https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd Here, there, and everywhere! en-us 2023-01-13 17:28:24 UTC 2023-01-23 17:22:40 UTC hello@padlet.com msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447198967 A Japanese man was arrested and he claimed that his arrest violated the 5th amendment. This changed the interpretation of the 5th amendment because due process applies to anyone and at the time, even citizens during the war. So no matter the circumstance, citizens have the right to due process of law. This case connects to the founding ideal of equality. American citizens of Japanese descent were not treated equally to those born in the US because of something that happened.]]> 2023-01-17 17:16:47 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447198967 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447213465 After Police broke into Mapp's home without a warrant and arrested her, she claimed that her arrest violated her 4th amendment rights. The interpretation of the 4th amendment did not change because the rights that were violated were strictly listed in the amendment. The found ideal connected to this is rights because she had the basic rights to not have her home unlawfully invaded. ]]> 2023-01-17 17:26:04 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447213465 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447219671 Miranda was arrested and questioned for kidnapping and rape. The police interrogated him without him knowing that he had the right to have an attorney which goes against the 5th amendment. The interpretation of the amendment changed because it put more attention on the other aspects of the 5th amendment not just the right to remain silent. The ideal that connects to this case is rights. This is because he had the right to have an attorney to defend him in court to help improve his quality of life.]]> 2023-01-17 17:29:40 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447219671 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447243618 Students wore black armbands to protest a truce for the Vietnam war peacefully. The school suspended them for wearing them and banned the armbands from being worn and the students and parents sued for violating the 1st Amendment. This changed the interpretation of the 1st amendment because it focused more on people being able to express themselves for what they believe in. The Ideal that this case affects is Liberty which is the freedom to act without being limited which is what happened to the students. They were limited from peacefully acting.]]> 2023-01-17 17:45:45 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447243618 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447253739 A member of the Klu Klux Klan made a speech that violated an Ohio law. He was convicted and he stated that the law went against the 1st amendment. The interpretation changed because it was dealing with the law which was larger than some sort of protest. This made it so the amendment can benefit more people from the banning of the Ohio state law. The ideals that this case connects to are Liberty and Rights because people are allowed to act without being limited and they have a right to peacefully voice their opinion.]]> 2023-01-17 17:52:34 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447253739 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447346672 A woman challenged a Texas law of Abortion to make it illegal except in the case of a doctor-recommended termination where the pregnancy would put the mother's health in danger. This dealt with the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 9th amendments of the Bill of Rights. This changed the interpretation because it allowed more focus to be drawn to one's privacy which is protected in the Bill of Rights. The Ideals linked with this court case are Rights and Liberty. This is because their privacy is protected as a human right and Liberty because people are allowed to do what they need to do freely, especially when it comes to health.]]> 2023-01-17 18:55:39 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447346672 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447348420 Furman was convicted of the death penalty after he robbed and killed someone. He claimed that the death penalty violated the 8th amendment. The interpretation of the 8th amendment changed because the death penalty was starting to be seen as a cruel punishment by some. The ideal that this case deals with is rights because being safe from cruel and unusual punishments.]]> 2023-01-17 18:56:50 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2447348420 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450126693 Gregg was convicted of robbery and murder and sentenced to the death penalty. He claimed that the death penalty violated the 8th amendment. The interpretation of the 8th amendment did not change because his case was similar to cases before that had already helped change the interpretation. The founding ideal connected to this is rights because the decision made would affect his basic human rights.]]> 2023-01-19 17:25:03 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450126693 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450141635 Wright was a principal who would strike kids with paddles as punishment and the kids/parents claimed that striking kids with paddles goes against the 8th amendment. The amendment interpretation did change because the focus shifted to smaller issues with the 8th amendment like teachers inflicting corporal punishment. Which was not as focused on before. The founding ideals linked with this case are liberty and rights because the students had the right to speak freely without punishment as long as they did it peacefully. ]]> 2023-01-19 17:35:57 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450141635 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450154756 After a 14-year-old was caught smoking, her backpack was searched and she stated that the search violated the 4th amendment. This changed the interpretation of the 4th amendment because it affected the amount of control a school would have over its student's privacy. The ideal connected to this case is rights because she had the right to privacy in her school.]]> 2023-01-19 17:45:44 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450154756 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450530493 When a student made an inappropriate speech and got suspended, he challenged saying that the suspension violated his 1st amendment rights. The interpretation changed because this also affected what teachers and school officials had control over their students and what they said. The ideals linked with this case are liberty and rights. This is because everyone has the right to, peacefully, say whatever they desire without being limited.]]> 2023-01-20 00:58:32 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450530493 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450546608 After a student-edited newsletter was deleted because it was inappropriate, the student argued that taking down the newsletter violated his 1st amendment rights. This changed the interpretation because this decided how schools should change things to help better the school and still have active student participation. The ideal connected to this case is liberty. This is because the student argued that he had the freedom to act without being limited.]]> 2023-01-20 01:23:37 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450546608 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450548930 After a school inflicted drug tests on athletes, parents stated that the tests were a violation of the 4th amendment specifically the "no unreasonable search and seizure". This changed the interpretation of the 4th amendment because this affected student opportunities. The ideal connected to this is opportunity because by having drug tests, this limited the number of players who had the opportunity to play but could not because their parents would not continue with the drug test.]]> 2023-01-20 01:26:55 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450548930 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450633481 After a man was sentenced to the death penalty, he argued saying that the death penalty violated the 8th amendment because it would cause health issues that would make it cruel. This affected the interpretation of the 8th amendment because the death penalty could be cruel because of health issues which 'changed' the definition of cruel. The ideals connected to this is rights because his medical condition would have caused a painful death and a cruel one and his rights were that he could not have a cruel and unusual punishment.]]> 2023-01-20 03:51:48 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450633481 msquires11 https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450635321 A student posted something bashing at the school because she did not make the cheer team she wanted, after she was suspended, she claimed that her suspension violated her first amendment rights. This changed the interpretation of the 1st amendment because freedom of the press now dealt with social media and what could be said there. The Ideals connected to this case are opportunity and rights because she had her opportunity to cheer on the team she made (which is not the one she wanted) taken away from her suspension. She also had the right t speak freely (although limited by the school)

]]> 2023-01-20 03:55:41 UTC https://padlet.com/msquires11/w5ql17gw0aiu5bd/wish/2450635321