Everyone loves a rescue...right (3rd period) by Warren Selzer

Makenna Reilly

2018-03-19 18:14:45 UTC

If you do something risky, the public should have the responsibility to rescue you because the public would suffer from your loss, accidents happen, and people’s lives would be interrupted if they didn’t have someone to clean the accidents up.

If something happens and a fire is started without anyone trying to help, their family will suffer and blame other people for not helping. Imagine trying to go to sleep at night with the thought of being able to save someone but not taking action! Also, wouldn’t you want someone to save you if there was a terrible accident.

A lot of the time, we make small risks like lighting a match or cooking on a stovetop. If you purposefully hurt yourself, that is your problem, but 99% of the time, it’s an accident and someone should be able to give a helping hand. When accidents happen people can relate to them and need to help.

If there was a car accident ahead of you and no one was cleaning it up your whole day would take two steps back. Remember, firemen and police are part of the community. Don’t you think that without them, simple things like commuting to work and would take hours!

Instructions

warren_selzer — 2018-03-19 18:16:04 UTC

1. Make a claim/thesis statement.
2. give three reasons to why or why not.
3. Make it good! The internet doesn't accept lame arguments!

~B.A.L.Y.~

2018-03-19 18:16:04 UTC

People shouldn't rescue people if they do something risky or stupid. For example, when people take actions, they know the consequences and risks that will follow their actions. The public should not be in charge of others actions, and risk their lives for others that made a poor decision. A person should take charge of themselves and worry about their own actions. For example, if someone decides they want to do the 1,000 degree knife challenge and cause a fire it is their fault and they should take responsibility for their actions. Others shouldn't worry about their problems because they chose to take the risks. Don't expect someone to help you after you made a poor decision.

Katherine Elkins

2018-03-19 18:16:14 UTC

If you do something risky, the public shouldn't be in charge of rescuing you. The time still can if they want, though. When you get yourself into a problematic situation, you can probably find your way out of it, or you can try to get a friend or family member to help you. If the public wants to help you, they can, but it shoyldnt be their responsibility to solve the problem you've gotten yourself into. Also, you should have known about the risk she involved in doing whatever you do, Andy should have a plan rob

Ethan Fuller and Joshua Catman

2018-03-19 18:16:24 UTC

If someone does something RISKAY they should be saved because it will look bad on your country and the people will (most likely) repay you. Aldosterone also if you save someone you could be prepared for if you did the same mistake.

Hi

Yes, they Should (Ian prince)

2018-03-19 18:16:39 UTC

If you do something risky, it may also endanger others, and at that point, it is everyone's business.

EJ Chadwick

2018-03-19 18:18:12 UTC

The public should be responsible for saving you when your in danger, because by saving someone from harm or danger, they will likely do the same for you someday. Also, the people that saved you would benefit from you being there.

Emmanuel Akinleye and Justin Kwakye

2018-03-19 18:18:30 UTC

If you did something risky and somehow you got hurt, the public wouldn't just stand there and laugh at them, they would go and give them aid.

Ian prince

2018-03-19 18:20:08 UTC

If you endanger yourself, you also risk endangering others, and at that point, it's everyone's business. It's a lot better to stop a problem before it's a big problem. If someone starts a fire, people can put the fire out before it spreads across the neighborhood.

GERVEN LANDDERYY

2018-03-19 18:20:26 UTC

If someone is hurt or injured that it is the Public's responsibility to help them and give them Aid. That is like if someone is being mauled by a bear he walked up to them and then do the L dance over them it's just not right. It has been scientifically proven showing sympathy for someone makes them feel better about themselves. This also ties in with the Second Amendment the Second Amendment is the right to bear arms which means you are allowed to carry a weapon on you at all times at certain places this ties in with this because being able to protect your family and other people. If you got her would you want someone just to stand there and laugh at you?

Everyone loves an rescue.. . .. right? Chloe Eva Collier & Oliva

2018-03-19 18:21:29 UTC

Imagine this someone is on a tree or a pole or whatever that can't get down because there a fire on the bottom. Know imagine yourself in that situation. Would you want some one to help you. Well guess what if it's not the public's problem. NO ONE IS GONNA HELP YOU. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AIN'T GONNA PUT THE FIRE OUT. (your dead sorry 😁)

Everyone needs a rescue

jharris0165 — 2018-03-19 18:21:46 UTC

You need a rescue because you don't need to suffer to learn most lessons because if your

Victoria Jones

2018-03-19 18:21:56 UTC

If you do something risky no one else should be obliged to clean up your mess for you. I’m not saying they shouldn’t. I’m saying they shouldn’t HAVE to. Going into something risky you should have previously known about the risks. It’s not the public’s responsibility to solve your problems. You should have learned problem solving strategy’s in kindergarten.

etill2718 — 2018-03-19 18:23:19 UTC

I think have a hero would be cool ecspedhilay if I was going to die

Oreilly , Ciara , Ryleigh

2018-03-19 18:26:06 UTC

Ryleigh : Yes because people (police officer and firefighters) that are out in the world can try to stop dangerous things that which is risky

Nicky Conzo

2018-03-19 18:31:01 UTC

2018-03-19 18:31:17 UTC

Yes,