https://padlet.com/maima_am95/waz5w6939pbb Assessment & Feedback en-us 2016-11-27 22:31:55 UTC 2016-11-28 23:12:05 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Lightdecrease.png maima_am95 https://padlet.com/maima_am95/waz5w6939pbb/wish/140057402
The students were notified that they would be evaluated on:

•  How well they collaborated
•  Productive competence in Japanese (writing and speaking)
• Reporting skills rather than the quality of the final report

]]> 2016-11-27 22:34:22 UTC https://padlet.com/maima_am95/waz5w6939pbb/wish/140057402 maima_am95 https://padlet.com/maima_am95/waz5w6939pbb/wish/140057846 There were different forms of assessment in each term.

In the 1st and 2nd term:
The weekly and final oral presentations were assessed by the instructor and peer review.

In the 3rd term, additional external peer review in the form of email exchanges with native Japanese students provided further scaffolding.]]> 2016-11-27 22:40:30 UTC https://padlet.com/maima_am95/waz5w6939pbb/wish/140057846 maima_am95 https://padlet.com/maima_am95/waz5w6939pbb/wish/140058339 In all terms: the final written reports were evaluated by the instructor and validated by 4 other Japanese teachers using an evaluation rubric designed to assess the quality and relevance of the questions asked and answered, the supporting evidence, the accuracy and creativity in discussing and communicating the research findings, and the quality and complexity of the Japanese vocabulary and grammar. ]]> 2016-11-27 22:48:51 UTC https://padlet.com/maima_am95/waz5w6939pbb/wish/140058339