<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of CCOT of the US Supreme Court by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8</link>
      <description>Working with your group you will create a &quot;timeline&quot; of significant court cases. Using the cases you have to choose from in class, research them, add them to the proper category with a summary. </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-10-16 14:57:44 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-03-17 07:39:53 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Your boxes should look something like the one below for each court case. </title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293395360</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>Date</li><li>Constitutional issue (posed as a question)</li><li>Decision (answer to question)</li><li>Votes for majority/dissenting opinion</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:05:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293395360</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marbury v. Madison</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293395656</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Date: 1803<br>Questions: Which branch of government is most powerful?<br>Decision: They are all equal as this cases establishes the ability of the Supreme Court to determine the Constitutionality of a law<br>Votes: 4 majority<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2 dissenting&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:06:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293395656</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities </title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293395775</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>At the end of each column provide an evaluation of what has changed or what has stayed the same over time for the given category. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:06:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293395775</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FCC v. AT&amp;T</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293423640</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> January 19, 2011<br><br><strong>Constitutional issue:</strong> May corporations assert personal privacy interests to prevent the government from releasing documents about them?<br><br><strong>Decision:</strong> The decision was made that corporations can't assert personal privacy interests to prevent the government from releasing documents about them.<br><br><strong>Votes for majority/dissenting opinion:</strong> Unanimous/everyone</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:44:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293423640</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New York Times v. Sullivan</title>
         <author>20esmith3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293423784</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> Argued Jan 6-7 1964<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Did Alabama's law violate the first amendment regarding freedom of speech and freedom of press protections<br><strong>Decision: </strong>The courts said that the newspaper company needed to know that the information they were publishing were false, but they did not, so they ruled in the New York Times favor<br><strong>Votes</strong>:<strong> </strong>Unanimous in the New York Times favor<strong>&nbsp;</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:44:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293423784</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>NASA v. Nelson</title>
         <author>20icleck</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293423880</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Oct 5, 2010<br>Constitutional Issue: Should the NASA employees have to have overly intrusive background checks?<br>Decision: The Supreme Court still upheld the background checks and went with the first court's decision to have the background checks.<br>Votes for Majority: Unanimous</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:44:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293423880</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Washington v. Glucksberg</title>
         <author>20kmair</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293426148</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> Jan 8, 1997<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong>  Does banning physician assisted suicide for terminally ill adults violate the 14th Amendment?<br><strong>Decision:</strong> No.  Banning physician assisted suicide does not violate the 14th Amendment.  Assisted suicide is not a fundamental liberty.  <strong><br>Votes:</strong> everyone</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:47:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293426148</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bethel v. Frasier</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293428192</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date: </strong>March 3, 1986 <br><br><strong>Constitutional issue:</strong> Does the First Amendment prevent a school district from disciplining a high school student for giving a lewd speech at a high school assembly?<br><br><strong>Decision:</strong> The decisions was made that the first amendment did not prevent a school from discipling a high school student for giving a speech.<br><br><strong>Votes for majority/dissenting opinion:</strong> 7 majority : 2 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:50:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293428192</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Engle v. Vitale</title>
         <author>20icleck</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293431957</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Apr 3, 1962&nbsp;<br>Constitutional Issue: Does praying at the beginning of a school day violate the first amendment?<br>Decision: The court decided that it was against the first amendment.<br>Votes for Majority: 6<br>Votes for Dissenting: 1</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:56:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293431957</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Roe v. Wade</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293432624</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> December 13, 1971<br><br><strong>Constitutional issue:</strong> Does the Constitution embrace a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?<br><br><strong>Decision:</strong> The Court has decided that women's right to an abortion falls into the right for privacy which is the followed by the 14th Amendment.<br><br><strong>Votes for majority/dissenting opinion:</strong> 7 majority : 2 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:56:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293432624</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Santa Fe School District v. Doe</title>
