effectiveness of this simple political ad in the 1820s would likely have been significant due to communication methods of the time. Jackson's image as a "man of the people" resonated with common people. A straightforward ad highlighting his military heroism, such as his leadership in the Battle of New Orleans, and his populist ideals would align with the voters' values and political appeals.

Cory H reply to Courtney

hartm20_1 — 2025-03-27 23:09:54 UTC

You made an excellent point about Jackson's actions in Florida. The execution of the British subjects is a strong example of how his decisive and aggressive behavior contributed to fears surrounding his leadership style. I also appreciate how you connected this to the cartoon, as it highlights Jackson's tendency to act individually. Section II of the textbook indeed provides helpful context, reinforcing why individuals were wary of leaders like Jackson. Great examples—thanks for sharing!

Gombas - Response to Cory H.

2025-03-30 19:19:49 UTC

Cory, I definitely agree with what you have written. Jackson was considered a man of the people, which appealed to those who did not have status or wealth like others. This can be seen through all of Jackson's policies and fight against unconstitutional actions. We again see him stand for the people when he vetoed the idea for a Second Bank of America, which caused conflict between the executive branch and the financial institutions (Johnson 179). Newspapers and political ads were the Twitter and TikTok of that era, so it's likely that they held sway over those who had access to the resources. Good post!