         <author>20esmith3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293433444</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> Mar 29, 2000<br><strong>Constitutional issue</strong>: Does the Santa Fe School District violate the 1st amendment by allowing these students to pray over the loud speaker?<br><strong>Decision</strong>: Yes, allowing these students to pray over the loud speaker does violate the 1st amendment. <br><strong>Vote</strong>: 6 for majority, 3 for dissenting &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 15:58:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293433444</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Texas v. Johnson</title>
         <author>20kmair</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293435435</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> March 21, 1989<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong>  Does the First Amendment protect the desecration of the American flag as a form of speech.<br><strong>Decision: </strong>It was decided that the burning of the American flag was a form of expression and is protected under the First Amendment.<br><strong>Vote:</strong> 5-to-4 vote</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:01:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293435435</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abington School District v. Schempp</title>
         <author>20esmith3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437281</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Feb 27-28 1963<br>Constitutional Issue: Does the Abington School District violate the 1st and 14th amendment by reading from the bible every day?<br>Decision: Public schools cannot read or recited of the Lord's prayer under the 1st<br>Vote: 8 majority 1 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:04:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437281</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437471</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>First Amendment continues to protect the freedom of speech. It is still tightly kept but it has become ore lenient over the years.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:04:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437471</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437737</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Privacy has gotten more strict than before.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:04:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437737</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437884</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Not much has changed with this, because the 1st amendment is still being violated in schools<br>The court stayed strict about violation of the 1st amendment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:05:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293437884</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438139</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Over time, this issue has slowly gone away. You don't see it as much as what you did in the past. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:05:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438139</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438327</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Protecting individual freedoms is something that has continued to be super important to the U.S. &nbsp;We went from super strict, to being allowed to talk.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:05:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438327</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438414</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Through time, the amendments protected people from searches and let them have the right to be protected in trials. The United States stayed consistent with the choices and the decisions for the cases that included the rights of the accused. Everything stayed the same with the rights.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:05:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438414</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Schenck v. United States</title>
         <author>20icleck</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438975</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:Jan 9 - 10, 1919<br>Constitutional Issue: Does the draft violate the first amendment?<br>Decision: The court claimed the issue did not violate the first amendment and that it was a proper use of the Congress's wartime authority.<br>Votes for majority: Unanimous<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:06:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293438975</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tinker v. Des Moines</title>
         <author>20kmair</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293442185</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> Nov 12, 1968<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Does the First Amendment protect the students symbolic protest wearing armbands in public school?<br><strong>Decision:</strong>  The First Amendment protects these students.  The student's right to speech does not go away when they step on school grounds.  <br><strong>Votes:</strong> 7-to-2 vote</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 16:11:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293442185</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tinker v. Des Moines</title>
         <author>20kmair</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293886812</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> Nov 12, 1968<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Does the First Amendment protect the students symbolic protest wearing armbands in public school?<br><strong>Decision:</strong>  The First Amendment protects these students.  The student's right to speech does not go away when they step on school grounds.  <br><strong>Votes:</strong> 7-to-2 vote</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:47:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293886812</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293887965</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> May 2 - 3, 1935<br><strong>Constitutional Issue: </strong>Did Congress unconstitutionally delegate legislative power to the President by giving him power to regulate certain industries without also providing guiding standards?<br><strong>Decision:</strong> The decision was made that Schechter Poultry Corp. won the case. The president can't be allowed to have the control to make   laws that he/she believes are necessary to achieve a goal.<br><strong>Votes:</strong> Unanimous</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:48:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293887965</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Schenck v. United States</title>
         <author>20kmair</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293888712</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:Jan 9 - 10, 1919<br>Constitutional Issue: Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his First Amendment right to freedom of speech?<br>Decision: The court claimed the issue did not violate the first amendment and that it was a proper use of the Congress's wartime authority.<br>Votes for majority: Unanimous<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:49:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293888712</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Korematsu v United States</title>
         <author>20esmith3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293889242</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> Oct 11-12 1944<br><strong>Constitutional Issue: </strong>Did the president and congress violate Japanese-Americans 5th amendment?<br><strong>Decision:</strong> The exclusion order applying to Americans of Japanese descent was lawful<br><strong>Votes:</strong> 6 majority, 3 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:50:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293889242</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gideon v. Wainwright</title>
         <author>20icleck</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293890118</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> Jan 15, 1963<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Does the 6th amendment apply to felony defendants in state courts?<strong>Decision: </strong>The 6th amendment does reach the state courts. He can have a lawyer.<br><strong>Votes:</strong> Unanimous</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:51:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293890118</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Brown v. Board of Education</title>
         <author>20kmair</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293891455</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> Dec 9-11, 1952<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Is the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment violated when public education is segregated based on race?<br><strong>Decision:</strong> This does violate the Fourteenth Amendment and the claim of being "separate but equal" was indeed decided it was not equal. <br><strong>Vote:</strong> unanimous</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:53:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293891455</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Escobedo v. Illinois</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293892285</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> Apr 29, 1964<br><strong>Constitutional Issue: </strong>Was Escobedo denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment?<br><strong>Decision:</strong> The court has decided that Escobedo's rights were violated. He wasn't allowed a lawyer and that is part of the 6th amendment, which is to speak to an attorney.<br><strong>Votes:</strong> 5 majority : 4 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:54:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293892285</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mapp v Ohio</title>
         <author>20esmith3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293893346</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> Mar 29, 1961<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Did the police violate Dollree Mapp's freedom on expression?<br><strong>Decision:</strong> The majority moved aside the 1st amendment issue, and went straight to the 4th amendment, that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures is inadmissible<br><strong>Vote:</strong> 6 majority, 3 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:56:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293893346</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293894990</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong>Oct 5, 1964<br><strong>Constitutional Issue: </strong>Did Congress, in passing Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, exceed its Commerce Clause powers by depriving places of public accommodation of the right to choose their own customers?<br><strong>Decision:</strong> The Commerce Clause extends the anti-discrimination provisions in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to hotels that host travelers from outside the state.<br><strong>Votes:</strong> Unanimous</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:58:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293894990</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dred Scott v. Sanford</title>
         <author>20icleck</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293896289</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Dates: 2/11-18/1856<br>Constitutional Issue: Did filing residence in a free land make you free?<br>Decision: The court decided that the slavery went against the 5th amendment.<br>Votes: 7-2</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 15:00:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293896289</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>United States v. Nixon</title>
         <author>20kmair</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293897088</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date Argued:</strong> Jul 8, 1974<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Should the President be able to use his "executive privilege" to hide things from judicial review?<br><strong>Decision:</strong>  it was voted that the President should not be able to have the power to keep things from the judicial review just because he's the President.<br><strong>Vote:</strong> unanimous </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 15:01:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293897088</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Plessy v Ferguson</title>
         <author>20esmith3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293897632</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Date:</strong> Apr 13, 1896<br><strong>Constitutional Issue:</strong> Did the Separate Car Act violate Plessy's 13th and 14th amendment?<br><strong>Decision:</strong>Equal but separate accommodations for whites and blacks imposed by Louisiana do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment<br><strong>Votes:</strong> 7 majority, 1 dissenting </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 15:02:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293897632</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293898939</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The President still can't make laws, even if it benefits the country. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 15:03:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293898939</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bush v. Gore</title>
         <author>20icleck</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293900495</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Dec 11, 2000<br>Constitutional Issue: Was Florida allowed to make/change a new voting law?<br>Decision: The recounts violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.<br>Vote: The President's decision.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 15:05:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293900495</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miranda v. Arizona</title>
         <author>20kmoroz</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293945354</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1966<br>Constitutional Issue: Does the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect?<br>Decision: That you have to have your rights read to you.<br>Vote: 5 majority : 4 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 16:11:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20kmoroz/w8n21m0tqhi8/wish/293945354</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
